DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜM IŞIĞINDA İÇ DENETİM ÜZERİNE BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ YAKLAŞIMI

Öz

Bu çalışma, iç denetim ve dijitalleşme temalarının bir arada kullanıldığı yayınlar hakkında derinlemesine bilgi sahibi olmaya yönelik olarak gerçekleştirilmiş olup bibliyometrik analiz yöntemine dayanmaktadır. Çalışmanın genel akışının ve amacının anlatıldığı “giriş” bölümünden sonra yer alan “kavramsal çerçeve” bölümü, iç denetimin tarihsel süreç boyunca yaşadığı değişimi ve endüstriyel gelişmelerden ne şekilde etkilendiğini; dolayısıyla günümüzdeki dijitalleşmenin iç denetim açısından ne gibi bir önem taşıdığını ele almaktadır. Araştırmada kullanılan yayınlar “Scopus” veri tabanından sağlanmış olup bulgular kısmında VOSviewer programı yardımıyla gerçekleştirilen “Ortak yazar analizi”, “Yazarların atıf analizi”, “Eserlerin atıf analizi”, “Ülkelerin atıf analizi”, “Kurumların atıf analizi”, “Anahtar sözcük analizi”, “Eserlerin bibliyografik eşleşme analizi”, “Yazarların bibliyografik eşleşme analizi” ve “Ortak yazarların ortak atıf analizi” başta olmak üzere çeşitli trendlere, istatistiki bilgilere ve açıklamalara yer verilmiştir. Araştırmada, hızla gelişen dijitalleşme karşısında işletmeler açısından iç denetimin ne denli önemli olduğunu vurgulanmakta, bu sebeple de bu alanda yapılacak olan araştırma ve yayınların sayısının artmasının öneminin altı çizilmektedir. Tüm bunların yerine getirilebilmesi içinse, mevcut literatürün çok iyi özümsenmesi, hayati bir başlangıç noktası olarak görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İç Denetim
• Dijitalleşme
• Bibliyometrik Analiz

A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS APPROACH TO INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

Öz

This study was conducted to obtain in-depth information about publications that integrate the themes of internal audit and digitalization, utilizing bibliometric analysis. The "conceptual framework" section, which follows the "introduction" that explains the general flow and purpose of the study, emphasizes how internal audit has been affected by technological developments throughout history and how it has evolved, highlighting the importance of today's digitalization for internal audit. The publications applied for in this study have been searched from the database "Scopus." The findings section includes various trends and statistical information, especially "Co-authorship of authors analysis," "Citation of authors analysis," “Citation of documents analysis,” "Countries' citation analysis," "Citation of organizations analysis," "Co-occurrence of keywords analysis," "Bibliographic coupling of documents analysis," "Bibliographic coupling of authors analysis," and "Co-citation of authors analysis," performed with the help of the VOSviewer program. The research emphasizes the critical importance of internal audit for businesses in the face of rapidly developing digitalization. Therefore, the study underscores the need to increase the number of research and publications in this field. A thorough understanding of the existing literature is a vital starting point to achieve this goal.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Internal Audit
• Digitalization
• Bibliometric Analysis

Kaynakça

1. Adelakun, N. B. O. (2022). The Impact of AI on Internal Auditing: Transforming Practices and Ensuring Compliance. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 4(6), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.51594/farj.v4i6.1316
2. Aldemir, C., & Uysal, T. U. (2024). AI Competencies for Internal Auditors in the Public Sector. EDPACS, 69(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2024.2312001
3. Alles, M. G. (2015). Drivers of the Use and Facilitators and Obstacles of the Evolution of Big Data by the Audit Profession. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51067
4. Alles, M., Brennan, G., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2006). Continuous monitoring of business process controls: A pilot implementation of a continuous auditing system at Siemens. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7(2), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2005.10.004
5. Alles, M.G., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M.A. (2018). Putting Continuous Auditing Theory into Practice: Lessons from Two Pilot Implementations. In: Chan, D.Y., Chiu, V., & Vasarhelyi, M.A. (Eds.) Continuous Auditing (Rutgers Studies in Accounting Analytics). (ss. 247-270). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-413-420181011
6. Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Big Data and Analytics in the Modern Audit Engagement: Research Needs. Auditing a Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51684
7. Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2014). Academics and Practitioners Are Alike and Unlike: The Paradoxes of Academic–Practitioner Relationships. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1181-1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314529160
8. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441-454. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.441

9. Betti, N. and Sarens, G. (2021), Understanding the internal audit function in a digitalised business environment, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(2), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2019-0114
10. Bierstaker, J. L., Brody, R. G., & Pacini, C. (2006). Accountants' perceptions regarding fraud detection and prevention methods. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(5), 520-535. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610667283
11. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150
12. Bou‐Raad, G. (2000), Internal auditors and a value‐added approach: the new business regime, Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(4), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900010322461
13. Cangemi, M. P., & Brennan, G. (2019). Blockchain Auditing – Accelerating the need for automated audits! EDPACS, 59(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2019.1615176
14. Chambers, A. D., & Odar, M. (2015). A new vision for internal audit. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-08-2014-1073
15. Christ, M. H., Eulerich, M., Krane, R., & Wood, D. A. (2021). New Frontiers for Internal Audit Research*. Accounting Perspectives, 20(4), 449–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12272
16. Cong, L. W., & He, Z. (2019). Blockchain Disruption and Smart Contracts. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1754–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz007
17. Creasey, T. (2024). İnternetten alınan yazarlı yazı: Best Practices in Change Management, Prosci. https://www.prosci.com/blog/change-management-best-practices
18. Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward Blockchain-Based Accounting and Assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51804
19. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
20. Fedyk, A., Hodson, J., Khimich, N., & Fedyk, T. (2022). Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process? Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 938-985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09697-x
21. Feung, J. L. C., & Thiruchelvam, I. V. (2020). A framework model for continuous auditing in financial statement audits using big data analytics. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 3416-3434.
22. Fountain, L. (2019). İnternetten alınan yazarlı yazı: Internal Audit’s Evolving Cybersecurity Role, Internal Auditor, https://internalauditor.theiia.org/en/articles/2019/march/internal-audits-evolving-cybersecurity-role/ adresinden alındı.
23. Gotthardt, M., Koivulaakso, D., Paksoy, O., Saramo, C., Martikainen, M., & Lehner, O. (2020). Current State and Challenges in the Implementation of Smart Robotic Process Automation in Accounting and Auditing. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 9(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.35944/jofrp.2020.9.1.007
24. Gramling, A. A., Maletta, M. J., Schneider, A., & Church, B. K. (2004). The role of the internal audit function in corporate governance: A synthesis of the extant internal auditing literature and directions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23(1), 194-244.
25. Han, H., Shiwakoti, R. K., Jarvis, R., Mordi, C., & Botchie, D. (2023). Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and artificial Intelligence: A literature review. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 48, 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100598
26. Hood, W. W. & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342
27. Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2017). International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF).
28. Islam, S., & Stafford, T. (2022). Factors associated with the adoption of data analytics by internal audit function. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(2), 193-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-04-2021-3090
29. Joshi, P.L, Acharya, S. (2022). The changing role of internal auditor as assurer, assessor and advisor. In: Joshi, P.L., Dsouza, S. (Eds) The changing role of internal audit function in organisations (ss. 33-90). Sultan Chand & Sons
30. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, Not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation – becoming a digitally mature enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press.
31. Kassa, S.G. (2019) Auditors have a role in cyberresilience. ISACA Journal, 6
32. Kaufman, B. E. (2022). The academic-practitioner gap: Past time to bring in the practitioner perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 32(2), 100895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100895
33. Kim, H. J., Mannino, M., & Nieschwietz, R. J. (2009). Information technology acceptance in the internal audit profession: Impact of technology features and complexity. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10(4), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2009.09.001
34. Kokina, J., Mancha, R., & Pachamanova, D. (2017). Blockchain: Emergent industry adoption and implications for accounting. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51911
35. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73, 59-67.
36. Lenz, R., & Jeppesen, K. K. (2022), The Future of Internal Auditing: Gardener of Governance, The EDP Audit, Control, and Security Newsletter, 66(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2022.2036314
37. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20743
38. Lyu, P., Liu, X., & Yao, T. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of literature on bibliometrics in recent half-century. Journal of Information Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231191233
39. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (2018). The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 474-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23970
40. Mani, V. (2023). Auditing and Digital Transformation are at a Crossroads. ISACA Journal, 2, https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2023/volume-2/auditing-and-digital-transformation-are-at-a-crossroads adresinden alındı.
41. Mautz, R. K., Sharaf, H. A. (1961), The philosophy of auditing: American accounting association, Monograph No. 6. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
42. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Netherlands: Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3714-7
43. Moeller, R. R. (2009). Brink's Modern Internal Auditing: A Common Body of Knowledge. 7th Edition, USA: Wiley.
44. Moffitt, K. C., Rozario, A. M., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Robotic Process Automation for Auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-10589
45. Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional de la información, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
46. Möller, K., Schäffer, U., & Verbeeten, F. (2020). Digitalization in Management Accounting and Control: an editorial. Journal of Management and Control, 31, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00300-5
47. Nair, B. (2022). İnternetten alınan yazarlı yazı: The Evolution of Internal Audit in a Digital-First Environment, ISACA. https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/industry-news/2022/the-evolution-of-internal-audit-in-a-digital-first-environment adresinden alındı.
48. Pickett, K. H. S. (2010). The Internal Auditing Handbook. Wiltshire: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
49. Pizzi, S., Venturelli, A., Variale, M., & Macario, G. P. (2021). Assessing the impacts of digital transformation on internal auditing: A bibliometric analysis. Technology in Society, 67, 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101738
50. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349
51. PwC (2023). PwC Global Internal Audit Study 2023 – Seeing through walls to find new horizons. https://www.pwc.com.tr/global-internal-audit-study-2023 adresinden alındı.
52. Rakipi, R., De Santis, F., & D'Onza, G. (2021). Correlates of the internal audit function’s use of data analytics in the big data era: Global evidence. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 42, 100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2020.100357
53. Ramamoorti, S. (2003), Internal Auditing: History, Evolution, and Prospects”, Research Opportunities in Internal Auditing, 1–23. https://na.theiia.org/iiarf/Public Documents/Chapter 1 Internal Auditing History Evolution and Prospects.pdf
54. Sawyer, L. (2016), Sawyer's İç Denetçiler İçin Rehber: Cilt 1 - İç Denetimin Temelleri, (6. baskı.), İstanbul: İç Denetim Enstitüsü Yayınları.
55. Schmitz, J., & Leoni, G. (2019). Accounting and Auditing at the Time of Blockchain Technology: A Research Agenda. Australian Accounting Review, 29(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12286
56. Treleaven, P., Brown, R. G., & Yang, D. (2017). Blockchain Technology in Finance. Computer, 50(9), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2017.3571047
57. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., Wolfram, D. (Eds) Measuring Scholarly Impact (ss. 285-320). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
58. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Springer, 19-50.
59. Zhang, J., Yang, X., & Appelbaum, D. (2015). Toward Effective Big Data Analysis in Continuous Auditing. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51070