Bibliometric analysis on argumentation research in chemistry education
Öz
This study is a pioneer bibliometric study about investigating the argumentation studies related to chemistry topics. While bibliometric analysis exists to some extent for analyzing argumentation in education, further research focusing on argumentation in chemistry topics is needed to close the gap in an educational context. The Scopus database was selected to trace the articles published in journals between the years 2006 to 2024. Following the eligibility process, the study was conducted with 94 articles. To reveal the publications and citation trends, performance analysis was conducted. Bibliographic mapping was utilized to understand the conceptual, intellectual, and social structures of the data. In addition to demonstrating the most prolific articles, journals, authors, and countries, the reasons behind their success were investigated. Thus, the current study could help the researchers to determine the research trends. They will also gain valuable insight into which journals should be chosen to publish or which countries are more appropriate to apply for collaborations for projects like Erasmus+. Finally, the results reveal that argumentation studies have great potential in chemistry education.
Anahtar Kelimeler
argumentation, chemistry education, bibliometric analysis
Etik Beyan
No ethics committee approval was obtained because the research is a review article.
Kaynakça
- Abi-El-Mona, I., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Argumentative discourse in a high school chemistry classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 349–361.
- Atabey, N., & Evren-Yapicioğlu, A. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of the articles in the field of argumentation in science from 1976 to 2020. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 45, 785-808.
- Aydeniz, M. (2019). Teaching and learning chemistry through argumentation. In, S. Erduran (Ed.), Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Research, Policy and Practice, (pp. 11-31). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
- Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179–255.
- Crujeiras-Perez, B., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2019). Interdisciplinarity and argumentation in chemistry education. In, S. Erduran (Ed.), Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Research, Policy and Practice, (pp. 32-61). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
- Dede, E. & Ozdemir, E. (2022). Mapping and performance evaluation of mathematics education research in Turkey: A bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2021. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(4), 1-19.
- Deng, J.M., & Flynn, A. B. (2021). Reasoning, granularity, and comparisons in students' arguments on two organic chemistry items. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 749-771.
- Erduran, S. (2019). Preface. In S. Erduran (Ed.), Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Research, Policy and Practice, (pp. v-vi). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
- Erduran S., & Pabuçcu-Akış, A. (2023). Chemistry Education Research Recent Trends and the Onset of the Pandemic Era, Handbook of Research on Science Education Volume III, Edt: Norman G. Lederman, Dana L. Zeidler, Judith S. Lederman, ISBN: 9780367855758, Routledge, Taylor & Francis, New York, 657-691.
- Evdokimenkova, Y. B., & Soboleva, N. O. (2020). Organic chemistry in Russia: Bibliometric publication flow analysis over the past 30 years. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 14(1), 23–36.