Examination of studies on scientific process skills in science education through bibliometric and content analysis

Faruk Arıcı

doi:10.53444/deubefd.1567500

EN TR

Examination of studies on scientific process skills in science education through bibliometric and content analysis

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of academic research on scientific process skills (SPS) in science education using meticulously extracted data from the Web of Science (WoS) database. A holistic approach was employed in the research, integrating bibliometric analysis and content analysis to reveal general trends and thematic structures in the literature. Specifically, bibliometric analysis was employed to examine the most frequently cited studies on inter-author collaborations and keyword trends on SPS. Content analysis provides a unique contribution to our study by detailing the analysis of these publications. A distinguishing feature of this study is the use of a more extensive data set and a more extended period than previous studies, providing a more comprehensive picture of the evolution of research on SPS over time. The VosViwer bibliometric analysis software employs an array of analytical methods, including citation analysis, co-author analysis, keyword matching, and collaboration network analysis, to identify trends within the field. The analysis encompasses studies published from the inaugural study in 1992 through August 2024. The findings reveal a substantial increase in publications, with 2020 demonstrating the highest number of publications. In contrast, the average number of publications during the preceding five-year period was restricted to eight per year. Most of these publications are classified under "Education, Educational Research," with a smaller number falling under "Biology." This observation suggests that the primary focus of SPS research is within the educational context. Furthermore, the study revealed that publications in the SSCI and ESCI indexes are more prevalent, while there are fewer studies in the SCI-E index. The prominent researchers in this field include Kamisah Osman, Hatice Zeynep Inan, and Susan A. Kirch. A notable observation was Turkey's high ranking in terms of country distribution. This observation indicates that researchers have dedicated significant attention to the SPS in the context of science education. The most prevalent keywords in the analyzed studies were "SPS," "science education," "inquiry," and "assessment." Over time, there has been an upward trend in the use of terms such as "inquiry-based learning," "teacher education," and "elementary education." The most prominent academic journals in this field include the Journal of Research in Science Teaching and the International Journal of Science Education. Notwithstanding the strides made, the study underscores Turkish researchers' need to enhance their visibility and cultivate national journals to attain international standards.

Keywords

Science education , scientific process skills , bibliometric analysis , content analysis

Fen eğitiminde bilimsel süreç becerileri üzerine yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik ve içerik analizi yoluyla incelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma, Web of Science (WoS) veritabanından titizlikle çıkarılan verileri kullanarak, fen eğitimi alanındaki bilimsel süreç becerileri (BSB) ile ilgili akademik araştırmaların kapsamlı bir analizini sunmaktadır. Araştırmada, literatürdeki genel eğilimleri ve tematik yapıları ortaya çıkarmak için bibliyometrik analiz ve içerik analizini entegre ederek bütünsel bir yaklaşım kullanılmıştır. BSB konusunda yazarlar arası işbirlikleri, anahtar kelime eğilimleri ve en çok atıf alan çalışmaları incelemek için bibliyometrik analizden yararlanılmıştır. İçerik analizi ile en çok atıf alan makalelerin ele alınıp BSB’nin fen eğitimindeki durumunun detaylandırılması çalışmamıza özgün bir katkı sağlamıştır. Ayrıca, önceki çalışmalardan farklı olarak daha geniş bir veri seti ve daha uzun bir zaman dilimi kullanılmış, bu da BSB üzerine yapılan araştırmaların zaman içindeki değişimine dair daha kapsamlı bir çerçeve ortaya koymuştur. Analiz, 1992'deki ilk, ilgili çalışmadan Ağustos 2024'e kadar yayınlanan tüm çalışmaları kapsamaktadır. Bulgular, yayınlarda önemli bir artış olduğunu göstermektedir ve 2020, en yüksek yayın sayısına ulaşılan yıldır. Beş yıllık dönemler olışturularak yürütülen incelemede ortalama yayın sayısı yılda sekiz yayın ile sınırlır. Yayınların çoğu "Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırması" konu başlığı altında sınıflandırılırken, "Biyoloji" alanında yayın sayısı daha azdır. Bu, BSB'nin öncelikle eğitim bağlamında incelendiğini göstermektedir. Dahası, çalışma SSCI ve ESCI endekslerindeki yayınların daha yaygın olduğunu, SCI-E endeksinde ise daha az sayıda çalışma bulunduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bu alandaki en önde gelen araştırmacılar arasında Kamisah Osman, Hatice Zeynep İnan, Susan A. Kirch yer almaktadır. Özellikle, Türkiye’nin ülke dağılımında üst sıralarda yer aldığı görülmüştür ve bu durum araştırmacıların fen eğitiminde BSB’ye yoğun olarak odaklandığını göstermektedir. İncelenen çalışmalarda en sık görülen anahtar kelimeler "BSB", "fen eğitimi", "sorgulama" ve "değerlendirme"dir. Zamanla, "sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme", "öğretmen eğitimi" ve "ilköğretim eğitimi" terimleri giderek daha yaygın hale gelmiştir. Ayrıca, bu alanda yayınlanan en önemli dergiler Journal of Research in Science Teaching ve International Journal of Science Education'dır. Yukarıda belirtilen ilerlemeye rağmen, çalışma Türk araştırmacıların görünürlüklerini artırmaları ve uluslararası standartlara ulaşmak için ulusal dergileri geliştirmeleri gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilimsel süreç becerileri , bibliyometrik analiz , fen eğitimi , içerik analizi

Kaynakça

Arıcı, F. (2024). Examination of Research Conducted on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Science Education. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 14(3), 539-562. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1485114
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Ayas, A., Çepni, S. Akdeniz, A.R. Özmen, H. Yiğit, N., & Ayvacı, H.Ş. (2012). Science and technology teaching from theory to practice. PegemA.
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43174976
Barman, C. R. (1992). An evaluation of the use of a technique designed to assist prospective elementary teachers use the learning cycle with science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 92(2), 59.
Bilgin, I. (2006). The effects of hands-on activities incorporating a cooperative learning approach on eight grade students'science process skills and attitudes toward science. Journal of Baltic Science Education, (9). http://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1404214209.pdf
Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329(5995), 996-996. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, Co: BSCS, 5(88-98).
Cengiz, E., & Arıcı, F. (2024). Middle School Fifth-Grade Students’ Level of Understanding the Concept of Condensation in Different Contexts. Journal of Chemical Education. 101 (9), 3813-3822. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00373
Colvill, M., & Pattie, I. (2002). Science skills: the building blocks for scientific literacy. Investigating, 18(3), 20-22.

Damar, M., Özdağoğlu, G., & Özveri, O. (2020). Bilimsel Üretkenlik Bağlamında Dünya Sıralama Sistemleri ve Türkiye’deki Üniversitelerin Mevcut Durumu. [World ranking systems in the context of scientific productivity and the current situation of universities in Turkey]. Journal of University Research, 3(3), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.792205
Darmaji, D. A. K., Astalini, R. P., & Kuswanto, M. I. (2020). Do a science process skills affect on critical thinking in science? Differences in urban and rural. Int J Eval & Res Educ. ISSN, 2252(8822), 8822. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1274675.pdf
Demirci-Güler, M. P. (2017). Science teaching. Pegem Akademi.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Dikici, A., Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2020). The relationship between demographic variables and scientific creativity: mediating and moderating roles of scientific process skills. Research in Science Education, 50, 2055-2079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9763-2
Dolapcioglu, S., & Subasi, M. (2022). The Relationship between Scientific Process Skills and Science Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Journal of Science Learning, 5(2), 363-372. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i2.39356
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105, 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Fensham, P. J. (2009). The link between policy and practice in science education: The role of research. Science Education, 93(6), 1076-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20349
Froumin, I. (2012). Building a New Research University: Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation. P.G. Altbach, and J. Salmi (Eds.) (K. Yamac, Trans.). The Road to Academic Excellence Creating World Class Research Universities (pp.241-263). Efil.
Gunsen, G., Fazlioglu, Y., & Bayir, E. (2018). The effects of constructivist approach based science teaching on scientific process skills of 5 years old children. Hacettepe Unıversıtesı Egıtım Fakultesı Dergısı-Hacettepe Unıversıty Journal Of Educatıon, 33(3), 599-616. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018036552
Gultepe, N. (2016). High school science teachers' views on science process skills. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(5), 779-800. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1114270
Handayani, G., Adisyahputra, A., & Indrayanti, R. (2018). Correlation between integrated science process skills and ability to read comprehension to scientific literacy in biology teachers students. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.11-1.3
Hasanah, U., & Shimizu, K. (2020). Crucial cognitive skills in science education: A systematic review. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 36-72. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.7140
Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Science Learning. Studies in Science Education, 28(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560085
Julien, H., & Barker, S. (2009). How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.008
İdil, Ş., Gülen, S., & Dönmez, İ. (2024). What Should We Understand from PISA 2022 Results?. Journal of STEAM Education, 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55290/steam.1415261
Idris, N., Talib, O., & Razali, F. (2022). Strategies in mastering science process skills in science experiments: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.32969
Irwanto, I., Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2019). Analyzing the relationships between preservice chemistry teachers’ science process skills and critical thinking skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(3), 299-313. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10283a)
Juhji, J., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Interaction between science process skills and scientific attitudes of students towards technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.600979
Kefi, S., & Yildiz, F. U. (2024). The study of parents creating opportunities for their preschoolers in using basic scientific process skills at home. Early Child Development and Care, 194(3), 366-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2024.2315417
Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). The effect of guided-inquiry instruction on 6th grade Turkish students' achievement, science process skills, and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942
Kol, Ö., & Yaman, S. (2022). The Effects of Studies in the Field of Science on Scientific Process Skills: A Meta-Analysis Study. Participatory Educational Research, 9(4), 469-494.
Korucuk, M. (2024). Eğitim Bilimleri Odağında Türkiye’deki Üniversitelerin Değerlendirilmesi: İkincil Veri Analizi. [Evaluation of Universities in Turkey with a Focus on Educational Sciences: Secondary Data Analysis). Journal of University Research, 7(3), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.1482817
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2012). Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry: Building instructional capacity through professional development. Second international handbook of science education, 335-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_24
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of research in science teaching, 51(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125
Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2011). Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806524
Markawi, N. (2013). Pengaruh keterampilan proses sains, penalaran, dan pemecahan masalah terhadap hasil belajar fisika [The effect of science process skills, reasoning, and problem solving on physics learning outcomes]. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3 (1), 11–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i1.109
Mushani, M. (2021). Science process skills in science education of developed and developing countries: Literature review. Unnes Science Education Journal, 10(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v10i1.42153
Mulyeni, T., Jamaris, M., & Supriyati, Y. (2019). Improving basic science process skills through inquiry-based approach in learning science for early elementary students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.36681/
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academy of Sciences.
National Research Council. (1996) . National science education standards. National Academies Press.
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What "ideas about science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of research in science teaching, 40(7), 692-720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
Özdemir, G., & Dikici, A. (2017). Relationships between scientific process skills and scientific creativity: Mediating role of nature of science knowledge. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 3(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.275696
Padilla, M. J., Okey, J. R., & Dillashaw, F. G. (1983). The relationship between science process skill and formal thinking abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(3), 239-246. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200308
Setiani, R., Surasmi, W. A., & Tresnaningsih, S. (2020, March). Effectiveness of Project Based Laboratory Learning to Increase Student’s Science Process Skills and Creativity. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1491, No. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012006/pdf
Settlage, J., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Teaching science to every child: Using culture as a starting point. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817780
Shouse, A. W., Schweingruber, H. A., & Duschl, R. A. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press.
Setiawan, R. R., Suwondo, S., & Syafii, W. (2021). Implementation of Project-Based Learning Student Worksheets to Improve Students' Science Process Skills on Environmental Pollution in High Schools. Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 130-140 https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.5.1.p.130-140
Tan, M., & Temiz, B. K. (2003). Fen öğretiminde bilimsel süreç becerilerinin yeri ve önemi. [The importance and role of the science process skills in science teaching.] Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 13(13), 89-101.
Tanti, T., Kurniawan, D. A., Kuswanto, K., Utami, W., & Wardhana, I. (2020). Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking in Science: Urban and Rural Disparity. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 489-498. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.24139
Turkmen, H. & Kandemir, E. M. (2018). Öğretmenlerin bilimsel süreç becerileri öğrenme alanı algıları üzerine bir durum çalışması [A case study on teachers' perceptions of scientific process skills learning area]. Journal of European Education, 1(1), 15-24. http://eujournal.org/index.php/JEE/article/view/171
Urapcenter, (2020). University Ranking by Academic Performance (English webpage). https://www.urapcenter.org/
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285-320). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
Wang, Q.H., Wang, Q., & Liu, C.N. (2012). Building World-Class Universities in China: Shanghai Jiao Tong University. P.G. Altbach, and J. Salmi (Eds.) (K. Yamaç, Trans.). The Road to Academic Excellence Building World Class Research Universities (pp.27-48). Ankara: Efil.
Yildiz, C., & Yildiz, T. G. (2021). Exploring the relationship between creative thinking and scientific process skills of preschool children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100795
Yildirim, M., Çalik, M., & Özmen, H. (2016). A Meta-Synthesis of Turkish Studies in Science Process Skills. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 6518-6539.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Faruk Arıcı ^*
0000-0003-0368-6346
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

27 Mart 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Ekim 2024

Kabul Tarihi

12 Şubat 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Sayı: 63

DOI

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1567500

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA75FL25GU

APA

Arıcı, F. (2025). Examination of studies on scientific process skills in science education through bibliometric and content analysis. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 63, 818-846. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1567500

Examination of studies on scientific process skills in science education through bibliometric and content analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Fen eğitiminde bilimsel süreç becerileri üzerine yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik ve içerik analizi yoluyla incelenmesi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster