BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

INDIVIDUALS WITH A DISABILITY HEARING and THEORY OF MIND

Yıl 2011, Sayı: 30, 238 - 249, 01.12.2011

Deniz Tekin Alev Girli

Öz

The purpose of this study is to review studies which consist of theory of mind (ToM) characteristics of people with hearing disabilities. In the first part of the study, general features of ToM are described. In the second part of the study, studies which investigated ToM features of people with hearing disabilities are covered in detail. In the third part of the study, studies which investigated factors on ToM features of people with hearing disabilities are presented and finally studies which covered the relationship between language useage of children with hearing disabilities in their houses and relationship between ToM are presented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hearing loss theory of mind (ToM) false belief individuals with hearing disabilities

Kaynakça

  • Atasoy, S. (2008). Yüksek Fonksiyonlu Otistik Çocuklarda Çeşitli Bilişsel Özellikler Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Doktora tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Bates, E. (1978). The Emergence of Symbols. New York: Academic Press.
  • Bretherton, I , McNew, S., & Beeghly-Smith, M (1981) Early Person Knowledge As Expressed In Gestural And Verbal Communication When Do İnfants Acquire A „Theory Of Mind”„ In M.E. Lamb ve L.R. Sherod (Eds ), Infant social cognition, Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
  • Baron-Cohen, S. & Swettenham, J. (1997). Theory of mind in autism: Its relationship to executive function and central coherence. Handbook of Autism and Developmental Disorders. (2.baskı). New York; John Wiley & Sons
  • Courtin, C. & Melot, A.M. (1998). Development of theories of mind in deaf children. Psychological Perspectives on Deafness. Malwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 79–102.
  • Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Marriage, and Politics. New York: Norton
  • Girli, A. & Tekin, D. (2010). Investigating False Belief Levels of Typically Developed Children and Children with Autism. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2, 1951- 1954.
  • Gökçen S, Bora E, Erermis, S, Kesikci H, & Aydin C. (2008). Theory of mind and verbal working memory deficits in parents of the patients with autistic disorder. Psychiatry Research. 160, 23-29.
  • Howlin, P., Baron-Cohen, S. & Hadwin, J. (1999) Teaching Children with Autism to Mind- Read: a Practical Guide, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Howley, M. & Howe, C. (2004). Social interaction and cognitive growth: An examination through the role taking skills of deaf and hearing children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 22, 219-243.
  • Lieberman, D.J. (2007). You Can Read Anyone/ Never Be Fooled, Lied to or Taken Advantage of Again. Viter Pres, New Jersey.
  • Meristo, M. & Hjelmquist, E. (2009). Executive functions and theory of mind among deaf children: Different routes to understanding other minds? Journal of Cognition and Development. 10(1-2), 67-91.
  • Meristo, M., Falkman, K. W., Hjelmquist, E., Tedoldi, M., Surian, L., & Siegal, M. (2007). Language access and theory of mind reasoning: Evidence from deaf children in bilingual and oralist environments. Developmental Psychology. 43, 1156–1169.
  • Moeller, P., & Schick, B. (2006). Relations between maternal input and „theory of mind‟ understanding in deaf children. Child Development. 77, 751-766.
  • Peterson, C.C. (2004). Theory of mind development in oral deaf children with cochlear implants or conventional hearing aids. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 45/6, 1096-1106.
  • Peterson, C.C., & Siegal, M. (1995). Deafness, conversation and theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatr., 36, 458-474.
  • Peterson, C.C., & Siegal, M. (1999). Representing inner worlds: Theory of mind in autistic, deaf and normal hearing children. Psychological Science, 10, 126-129.
  • Peterson, C. C. & Siegal, M. (2000). Insights into theory of mind from deafness and autism. Mind and Language. 15, 123–145.
  • Peterson, C.C. & Slaughter, V.P. (2006). Telling the story of theory of mind: Deaf and hearing children‟s narratives and mental state understanding. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 24, 151-179.
  • Pratt, C. & Bryant,B.E. (1990). Young children understand that looking leads to knowing (so long as they are looking through a single barrel), Child Development. 61, 973–982.
  • Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the Chimpanzee Have A Theory of Mind? Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 4, 515-526.
  • Pyers, J.E. & Senghas, A. (2009). Language Promotes False-Belief Understanding : Evidence From Learners of a New Sign Language. Psychological Science. 20(7), 805-812.
  • Remmel, E., Bettger, J. G. & Weinberg, A. M. (2001). Theory of mind development in deaf children. M. D. Clark, M. Marschark, ve M. Karchmer baskısı içinde, Context, cognition, and deafness (sayfa. 113-134). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
  • Rieffe, C. & Terwogt, M.M. (2000). Deaf Children‟s Understanding of Emotions: Desires Take Predence. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 41, 601-608.
  • Scaife, M. & Bruner, J.S. (1975). The Capacity for Joint Visual Attention in the Infant. Nature. 253, 265-266.
  • Schick, B., de Villiers, P., de Villiers, J. & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language and Theory of Mind a Study of Deaf Children. Child Development. 78(2), 376-396.
  • Staden, A. (2010). Comparing native signing, late signing and orally trained deaf children‟s theory of mind abilities. South African Journal of Psychology. 40 (1), 97-106.
  • Tekin, D. (2010). Düşünce Baloncukları Tekniğinin Kullanıldığı “Yanlış İnanç Öğretim Paketi”nin Asperger Sendromu ve Yüksek İşlevli Otizm Tanısı Almış Çocukların “Yanlış İnanç” Düzeyleri Üzerindeki Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Wellman H.M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of Theory of Mind Development: the Truth about False Belief. Child Development. 72, 655-684.
  • Woolfe, T., Want, S.C., & Siegal, M. (2002). Signposts to development: Theory of mind in deaf children. Child Development. 73, 768–778.
  • Yağmurlu, B., Berument, & S. K., Çelimli, Ş. (2005). The role of institution and home contexts in theory of mind development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 26, 521-537.
  • Yağmurlu, B., Köymen, S. B., & Sanson, A. (2005). Ebeveynlerin ve çocuk mizacının olumlu sosyal davranış gelişimine etkileri: Zihin kuramının belirleyici rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 20, 1-20.

İŞİTME ENGELİ OLAN BİREYLER VE ZİHİN KURAMI

Yıl 2011, Sayı: 30, 238 - 249, 01.12.2011

Deniz Tekin Alev Girli

Öz

Bu çalışmada işitme engeli olan bireylerin zihin kuramı özelliklerinin yer aldığı çalışmaların derlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın ilk bölümünde genel özellikleri ile zihin kuramı açıklanmıştır. Çalışmanın ikinci bölümünde işitme engeli olan bireylerin zihin kuramı özelliklerini inceleyen çalışmalar detaylı olarak ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın üçüncü bölümünde işitme engeli olan bireylerin zihin kuramı özelliklerinde etkili olabilecek faktörlerin incelendiği çalışmalara yer verilmiş ve son olarak işitme engeli olan çocukların evlerinde kullanılan dil ile zihin kuramı arasındaki ilişkiyi ele alan çalışmalara yer verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İşitme kaybı zihin kuramı yanlış inanç işitme yetersizliği olan bireyler

Kaynakça

  • Atasoy, S. (2008). Yüksek Fonksiyonlu Otistik Çocuklarda Çeşitli Bilişsel Özellikler Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Doktora tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Bates, E. (1978). The Emergence of Symbols. New York: Academic Press.
  • Bretherton, I , McNew, S., & Beeghly-Smith, M (1981) Early Person Knowledge As Expressed In Gestural And Verbal Communication When Do İnfants Acquire A „Theory Of Mind”„ In M.E. Lamb ve L.R. Sherod (Eds ), Infant social cognition, Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
  • Baron-Cohen, S. & Swettenham, J. (1997). Theory of mind in autism: Its relationship to executive function and central coherence. Handbook of Autism and Developmental Disorders. (2.baskı). New York; John Wiley & Sons
  • Courtin, C. & Melot, A.M. (1998). Development of theories of mind in deaf children. Psychological Perspectives on Deafness. Malwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 79–102.
  • Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Marriage, and Politics. New York: Norton
  • Girli, A. & Tekin, D. (2010). Investigating False Belief Levels of Typically Developed Children and Children with Autism. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2, 1951- 1954.
  • Gökçen S, Bora E, Erermis, S, Kesikci H, & Aydin C. (2008). Theory of mind and verbal working memory deficits in parents of the patients with autistic disorder. Psychiatry Research. 160, 23-29.
  • Howlin, P., Baron-Cohen, S. & Hadwin, J. (1999) Teaching Children with Autism to Mind- Read: a Practical Guide, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Howley, M. & Howe, C. (2004). Social interaction and cognitive growth: An examination through the role taking skills of deaf and hearing children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 22, 219-243.
  • Lieberman, D.J. (2007). You Can Read Anyone/ Never Be Fooled, Lied to or Taken Advantage of Again. Viter Pres, New Jersey.
  • Meristo, M. & Hjelmquist, E. (2009). Executive functions and theory of mind among deaf children: Different routes to understanding other minds? Journal of Cognition and Development. 10(1-2), 67-91.
  • Meristo, M., Falkman, K. W., Hjelmquist, E., Tedoldi, M., Surian, L., & Siegal, M. (2007). Language access and theory of mind reasoning: Evidence from deaf children in bilingual and oralist environments. Developmental Psychology. 43, 1156–1169.
  • Moeller, P., & Schick, B. (2006). Relations between maternal input and „theory of mind‟ understanding in deaf children. Child Development. 77, 751-766.
  • Peterson, C.C. (2004). Theory of mind development in oral deaf children with cochlear implants or conventional hearing aids. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 45/6, 1096-1106.
  • Peterson, C.C., & Siegal, M. (1995). Deafness, conversation and theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatr., 36, 458-474.
  • Peterson, C.C., & Siegal, M. (1999). Representing inner worlds: Theory of mind in autistic, deaf and normal hearing children. Psychological Science, 10, 126-129.
  • Peterson, C. C. & Siegal, M. (2000). Insights into theory of mind from deafness and autism. Mind and Language. 15, 123–145.
  • Peterson, C.C. & Slaughter, V.P. (2006). Telling the story of theory of mind: Deaf and hearing children‟s narratives and mental state understanding. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 24, 151-179.
  • Pratt, C. & Bryant,B.E. (1990). Young children understand that looking leads to knowing (so long as they are looking through a single barrel), Child Development. 61, 973–982.
  • Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the Chimpanzee Have A Theory of Mind? Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 4, 515-526.
  • Pyers, J.E. & Senghas, A. (2009). Language Promotes False-Belief Understanding : Evidence From Learners of a New Sign Language. Psychological Science. 20(7), 805-812.
  • Remmel, E., Bettger, J. G. & Weinberg, A. M. (2001). Theory of mind development in deaf children. M. D. Clark, M. Marschark, ve M. Karchmer baskısı içinde, Context, cognition, and deafness (sayfa. 113-134). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
  • Rieffe, C. & Terwogt, M.M. (2000). Deaf Children‟s Understanding of Emotions: Desires Take Predence. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 41, 601-608.
  • Scaife, M. & Bruner, J.S. (1975). The Capacity for Joint Visual Attention in the Infant. Nature. 253, 265-266.
  • Schick, B., de Villiers, P., de Villiers, J. & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language and Theory of Mind a Study of Deaf Children. Child Development. 78(2), 376-396.
  • Staden, A. (2010). Comparing native signing, late signing and orally trained deaf children‟s theory of mind abilities. South African Journal of Psychology. 40 (1), 97-106.
  • Tekin, D. (2010). Düşünce Baloncukları Tekniğinin Kullanıldığı “Yanlış İnanç Öğretim Paketi”nin Asperger Sendromu ve Yüksek İşlevli Otizm Tanısı Almış Çocukların “Yanlış İnanç” Düzeyleri Üzerindeki Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Wellman H.M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of Theory of Mind Development: the Truth about False Belief. Child Development. 72, 655-684.
  • Woolfe, T., Want, S.C., & Siegal, M. (2002). Signposts to development: Theory of mind in deaf children. Child Development. 73, 768–778.
  • Yağmurlu, B., Berument, & S. K., Çelimli, Ş. (2005). The role of institution and home contexts in theory of mind development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 26, 521-537.
  • Yağmurlu, B., Köymen, S. B., & Sanson, A. (2005). Ebeveynlerin ve çocuk mizacının olumlu sosyal davranış gelişimine etkileri: Zihin kuramının belirleyici rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 20, 1-20.
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA45BR79ZH
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Deniz Tekin Bu kişi benim

Alev Girli Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2011
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011 Sayı: 30

Kaynak Göster

APA Tekin, D., & Girli, A. (2011). İŞİTME ENGELİ OLAN BİREYLER VE ZİHİN KURAMI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi(30), 238-249.