Special Education Teachers ' Knowledge, Experiences, and Professional Development Needs on Evidence-Based Practices

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 58, 3209 - 3235, 27.12.2023

Elif Tekin İftar Derya Genç Tosun Arzu Özen

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1368139

Öz

This study aimed to determine whether the teachers who serve the students with developmental disabilities in their classrooms by working in the public or private schools have knowledge about EBPs, their experiences and what their professional development needs are in this regard. The participants of the study are special education teachers working in the public or private schools in the 2021-2022 academic year. The researchers developed the "Questionnaire for Determining the Knowledge, Experience and Professional Development Needs of Special Education Teachers on Scientific-Based Practices". The survey was answered by 238 teachers, but data from 216 participants who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. It was seen that 61% of the participants graduated at sometime within the 1–9 year range, and 26% graduated at sometime within the 10–19 year range. Of them 81% have a bachelor's degree and 19% have a master's degree. It was observed that 90% or more of the participants had 15 EBPs that was a familiar practice for them. Participants often feel themselves well-prepared in the EBPs they use, and they report that they find EBPs to be mostly very effective, effective, and moderately effective on their students' learning. Teachers views on the quality of the training they receive vary. Lastly, it can be thought that teachers will benefit more from the trainings by designing the courses carried out in universities and the professional development activities more qualified and practice-oriented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Special education teachers, evidence-based practices, professional development needs

Özel Eğitim Öğretmenlerinin Bilimsel-Dayanaklı Uygulamalara İlişkin Bilgileri, Deneyimleri ve Mesleki Gelişim Gereksinimleri

Öz

Araştırmanın amacı özel eğitim öğretmenlerin bilimsel-dayanaklı uygulamalara ilişkin bilgi sahibi olup olmadıklarını, deneyimlerini ve bu konudaki mesleki gelişim gereksinimlerinin neler olduğunu belirlemektir. Araştırmanın katılımcıları 2021-2022 eğitim-öğretim yılında kamu ya da özel sektörde görev yapan 216 özel eğitim öğretmenidir. Araştırmacılar veri toplamak amacıyla “Bilimsel-dayanaklı Uygulamalar Konusunda Özel Eğitim Öğretmenlerinin Bilgileri, Deneyimleri ve Mesleki Gelişim Gereksinimlerini Belirleme Anketi”ni geliştirmiştir ve anket sorularına verilen yanıtlar betimsel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Öğretmenlerin demografik özellikleri açısından en dikkat çeken bulgular genç bir öğretmen kitlesinden veri toplanmış olması ve aynı zamanda öğretmenlerin üçte ikisinden daha fazlasının lisans dercesine sahip olmasıdır. Öğretmenlerin büyük bir çoğunluğu (%90 ve üzeri) bilimsel dayanaklı uygulamaların yarısından fazlasına, bilimsel dayanaklı olmayan uygulamaların ise yarısına yakınına ilişkin bilgi sahibi olduklarını bildirmişlerdir. Öğretmenlerin bildiklerini ifade ettikleri bilimsel-dayanaklı uygulamaları kullanmaları halinde ise öğrencilerine hedeflenen becerileri öğretmedeki etkililiğine yönelik çoğunlukla etkili ya da çok etkili olduğu yönünde görüş bildirmişlerdir. Öğretmenler bilimsel-dayanaklı uygulamalardan hangisini kullanacağını seçerken en çok öğrenci özelliklerini, hedef davranışın özelliklerini, kullandıkları uygulamaya ilişkin sahip oldukları bilgi ve beceri düzeyini dikkate aldıklarını belirtmişlerdir. Son olarak öğretmenlerin bilimsel-dayanaklı uygulamalara yönelik aldıkları eğitimin niteliğine ilişkin görüşleri çeşitlilik göstermektedir. Öğretmenlerin nitelikli ve uygulama ağırlıklı tasarlanan eğitimlere ihtiyaç duyduğu düşünülmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Özel eğitim öğretmenleri, bilimsel dayanaklı uygulamalar, mesleki gelişim gereksinimleri

Etik Beyan

Araştırma için İç Anadolu Bölgesi’nde bulunan üniversitelerden birinin Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu Başkanlığı’ndan Etik Kurul Onayı alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

• Alhossein, A. (2021). Teachers’ knowledge and use of evidence-based practices for students with autism spectrum disorder in Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741409
• Atas, B., Ozsandikci, I., Olcay, S., & Saral, D. (2023). Opinions about evidence-based practices among special education techers. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 20(1), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2022.2133981
• Barned, N. E., Knapp, N. F., & Neuharth-Pritchett, S. (2011). Knowledge and attitudes of early childhood preservice teachers regarding the inclusion of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32(4), 302-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2011.622235
• Brock, M. E., Huber, H. B., Carter, E. W., Juarez, A. P., & Warren, Z. E. (2014). Statewide assessment of professional development needs related to educating students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 29(2), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614522290
• Burns, M. K., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. Journal of Special Education, 43, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466908315563
• Carter, M., Stephenson, J., & Strnadová, I. (2011). Reported prevalence by Australian special educators of evidence-based instructional practices. Australian Journal of Special Education, 35, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.35.1.47
• Carter, M., Strnadová, I., & Stephenson, J. (2012). Reported prevalence evidence-based instructional practices by special educators in the Czech Republic. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27, 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2012.691229
• Cook, B. G., & Cook, S. G. (2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466911420877
• Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900201
• Cook, B. G., Smith, G. J., & Tankersley, M. (2011). Evidence-based practices in education. In S. Graham, T. Urban, ve K. Harris (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
• Çiftçi-Tekinarslan, İ., Arı, A., Bozak, B., Çay, E. & Çiçek, M. (2018). Özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel dayanaklı uygulamalar hakkındaki görüşleri. International Journal of Human Sciences, 15(3), 2458-9489. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/5373
• Çil, H., Kalkan, S., & Akemoglu, Y. (2022). Özel Eğitim Öğretmenlerinin OSB’li Çocukların Eğitimlerinde Kullandıkları Bilimsel Dayanaklı Uygulamalara Yönelik Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Special Education Research and Practice, 4(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.37233/TRSPED.2022.0121
• Degirmenci, H. D., & Tekin-Iftar, E. (2023). Web-based professional development with and without coaching to train Turkish special education teachers. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities. 58(3), 299-314.
• Fidan, A. & Tekin-Iftar, E., (2022). Effects of professional development with hybrid coaching on middle school teachers’ teaching skills and students’ academic outcomes. Education and Treatment of Children, 45(2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-021-00069-9
• Hamrick, J., Cerda, M., O’Toole, C., & Hagen-Collins, K. (2021). Educator knowledge and preparedness for educating students with autism for public schools. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 36(4), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357621989310
• Hess, K. L., Morrier, M. J., Heflin, L. J., & Ivey, M. L. (2008). Autism treatment survey: services received by children with autism spectrum disorders in public school classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 961–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0470-5
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
• Hume, K., Steinbrenner, J. R., Odom, S. L., Morin, K. L., Nowell, S. W., Tomaszewski, B., Szendrey, S., McIntyre, N. S., Yücesoy-Özkan, S., & Savage, M. N. (2021). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism: Third generation review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(11), 4013–4032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04844-2
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 614 et seq.
• Kıyak, Ü. E., & Tekin-Iftar, E. (2022). General education teacher preparation in core academic content teaching for students with developmental disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 37(2), 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1847
• Knight, V. F., Huber, H. B., Kuntz, E. M., Carter, E. W., & Juarez, A. P. (2019). Instructional practices, priorities, and preparedness for educating students with autism and intellectual disability. Focus Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618755694
• Kratochwill, T. R., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Machalicek, W., Ferron, J., & Johnson, A. (2021). Single-case design standards: An update and proposed upgrades. Journal of School Psychology, 89, 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.10.006
• Kretlow, A. G., & Bartholomew, C. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of the literature. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 279-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618755694
• Lavonen, J. (2018). Educating professional teachers in Finland through the continuous improvement of teacher education programmes. In Y. Weinberger and Libman, Z. (Eds) Contemporary pedagogies in teacher education and development, (pp. 3-22).
• Marder, T., & deBettencourt, L. U. (2015). Teaching students with ASD using evidence-based practices: Why is training critical now? Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Sage.
• National Autism Center (2015). Findings and conclusions: national standards project, Phase 2. Retrieved from http://www.nationalautismcenter.org/090605-2/
• Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2016). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (11. Baskı). Pearson.
• National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders, (2021). What are evidence-based practices? Retrieved from https://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/evidence-based-practices
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110.
• Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. (2005). Research methods in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100201
• Paynter, J.M., & Keen, D. (2015). Knowledge and use of intervention practices by community-based early intervention service providers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1614–1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2316-2
• Reed, D. D. F., Novak, M. D., Henley, A. J., Brand, D., & McDonald, M. D. (2017). Evidence-based interventions. In Justin B. Leaf.( Handbook of social skills and autism spectrum disorder (pp. 139-155). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62995-7
• Sirin, N., & Tekin-Iftar, E. (2016). Opinions of Turkish parents and teachers about safety skills instruction to children with autism spectrum disorders: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2653-2665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2809-2
• Stahmer, A. C., Collings, N. M., & Palinkas, L. A. (2005). Early intervention practices for children with autism: Descriptions from community providers. Focus on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 20, 66-79.https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200020301
• Tekin-Iftar, E. (2021). Genel eğitim sınıflarında öğrenim gören özel gereksinimli öğrencilerin öğretimi: Öğretmenlere sunulan mesleki gelişim desteğinin öğretmen ve öğrenci davranışları üzerindeki etkileri. Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu Başkanlığı SOBAG 1010 Projesi. (Proje No: 218K116).
• Tekin-Iftar, E., Collins, B., Spooner, F., & Olcay-Gul, S. (2017). Coaching teachers to use a simultaneous prompting procedure to teach core contents to students with autism. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(3), 225-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417703751
• Test, D. W., Kemp-Inman, A., Diegelmann, K., Hitt, S. B., & Bethune, L. (2015). Are online sources for identifying evidence-based practices trustworthy? An evaluation. Exceptional Children, 82, 58-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585477
• Travers, J. C. (2017). Evaluating claims to avoid pseudoscientific and unproven practices in special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(4), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216659466
• TUBİTAK Çağrı Metni (2018). TÜBİTAK – ARDEB Eğitim Çağrı Programı “1003-SBB-EGTM-2015-2 Öğretmen Niteliğinin Geliştirilmesi Yoluyla Eğitim Kalitesinin İyileştirilmesi” Çağrı Metni https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/1003-sbb-egtm-2015-2.pdf
• Tunç-Paftalı, A., & Tekin-Iftar, E. (2021). E-coaching preschool teachers to use simultaneous prompting to teach children with autism spectrum disorder. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(3), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420925014
• Ünal, F. (2020) Koçluk desteğiyle sunulan Web tabanlı mesleki gelişim portalının okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin gömülü öğretim becerileri ile gelişimsel yetersizliği olan çocukların hedef davranışları üzerindeki etkililiği [The effects of coaching via Web-based embedded teaching on pre-school teachers’ use of embedded teaching skills and children’s levels of learning the target behaviors.] (Tez Numarası: 2863381) [Doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
• Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (REL 2007-No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/rel_2007033.pdf