Key Competence Choices of Students at a Science Festival in Turkey: A Preliminary Study

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 60, 1422 - 1441, 28.06.2024

Merve Kocagül

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1444398

Öz

This study focusses on ensuring quality education among other SDGs. The choice of competency area of participants in a local science festival that adopted European key competencies for lifelong learning as a theme and the effect of demographic and contextual variables on these choices were investigated. The survey method was used to make inferences about the participants' attitudes towards competency areas through their choices. Data were collected through the Participant Information Form. Descriptive statistics and chi-square independence tests were conducted in the SPSS-22 programme to analyse the data. The findings revealed that the students selected the area of competency in mathematics, science and technology the most and the area of digital competency the least. Furthermore, the choices of the competency area of the students differed according to their gender, education level, and socioeconomic level of the district in which they resided. It can be concluded that there are political, social, and economic reasons for the choices of the competency area of the students. In this context, it is recommended that educational policies include practices that promote all competence areas, the government incentives for competence development should be expanded and maintained, the technical infrastructure of socioeconomically disadvantaged schools should be strengthened, and appropriate learning environments should be created, both to ensure students' key competence development and to eliminate gender differences.

Anahtar Kelimeler

key competencies, quality education, science festival, lifelong learning

Etik Beyan

All data collection tools and informed consent forms that participants provided to participate in the study were reviewed and approved by Pamukkale University Social and Human Sciences Research and Publication Ethics Committee (25.02.2022/ Document Number: 175306)

Destekleyen Kurum

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

Proje Numarası

122B108

Türkiye'deki Bir Bilim Şenliğinde Öğrencilerin Anahtar Yetkinlik Seçimleri: Bir Ön Çalışma

Öz

Bu çalışma, diğer Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri'nin arasında kaliteli eğitimin sağlanmasına odaklanmaktadır. Yaşam boyu öğrenme için Avrupa temel yetkinliklerini tema olarak benimseyen yerel bir bilim festivalinde katılımcıların yetkinlik alanı seçimi ve demografik ve bağlamsal değişkenlerin bu seçimler üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Katılımcıların seçimleri üzerinden yetkinlik alanlarına yönelik tutumları hakkında çıkarımlarda bulunmak için anket yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Veriler Katılımcı Bilgi Formu aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Verileri analiz etmek için SPSS-22 programında tanımlayıcı istatistikler ve ki-kare bağımsızlık testleri yapılmıştır. Bulgular, öğrencilerin en çok matematik, fen ve teknoloji alanındaki yetkinlik alanını, en az ise dijital yetkinlik alanını seçtiklerini ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin yetkinlik alanı seçimleri cinsiyetlerine, eğitim düzeylerine ve ikamet ettikleri ilçenin sosyoekonomik düzeyine göre farklılık göstermiştir. Öğrencilerin yetkinlik alanı seçimlerinin siyasi, sosyal ve ekonomik nedenleri olduğu sonucuna varılabilir. Bu bağlamda, eğitim politikalarının tüm yetkinlik alanlarını teşvik eden uygulamaları içermesi, yetkinlik gelişimine yönelik devlet teşviklerinin yaygınlaştırılarak sürdürülmesi, sosyoekonomik açıdan dezavantajlı okulların teknik altyapısının güçlendirilmesi ve hem öğrencilerin temel yetkinlik gelişimlerinin sağlanması hem de cinsiyet farklılıklarının giderilmesi için uygun öğrenme ortamlarının yaratılması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

anahtar yetkinlikler, kaliteli eğitim, bilim şenliği, yaşamboyu öğrenme

Proje Numarası

122B108

Kaynakça

• Acar, S., Sahin-Cinoglu, D., Karagoz, T., Kaygisiz, G., Meydan, M. C. & Isik, M. (2022). İlçelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik sıralaması araştırması [Survey on socio-economic development ranking of districts] (Report No. 8). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Industry and Technology General Directorate of Development Agencies.
• Akkanat, C. (2020). Evaluation of Merzifon science festival held under the TUBİTAK 4007 science festival support program according to different age groups. Journal of Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Practice, 2(2), 102-122. https://doi.org/10.47157/jietp.803230
• Ali, I., Ali, M., & Badghish, S. (2019) Symmetric and asymmetric modeling of entrepreneurial ecosystem in developing entrepreneurial intentions among female university students in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 435-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-02-2019-0039
• Almeida, F. & Buzady, Z. (2019). Assessment of entrpreneurship competencies through the use of FLIGBY. Digital Education Review, 35, 151-169. http://greav.ub.edu/der/
• Arikan, S., Erktin, E. & Pesen, M. (2022). Development and validation of a STEM competencies assessment framework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10132-3
• Arshad, Z., Shahbaz, M. & Al-Bashabsheh, A. M. B. (2015). Willingness to communicate in English: A gender based study. International Journal of English and Education, 4(4), 311- 319.
• Ates, O., Ates, A. M. & Aladag, Y. (2021). Perceptions of students and teachers participating in a science festival regarding science and scientists. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(1), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1740666
• Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., & Stoltenberg, U. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416-430.
• Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W. & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academy of Sciences.
• Borkowska, A. (2021). In-class willingness to communicate in English among third agers: Results of a questionnaire study. In M. Pawlak (Ed.). Investigating individual learner differences in second language learning (pp.95-113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75726-7_5
• Canovan, C. (2020). More than a grand day out? Learning on school trips to science festivals from the perspectives of teachers, pupils and organisers. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1680904
• Coenen, J., Borghans, L. & Diris, R. (2021). Personality traits, preferences and educational choices: A focus on STEM. Journal of Economic Psychology, 84, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102361
• Creameans, J. W., Pitts, M. G., White, O., Greenwell, K. M., Colon, K., Garneau-Tsodikova, S. & Venditto, V. J. (2020). Everything is science: A free city-wide science festival. Front Commun, 5(68), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00068
• Donovan, L. A. & MacIntyre, P. D. (2004). Age and sex differences in willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived competence. Communication Research Reports, 21(4), 420-427.
• Duru, E., Duatepe-Paksu, A., Balkis, M., Duru, S. & Bakay, M. E. (2020). Examination of 21st-century competencies and skills of graduates from the perspective of sector representatives and academicians. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(4), 1059-1079. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.8c.4s.1m
• Duruhan, K. & Sad, S. N. (2011). Turkish students’ perceptions of citizenship duties and rights: An evaluation of citizenship education in Turkey. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 6(3), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl.6.3.303_1
• Ekici, H. (2019). Türk toplumunda Suriyelilere yönelik algılanan tehditler ve çözüm önerileri [Threat perceptions of Turkish society towards Syrians and policy recommendations]. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 19(44), 695-730.
• European Commission (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Publication Office of the European Union.
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes toward objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035872
• Fogg-Rogers, L., Bay, J. L., Burgess, H. & Purdy, S. C. (2015). Knowledge is power: A mixed method study exploring adult audience preferences for engagement and learning formats over three years of a health science festival. Science Communication, 37(4), 2-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015585006
• Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th Edition). McGraw- Hill Companies.
• Godaert, E., Aesaert, K., Voogt, J. & van Braak, J. (2022). Assessment of students’ digital competences in primary school: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 9953–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11020-9
• Grimberg, B. I., Williamson, K. & Key, J. S. (2019). Facilitating scientific engagement through a science-art festival. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 9(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1571648
• Gurkan, B. & Doganay, A. (2020). Factors affecting citizenship education according to perceptions and experiences of secondary-school teachers. Turkish Journal of Education, 9(2), 106-133. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.592720
• Hol, D. & Kasimi, Y. (2022). A growing dilemma: English speaking anxiety in EFL classrooms: A review of research. Rumeli Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 28, 421- 438.
• Hubbard, J., Russo, J. & Livy, S. (2022). Assessing mathematical competence through challenging tasks. In N. Fitzallen, C. Murphy, V. Hatisaru, & N. Maher (Eds.), Mathematical confluences and journeys —Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group (pp. 282‒289). MERGA.
• Idema, J. & Patrick, P. G. (2019). Experiential learning theory: Identifying the impact of an ocean science festival on family members and defining characteristics of successful activities. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 9(3), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1614238
• Isiklar, S. & Abali-Ozturk, Y. (2022). The effect of philosophy for children (P4C) curriculum on critical thinking through philosophical inquiry and problem solving skills. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(1), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.942575
• Jensen, E. & Buckley, N. (2014). Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations, and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research. Public Understanding of Science, 23(5), 557-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512458624
• Karagoz, Y. (2017). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı nitel-nicel-karma bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayın etiği [SPSS and AMOS applied qualitative-quantitative-mixed scientific research methods and publication ethics]. Nobel Publishing.
• Kececi, G. (2017). The aims and learning attainments of secondary and high school students attending science festivals: A case study. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(23), 1146- 1153.
• Keskin, E., Karagolge, Z. & Ceyhun, İ. (2019). Identifying the effects of science festivals on students’ attitudes towards science courses and projects. e-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.596585
• Kim, H. J. & Chung, J. Y. (2020). Factors affecting youth citizenship in accordance with socioeconomic background. Children and Youth Services Review, 111, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104847
• Kizilay, E., Yamak, H. & Kavak, N. (2019). STEM career preferences of the Anatolian high school students from different socioeconomic levels. Journal of Educational Issues, 5(2), 58-72.
• Klieme, E., Hartig, J. & Rauch, D. (2008). The concept of competence in educational contexts. In J. Hartig, E. Klieme, & D. Leutner (Eds.) Assessment of competencies in educational contexts (pp. 3-22). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
• Koc, C. & Bahadir, S. (2022). On birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin felsefe dersine yönelik tutumları ve öğretmenlerin aynasından öğrencilere bir bakış [Eleventh-grade students’ attitudes towards philosophy class and a look at students from the mirror of teachers]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 64, 612-645. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1116710
• Kricorian, K., Seu, M., Lopez, D., Ureta, E. & Equils, O. (2020). Factors influencing participation of underrepresented students in STEM fields: matched mentors and mindsets. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(16), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00219-2
• Lozano, R., Merrill, M.Y., Sammalisto, K., Ceulemans, K. & Lozano, F. (2017). Connecting competences and pedagogical approaches for sustainable development in higher education: A literature review and framework proposal. Sustainability, 9(10), 1-15. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1889/pdf Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). 3-8. Sınıflar fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [3-8. Grades Science Lesson Curriculum].
• National Research Council. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Washington: National Academies Press.
• OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Vol. 1. The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
• Ogegbo, A. A., Akinrinola, F. Y., Adegoke, O., Ifekoya, K. & Namusoke, J. (2022). Assessment of female university students’ digital comepetence: Potential implications for higher education in Africa. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(3), 98-109.
• Osakede, U. A., Lawanson, A. O. & Sobowale, D. A. (2017). Entrepreneurial interest and academic performance in Nigeria: Evidence from undergraduate students in the University of Ibadan. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(19), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0079-7
• Oz Dom, O. & Bingol, Y. (2021). Political participation of youth in Turkey: Social media as a motivation. Journal of Human and Social Science Researches, 10(1), 605-625.
• Pines, A. M., Lerner, M. & Schwartz, D. (2012). Gender differences among social vs. business entrepreneurs. In T. Burger-Helmchen (Ed.). Entrepreneurship: Gender, geographics and social context (pp.3-14). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/2277
• Rafanan, R. J. L., Guzman, C. Y. & Rogayan, D. V. (2020). Pursuing STEM careers: Perspectives of senior high school students. Participatory Educational Research, 7(3), 38-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.20.34.7.3 Riasati, M. J. (2018). Willingness to speak English among foreign language learners: A causal model. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1455332
• Ro, H. K., Fernandez, F. & Alcott, B. (2021). Social class, human capital, and enrollment in STEM subjects at prestigious universities: The case of England. Educational Policy, 35(3), 422-449 https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818813305
• Sahin, A. & Waxman, H. C. (2021). Factors affecting high school students’ Stem career interest: Findings from a 4-year study. Journal of STEM Education, 22(3), 5-19.
• Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Vanous, S. & Posavac, S. S. (2005). The multiple roles of attitudes in decision making. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.). The routines of decision making (pp.101-116). Psychology Press.
• Schmidt, K. M. & Kelter, P. (2017). Science fairs: A qualitative study of their impact on student science inquiry learning and attitudes toward STEM. Science Educator, 25(2), 126-132.
• Sharpe, D. (2015). Chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what?. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.7275/tbfa-x148
• Silva-Quiroz, J. & Morales-Morgado, E. M. (2022). Assessing digital competence and its relationship with the socioeconomic level of Chilean university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00346-6
• Simovic, V., Domazet, I., Bugarcic, M., Safi, M., Sarhan, H., Bhagat, R. & Martinovic, A. B. (2023). The association of socio-demographic characteristics of university students and the levels of their digital entrepreneurial competences, Heliyon, 9(10), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20897
• Slogar, H., Stanić, N. & Jerin, K. (2021). Self-assessment of entrepreneurial competencies of students. Zbornik Veleučilišta u Rijeci, 9(1), 79-95.
• Solek-Borowska, C. & Chudy-Laskowska, K. (2018). Assessing entrepreneurial attitudes and skills of students. Modern Management Review, 23(25), 185-203.
• Sovansophal, K. (2019). Family socioeconomic status and students’ choice of STEM majors: Evidence from higher education of Cambodia. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 22(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-03-2019-0025
• Taha, K. A. S., Ramlan, S. N. & Noor, I. M. (2017). The factors affecting entrepreneurial intentions of university students in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Technoentrepreneurship, 7(2), 189-202.
• Tisza, G., Papavlasopoulou, S., Christidou, D., Voulgari, I., Livari, N., Giannakos, M. N., Kinnula, M. & Markopoulos, P. (2019). The role of age and gender on implementing informal and non-formal science learning activities for children. Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe Conference, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335065
• Tiwari, P., Bhat, A. K., Tikoria, J. & Saha, K. (2020). Exploring the factors responsible in predicting entrepreneurial intention among nascent entrepreneurs: A field research. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-05-2018-0054
• United Nations General Assembly. (2015, October 21). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. refworld. https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html
• UNESCO (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://stairwaytosdg.eu/images/UNESCO_Education_for_Sustainable_Development_Goals_ENG.pdf
• UNESCO (2022). Making lifelong learning a reality: A handbook. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
• Vajak, M., Izadpanah, S. & Naserian, J. (2021). The assessment of intercultural competence in Iranian EFL and Non-EFL learners: Knowledge, skill, awareness, and attitude. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1936885
• van den Berg, H. (2019). Factors affecting cultural participation among children. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Utrecht University.
• Varadi, J. & Jozsa, G. (2023). Factors affecting attendance of and attitudes towards artistic events among primary school children. Social Sciences, 12(404), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070404 Weber, K. & Custer, R. (2005). Gender-based preferences toward technology education content, activities, and instructional methods. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2), 55-71.
• Wharton, N. P. (2019). The impact of a science fair on high school students’ feelings of self-efficacy in STEM. [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina]. University Libraries: University of South Carolina. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5129.
• Yilmaz-Ince, E., Kabul, A. & Diler, I. (2022). The effect of science festival on participants’ attitudes towards science. Journal of STEAM Education, 5(1), 88-99.
• Yordanova, D. I. & Tarrazon, M. A. (2010). Gender differences in entrepreneurial intentions: Evidence from Bulgaria. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 15(3), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946710001543