ANLAMIN DİJİTALLEŞTİRİLMESİ: YAPAY ZEKANIN BEŞERI BİLİMLERDEKİ DÖNÜŞTÜRÜCÜ ROLÜ

Öz

Bu çalışma, yapay zekanın (YZ) beşeri bilimlerdeki epistemolojik dönüşümünü disiplinler arası bir perspektifle ele almaktadır. Edebiyat, tarih, din ve felsefe gibi temel beşeri disiplinler, YZ teknolojilerinin gelişimiyle birlikte yalnızca araştırma teknikleri bakımından değil, anlam üretim süreçleri açısından da önemli bir dönüşüm geçirmiştir. Çalışma, bu dönüşümü hermeneutik, fenomenolojik ve posthümanist teorik yaklaşımlar ekseninde tartışmakta; YZ’nin bilgi üretimi, metin yorumu, etik ve öznellik konularındaki etkisini sorgulamaktadır. Eleştirel inceleme ve içerik analizi yöntemleriyle yapılandırılan bu araştırma, YZ’nin geleneksel epistemolojik yapılarla girdiği gerilimi ve bu gerilimden doğan yeni bilgi rejimlerini analiz etmektedir. Sonuçlar, YZ’nin tamamlayıcı fakat ikame edici olmayan bir rol oynadığını, beşeri yorumlama biçimlerinin yerini alamasa da onları dönüştürdüğünü göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay Zeka
• Beşeri Bilimler
• Hermeneutik
• Fenomenoloji
• Posthümanizm
• Anlam Üretimi
• Epistemoloji

THE DIGITALIZATION OF MEANING: THE TRANSFORMATIVE ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE HUMANITIES

Öz

This study explores the epistemological transformation induced by artificial intelligence (AI) within the humanities from an interdisciplinary perspective. Core disciplines such as literature, history, religion, and philosophy have undergone significant changes not only in terms of research methods but also in meaning-making processes, driven by the advancement of AI technologies. The paper engages with these transformations through the theoretical lenses of hermeneutics, phenomenology, and posthumanism, critically examining the role of AI in knowledge production, text interpretation, ethics, and subjectivity. Structured through critical review and content analysis, the research investigates the epistemic tensions arising from AI’s interaction with traditional interpretative frameworks. Findings indicate that AI functions as a complementary, though not substitutive, actor in the humanities - transforming, rather than replacing, human-centered approaches to meaning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial Intelligence
• Humanities
• Hermeneutics
• Phenomenology
• Posthumanism
• Meaning-Making
• Epistemology

Kaynakça

1. Afzaal, M., Ahmad, S., Imran, M., & Xiangtao, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence, context, and meaning making in language: A rationalization approach. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(3), 115-122.
2. Aksan, D. (2014). Her yönüyle dil: Ana çizgileriyle dilbilim (5. baskı). Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
3. Åsberg, C., & Braidotti, R. (2018). Feminist posthumanities: An introduction. A feminist companion to the posthumanities, 1-22.
4. Asian Research Center. (2024). AI and religious ethics: Challenges and opportunities. https://www.asianresearchcenter.org/ai-and-religion
5. Aykıt, M. A. (2024). İslam Felsefesi Alanında Yapay Zeka Modellerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Chatgpt–Google Bard. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 24(3), 92-115.
6. BBVA. (2018, November 6). Artificial intelligence has made its way to literature. https://www.bbva.com/en/artificial-intelligence-made-way-literature/
7. Beavers, A. F. (2008). Phenomenology and artificial intelligence. Minds and Machines, 18(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-008-9094-8
8. Beyer, C. (2010). Edmund husserl. In The Routledge Companion to nineteenth Century Philosophy (pp. 887-909). Routledge.

9. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
10. Bringsjord, S. (2018). Artificial intelligence. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2018 ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artificial-intelligence/
11. Bringsjord, S., & Ferrucci, D. (2000). Artificial intelligence and literary creativity: Inside the mind of Brutus, a storytelling machine. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Brown, T. (2023, April 25). With artificial intelligence, philosophy of mind has become an experimental science. Medium. https://medium.com/machine-cognition/with-artificial-intelligence-philosophy-of-mind-has-become-an-experimental-science-e0b79dc6601a
13. Catholic Insight. (2024). AI and religion: Ethical considerations for faith communities. https://catholicinsight.com/ai-and-religion/
14. Chicago Booth Review. (2024). How automation impacts religious belief: A global study. https://www.chicagobooth.edu/review/how-automation-impacts-religion
15. Christensen, M., Welch, A., & Barr, J. (2017). Husserlian descriptive phenomenology: A review of intentionality, reduction and the natural attitude. Journal of nursing education and practice, 7(8), 113-118.
16. Cündioğlu, D. (2014). Kur'an'ı Anlama'nın Anlamı: Hermenötik Bir Deneyim (I). Kapı.
17. Çebi, S. S. (2011). Antik Yunan'da ve Modern Batı Toplumlarında Hukuk ve Bilime Eleştirel Bir Bakış. HFSA, 2390.
18. Daston, L. (2017). The history of science and the history of knowledge. KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge, 1(1), 131-154.
19. Deng, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence in the rising wave of deep learning: The historical path and future outlook [perspectives]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(1), 180-177.
20. European Now Journal. (2021). Re-thinking “human-centric” AI: An introduction to posthumanist critique. https://www.europeannowjournal.org/2021/03/10/re-thinking-human-centric-ai-an-introduction-to-posthumanist-critique/
21. Felicelli, A. (2023, December 31). As a writer I don’t despair about AI -it can’t replicate our imaginations. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-12-31/ai-books-writers-literature-robots-novels-lawsuits
22. Floridi, L., Burr, C., & Helbing, D. (Eds.). (2021). Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Springer. Freedomlab. (2023). Are we heading towards post-human intelligence? https://freedomlab.com/are-we-heading-towards-post-human-intelligence/
23. Gadamer, H. G. (1977). Philosophical hermeneutics. Univ of California Press.
24. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed.). Continuum.
25. Gamez, D. (2021). The effects of implementing phenomenology in a deep neural network. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 6714092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.6714092
26. Gouveia, S. S., & Pereira, A. (2024). Phenomenology and artificial intelligence: Introductory notes. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-024-09963-7
27. Guvvala, S. (2023, October 11). Evolution of AI-generated poetry and literature. Analytics Vidhya. https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2023/10/ai-generated-poetry-and-literature/
28. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
29. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. Harper & Row.
30. Hoeckel, B. (2023, April 11). How AI is helping historians better understand our past. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/04/11/1071104/ai-helping-historians-analyze-past/
31. Hooke, J. D. F., & McGrath, S. J. (Eds.). (2024). The hermeneutics of artificial intelligence. Springer.
32. Husserl, E. (2012). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W. R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1913)
33. Kansteiner, W. (2022). Digital doping: AI and the future of historical research. History and Theory, 61(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12254
34. Kharis Publishing. (2023). AI’s role in shaping modern literature. https://kharispublishing.com/kp/exploring-the-impact-of-ai-on-literature/
35. Leetaru, K. (2019, April 16). Could AI help us better understand history? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2019/04/16/could-ai-help-us-better-understand-history/
36. Lu, C. A. (2025). Tracing the Evolution of Artificial Intelligence Education at Stanford University. TechTrends, 1-7.
37. Manna, R. (2021). From posthumanism to ethics of artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 36(4), 1275–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01173-7
38. Mellamphy, N. (2021). Re-thinking “human-centric” AI: An introduction to posthumanist critique. European Now Journal. https://www.europeannowjournal.org/2021/03/10/re-thinking-human-centric-ai-an-introduction-to-posthumanist-critique/
39. Moretti, F. (2000). Conjectures on world literature. New Left Review, 1, 54–68.
40. Moretti, F. (2007). Graphs, maps, trees: Abstract models for literary history. Verso.
41. Muggleton, S. (2014). Alan Turing and the development of Artificial Intelligence. AI communications, 27(1), 3-10. Nagel, T. (1974). What Is It Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.
42. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. (2023). Phenomenology and artificial intelligence bridges [Special issue]. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.
43. Proceedings of the 35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. (2024). Emotional hermeneutics: Exploring the limits of artificial intelligence from a Diltheyan perspective. ACM.
44. Schrage, M., & Kiron, D. (2025). Philosophy has been and should be integral to AI. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/philosophy-has-been-and-should-be-integral-to-ai/
45. Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–457.
46. Shults, F. L., Gore, R., Wildman, W. J., Lynch, C. J., & Toerien, D. (2017). The simulation of religious culture: An introduction to agent-based modeling of religious sociality. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 27(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2017.1285555
47. Vestrucci, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and the Experience of Meaning: A Theological Reflection. Theology and Science, 20(1), 65–78.
48. Wilstrup, D. (2023). Turning consciousness into a testable theory with AI. Medium. https://medium.com/machine-cognition/with-artificial-intelligence-philosophy-of-mind-has-become-an-experimental-science-e0b79dc6601a
49. Wyre, K. (2024). Exploring the connection of philosophy and artificial intelligence. American Public University. https://www.apu.apus.edu/area-of-study/arts-and-humanities/resources/exploring-the-connection-of-philosophy-and-artificial-intelligence/
50. Zhu, J., & Harrell, D. F. (2009). The artificial intelligence (AI) hermeneutic network: Toward an approach to analysis and design of intentional systems. Digital Humanities Conference, 123–130.