BİR ULUSLARARASI HUKUK MÜESSESESİ OLARAK ULUSLARARASI ÖRGÜTLER ARASINDA ARDILLIK

Öz

Uluslararası örgütler hukukunun en önemli merak uyandıran alanlarından biri devletler arasındaki ardıllık olmaktadır. Devletlerle mukayese edilirken her ne kadar hukuk kişiliklerinin tanınması yeni bir fenomen olsa da uluslararası örgütlerin uluslararası hukuk düzleminde sınırlı faaliyet ve hizmet görmeleri söz konusudur. Bunu yaparken de, uluslararası hukuku kullanmakta ve bu alışve-rişin bir sonucu olarak aralarında devletlerin ardıllığı kuralları da dâhil olmak üzere uluslararası hukuk kurallarının ihtiyaç ve yeteneklerine hizmet edecek şekilde uyarlanmaları gerekmektedir. Çok karmaşık yapısı sebebiyle devlet ardıllığı uluslararası hukukun en belirsiz alanı olarak mütalâa edilmektedir. Böylelikle, bu kadar karmaşık bir alanı özünde çok geniş bir çalışmayı zarurî kılan bir başka alana taşımanın çok zor bir iş olduğu farz edilebilecektir. Ancak, bu kısa makalede bu denli geniş bir çalışma söz konusu edilmeyecektir. Bu bağ-lamda, bu kısa çalışmada bizim amacımız sadece uluslararası örgütler arasında ardıllığın var olduğunun ve uluslararası örgütler hukukunun bir konusu olarak tanınması için kısaca içeriğinin ve hukukî statüsünün ortaya konulmasından ibarettir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Devletlerin Ardıllığı
• Hükûmetler Arası Örgütler
• Uluslararası Örgütler Arasında Ardıllık
• Birleşmiş Milletler
• Uluslararası Örgütlerin Dağılması

Kaynakça

1. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan F.: Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations, 2nd Edition, Cambridge, 2005.
2. Bal, Ali: Uluslararası Hava Hukuku: Hava Sahasının Hukukî Rejimi, Ankara 2019.
3. Berkov, The World Health Organization: A Study in Decentralized International Administration, Genève, 1957.
4. Bernardez, Santiago Torres: “Succession of States”, in International Law: Achievements and Prospects, edited by Bedjaoui, Paris, 1991, s. 381-404.
5. Bettati, Mario: “Création et personnalité juridique des organisations internationales”, in A Handbook on International Organizations/Manuel sur les organisations internationales, edited by Dupuy, Dordrecht, 1988, s. 33-60.
6. Boczek, Boleslaw Adam: The A to Z of International Law, Lanham, 2010.
7. Bokor-Szegö, Hanna: “Identity and Succession of States in Modern International Law”, in Questions of International Law: Hungarian Perspectives, edited by Haratszi, Translated by Decsényi & Simon, Budapest, 1986, s. 15-41.
8. Bühler, Konrad G.: “State Succession, Identity/Continuity and Membership in the United Nations”, in La succession d’états: la codification à l’épreuve des faits/State Succession: Codification Tested againts the Facts, edited by Eisemann & Koskenniemi, The Hague, 2000, s. 187-326.

9. Bühler, Konrad G.: State Succession and Membership in International Organizations: Legal Theories versus Political Pragmatism, The Hague, 2001.
10. Caflisch, Lucius C.: “The Law of State Succession: Theoretical Observations”, Netherlands International Law Review, vol. 10/4, 1963, s. 337-366.
11. Castrén, Erik: “On State Succession in Practice and Theory”, Nordisk Tidsskrift International Ret, vol. 24, 1954, s. 55-75.
12. Cervera Vallterra, María: “La disolución de la Comunidad Europea del Carbón y del Acero: estado actual”, Revista de derecho Commutaria Europea, no: 12, 2002, s. 393-432.
13. Chiu, Hungdah: “Succession in International Organisations”, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 14/1, 1965, s. 83-120.
14. Cowger, Alfred R. Jr.: “Rights and Obligations of Successor States: An Alternative Theory”, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, vol. 17/2, 1985, s. 385-314.
15. Crawford, James: “The Contribution of Professor D.P. O’Connell to the Discipline of International Law”, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 51, 1980, s. 1-87.
16. Çamyamaç, Anıl: “Dünya Turizm Örgütü”, İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8, Sayı: 2, 2017, s. 159-186.
17. Çamyamaç, Anıl: “Uluslararası Hukukta Elçilik Binalarına Dair Bazı Teknik Konular Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Terazi (Aylık Hukuk Dersleri), Cilt: 13 Sayı: 145, 2018, s. 73-92.
18. Çamyamaç, Anıl: “Avrupa Birliği’nde Ayrılıkçı Hareketler ve Olası Hukukî Sonuçları Hakkında”, in Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinde Ayrılıkçı Hareketler: Katalonya, Bask Bölgesi, Kuzey İrlanda, İskoçya, Flaman Bölgesi ve Kuzey İtalya, edited by Yıldız, Ankara 2020, s. 7-38.
19. Degan, Vladimir-Djuro: “State Succession”, Finnish Yearbook of International Law, vol. 4, 1993, s. 130-193.
20. Delupis, di Ingrid Doimi: The East African Community and Common Market, London, 1970.
21. Eisemann, Pierre Michel & Koskenniemi, Martti (eds.): La succession d’états: la codification à l’épreuve des faits/State Succession: Codification Tested against the Facts, The Hague, 2000. Elias, Taslim O.: The International Court of Justice and Some Contemporary Problems: Essays on International Law, The Hague, 1983.
22. Fiedler, Wilfried: “Continuinty”, Encyclopedia of Public International Law: States-Responsibility of States-International Law and Municipal Law, vol. 10, edited by Bernhardt, Amsterdam, 1987, s. 65-68.
23. Fiedler, Wilfried: “State Succession”, Encyclopedia of Public International Law: States-Responsibility of States-International Law and Municipal Law, vol. 10, edited by Bernhardt, Amsterdam, 1987, s. 446-456.
24. Fitzmaurice, Gerald Gray: “The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: International Organizations and Tribunals”, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 29, 1952, s. 1-62.
25. Gebeyehu, Alemnew: “Dissolution and Succession of International Organizations”, Journal of Research in Humanities & Social Sciences, vol. 17/1, 2017, s. 83-89.
26. González-Campos, D. Julio: “Notas sobre la practica de las organizaciones internacionales respecto a los efectos de la sucesión de Estados en el estatuto de miembro de la organizacion”, Revista Espanola de derecho internacional, vol. 15/3, 1962, s. 465-508.
27. Goodman, Neville M.: International Health Organizations, 2nd Edition, Aylesbury, 1971.
28. Green, Leslie C.: “The Dissolution of States and Membership of the United Nations”, Saskatchewan Law Review, vol. 32/2, 1967, s. 93-112.
29. Grotius, Hugo: De jure belli ac pais, Translated by Kelsey, Oxford, 1925.
30. Hahn, Hugo J.: “Continuity in the Law of International Organization”, Duke Law Journal, vol. 1962/2, 1962, s. 379-422. (HAHN, 1962 (I))
31. Hahn, Hugo J.: “Continuity in the Law of International Organization. Part Two: Continuity from OEEC to OECD”, Duke Law Journal, vol. 1962/4, 1962, s. 522-557. (HAHN, 1962 (II))
32. Hahn, Hugo J.: “La reconstitution de l’O.E.C.E. at sa continuation dans l’O.C.D.E.”, Annuaire français de droit international, vol. 8, 1962, s. 751-762.
33. Hahn, Hugo J., “Constitutional Limitations in the Law of the European Organisations”, Recueil des cours, vol. 108, 1963-I, 1963, s. 189-306.
34. Hahn, Hugo J.: “International Organizations, Succession”, Encyclopedia of Public International Law: International Organizations in General-Universal International Organizations and Cooperations, vol. 5, edited by Bernhardt, Amsterdam, 1983, s. 166-168.
35. Hershey, Amos S.: “The Succession of States”, American Journal of International Law, vol. 5/2, 1911, s. 285-297.
36. Hudson, Manley O.: “The Succession of the International Court of Justice to the Permanent Court of International Justice”, American Journal of International Law, vol. 51/3, 1957, s. 569-573.
37. Ingravallo, Ivan: “Handle with Care! The Succession between International Organizations”, in Evolutions in the Law of International Organizations, edited by Virzo & Ingravallo, Leiden, 2015, s. 451-467.
38. Kiss, Alexander-Charles: “Quelques aspects de la subsitution d’une organisation internationale a une autre”, Annuaire français de droit international, vol. 7, 1961, s. 463-491.
39. Klabbers, Jan: An Introduction to International Institutional Law, Cambridge, 2002.
40. Klein, Eckart: “South West Africa/Namibia (Advisory Opinions and Judgments)”, Encyclopedia of Public International Law: Decisions of International Courts and Tribunals and International Arbitrations, vol. 2, edited by Bernhardt, Amsterdam, 1981, s. 260-270.
41. Koskenniemi, Martti: “Report of the Director of the English Speaking Section of the Sector”, in La succession d’états: la codification à l’épreuve des faits/State Succession: Codification Tested against the Facts, edited by Eisemann & Koskenniemi, The Hague, 2000, s. 65-132.
42. Kunz, Josef L.: “The Bogota Charter of the Organization of American States”, American Journal of International Law, vol. 42/3, 1948, s. 568-589.
43. Linares, Antonio: “La sucesión de estados”, Boletin de la academia de ciencas, politicos y sociales, vol. 32/47, 1971, s. 73-82.
44. Lyall, Francis: “INMARSAT”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, on-line edition, edited by Wolfrum, November 2006 via https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e468 (son ziyaret tarihi: 01/07/17).
45. Maluwa, Tijana: “From the Organisation of African Unity to the African Union: Rethinking the Framework for Inter-State Cooperation in Africa in the Era of Globalisation”, University of Botswana Law Journal, vol. 5/6, 2007, s. 5-47.
46. Marek, Krystna: Identity and Continuity of States in Public International Law, Genève, 1968.
47. McKinnon Wood, H.: “The Dissolution of the League of Nations”, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 23, 1946, s. 317-323.
48. Mensah, Thomas A.: “International Maritime Organization (IMO)”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, on-line edition, edited by Wolfrum, April 2011 via https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e491 (son ziyaret tarihi: 01/07/17).
49. Meray, Seha L.: Devletler Hukukuna Giriş, Cilt I, Gözden Geçirilmiş 2. Baskı, Ankara 1960.
50. Meray, Seha L.: Devletler Hukukuna Giriş, Cilt II, Ankara, …
51. Mochi-Onory, Andrea G.: “The Nature of Succession between International Organizations: Functions and Treaties”, Revue héllenique de droit international, vol. 21/1, 1968, s. 33-48.
52. Müllerson, Rein: “The Continuity and Succession of States, by Reference to the Former USSR and Yugoslavia”, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 42/3, 1993, s. 473-493.
53. Myers, Denys P.: “Liquidation of League of Nations Functions”, American Journal of International Law, vol. 42/2, 1948, s. 320-354.
54. Myers, Patrick R.: Succession between International Organizations, London, 1993.
55. Nogovitsyna, Yulina: “An Alternative Look at State Succession”, Polish Yearbook of International Law, vol. 26, 2002/3, s. 175-186.
56. O’Connell, Daniel Patrick: The Law of State Succession, Cambridge, 1956.
57. O’Connell, Daniel Patrick: International Law, vol. I, 2nd Edition, London, 1970.
58. Oppenheim, Lassa: International Law: A Treatise, vol. I (Peace), London, 1912.
59. Pazarcı, Hüseyin: Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, III. Kitap, Gözden Geçirilmiş 3. Baskı, Ankara 1999.
60. Pazarcı, Hüseyin: Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, IV. Kitap, Gözden Geçirilmiş 3. Bası, Ankara 2016.
61. Pazartzis, Photini: “State Succession to Multilateral Treaties: Recent Developments”, Austrian Review of International & European Law, vol. 3, 1998, s. 397-415.
62. Rembe, Nasila S.: “The Vienna Convention on State Succession in Respect of Treaties: An African Perspective on Its Applicability and Limitations”, Comparative & International Law Journal of Southern Africa, vol. 17, 1984, s. 131-143.
63. Reuterswärd, Reinhold: “The Legal Nature of International Organizations”, Nordisk Tidsskrift International Ret, vol. 49, 1989, s. 14-30.
64. Ribbelink, Olivier Menno: “On the Uniting of States in Respect of Treaties”, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol. 26, 1995, s. 139-169.
65. Sands, Philippe & Klein, Pierre: Bowett’s Law of International Institutions, 5th Edition, London, 2001.
66. Schachter, Oscar: “State Succession: The Once and Future Law”, Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 33/2, 1993, s. 253-260.
67. Schermers, Henry G.: “Succession of States and International Organizations”, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol. 6, 1975, s. 103-119.
68. Schermers, Henry G.: “Besprechungen: PATRICK R. MYERS: Succession between International Organizations. A Publication of the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva. 1993. 185p.”, Archiv des Völkerrechts, vol. 35/3, 1997, s. 332-334.
69. Schermers, Henry G. & Blokker, Niels M.: International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity, 6th Revised Edition, Leiden, 2018.
70. Schiavone, Giuseppe: International Organizations: A Dictionary and Directory, 7th Edition, New York, 2008.
71. Schmalenbach, Kirsten: “International Organizations of Institutions, Succession”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, on-line edition, edited by Wolfrum, 2011 via www.mpepil.com (son ziyaret tarihi: 25/10/11).
72. Schneider, Johannes Wilhelmus: Treaty-Making Power of International Organizations, Genève, 1963.
73. Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz: Corporations in and under International Law, Cambridge, 1987.
74. Shaw, Malcolm N.: “State Succession Revisited”, Finnish Yearbook of International Law, vol. 5, 1994, s. 34-98.
75. Simmonds, Keith R.: “International Maritime Organization”, Encyclopedia of Public International Law: International Organizations in General-Universal International Organizations and Cooperation, vol. 5, edited by Bernhardt, Amsterdam, 1983, s. 104-108.
76. Sur, Melda: Uluslararası Hukukun Esasları, Gözden Geçirilmiş 14. Baskı, İstanbul 2020.
77. Szafarz, Renata: “Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties: A General Analysis”, Polish Yearbook of International Law, vol. 10, 1980, s. 77-113.
78. Teles, Miguel Galvão: “State Succession and Treaty Survival between the Predecessor State and the Other State Party”, South African Yearbook of International Law, vol. 36, 2011, s. 1-36.
79. Torrecuadrada García-Lozano, Soledad: “La sucesión entre organizaciones internationales y la Unión Europea”, Anuario de derecho internacional, vol. 21, 2005, s. 227-271.
80. Ubertazzi, Benedetta: “The End of the ECSC”, European Integration Online Papers, vol. 8/20, 2004 via http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-020a.htm (son ziyaret tarihi: 18/03/20).
81. Vagts, Detlev F.: “State Succession: The Codifiers’ View”, Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 33/2, 1993, s. 275-297.
82. Verzijl, Jan Hendrik Willem: International Law in Historical Perspective: State Succession, vol. VII, Leyden, 1974.
83. Virally, Michel: “Definition and Classification: A Legal Approach”, International Social Science, vol. 29/1, 1977, s. 58-72.
84. Vrancken, Patrick: “The World Tourism Organisation”, South African Yearbook of International Law, vol. 24, 1999, s. 231-245.
85. Wessel, Ramsey A.: “Dissolution and Succession: The Transmigration of the Soul of International Organizations”, in Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations, edited by Klabbers & Wallendahl, Surrey, 2011, s. 342-362.
86. Zimmermann, Andreas: “State Succession in Treaties”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, on-line edition, edited by Wolfrum, November 2006 via https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/ law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1109 (son ziyaret tarihi: 01/07/17).
87. Zimmermann, Andreas: “State Succession in Other Matters than Treaties”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, on-line edition, edited by Wolfrum, April 2007 via https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/ 10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1108 (son ziyaret tarihi: 01/07/17).
88. Zimmermann, Andreas: “Continuity of States”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, on-line edition, edited by Wolfrum, 2010 via www.mpepil.com (son ziyaret tarihi: 04/10/10).