Besin Güvenliği Konusunda Bilgisayar Destekli Eğitim İle Klasik Eğitimin Karşılaştırılması

Öz

Giriş: Okul hemşireleri sağlığı geliştirici eğitimin ayrılmaz parçasıdırlar ve bilgisayarları bu amaçla kullanabilirler. Amaç: Araştırma besin güvenliği ve besinlerle bulaşan hastalıklardan korunmaya ilişkin ilköğretime yönelik hazırlanan interaktif eğitim CD’ sinin klasik yönteme göre etkisini karşılaştırmak üzere uygulanmış yarı deneysel bir alan çalışmasıdır. Yöntem: İzmir ilinde amaca uygun örneklem yöntemi ile seçilmiş bir ilkokulda, altıncı sınıfta okuyan 75 öğrenci araştırmanın örneklemini oluşturmuştur. Çalışmada öntest sontest kontrol gruplu desen kullanılmıştır. İkişer şube deney ve kontrol grubuna yansız olarak atanmıştır. Eğitim süresi her iki grupta 45’ er dakikadır. Gruplardaki bilgi – davranış - geribildirim puan ortalamaları farklarını belirlemek üzere pre-test, post-testler değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Deney ve kontrol grubundaki öğrencilerin bilgi-davranış puan ortalamaları arasında uygulanan tekrarlı ölçümlerde iki yönlü varyans analizinde fark istatistiksel olarak anlamsızdır (p>0,05). Eğitime yönelik geribildirim puan ortalamaları deney grubunda 87,2 ± 11,38, kontrol grubunda 83,9 ± 12,17 saptanmıştır ( t: 1,237, p> 0.05). Sonuç: Sağlık eğitim CD’ si besin güvenliği eğitiminde ilköğretim öğrencilerinde kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilgisayar destekli sağlık eğitimi, Bilgisayara dayalı besin güvenliği eğitimi, Okul hemşiresi, Sağlık eğitimi

The Comparison Between Computer-Based Education And Traditional Education Methods In Food Safety

Öz

Introduction: School nurses are the unsepareted components of the health promotion education programs and they can use computers for this goal. Aim: This research is a half-experimental study and carried out for comparing the effectiveness of the health education CD that was prepared for primary school students about food safety and prevention from food-related illnesses with traditional education methods. Method: Research sample was used by purposeful sampling at 75 primary school student in İzmir. Two each grade assigned experimental and control group neutrally. Pre-test, post-test control group design was used in study. Education period was 45 minutes for each group. In order to determine of the knowledge-behaviour the difference student achievement between the groups pre-test, post-test results was evaluated. Results: The mean score between experiment and control groups students knowledge and behaviour data were analyzed using by two factor repeated measures ANOVA and the significant differences were not found between the groups (p > 0.05). The mean of the results about student’s education feedback of the experiment and the control group is 87.2 ± 11.38 for experiment group and 83.9 ± 12.17 for control group (t: 1,237, p > 0.05). Conclusion: Health education CD can be an alternative for traditional education method in food safety education

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Computer based health education, Computer based food safety education, School nurse and computer based health education

Kaynakça

1. Block, G., Miller, M., Harnack, L., Kayman, M. S., & Cristofar, S. (2000). An interactive Cd-rom for nutrition screening and counseling. American Journal of Public Health, May, (90)5, 781-785.
2. Borup, I.K., (2002). The school health nurse’s assessment of a successful health dialogue. Health and Social Care in the Community, 10(1), 10-19.
3. Bosworth, K., Espelage, D., DuBay, T., Dahlberg, L. L., & Daytner, G. (1996). Using multimedia to teach conflict- resolution skills to young adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12(Suppl. 5), 65-74.
4. Beasley, N., Smyth, K. (2014). Expected and actual student use of an online learning environment : a critical analysis. J Electr e-Learning, 2, 43-50.
5. Beffa-Negrini, P.A., Cohen, N.L., Miller, B. (2012). Strategies to motivate students in online learning environments. J Nutr Educ Behav, 34(6), 334-40.
6. Buller, M., Kane, I.L, Martin, R.C. (2008). Randomize trial evaluating computer based sun safety education for children in elemantary school. Journal of Cancer Education, 23,74-79.
7. Bynum, A.B., Cranford, C.O., Irwin, C.A., Denny. (2002). Participation satisfaction with a school telehealth education program using interactive compressed video delivery methods in rural arkansas. The Journal of School Health , 72(6), 235-242.
8. Cowel, J.M. (2012). The future of nursing and school nursing. The journal of school nursing, 28, 88.

9. Conrick, M. (1998). Computer based education more than just a package, AEJNE, 4(1), October.
10. Cremers, H.P., Mercken, L., Oenema, A., & Vries, H. 2012. A web – based computer tailored smoking prevention programme for primary school children: intevention design and study protocol. BMC Public Health, 12, 277.
11. Demirel, Ö., Seferoğlu, S., Yağcı, E., (2003), Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme, Pegem Yayıncılık, Ankara, 22-79, 128- 150.
12. Dorman, S.M. (1992). Evaluating computer software for the health education classroom. Journal of School Health, Jan, 62(1), 35.
13. Dorman, S.M., (1997). CD rom use in health instruction. Journal of School Health, 67 (10), 444 - 446.
14. Dockrell, S., Earle, D., Galvin, R. (2010) Computer releated posture and discomfort in primary school children: The effect of school based ergonomic intervention. Computers&Education, 55, 276-284.
15. Haapala, I., Orlofsky, C.J., Probart, C.K., et.all. (2001). Student serving it safe. an educational cd rom linking cafeteria and classroom, 2 nd Version. Interactıve Technology ın Educatıon Labaratory, University Park, PA.
16. Haapala, I., Probart, C.(2004). Food safety knowledge, perceptions and behaviors among middle school students. J Nutr Educ Behav, 36, 71-76.
17. Hamblet, M. (1994). Health education training for teachers, Health Education, 5, November, 29-33.
18. Hardin, P.C., Reis, J. (1997). Interactive multimedia software design, Health Education & Behavior, 24 (1), February, 35-53.
19. Hornung, R.L., Lennon, P.A., Garret, J.M., Devellis, R.F., Weinberg, P.D., Strecher, V.J. & (2000). Interactive Computer Technology for Skin Cancer Prevention Targeting Children, Am J Prev Med ; 18 (1).
20. Judith, B. (1994). School Nursing, Nursing Clinics of North America, 29 (3), 443 - 457.
21. Karasar, N.(1995). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, 7. Basım, Ankara, s:97.
22. Kendall, P.A., Elsbernd, A., Sinclair, K., Schroeder, M., Chen, G., Bergmann, V., Hillers, V.N., Medeiros, L.C. 2004. Observation versus self-report: validation of a consumer food behavior questionnaire. J Food Protect, 67(11),2578–86.
23. Kreisel, K. (2003). Evaluation of a computer-based nutrition education tool, Public Health Nutrition.7(2), 271-277.
24. Khanna, M.S., Kendall, P.C. (2008). Computer assited CBT for child anxiety: The coping cat CD-ROM. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 15,159-165.
25. McMahon, G. (2009). Critical thinking and ICT integration in a Western Australian secondary school. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 269–281.
26. Medeiros, L.C., Hillers, V.N., Kendall, P.A., Mason, A. (2001a). Food safety education: what should we be teaching to consumers? J Nutr Educ Behav, 33(2),109–13.
27. Özgüven, İ.E. (1998). Psikolojik Testler, PDREM Yayınları, 2.Baskı, Ankara, 83-95.
28. Park, J.H., Kim J.S. (2011). Effects of spinal health education programs for elemantary school children. Journal for specialists in Pediatric nursing, 16, 121- 129.
29. Polit, F.D. (1993). Essentials of Nursing Research, Third Edition, Lippincot, Pennsylvania, 127-154.
30. Reis J, Riley W. (2002). Assessment of a computer- supported alchool education intervention program. Health Education, 102(3), 124-132.
31. Rıza, E.T.(2003). Eğitim Teknolojisi Uygulamaları ve Materyal Geliştirme, 6. baskı, Birleşik Matbaa, İzmir, 416-425.
32. Akgün, A. (2005) Tıbbi araştırmalarda istatistiksel analiz teknikleri, SPSS uygulamaları, 3. Baskı, Emek Ofset, Ankara.
33. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2010), Healty people 2020: Food Safety, Office of Disease Washington, DC, avaliable at: http: //healty people.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overwiew.asp x?topicid (accesed 12 january 2012). Promotion
34. Whitwhead, D. (2001). Health Education, Behavioural Change and Social Psychology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34 (6), 822-832.
35. Wold, S.J., Nancy, V.D. (2001). School nursing: a framework for practice. The Journal of School Health, Oct, 71(8), 401-404.
36. Yalın, H.İ. (2000). Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme, ikinci baskı, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara,. 131-134.