THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT: AN EVALUATION IN THE CONTEXT OF DARFUR CRISIS AND LIBYA INTERVENTION

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 4 , 603 - 628 , 08.04.2018

Orkun Sürücüoğlu

https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.412249

Cited By: 1

https://izlik.org/JA68DK99EG

Öz

The international military interventions occurred in
the 1990s caused a tension between the idea of protecting human rights and the
principle of state sovereignty; and the legality of the interventions has
become controversial. The Commission (International Commission on Intervention
and State Sovereignty) that was established to form a normative consensus put
forward its views through the concept of “responsibility to protect” and these
views were upheld in the United Nations (UN) 2005 World Summit Outcome
Document. Particularly, after the military intervention in Libya in 2011, the
concept of the responsibility to protect has come to the fore again. The aim of
this study is to discuss whether the responsibility to protect has reached the
status of a legal norm. For this purpose, it will be examined why there was not
made a military intervention in Darfur but in Libya, and the deductions will be
made through this comparison. The study claims that the responsibility to
protect has not become a legal norm yet, but a moral one. The interests of
permanent members of the UN Security Council and the attitude of regional
organizations are the main factors in making a military intervention in
relevant cases. The case-based evaluations and absence of a mechanism that
would compel the states to a military intervention in necessary circumstances
seem to be the deficiencies in this context.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Responsibility to Protect , Humanitarian Intervention , ICISS , Darfur , Libya

KORUMA SORUMLULUĞU: DARFUR KRİZİ VE LİBYA MÜDAHALESİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

https://izlik.org/JA68DK99EG

Öz

1990’lı yıllarda
düzenlenen uluslararası askeri müdahaleler, insan haklarının korunması
düşüncesi ile devletin egemenliği ilkesi arasında gerilim oluşturmuş ve bu
müdahalelerin hukukiliği tartışmaya açılmıştır. Bu konuda normatif bir
konsensüs oluşturmak üzere kurulan komisyonun (International Commission on
Intervention and State Sovereignty) “koruma sorumluluğu” kavramıyla ortaya
koyduğu görüşler kimi değişikliklerle 2005 Birleşmiş Milletler (BM) Dünya
Zirvesi’nin Sonuç Bildirgesi’nde kendine yer bulmuştur. Özellikle 2011 yılında
Libya’ya yapılan askeri müdahaleden sonra uluslararası kamuoyunda koruma
sorumluluğu kavramı tekrar gündeme gelmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, koruma sorumluluğunun
hukuki bir norm statüsüne ulaşıp ulaşmadığını tartışmaktır. Bunun için
Darfur’da neden askeri müdahale yapılamayıp da Libya’da yapıldığı irdelenmekte
ve bu karşılaştırma üzerinden çıkarımlarda bulunulmaktadır. Çalışma, koruma
sorumluluğunun henüz hukuki bir norm olmadığı, ancak ahlaki bir norm olarak öne
çıktığını ileri sürmektedir. İlgili durumlarda askeri müdahalenin yapılmasında
BM Güvenlik Konseyi’nin daimi üyelerinin çıkarları ve bölgesel örgütlerin tavrı
temel etken olmaktadır. Müdahale seçeneğinin olay bazlı değerlendirme sonucunda
gündeme gelmesi ve devletleri gerektiğinde müdahaleye zorlayacak bir mekanizma
bulunmaması da bu bağlamda önemli eksiklikler olarak göze çarpmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Koruma Sorumluluğu , İnsani Müdahale , ICISS , Darfur , Libya

Kaynakça

• Afrika Birliği (2000). Afrika Birliği Kurucu Antlaşması. http://www.au.int/en/sites/default/files/ConstitutiveAct_EN.pdf, (20.05.2016).
• Afrika Birliği (2011a). 261. Barış ve Güvenlik Konseyi Toplantısının Bildirisi. http://www.peaceau.org/uploads/psc-communique-on-the-situation-in-libya.pdf, (20.05.2016).
• Afrika Birliği (2011b). 265. Barış ve Güvenlik Konseyi Toplantısının Bildirisi. http://www.au.int/en/sites/default/files/pressreleases/24210-pr-communique_en_10_march_2011_psd_the_265th_meeting_of_the_peace_and_security_council_adopted_following_decision_situation_libya.pdf, (20.05.2016).
• Akuffo, E. A. (2010). Cooperating for peace and security or competing for legitimacy in Africa? The case of the African Union in Darfur. African Security Review, 19 (4): 74-89.
• Anshan, L. (2008). China-Sudan relations: The past and present. Çin-Sudan İlişkileri Sempozyumu, 26 Temmuz 2007, Beijing, Çin. http://www.cffpa.com/pdf/CFPA_chinaweb.pdf, (20.05.2016).
• Arsava, F. (2013). Libya örneğinde insan haklarının korunması için yapılan askeri müdahale. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, 12: 81-97.
• BBC News (2006). “Sudan rejects Darfur resolution”, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5304160.stm, (20.05.2016).
• BBC News (2011). “Libya protests: Defiant Gaddafi refuses to quit”, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-12544624, (20.05.2016).
• Bellamy, A. J. (2006). Whither the responsibility to protect? Humanitarian intervention and the 2005 world summit. Ethics&International Affairs, 20 (2): 143-169.
• Bellamy, A. J. (2008). The responsibility to protect and the problem of military intervention. International Affairs, 84 (4): 615-639.
• Bellamy, A. J. (2010). The responsibility to protect-five years on. Ethics&International Affairs, 24 (2): 143-169.
• Bellamy, A. J. ve Williams, P. D. (2011). The new politics of protection? Cote d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs, 87 (4): 825-850.
• Belloni, R. (2006). The tragedy of Darfur and the limits of the ‘responsibility to protect’. Ethnopolitics, 5 (4): 327-346.
• Benjamin, D. (2010). Sudan and the resort to regional arrangements: Putting effect to the responsibility to protect?. The International Journal of Human Rights, 14 (2): 233-245.
• Birleşmiş Milletler (1999). BM Genel Sekreteri Yıllık Raporu. http://www.un.org/press/en/1999/19990920.sgsm7136.html, (04.03.2017).
• Birleşmiş Milletler (2005). 2005 Dünya Zirvesi Sonuç Bildirgesi. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/ods/A-RES-60-1-E.pdf, (20.05.2016).
• Birleşmiş Milletler (2009). BM Genel Kurulu Kararı 63/308. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/63/308, (20.05.2016).
• Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi (2006). BMGK Kararı 1706. http://www.un.org/press/en/2006/sc8821.doc.htm, (20.05.2016).
• Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi (2007). BMGK Kararı 1769. http://www.un.org/press/en/2007/sc9089.doc.htm, (20.05.2016).
• Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi (2011a). BMGK Kararı 1970. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1970(2011), (20.05.2016).
• Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi (2011b). BMGK 6498. Toplantı. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/PV.6498, (20.05.2016).
• Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi (2011c). BMGK Kararı 1973. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1973(2011), (20.05.2016).
• Cohen, R. ve Deng, F. M. (2009). Mass displacement caused by conflicts and one-sided violence: National and international responses. SIPRI (Der.) SIPRI YEARBOOK 2009: Armaments, disarmament and international security: İçinde 15-38. (İsveç: SIPRI).
• Collins, R. O. (2008). A history of modern Sudan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Condon, S. (2011). Clinton: There’s “no way” United States will take unilateral action in Libya. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/clinton-theres-no-way-united-states-will-take-unilateral-action-in-libya/ (20.05.2016).
• De Waal, A. (2007). Darfur and the failure of the responsibility to protect. International Affairs, 83 (6): 1039-1054.
• Deng, F. M. (2004). The impact of state failure on migration. Mediterranean Quarterly, 15 (4): 16-36.
• Flint, J. ve De Waal, A. (2008). Darfur: A new history of a long war. New York: Zed Books.
• Glanville, L. (2013). Intervention in Libya: From sovereign consent to regional consent. International Studies Perspectives, 14 (3): 325-342.
• Goodenough, P. (2011). Russia, China accuse west of exceeding UN resolution, making Libyan crisis worse. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/russia-china-accuse-west-exceeding-un-resolution-making-libyan-crisis-worse (20.05.2016).
• Grono, N. (2006). Briefing – Darfur: The international community’s failure to protect. African Affairs, 105 (421): 621-631.
• Grotius, H. (1967). Savaş ve barış hukuku: seçmeler. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
• Grotius, H. (2005). The rights of war and peace II. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
• Gözen Ercan, P. (2012). The responsibility to protect: An international norm?. USAK YEARBOOK 2012, 5: 243-262.
• Gözen Ercan, P. (2013). Legitimacy, legality and lawfulness: Questioning humanitarian military intervention in a changing international political milieu. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 3 (1): 9-30.
• Gözen Ercan, P. (Güz 2014). R2P: From Slogan to an International Ethical Norm. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 11 (43): 35-52.
• Güneysu, G. (2014). Deri renginin yarattığı trajedi. C. Çakmak, F. G. Çolak ve G. Güneysu (Der.) 20. yüzyılda soykırım ve etnik temizlik: İçinde 217-234. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Hehir, A. (2013). The permanence of inconsistency: Libya, the security council, and the responsibility to protect. International Security, 38 (1): 137-159.
• Holzgrefe, J. L. (2003). The humanitarian intervention debate. J. L. Holzfere ve R. O. Keohane (Der.) Humanitarian intervention: Ethical, legal and political dilemmas: İçinde 15-52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hürriyet (2010). “Fransa ile Libya arasında gizli petrol anlaşması”, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/fransa-ile-libya-arasinda-gizli-petrol-anlasmasi-18626529, (20.05.2016).
• Jones, B. D. (2011). Libya and the responsibilites of power. Survival, 53 (3): 51-60.
• Jumbert, M. G. (2014). How Sudan’s ‘rogue’ state label shaped US responses to the Darfur conflict: What’s the problem and who’s in charge?. Third World Quarterly, 35 (2): 284-299.
• Kern, S. (2011). Why France was so keen to attack Libya. http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1983/france-libya-attack, (20.05.2016).
• Kersavage, K. (2014). The “responsibility to protect” our answer to “never again”? Libya, Syria and a critical analysis of R2P. International Affairs Forum, 5 (1): 24-41.
• Keskin, F. (Kış 2006-2007). İnsancıl Müdahale: 1999 Kosova ve 2003 Irak Sonrası Durum. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 3 (12): 49-70.
• Keskin, F. (Bahar 2009). Darfur: Koruma Yükümlülüğü ve İnsancıl Müdahale Kavramları Çerçevesinde Bir İnceleme. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 6 (21): 67-88.
• Mamdani, M. (2010). Responsibility to protect or right to punish. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 4 (1): 53-67.
• Murithi, T. (2009). The African Union’s transition from non-intervention to non-indifference: An ad hoc approach to the responsibility to protect. International Politics and Society, 1: 90-106.
• Nuruzzaman, M. (2013). The “responsibility to protect” doctrine: Revived in Libya, buried in Syria. Insight Turkey, 15 (2): 57-66.
• Okeke, J. M. (2010). Contextualising the ‘responsibility to protect’ in Darfur. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies, 5 (1): 65-81.
• Omorogbe, E. Y. (2012). The African Union, the responsibility to protect and the Libyan crisis. Netherlands International Law Review, 59 (2): 141-163.
• Rieff, D. (2008). Humanitarian vanities. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/magazine/01wwln-lede-t.html?ref=magazine&_r=1, (20.05.2016).
• Rotmann, P., Kurtz G. ve Brockmeier, S. (2014). Major powers and the contested evolution of a responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development, 14 (4): 355-377.
• Semin, A. (2011). Kaddafi sonrası Libya’nın geleceği. http://www.bilgesam.org/incele/1151/-kaddafi-sonrasi-libya'nin#.VnFC7UqLTIU, (20.05.2016).
• Silander, D. (2013). R2P-principle and practice? The UNSC on Libya. Journal of Applied Security Research, 8 (2): 262-284.
• Smith-Spark L. ve Dewan A. (2017). Libya: Why the EU is looking to Russia. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/10/africa/libya-russia-eu-haftar/index.html, (26.03.2017).
• Stahn, C. (2007). Responsibility to protect: Political rhetoric or emerging legal norm?. The American Journal of International Law, 101 (1): 99-120.
• Thakur, R. (2013). R2P after Libya and Syria: Engaging emerging powers. The Washington Quarterly, 36 (2): 61-76.
• Thakur, R. (2015). The development and evolution of R2P as international policy. Global Policy, 6 (3): 190-200.
• Uluslararası Müdahale ve Devlet Egemenliği Komisyonu - ICISS (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: The Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf, (20.05.2016).
• Williams, P. D. (2011). Briefing: The road to humanitarian war in Libya. Global Responsibility to Protect, 3 (2): 248-259.
• Williams, P. D. ve Bellamy A. J. (2012). Principles, politics, and prudence: Libya, the responsibility to protect, and the use of military force. Global Governance, 18 (3): 273-297.
• Zifcak, S. (2012). The responsibility to protect after Libya and Syria. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 13 (1): 1-35.