HEIDEGGER’S DASEIN AND ANGST: EXAMINING THE ANXIETY OF EXISTENCE IN INGMAR BERGMAN’S PERSONA
Öz
According to a common belief, anxiety can be an experience of a certain degree of powerlessness because a person suffering from anxiety is hampered as a person who cannot possess a particular category of power. This lack of a desired power manifests as the source of emotion that results in anxiety. Because fear and anxiety are commonly used interchangeably in ordinary discourse, fear is often used erroneously instead of anxiety when, under further examination, anxiety would be the preferable usage. However, shedding light on the idea of anxiety (Angst), Heidegger (1889-1976) in Being and Time (1927) takes it upon himself to distinguish fear from anxiety: while the former (Fear) is experienced as an identifiable object -- as a threat qua threat -- to our life, the latter (Angst) is experienced where there is no identifiable object resulting in a relatively eventual traumatic experience, whereby the individual is “deprived of any avenue of escape from the threatening danger.” Anxiety of existence on its own as a philosophical problem in Heidegger’s examination is elaborated by the concepts of Being or Dasein (Existence). In this respect, describing ‘the self of everyday Dasein’ as the ‘the-self-there,’ Heidegger differentiates ‘authentic being’ from ‘inauthentic being.’ He highlights the problematic that we as human beings are thrown into the world of Being where individuals may fail to identify and differentiate themselves among inauthentic inscriptions of the masses within the confines of Existence. Examining the anxiety of Existence (Being of the world) around the idea of Dasein (Being in the world), Heidegger therefore discusses the anxiety under the rubric of thrownness. To this end, in this essay, with a Heideggerian perception of anxiety, I will discuss Ingmar Bergman’s (1918-2007) classic work of art Persona (1966) by bringing forth the personality of a successful actress, found in Elizabeth Vogler (Liv Ullmann)’s story, where she seems to be suffering from an enigmatic mental collapse with symptoms such as muteness and a near catatonic lassitude.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Heidegger, M. (1998). Being and Time. Edward Robinson (Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Heidegger’s Critiques of Descartes. (2008).https://py111.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/heideggers-critique-of-descartes/ (Accessed: 9.04.2018)
- Ingmar, B. (1966). Persona. Sweden: AB Svensk Filmindustri.
- Inwood, M. (2000). Heidegger A Very Short Introduction. Oxford. University Press.
- Magrini, J. (2006). Anxiety in Heidegger’s Being and Time: The Harbinger of Authenticity. Philosophy Scholarship,2006 Issue of Dialogue. Paper 15. 77-86. http://dc.cod.edu/philosophypub/15, (Accessed: 10.04.2018).
- Mansbach, A. (1998). Heidegger’s Critique of Cartesianism: the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, 10-15 August 1998, Boston, Massachusetts, the US. https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Cont/ContMans.htm (Accessed: 14.05.2018).
- Munday, R. (2009) Glossary of Terms in Being and Time. http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/b_resources/b_and_t_glossary.html#a (Accessed: 19.05.2018).
- Padgett, A. (2007). Dasein and the Philosopher: Responsibility in Heidegger and Mamardashvili. Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology, 6, (1), 1 – 21.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
M. Önder Göncüoğlu
*
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
5 Haziran 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi
17 Şubat 2019
Kabul Tarihi
1 Kasım 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2020 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2
Cited By
The Problematic of Authenticity in Sándor Márai’s Portraits of a Marriage
Bitig Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.69787/bitigefd.1628673