PROCEDURAL DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2 , 661 - 677 , 30.06.2021

Faik Kurtulmus

https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.854274

Cited By: 2

https://izlik.org/JA38SK58MM

Öz

It is commonly thought that while the rule of law is a requirement of liberal democracy it is not a requirement of procedural democracy. Using Robert Dahl’s account of procedural democracy, this article examines the relationship between the rule of law and procedural democracy. It argues that the rule of law is, in fact, a requirement of procedural democracy. This article defends three claims. First, the protection of political liberties, and free and fair elections, which are both essential for procedural democracies, depend on the rule of law. Second, the absence of the rule of law undermines the relationship of vertical accountability between politicians and voters—an essential aspect of procedural democracy. Finally, shortcomings of a regime with respect to the rule of law facilitates democratic backsliding in regimes that partially satisfy the requirements of procedural democracy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liberal Democracy , Procedural Democracy , Rule of Law , Democratic Backsliding , Vertical Accountability

PROSEDÜREL DEMOKRASİ VE HUKUKUN ÜSTÜNLÜĞÜ

https://izlik.org/JA38SK58MM

Öz

Hukukun üstünlüğü, liberal demokrasinin bir şartı olarak kabul edilse de prosedürel demokrasinin bir şartı olarak görülmemektedir. Bu makale, Robert Dahl’ın sunduğu prosedürel demokrasi tanımını merkeze alarak hukukun üstünlüğünün prosedürel demokrasinin de gereği olduğunu savunmakta ve prosedürel demokrasi ile hukukun üstünlüğü arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Bu makale üç iddiayı savunmaktadır. İlkin, prosedürel demokrasi için şart olan hakların güvence altına alınması ve seçimlerin adil ve özgür olmasının sağlanması için hukukun üstünlüğünün tesis edilmesi gereklidir. İkinci olarak, prosedürel demokrasinin temel amaçlarından biri olan dikey hesap verebilirliğin, seçmenlerin seçilenlerden hesap sorabilmesinin, sağlanmasında hukukun üstünlüğü büyük önem taşır. Son olarak, hukukun üstünlüğüyle ilgili sistematik kusurlar, prosedürel demokrasinin gereklerinin kısmen yerine getirildiği rejimlerin daha otoriter rejimlere dönüşmesini kolaylaştırmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liberal demokrasi , Prosedürel demokrasi , Hukukun üstünlüğü , Demokratik gerileme , Dikey hesap verebilirlik

Kaynakça

• Bagehot, W. (2001). The English Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bermeo, N. (2016). On Democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5-19.
• Bingham, T. (2011). The Rule of law. London: Penguin Books.
• Bogdanor, V. (2009). The New British Constitution. Oxford: Hart.
• Candaş, A. (2008). Anayasal demokrasinin paradoksu: Demokratik meşruiyet ve hukukun üstünlüğü. İçinde: L Köker (der), Aydınlanma ve Hukuk, Istanbul: Osmanlı Bankası Arşiv ve Araştırma Merkezi, 75-87.
• Collier, D. ve Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49 (3), 430-451.
• Çınar, K. ve Uğur Çınar, M. (2015). Building democracy to last: The Turkish experience in comparative perspective. Mediterranean Politics, 20 (3), 342-363.
• Dahl, R. A. (1979). Procedural democracy. P. Laslett & J. S. Fishkin (Der.) Philosophy, Politics & Society içinde (ss. 97-133). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Dahl, R. A. (2017). Demokrasi üzerine. Çev. B Kadıoğlu, Istanbul: Phoenix Yayınları.
• Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore: Baltimore University Press.
• Dicey, A. V. (1982). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. 8. edisyon, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
• Dworkin, R. (1985). A matter of principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law and natural rights. 2. Baskı, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fuller, L. F. (1964). The morality of law. Düzeltilmiş baskı, New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Kenney, C. D. (2003). Horizontal accountability: Concepts and conflicts. S. Mainwaring ve C. Welna (Der.) Democratic Accountability in Latin America içinde (ss. 55-76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• King, Anthony. (2009). The British Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Levitsky, S. ve Loxton, J. (2013). Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization, 20(1), 107-136.
• Levitsky, L. ve Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Linz, Juan J. ve Stepan A. C. (1996) “Toward consolidated democracies.” Journal of Democracy 7(2): 14–33.
• Loughlin, M. (2013). The British Constitution: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Møller, J. ve Skaaning, S. (2013). Regime types and democratic sequencing. Journal of Democracy 24 (1), 142–55.
• O’Donnell, G. A. (1994). Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5 (1), 55-69.
• O’Donnell, G. A. (1999). Horizontal accountability and new polyarchies. A. Schedler, L. Diamond ve M. F. Plattner (Der.) The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies içinde (ss. 29-52). Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner.
• O’Donnell, G. A. (2001). Democracy, law, and comparative politics. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 7-36.
• O’Donnell, G. A. (2003). Horizontal accountability: The Legal Institutionalization of Mistrust. S. Mainwaring ve C. Welna (Der.) Democratic Accountability in Latin America içinde (ss. 34-54). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
• O’Donnell, G. A. (2004). Why the rule of law matters. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 32-46.
• Przeworkski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Przeworski, A. (1999). Minimalist conception of democracy: A defense. İçinde: I. Shapiro ve Hacker-Cordón (der), Democracy’s Value, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23-55.
• Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of justice. Düzeltilmiş baskı, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Raz, J. (2009). The authority of law. 2. Baskı, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Rhoden, T. F. (2015). The liberal in liberal democracy. Democratization 22 (3), 560–78.
• Schmitter, P. C. ve Karl, T. L. (1991). What democracy is… and is not, Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75-88.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (2010). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.
• Tamahana, B. Z. (2004). On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tasioulas, J. (2020). The Rule of law. İçinde: J Tasioulas (der) The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Weingast, B. R. (1997). The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. The American Political Science Review, 91(2), 245-263.