BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE IMPACT OF PERCIEVED JUSTICE OF EMPLOYEES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: MODERATING EFFECT OF EMPLOYEE WELL-BEING

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4 , 559 - 585 , 16.03.2015

Mazlum Çelik , Ömer Turunç , Necdet Bilgin

https://doi.org/10.16953/deusbed.25259
https://izlik.org/JA26FN59PY

Öz

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of the employees’ perceived justice and well-being on psychological capital and the moderating role of well-being in this effect. According to the study carried out on 683 employees in tourism sector, it is determined that both perceived justice and well-being positive and significant effect on the employees’ psychological capital. Besides, it is determined that the employees’ well-being level has a moderating role for the influences of the perceived justice (Distributive, procedure and interactional) on psychological capital.


Keywords: Organizational Justice, Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, Interactional Justice, Psychological Capital, Well-being.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Justice Distributive Justice Procedural Justice

Kaynakça

  • Aiken, L. S. ve West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Alvin, D. F. (1987). Distributive justice and satisfaction with material well-being. American Sociological Review, 52 (1): 83-95.
  • Annes, J. (1982). An introduction to Plato’s republic. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, M. ve Palmer, N. F. (2010). Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15 (1): 17-28.
  • Avey, J. B., Patera, J. L. ve West, B. J. (2006). The implications of positive psychological capital on employee absenteeism. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13 (2): 42-60.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  • Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6): 1173-1182.
  • Beugre, C. D. (2002). Understanding organizational justice and its impact on managing employees: An African perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13 (7): 1091-1104.
  • Bies, R. J. (2001). International (in) justice: The sacred and the profane. J. Greenberg ve R. Cropanzano (Ed.) Advances in Organization Justice: İçinde 89-118. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bies, R. J., ve Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard ve M. Bazerman (Ed.) Research on Negotiations in Organization: İçinde 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Alding.
  • Bryant, F. B. ve Cvengros, J. A. (2004). Distinguishing hope and optimism. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23 (2): 273-302.
  • Carver, C. S. ve Scheier, M. F. (2003). Optimism. C. R. Snyder ve S. J. Lopez (Ed.) Handbook of positive psychology: İçinde 231-243. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cecil, R. ve Karla, S. (2009). Hope, optimism and self-efficacy: A system of competence and control enhancing African American college students academic well-being. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 35 (2): 16-26.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P. , West, S. G. ve Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86 (2): 278-321.
  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. ve Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3): 425-445.
  • Cropanzano, R. ve Wright, T. A. (1999). A five-year study of change in the relationship between well-being and job performance. Consulting Psychology Journal, 51 (4): 252-265.
  • Cropanzano, R. ve Folger, R. (1996). Procedural justice and worker motivation. R. M. Steers, L. W. Porter ve G. A. Bigley (Ed.) Motivation and leadership at work: İçinde: 72-83, NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
  • Çelik, M., Turunç, Ö. ve Demirkaya, H. (2011). Çalışanların adalet algılarının iş performansına etkisinde kişi örgüt uyumunun aracılık rolü: Turizm sektöründe görgül bir çalışma. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 8 (2): 40-57.
  • Daniels, K. ve Harris, C. (2000). Work, psychological well-being and performance. Occupational Medicine, 50 (5): 304-309.
  • De Boer, E. M., Bakker, A. B., Syroit, J. E. ve Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). Unfairness at work as a predictor of absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 181-197.
  • Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia and wellbeing: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9 (1): 1-11.
  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95: 542-575.
  • Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31 (2): 103-157.
  • Diener, E. ve Larsen, R. J. (1993). The experience of emotional wellbeing. M. Lewis ve J. M. Haviland (Ed.) Handbook of emotions: İçinde 405-415. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. ve Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychol.Bull, 125 (2): 276-302.
  • Elovainio, M., Kivimäki, M., ve Vahtera, J. (2002). Organizational justice: Evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. American Journal of Public Health, 92 (1): 105-108.
  • Elovainio, M., Kivimäki, M., Steen, N., ve Vahtera, J. (2004). Job decision latitude, organizational justice and health: Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 58 (9): 1659-1669.
  • Eren, E. (2012). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi. 12. Baskı. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Fischer, A. R. ve Holz, K. B. (2010). Testing a model of women’s personal sense of justice, control, well-being, and distress in the context of sexist discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34 (3): 297-310.
  • Fitz-enz, J. (2009). The ROI of human capital: Measuring the economic value of employee performance. İkinci Baskı. New York: Amacom.
  • Folger, R. ve Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resources management. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage Publications.
  • Folger, R. ve Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32 (1): 115-130.
  • Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of results on the happiness measures: A 60-second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20: 355-381.
  • Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldberg, D. P. ve Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9 (1): 139-145.
  • Graham, C., Eggers, A. ve Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55: 319-342.
  • Grant, A. M. ve Campbell, E. M. (2007). Doing harm, doing good, being well and burning out: The interactions of perceived prosocial and antisocial impact in service work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80: 665-691.
  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12 (1): 9-22.
  • Greenberg, J. ve Colquitt, J. A. (Ed.) (2005). Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hausman, D. M. (2009). Benevolence, justice, well-being and the health gradient. Public Health Ethics, 2 (3): 235-243.
  • Huseman, R., Hatfield J. ve Miles, E. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12 (2): 222-234.
  • Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health. New York: Basic Books.
  • Juntunen, C. L. ve Wettersten, K. B. (2006). Work hope: Development and initial validation of a measure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53 (1): 91-106.
  • Kahneman, D., Diener, E, ve Schwarz, N. (Ed). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Karaeminoğulları, A. (2006). Öğretim elemanlarının örgütsel adalet algıları ile sergiledikleri üretkenliğe aykırı davranışlar arasındaki ilişki ve bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Kausto, J., Lipponen, E. A. L. ve Elovainio, M. (2005). Moderating effects of join security in the relationships between procedural justice and employee wellbeing. European J. Work and Organizational Psychology, 14 (4): 431-452.
  • Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K. ve Posig, M. (2005). Does trust matter? The relationship between equity sensitivity and perceived organizational justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 56 (3): 205-218.
  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.
  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. K. Gergen, M. Greenberg ve R. Willis (Ed.) Social exchange: Advances in theory and research: İçinde 27-55. New York: Plenum.
  • Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., Kunkel, S. R. ve Kasl, S. V. (2002). Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (2): 261-270.
  • Lind, E. A. ve Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
  • Liu L., Chang Y., Fu J., Wang, J. ve Wang, L. (2012). The mediating role of psychological capital on the association between occupational stress and depressive symptoms among Chinese physicians: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 12: 1-8.
  • Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33 (3): 321-349.
  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M. ve Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16 (1): 57-72.
  • Luthans, F. ve Jensen S. M. (2002). Hope: A new positive strength for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 1 (3): 304-322.
  • Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., ve Norman, S. M. (2007). Psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60: 541-572.
  • Luthans, F., Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J. ve Avey, J. B. (2008). The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate - employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29 (2): 219-238.
  • Marenbon J. (1997). Early medieval philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Pres.
  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56 (3): 227-239.
  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., ve Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 738-748.
  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (6): 845-855.
  • Mroczek, D. K., ve Spiro, A. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the veterans affairs normative aging study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88 (1): 189-202.
  • Niehoff, R. T. ve Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (3): 527-556.
  • Ostir, G. V., Markides, K. S., Peek, M. K. ve Goodwin, J. S. (2001). The association between emotional well-being and the incidence of stroke in older adults. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63 (2): 210-215.
  • Tripathi, P. (2011). Employee well-being: Role of psychological capital, amity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2 (1): 18-22.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5): 879-903.
  • Rainey, D. W. (1995). Stress, burnout, and intention to terminate among umpires. J. Sport Behavior, 18 (4): 578-590.
  • Rani, R., Garg, P. ve Rastogi, R. (2012). Organizational justice and psychological wellbeing of police employees: A relationship study. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 1 (5): 183-194.
  • Ryff, C. D. (1989a). Beyond ponce DeLeon and life satisfaction: New directions in the quest of successful ageing. Int. J. Development, 12 (1): 35-55.
  • Ryff, C. D. (1989b). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6): 1069-1081.
  • Scheier, M. F. ve Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4 (3): 219-247.
  • Schmitt, M. ve Dörfel, M. (1999). Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29 (4): 443-453.
  • Sekaran, U. (1992). Research methods for business. Canada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Sekman, M. (2005). Her şey seninle başlar. 7. Baskı. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness. New York: Free Press.
  • Seligman, M. ve Maier, S. F. (1967). Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74 (1): 1-9.
  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1998). Learned pptimism. New York: Pocket Books.
  • Shahnawaz, M. G. ve Jafri, H. (2009). Psychological capital as predictors of organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35 (Special Issue): 78-84.
  • Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13 (4): 249-276.
  • Snyder, C. R., Irving, L. M., ve Anderson, J. R. (1991). Hope and health. C. R. Snyder (Ed.) Handbook of social and clinical psychology: İçinde 295-305. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Sousa-Poza A. ve Sousa-Poza A. A. (2000). Well-being at work: A cross-national analysis of the levels and determinants of job satisfaction. Journal of Socio-Economics, 29 (6): 517-538.
  • Spell, C. S. ve Arnold, T. (2007). An appraisal perspective of justice, structure, and job control as antecedents of psychological distress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28 (6): 729-751.
  • Strassle, C. G., McKee, A. E. ve Plant, D. D. (1999). Optimism as an indicator of psychological health: Using psychological assessment wisely. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72 (2): 191-201.
  • Sullivan M. J. L., Adams H., Horan S., Maher D., Boland D. ve Gross R. (2008). The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: Scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil., 18 (3): 249-261.
  • Tepper, B. J. (2001). Health consequences of organizational justice: Tests of main and interactive effects. Organizational and Human Behavior Processes, 86 (2): 197-215.
  • Tiger, L. (1971). Optimism: The biology of hope. New York: Simon-Schuster.
  • Vermunt, R. ve Steensma, H. (2005). How can justice be used to manage stress in organizations? J. Greenberg ve J. A. Coquitt (Ed.) Handbook of organizational justice: İçinde 383-410. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Viswesvaran, C. ve Ones, D. S. (2002). Examining the construct of organizational justice: A meta-analytic evaluation of relations with work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 38 (3): 193-203.
  • Walster, E., Ellen, B. ve Walster, G. W. (1976). New directions in equity research. L. Berkowitz ve E. Walster (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology: İçinde 1-42 (vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.
  • Walter-Busch, E. (2000). Stability and change of regional quality of life in Switzerland, 1978-1996. Social Indicators Research, 50 (1): 1-49.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A. ve Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (3): 517-529.
  • Walumbwa, F., Peterson, S. J., Avolio, B. J. ve Hartnell C. A. (2010). An investigation of the relationships among leader and follower psychological capital, service climate, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 63 (4): 937-963.
  • Ybema, J. F. ve Bos, K. (2010). Effects of organizational justice on depressive symptoms and sickness absence: A longitudinal perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 70 (10): 1609-1617.
  • Ylipaavalniemi, J., Kivimäki, M., Elovainio, M., Virtanen, M., Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. ve Vahtera, J. (2005). Psychosocial work characteristics and incidence of newly diagnosed depression: A prospective cohort study of three different models. Social Science & Medicine, 61 (1): 111-122.

ÇALIŞANLARIN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET ALGILARININ PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: ÇALIŞANLARIN İYİLİK HALİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4 , 559 - 585 , 16.03.2015

Mazlum Çelik , Ömer Turunç , Necdet Bilgin

https://doi.org/10.16953/deusbed.25259
https://izlik.org/JA26FN59PY

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı çalışanların psikolojik sermaye seviyeleri üzerinde adalet algılarının ve iyilik hallerinin etkisi ve bu etkide iyilik halinin düzenleyici rolünü belirlemektir. 683 turizm sektörü çalışanı üzerinde yapılan araştırma sonucunda; çalışanların adalet algılarının hem psikolojik sermaye seviyelerini ve hem de iyilik hallerini pozitif ve anlamlı olarak etkilediği, çalışanların iyilik hallerinin de psikolojik sermaye seviyelerini pozitif ve anlamlı etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Bunun dışında, çalışanların adalet algılarının her üç boyutunun (Prosedür, Dağıtım, Etkileşim) psikolojik sermaye seviyeleri üzerine etkisinde iyilik hallerinin düzenleyici rolünün bulunduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Sözcükler: Örgütsel Adalet, Dağıtım Adaleti, Prosedür Adaleti, Etkileşim Adaleti, Psikolojik Sermaye, İyilik Hali.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Aiken, L. S. ve West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Alvin, D. F. (1987). Distributive justice and satisfaction with material well-being. American Sociological Review, 52 (1): 83-95.
  • Annes, J. (1982). An introduction to Plato’s republic. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, M. ve Palmer, N. F. (2010). Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15 (1): 17-28.
  • Avey, J. B., Patera, J. L. ve West, B. J. (2006). The implications of positive psychological capital on employee absenteeism. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13 (2): 42-60.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  • Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6): 1173-1182.
  • Beugre, C. D. (2002). Understanding organizational justice and its impact on managing employees: An African perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13 (7): 1091-1104.
  • Bies, R. J. (2001). International (in) justice: The sacred and the profane. J. Greenberg ve R. Cropanzano (Ed.) Advances in Organization Justice: İçinde 89-118. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bies, R. J., ve Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard ve M. Bazerman (Ed.) Research on Negotiations in Organization: İçinde 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Alding.
  • Bryant, F. B. ve Cvengros, J. A. (2004). Distinguishing hope and optimism. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23 (2): 273-302.
  • Carver, C. S. ve Scheier, M. F. (2003). Optimism. C. R. Snyder ve S. J. Lopez (Ed.) Handbook of positive psychology: İçinde 231-243. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cecil, R. ve Karla, S. (2009). Hope, optimism and self-efficacy: A system of competence and control enhancing African American college students academic well-being. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 35 (2): 16-26.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P. , West, S. G. ve Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86 (2): 278-321.
  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. ve Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3): 425-445.
  • Cropanzano, R. ve Wright, T. A. (1999). A five-year study of change in the relationship between well-being and job performance. Consulting Psychology Journal, 51 (4): 252-265.
  • Cropanzano, R. ve Folger, R. (1996). Procedural justice and worker motivation. R. M. Steers, L. W. Porter ve G. A. Bigley (Ed.) Motivation and leadership at work: İçinde: 72-83, NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
  • Çelik, M., Turunç, Ö. ve Demirkaya, H. (2011). Çalışanların adalet algılarının iş performansına etkisinde kişi örgüt uyumunun aracılık rolü: Turizm sektöründe görgül bir çalışma. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 8 (2): 40-57.
  • Daniels, K. ve Harris, C. (2000). Work, psychological well-being and performance. Occupational Medicine, 50 (5): 304-309.
  • De Boer, E. M., Bakker, A. B., Syroit, J. E. ve Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). Unfairness at work as a predictor of absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 181-197.
  • Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia and wellbeing: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9 (1): 1-11.
  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95: 542-575.
  • Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31 (2): 103-157.
  • Diener, E. ve Larsen, R. J. (1993). The experience of emotional wellbeing. M. Lewis ve J. M. Haviland (Ed.) Handbook of emotions: İçinde 405-415. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. ve Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychol.Bull, 125 (2): 276-302.
  • Elovainio, M., Kivimäki, M., ve Vahtera, J. (2002). Organizational justice: Evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. American Journal of Public Health, 92 (1): 105-108.
  • Elovainio, M., Kivimäki, M., Steen, N., ve Vahtera, J. (2004). Job decision latitude, organizational justice and health: Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 58 (9): 1659-1669.
  • Eren, E. (2012). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi. 12. Baskı. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Fischer, A. R. ve Holz, K. B. (2010). Testing a model of women’s personal sense of justice, control, well-being, and distress in the context of sexist discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34 (3): 297-310.
  • Fitz-enz, J. (2009). The ROI of human capital: Measuring the economic value of employee performance. İkinci Baskı. New York: Amacom.
  • Folger, R. ve Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resources management. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage Publications.
  • Folger, R. ve Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32 (1): 115-130.
  • Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of results on the happiness measures: A 60-second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20: 355-381.
  • Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldberg, D. P. ve Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9 (1): 139-145.
  • Graham, C., Eggers, A. ve Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55: 319-342.
  • Grant, A. M. ve Campbell, E. M. (2007). Doing harm, doing good, being well and burning out: The interactions of perceived prosocial and antisocial impact in service work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80: 665-691.
  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12 (1): 9-22.
  • Greenberg, J. ve Colquitt, J. A. (Ed.) (2005). Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hausman, D. M. (2009). Benevolence, justice, well-being and the health gradient. Public Health Ethics, 2 (3): 235-243.
  • Huseman, R., Hatfield J. ve Miles, E. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12 (2): 222-234.
  • Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health. New York: Basic Books.
  • Juntunen, C. L. ve Wettersten, K. B. (2006). Work hope: Development and initial validation of a measure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53 (1): 91-106.
  • Kahneman, D., Diener, E, ve Schwarz, N. (Ed). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Karaeminoğulları, A. (2006). Öğretim elemanlarının örgütsel adalet algıları ile sergiledikleri üretkenliğe aykırı davranışlar arasındaki ilişki ve bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Kausto, J., Lipponen, E. A. L. ve Elovainio, M. (2005). Moderating effects of join security in the relationships between procedural justice and employee wellbeing. European J. Work and Organizational Psychology, 14 (4): 431-452.
  • Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K. ve Posig, M. (2005). Does trust matter? The relationship between equity sensitivity and perceived organizational justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 56 (3): 205-218.
  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.
  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. K. Gergen, M. Greenberg ve R. Willis (Ed.) Social exchange: Advances in theory and research: İçinde 27-55. New York: Plenum.
  • Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., Kunkel, S. R. ve Kasl, S. V. (2002). Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (2): 261-270.
  • Lind, E. A. ve Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
  • Liu L., Chang Y., Fu J., Wang, J. ve Wang, L. (2012). The mediating role of psychological capital on the association between occupational stress and depressive symptoms among Chinese physicians: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 12: 1-8.
  • Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33 (3): 321-349.
  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M. ve Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16 (1): 57-72.
  • Luthans, F. ve Jensen S. M. (2002). Hope: A new positive strength for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 1 (3): 304-322.
  • Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., ve Norman, S. M. (2007). Psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60: 541-572.
  • Luthans, F., Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J. ve Avey, J. B. (2008). The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate - employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29 (2): 219-238.
  • Marenbon J. (1997). Early medieval philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Pres.
  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56 (3): 227-239.
  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., ve Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 738-748.
  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (6): 845-855.
  • Mroczek, D. K., ve Spiro, A. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the veterans affairs normative aging study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88 (1): 189-202.
  • Niehoff, R. T. ve Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (3): 527-556.
  • Ostir, G. V., Markides, K. S., Peek, M. K. ve Goodwin, J. S. (2001). The association between emotional well-being and the incidence of stroke in older adults. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63 (2): 210-215.
  • Tripathi, P. (2011). Employee well-being: Role of psychological capital, amity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2 (1): 18-22.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5): 879-903.
  • Rainey, D. W. (1995). Stress, burnout, and intention to terminate among umpires. J. Sport Behavior, 18 (4): 578-590.
  • Rani, R., Garg, P. ve Rastogi, R. (2012). Organizational justice and psychological wellbeing of police employees: A relationship study. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 1 (5): 183-194.
  • Ryff, C. D. (1989a). Beyond ponce DeLeon and life satisfaction: New directions in the quest of successful ageing. Int. J. Development, 12 (1): 35-55.
  • Ryff, C. D. (1989b). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6): 1069-1081.
  • Scheier, M. F. ve Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4 (3): 219-247.
  • Schmitt, M. ve Dörfel, M. (1999). Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29 (4): 443-453.
  • Sekaran, U. (1992). Research methods for business. Canada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Sekman, M. (2005). Her şey seninle başlar. 7. Baskı. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness. New York: Free Press.
  • Seligman, M. ve Maier, S. F. (1967). Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74 (1): 1-9.
  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1998). Learned pptimism. New York: Pocket Books.
  • Shahnawaz, M. G. ve Jafri, H. (2009). Psychological capital as predictors of organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35 (Special Issue): 78-84.
  • Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13 (4): 249-276.
  • Snyder, C. R., Irving, L. M., ve Anderson, J. R. (1991). Hope and health. C. R. Snyder (Ed.) Handbook of social and clinical psychology: İçinde 295-305. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Sousa-Poza A. ve Sousa-Poza A. A. (2000). Well-being at work: A cross-national analysis of the levels and determinants of job satisfaction. Journal of Socio-Economics, 29 (6): 517-538.
  • Spell, C. S. ve Arnold, T. (2007). An appraisal perspective of justice, structure, and job control as antecedents of psychological distress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28 (6): 729-751.
  • Strassle, C. G., McKee, A. E. ve Plant, D. D. (1999). Optimism as an indicator of psychological health: Using psychological assessment wisely. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72 (2): 191-201.
  • Sullivan M. J. L., Adams H., Horan S., Maher D., Boland D. ve Gross R. (2008). The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: Scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil., 18 (3): 249-261.
  • Tepper, B. J. (2001). Health consequences of organizational justice: Tests of main and interactive effects. Organizational and Human Behavior Processes, 86 (2): 197-215.
  • Tiger, L. (1971). Optimism: The biology of hope. New York: Simon-Schuster.
  • Vermunt, R. ve Steensma, H. (2005). How can justice be used to manage stress in organizations? J. Greenberg ve J. A. Coquitt (Ed.) Handbook of organizational justice: İçinde 383-410. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Viswesvaran, C. ve Ones, D. S. (2002). Examining the construct of organizational justice: A meta-analytic evaluation of relations with work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 38 (3): 193-203.
  • Walster, E., Ellen, B. ve Walster, G. W. (1976). New directions in equity research. L. Berkowitz ve E. Walster (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology: İçinde 1-42 (vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.
  • Walter-Busch, E. (2000). Stability and change of regional quality of life in Switzerland, 1978-1996. Social Indicators Research, 50 (1): 1-49.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A. ve Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (3): 517-529.
  • Walumbwa, F., Peterson, S. J., Avolio, B. J. ve Hartnell C. A. (2010). An investigation of the relationships among leader and follower psychological capital, service climate, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 63 (4): 937-963.
  • Ybema, J. F. ve Bos, K. (2010). Effects of organizational justice on depressive symptoms and sickness absence: A longitudinal perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 70 (10): 1609-1617.
  • Ylipaavalniemi, J., Kivimäki, M., Elovainio, M., Virtanen, M., Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. ve Vahtera, J. (2005). Psychosocial work characteristics and incidence of newly diagnosed depression: A prospective cohort study of three different models. Social Science & Medicine, 61 (1): 111-122.
Toplam 97 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Yazarlar

Mazlum Çelik

Ömer Turunç

Necdet Bilgin Bu kişi benim

Gönderilme Tarihi 16 Mart 2015
Yayımlanma Tarihi 16 Mart 2015
DOI https://doi.org/10.16953/deusbed.25259
IZ https://izlik.org/JA26FN59PY
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Çelik, M., Turunç, Ö., & Bilgin, N. (2015). ÇALIŞANLARIN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET ALGILARININ PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: ÇALIŞANLARIN İYİLİK HALİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(4), 559-585. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusbed.25259

Cited By

THE EFFECT OF MANAGERS’ INDIGO LEADERSHIP STYLES ON EMPLOYERS’ JOB-RELATED AFFECTIVE WELL-BEING
Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi
Muhammet Hamdi MÜCEVHER
https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.701162
Ortaokul Öğretmenlerinin Örgütsel Adalet Algı Düzeyleri İle Örgütsel Mutluluk Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişki
MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi
Serkan ÇETİN
https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.800081
Modern İşgücünde Psikolojik Sermayenin Realitesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma
İnsan ve İnsan Dergisi
H.Tezcan UYSAL
https://doi.org/10.29224/insanveinsan.444436
Psikolojik Sermayenin İşe Yabancılaşmaya Etkisinde Örgütsel Desteğin Aracılık Rolü
İş ve İnsan Dergisi
Abdullah Çalışkan
https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.303183
PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYENİN KURUMSAL İTİBAR ÜZERİNE ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi
Meral AKYÜZ
https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.895345
The mediator role of well-being in the effect of COVID-19 anxiety on occupational commitment: research in the aviation sector
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2057011
Psikodrama Grup Uygulamasının Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Psikolojik İyi Oluş ve Kendini Kabul Düzeyleri Üzerine Etkisi: Yarı Deneysel Bir Çalışma
Humanistic Perspective
https://doi.org/10.47793/hp.1036412
REGULATORY ROLE OF ROLE CONFLICT AND ROLE UNCERTAINTY IN THE RELATIONSHIP OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND CREATIVITY
Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1105156
Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi
Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.453906
Psikolojik Sermayenin Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerindeki Etkisinde İş-Yaşam Dengesinin Aracılık Rolü: Bir Araştırma
Pamukkale Üniversitesi İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.47097/piar.867721
Örgütsel Adaletin Örgütsel Muhalefet ve Örgütsel Mutluluk İle İlişkisi: Öğretmenler Üzerine Bir İnceleme
Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education
https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1137439
iyilik Hali ve Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Eğitimi
Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1433582

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Aile Yılı Özel Sayısı Çağrısı
Sayı Editörü
Prof. Dr. NEBİYE KONUK KANDEMİR

Sevgili Araştırmacılar ve Değerli Yazarlar,
Aile, toplumun temel yapı taşıdır ve bireylerin gelişimi ile sosyal yaşamın şekillenmesinde kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Aile yapıları ve dinamikleri, tarihsel, kültürel ve toplumsal faktörlerle şekillenirken, bu faktörlerin aile içerisinde yaşanan sorunları, ilişkileri ve güç dengelerini nasıl etkilediği büyük bir önem taşımaktadır. 2025 yılı "Aile Yılı" olarak ilan edilmesi, aile olgusunun daha geniş bir perspektiften ele alınmasını ve bu konudaki farkındalığın artırılmasını hedeflemektedir.
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, "Cilt: 28 Sayı: Özel Sayı" olarak 2026 yılında yayımlanacak olan Aile Yılı Özel Sayısı'na yönelik makale çağrısında bulunmaktadır. Bu özel sayı, aile yapılarını, rollerini ve dinamiklerini inceleyen çalışmalara ev sahipliği yapmayı hedeflemektedir.
Aile ile ilgili çalışmalara olan ihtiyaç, yalnızca bireysel düzeyde değil, toplumsal düzeyde de açıktır. Son yıllarda, aile içi ilişkilerin sağlıklı bir şekilde sürdürülmesi, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği, kadın hakları, çocuk sağlığı ve eğitim gibi konular ön plana çıkmış, bu konularda yapılacak bilimsel araştırmaların önemi artmıştır. Aile Yılı Özel Sayısı'nın hazırlanması, bu kritik meselelerin sistematik bir biçimde incelenmesine ve topluma duyurulmasına olanak sağlayacaktır.
Bu özel sayı, aile dinamiklerini, ilişkilerini ve sorunlarını derinlemesine inceleyen, özgün ve yenilikçi çalışmaları bir araya getirerek, alanında önemli bir kaynak oluşturmayı hedeflemektedir. Ayrıca, uzmanların görüşleri ve çeşitli disiplinlerden gelen katkılar sayesinde, aile kavramına dair güncel bakış açıları sunulacak, toplumsal fayda sağlanacaktır.
Aşağıda, özel sayıda kabul edilebilecek (ama bunlarla sınırlı olmayan) güncellenmiş konular listesi yer almaktadır:

• Aile Yapıları ve Değişimi
• Geleneksel ve Modern Aile Rolleri
• Aile İçi İletişim ve İlişkiler
• Ailedeki Psiko-Sosyal Dinamikler
• Aile İlişkilerinde Kültürel Farklılıklar
• Evlilik ve Boşanma Dinamikleri
• Aile ve Çocuk Gelişimi
• Ebeveynlik Stilleri ve Çocuk Üzerindeki Etkileri
• Aile Ekonomisi ve Sosyal Politika
• Aileyi Etkileyen Toplumsal Değişimler
• Aile ve Eğitim İlişkisi
• Ailede Şiddet ve Koruma Mekanizmaları
• Aile İçi Sağlık ve Refah
• Kadınların Aile İçindeki Rolü ve Değişen Dinamikleri
• Kadın Hakları ve Aile İlişkileri
• Kadının Aile Üyeleriyle İlişkileri ve Güç Dinamikleri
• Ailede Cinsiyet Eşitliği
İki bağımsız anonim hakem tarafından değerlendirmeden geçecek makaleler, kabul edilmesi halinde, Aralık 2026'da yayımlanacak özel sayımızda yer alacaktır. Gelecek sayıların dolmuş olması ve süreçte makale yoğunluğunun bulunması nedeniyle dergimiz, özel sayı dışında makale kabulüne kapalıdır. Özel sayı dışında dergimize gönderilen makaleler iade edilecektir.
Saygılarımızla