KOMÜNİTERYANİZM VE LİBERALİZMİN KOMÜNİTERYAN ELEŞTİRİSİ

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 28, 308 - 335, 29.10.2021

Ahmet Karadağ , İhsan Konak

Öz

Liberalizm bireysel özne ve nötr devlet anlayışıyla açık topluma varlık kazandırmaya çalışır. Liberalizm bireyi merkeze alır ve bireyin iradesi üzerinde hiçbir beşeri otorite tanımaz; özgür birey için bunu olmazsa olmaz kabul eder. Liberalizmin bu kabulleri birçok felsefi ve siyasal akım tarafından eleştiriye uğramıştır. Komüniteryanizm bu eleştirel akımlardan bir tanesidir. Bu çalışmada liberalizmin komüniteryan eleştirisi ele alınmıştır. Bu bağlamda komüniteryanizmin liberalizme yönelttiği eleştiriler birey, cemaat, liberal tarafsızlık ve evrensel insan hakları üzerinden bir değerlendirmeye tabi tutulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Komüniteryanizm, Liberalizm, Birey, Cemaat.

COMMUNITARIANISM AND COMMUNITARIAN CRITIQUE OF LIBERALISM

Öz

Liberalism advocates open society. Open society is based on the coexistence of different segments of society with different good understandings. Liberalism tries to enrich open society with an understanding of individual subject and neutral state. According to liberal thought the individual is at the center. Liberalism recognizes no human authority over the will of the individual and regards this indispensable for the free individual. These assumptions of liberalism have been criticized by many philosophical and political movements. Communitarianism is one of these critical thoughts. The communitarian critique of liberalism is discussed in this study. In this context, the critique of communitarianism against liberalism has been discussed on the basis of individual, community, liberal neutrality and universal human rights.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Communitarianism, Liberalism, Individual, Community

Kaynakça

• Bacon, F. (2015). The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon. (Editör: J. M. Robertson), London: George Routledge & Sons. Baxter, V., Thessin, R. A. ve Clayton J. (2014), “Communitarian Leadership Practice Acquisition in Educational Leadership Preparation”, International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 9(2), s. 10-27.
• Berten, A., , Silveira, P. ve Pourtois, H. (2006), Genel Giriş. Liberaller ve Cemaatçiler, (Derleyenler: Andre Berten, Pablo da Silveira ve Herve Pourtois), içinde (9-24). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi, Dost Kitabevi, Ankara, 9-24.
• Bestor, A. (1970). Backwoods Utopias, The Sectarian and Owenite Phases of Communitarian Socialism in America 1663-1829. (2nd ed.), Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Brecher, B. (1999). Liberal and Communitarian Conceptions of Medical Need with Particular Reference to the Management of Organ Transplantation. Archives of Hellenic Medicine, 16(6), s. 609-614.
• Buchanan, A. E. (1989). Assessing the Communitarian Critique of Liberalism. Ethics, 99(4), s. 852-882.
• Çetin, H. (2001). Liberalizmin Temel İlkeleri. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), s. 219-237.
• Ekmekçi, A. (2012). Liberal Birey, Toplum ve Siyaset Anlayışlarının Eleştirisi Olarak Komüniteryen Düşüncenin Temel Argümanları. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi. Soysal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Etzioni, A. (1996). The Responsive Community: A Communitarian Perspective. American Sociological Review, 61(1), s. 1-11.
• Etzioni, A. (1999). Debate: The Road to Good Society. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 7(1), s. 88-103.
• Etzioni, A. (2000). The Third Way to a Good Society. London: Demos.
• Etzioni, A. (2011). Citizenship in a Communitarian Perspective. Ethnicities, 11(3), s. 336-349.
• Etzioni, A. (2014). Communitarianism Revisited. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(3), s. 241-260.
• Etzioni, A. (2015). Communitarianism. The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. (Editör: M. T. Gibbons). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
• Golby, M. (2006). Communitarianism and Education. Cirriculum Studies, 5(2), s. 125-138.
• Graffiths, M. ve O’Callaghan, T. (2002). International Relations: the Key Concepts. New York & Londra: Routledge.
• Gutmann, A. (1985). Communitarian Critics of Liberalism. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 14(3), s. 308-322.
• Habermas, J. (1995). Address: Multiculturalism and the Liberal State. Standford Law Review, 47(5), s. 849-853.
• Karacasulu, N. ve Karakir, İ. A. (2015). Cosmopolitan-Communitarian Dichotomy: Towards a Third Way?. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), s. 21-48.
• Knight, K. (2005). Aristotelianism Versus Communitarianism. Analyse & Kritik, 27, s. 259-273.
• Kocaoğlu, M. ve Altundal, U. (2017), “Siyasal Liberalizmde Birey İmgesi: Eleştirel Bir Bakış”, Birey ve Toplum, 7(13), s. 59-78.
• Kosnoski, J. (2000). “Is John Dewey Communitarian?”. Thinking Fundamentals, IWM Junior Visiting Fellow Conferences Vienna, 9.
• Križan, M. (1997). Communitarianism, Charles Taylor and the Postcommunist Transition. Politička misao, 34(5), s. 152-170.
• Kymlicka, A. (2016). Çağdaş Siyaset Felsefesine Giriş. E. Kılıç, (Çev). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Levitas, R. (2000). Community, Utapia and New Labour. Local Economy, 15(3), s. 188-197.
• MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. (3rd ed.), Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
• Miller, D. (1999), Communitarianism: Left, Right and Centre. Liberalism and its Practice, (Editörler: Dan Avnon ve Avner de-Shalit), Routledge, Londra & New York, 138-148.
• Nino, C. S. (1994). Positivism and Communitarianism: Between Human Rights and Democracy. Ratio Juris, 7(1), s. 14-40.
• Saaremӓel-Stoilov, K. (2006). Liberal Communitarian Interpretation of Social and Equality Rights: A Balanced Approach?. Juridica International, XI, s. 85-92.
• Sage, D. (2012). A Challenge to Liberalism? The Communitarianism of the Big Society and Blue Labor. Critical Social Policy, 32(3), 365-382.
• Sandel, M. (2009). Justice: What is The Right Thing to Do?. New York: Farrar Straus ve Giroux.
• Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and The Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sandel, M. (1984). The Procedural Republic and The Unencumbered Self. Political Theory, 12(1), s. 81-96.
• Sandel, M. (1984a), Introduction, Liberalism and Its Critics (Editör: M. Sandel), New York University Press, New York, 1-12.
• Singh, M. (2017). Individual, Cultural, and Social Identity: A Communitarian Approach. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 2(6), s. 101-104.
• Tam, H. (1998). Communitarianism: A New Agenda for Politics and Citizenship. London: MacMillan Press.
• Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and The Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of The Self: The Making of The Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Theobald, P. ve Wood, K. L. (2009), “Communitarianism and Multiculturalism in The Academy”, Journal of Thought, 44(1-2), s. 9-23.
• Thigpen, R. B. (1990). Book review. Liberalism, Community and Culture. by Will Kymlicka, American Journal of Political Science, 84, s. 1357-1358.
• Thigpen, R. B. ve Downing, L. A. (1987), “Liberalism and The Communitarian Critique”, American Journal of Political Science, 31(3), s. 637-655.
• Viola, F. (2004), Links of Community According to Liberalism and Communitarianism, Present and Future of Liberalism, (Editörler: E. Banus ve A. Llano), Eunsa, Pamplona, 521-533.
• Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
• Walzer, M. (1984). Liberalism and The Art of Separation. Political Theory, 12(3), s. 315-330.
• Walzer, M. (1990). The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism. Political Theory, 18(1), s. 6-23.
• Yoo, Jae-B. (2000). The Self and Society in Education: A Communitarian View. The SNU Journal of Education Research, 10(3), s. 1-17.