Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors

Cilt: 48 Sayı: 4 1 Aralık 2021
  • Ozgen Ahmet Yildirim *
  • Kerem Poyraz
  • Erkan Erdur
  • Canan Can
  • Cihan Gundogan
  • Halis Yerlikaya
  • Serdar Yildirim
  • Yunus Guzel
  • Halil Kömek
PDF İndir
TR EN

Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors

Öz

Objective: To investigate the caregiver burden and quality of life (QoL) of patients with metastatic prostate cancer and, to evaluate the relationship between questionnaire results and medical, socioeconomic, disease and treatment related factors of the patients. Methods: One hundred twenty one metastatic prostate cancer patients, and caregivers were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer who had at least one bone, lymph node or visceral metastasis who had undergone androgen deprivation or chemotherapy treatments for at least 3 months were included. Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires and Zarit caregiver burden interviews (ZCBI) were conducted with patients and their caregivers seperately. Patients’ disease, treatment, socioeconomic and caregiver related factors were recorded respectively. Results: Patients’ comorbidities, ECOG score, presence and quantity of bone or visceral metastasis, bone related events, receiving palliative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, using public transportation resulted in lower SF-36 and higher ZCBI results (p<0.001– p=0.049). Obligation to live in rented houses were correlated with lower SF-36 physical function results (p=0.043). Condition of the caregiver being from distant relatives resulted in a lower SF-36 score (p=0.01 - p=0.043). Moderate to strong negative correlation was detected between ZCBI and all SF-36 results (p<0.001, r:-646 to-749). In ZCBI, score over 47 resulted with 69.57% sensitivity and 65.52% specificity (AUC =0.671, p =0.008). Conclusion: QoL was directly related to caregiver burden. Factors such as patient comorbidities, bone metastasis and related situations, ECOG score, presence of visceral metastasis, undergoing chemotherapy, low socioeconomic status negatively affect the quality of life of patients and caregiver burden. If these factors can be monitored, the care and quality of life of these patients can be improved.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1.Burckhardt CS, Woods SL, Schultz AA, ZiebarthDM. Quality of life of adults with chronic illness: Apsychometric study. Res Nurs Health. 1989; 12:347–54.
  2. 2.Buyan N, Türkmen MA, Bilge I, et al. Quality of lifein children with chronic kidney disease (with childand parent assessments). Pediatr Nephrol. 2010; 25: 1487-96.
  3. 3.Rahmani F, Ranjbar F, Hosseinzadeh M, et al.Coping strategies of family caregivers of patientswith schizophrenia in Iran: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Sci. 2019; 6: 148–53.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ozgen Ahmet Yildirim * Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Kerem Poyraz Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Erkan Erdur Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Canan Can Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Cihan Gundogan Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Serdar Yildirim Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yunus Guzel Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Halil Kömek Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Aralık 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Ekim 2021

Kabul Tarihi

29 Kasım 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 48 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yildirim, O. A., Poyraz, K., Erdur, E., Can, C., Gundogan, C., Yerlikaya, H., Yildirim, S., Guzel, Y., & Kömek, H. (2021). Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors. Dicle Medical Journal, 48(4), 770-781. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1037634
AMA
1.Yildirim OA, Poyraz K, Erdur E, vd. Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors. diclemedj. 2021;48(4):770-781. doi:10.5798/dicletip.1037634
Chicago
Yildirim, Ozgen Ahmet, Kerem Poyraz, Erkan Erdur, vd. 2021. “Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors”. Dicle Medical Journal 48 (4): 770-81. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1037634.
EndNote
Yildirim OA, Poyraz K, Erdur E, Can C, Gundogan C, Yerlikaya H, Yildirim S, Guzel Y, Kömek H (01 Aralık 2021) Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors. Dicle Medical Journal 48 4 770–781.
IEEE
[1]O. A. Yildirim vd., “Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors”, diclemedj, c. 48, sy 4, ss. 770–781, Ara. 2021, doi: 10.5798/dicletip.1037634.
ISNAD
Yildirim, Ozgen Ahmet - Poyraz, Kerem - Erdur, Erkan - Can, Canan - Gundogan, Cihan - Yerlikaya, Halis - Yildirim, Serdar - Guzel, Yunus - Kömek, Halil. “Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors”. Dicle Medical Journal 48/4 (01 Aralık 2021): 770-781. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1037634.
JAMA
1.Yildirim OA, Poyraz K, Erdur E, Can C, Gundogan C, Yerlikaya H, Yildirim S, Guzel Y, Kömek H. Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors. diclemedj. 2021;48:770–781.
MLA
Yildirim, Ozgen Ahmet, vd. “Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors”. Dicle Medical Journal, c. 48, sy 4, Aralık 2021, ss. 770-81, doi:10.5798/dicletip.1037634.
Vancouver
1.Ozgen Ahmet Yildirim, Kerem Poyraz, Erkan Erdur, Canan Can, Cihan Gundogan, Halis Yerlikaya, Serdar Yildirim, Yunus Guzel, Halil Kömek. Evaluation of caregiver burden and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors. diclemedj. 01 Aralık 2021;48(4):770-81. doi:10.5798/dicletip.1037634

Cited By