Araştırma Makalesi

Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio

Cilt: 46 Sayı: 1 3 Mart 2019
  • Zafer Pekkolay *
  • Mazhar Müslüm Tuna
  • Mehmet Güven
  • Şadiye Altun Tuzcu
  • İbrahim Kaplan
  • Zeki Akkuş
  • Alpaslan Kemal Tuzcu
PDF İndir

Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the urine prolactin and serum/urine prolactin ratio for accuracy diagnosis of macroprolactinemia.

Methods: In the retrospective cross-sectional analysis, prolactin levels (high or normal) in the reproductive period of men and women were included in the study. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation method was used for the detection of macroprolactinemia. Then, patients were divided into three groups as macroprolactinemia, prolactinoma and healthy control group. In patients, prolactin values in spot urine with simultaneous serum prolactin values were calculated. The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the groups. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was determined to evaluate the predictive power of serum/urine prolactin ratio.

Results: A total of 41 patients were included in the study. Female/male:36 (87.8%)/ 5 (12.2%). Urinary prolactin median(minimum-maximum) values were macroprolactinemia, prolactinoma and control group, respectively; 0.06(0.05-0.10), 0.11(0.02-0.95), 0.08(0.05-0.25) ng/ml. Serum/urine ratio median (minium-maximum) values were macroprolactinemia, prolactinoma, and control group, respectively; 633(51-1032), 990(104-9635), 395.5(138-953). When the groups were compared, the patients with prolactinoma had higher urinary prolactin levels(p <0.01). Serum/urine prolactin ratio was found to be the highest in prolactinoma patients and the lowest in the control group and a significant difference was observed in groups (p <0.01).

ROC analysis(control-macroprolactin) for serum/urine prolactin ratio (Sensitivity 84.6 specificity 93.7 cut off >549,5 AUC=0.83) p<0.01

Conclusion: Urinary prolactin level and serum/urine prolactin ratio may be used in diagnosis of macroprolactinemia.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Horseman ND and Gregerson KA. Prolactin actions. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology. 2014; 52: 95-106.
  2. 2. Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, et all. Endocrine Society. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96: 273-88.
  3. 3. Freeman ME, Kanyicska B, Lerant A, et all. Prolactin: structure, function, and regulation of secretion. Physiological Reviews. 2000; 80: 1523–631.
  4. 4. Molitch ME. Prolactin in human reproduction In: Strauss JF, Barbieri R, eds. Yen and Jaffe's reproductive endocrinology: physiology, pathophysiology, and clinical management, 7th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia 2014: 45-65.
  5. 5. Hattori N, Ishihara T, Saiki Y, et all. Macroprolactinaemia in patients with hyperprolactinaemia: composition of macroprolactin and stability during long-term follow-up. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010; 73: 792–7.
  6. 6. Hattori N, Nakayama Y, Kitagawa K, et all. Anti-prolactin (PRL) autoantibody-binding sites (epitopes) on PRL molecule in macroprolactinemia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006; 190: 287-93.
  7. 7. Freeman ME, Kanyicska B, Lerant A, et all. Prolactin: structure, function, and regulation of secretion. Physiol Rev. 2000;80:1523–631.
  8. 8. Samson SL, Hamrahian AH, Ezzat S. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. American College of Endocrinology disease state clinical review: clinical relevance of macroprolactin in the absence or presence of true hyperprolactinemia. Endocr Pract. 2015; 21: 1427–35.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

3 Mart 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Kasım 2018

Kabul Tarihi

14 Aralık 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2019 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Pekkolay, Z., Tuna, M. M., Güven, M., Tuzcu, Ş. A., Kaplan, İ., Akkuş, Z., & Tuzcu, A. K. (2019). Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio. Dicle Medical Journal, 46(1), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.534848
AMA
1.Pekkolay Z, Tuna MM, Güven M, vd. Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio. diclemedj. 2019;46(1):119-124. doi:10.5798/dicletip.534848
Chicago
Pekkolay, Zafer, Mazhar Müslüm Tuna, Mehmet Güven, vd. 2019. “Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio”. Dicle Medical Journal 46 (1): 119-24. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.534848.
EndNote
Pekkolay Z, Tuna MM, Güven M, Tuzcu ŞA, Kaplan İ, Akkuş Z, Tuzcu AK (01 Mart 2019) Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio. Dicle Medical Journal 46 1 119–124.
IEEE
[1]Z. Pekkolay vd., “Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio”, diclemedj, c. 46, sy 1, ss. 119–124, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.5798/dicletip.534848.
ISNAD
Pekkolay, Zafer - Tuna, Mazhar Müslüm - Güven, Mehmet - Tuzcu, Şadiye Altun - Kaplan, İbrahim - Akkuş, Zeki - Tuzcu, Alpaslan Kemal. “Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio”. Dicle Medical Journal 46/1 (01 Mart 2019): 119-124. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.534848.
JAMA
1.Pekkolay Z, Tuna MM, Güven M, Tuzcu ŞA, Kaplan İ, Akkuş Z, Tuzcu AK. Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio. diclemedj. 2019;46:119–124.
MLA
Pekkolay, Zafer, vd. “Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio”. Dicle Medical Journal, c. 46, sy 1, Mart 2019, ss. 119-24, doi:10.5798/dicletip.534848.
Vancouver
1.Zafer Pekkolay, Mazhar Müslüm Tuna, Mehmet Güven, Şadiye Altun Tuzcu, İbrahim Kaplan, Zeki Akkuş, Alpaslan Kemal Tuzcu. Alternative methods for the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia: urine prolactin level and serum / urine prolactin ratio. diclemedj. 01 Mart 2019;46(1):119-24. doi:10.5798/dicletip.534848

Cited By