The Use Of Fasial Stımilator in Cochlear implant and Fasial Tumor Surgery

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 46 Sayı: 4, 807 - 812, 15.12.2019

Mehmet Akdağ , Ediz Argun Yorgancılar Muzeyyen Yıldırım Baylan

https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.661392

Öz

Objective: Our aim in conducting this clinical study that project was to investigate the surgical safety of facial nerve
monitoring along with its effects on the duration of the operation in otologic and neurotologic surgery.
Methods: We have used intraoperative monitoring and stimulation of facial nerve function routinely in 161 cochlear
surgery, and 10 neurotologic cases. Statistical study was performed only in otologic patients. The 171 patients who
underwent surgery, of the remaning 30 otologic surgery cases were randomly selected that were monitered. The
remaining 30 otologic surgery cases were not monitored and compared statistically for the duration of the operation
and the emerging complications.
Results: Of the study patients; no responses were detected in seven despite the stimulation. Response occurred only
after increasing the amplitude of the stimulation current in two patients. In the remaining 162 patients, the responses
were detected. Of the seven patients, in whom no responses were detected; electrode contact was lost in three, nerve
fatigue was found in two, and muscle-relaxant use for anesthesia was detected in one patient; while, no causes were
identified in one patient. Despite the presence of responses, a transient postoperative paresis was observed in one
patient. In cochlear implant patients, the mean duration of surgery was 2.35 hours without monitoring; whereas, it
was 1.45 hours in monitored patients.
Conclusion: We are of the opinion that this technological method may contribute significantly to obtaining
electrophysiologic data, as well as ensuring the safety of the operation and reducing the complication rates.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Facial nerve, Facial nerve monitoring

Kaynakça

• 1. Green JD, Shelton C, Brackmann DE. Iatrogenic facial nerve injury during otologic surgery. Laryngoscope. 1994; 104: 922-6.