A Case Study of Linguistic Innovations Among Turkish Youth

Abstract

The paper examines teenage language and how it expresses itself in unique ways to help define identities among peer groups. Teenagers challenge linguistic conventions to set themselves apart from adults by using a particular speech pattern that helps them identify and maintain their group identification. This study explores the psychological and social variables that influence the lexical features of teenage language among Turkish teenagers between the ages of fourteen and fifteen. The study analyses the spoken language of three Turkish teens over the course of two weeks, focusing on their vocative use, word creation, and cursing. The results show that in order to express their uniqueness and challenge societal conventions, this group of Turkish youths deliberately violates linguistic standards. Their overuse of swearing and the creation of new vocabulary emphasize their drive to set themselves apart from adults and create a sense of collective identity. The study also reveals how the English language and social media have influenced Turkish teenagers' language, as demonstrated by the use of Anglicisms and the creation of new terms related to sexuality and social media. According to the study, teenagers who group together are better able to communicate their uniqueness and use distinct languages.

Keywords

• Teenage language
• Peer-group identity
• Linguistic conventions
• Lexical features
• Sociocultural influences.

Teenage language: use and abuse

Öz

The paper examines teenage language and how it expresses itself in unique ways to help define identities among peer groups. Teenagers challenge linguistic conventions to set themselves apart from adults by using a particular speech pattern that helps them identify and maintain their group identification. This study explores the psychological and social variables that influence the lexical features of teenage language among Turkish teenagers between the ages of fourteen and fifteen. The study analyses the spoken language of three Turkish teens over the course of two weeks, focusing on their vocative use, word creation, and cursing. The results show that in order to express their uniqueness and challenge societal conventions, this group of Turkish youths deliberately violates linguistic standards. Their overuse of swearing and the creation of new vocabulary emphasize their drive to set themselves apart from adults and create a sense of collective identity. The study also reveals how the English language and social media have influenced Turkish teenagers' language, as demonstrated by the use of Anglicisms and the creation of new terms related to sexuality and social media. According to the study, teenagers who group together are better able to communicate their uniqueness and use distinct languages.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Teenage language
• Peer-group identity
• Linguistic conventions
• Lexical features
• Sociocultural influences.

Kaynakça

1. Cheshire, J. (2019). Global English, local English and youth identities in England and Europe. MåLbryting, 5(2001), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.7557/17.4742
2. de Klerk, V. (2005). Slang and swearing as markers of inclusion and exclusion in adolescence. In A. Williams & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Talking adolescence: Perspectives on communication in the teenage years (111–127). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing
3. Eckert, P. (1988). Adolescent Social Structure and the Spread of Linguistic Change. Language in Society, 17(2), 183–207. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4167922
4. Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Blackwell
5. Godin, M. N. (2006). Urban Youth Language in Multicultural Sweden. Scandinavian-Canadian Studies. 16, 126-141. https://doi.org/10.29173/scancan15
6. Ives, G., & Rana, R. (2018). Language and power (23rd ed.). Cambridge University Press
7. Jørgensen, A. M. M. (2013). Spanish teenage language and the COLAm-corpus. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v3i1.368
8. Laver, J. (1975). Communicative Functions of Phatic Communion. In A. Kendon, R. Harris & M. Key (Eds.), Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction ( 215-238). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907643.215

9. Leppänen, S., Pitkänen-Huhta, A., Piirainen-Marsh, A., Peuronen, S., (2009). Young people’s Translocal new media uses: A multiperspective analysis of language choice and Heteroglossia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1080–1107. https://doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01482.x
10. López, J. A. M. (2009). Lexical innovations in Madrid’s teenage talk: some intensifiers. In A.M Jørgensen & A. B. Stenström (Eds.), Youngspeak in a Multilingual Perspective ( 81–93). John Benjamin's Publishing Company
11. Martínez, I. M. P. (2020). Taboo Vocatives in the Language of London Teenagers. Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 31(2) 250–277. doi.org/10.1075/prag.19028.pal
12. McCarthy, M. & O'Keeffe, A. (2003) What's in a name? vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls. In P. Leistyna & C. Meyer (Eds), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use (153-185). Rodopi
13. Mencken, H. L., & McDavid, R. I. (1977). The American language: an inquiry into the development of English in the United States (1-vol. abridged ed.). Knopf
14. Stenström, A. (2006). Taboo words in teenage talk. Spanish in Context. 3(1) 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.3.1.08ste
15. Tagliamonte, S. (2016). Teen Talk: The Language of Adolescents. Cambridge University Press. https://doi:10.1017/CBO9781139583800
16. Thurlow, C. (2003). Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1)
17. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932