Çocuk Animasyon Filmlerinin Çevirisi Aracılığıyla Öz Temsil İnşa Etmek

Öz

Toplumsal bilişi şekillendiren kamu eğitim alanı araçlardan biri olarak animasyon filmleri çocukların eğitiminde dolaylı bir role sahiptir. Bu filmlerdeki söylemler aracılığıyla çocuklar farkında olmadan kimlik, toplumsal roller ve toplumsal normlar hakkında fikir sahibi olabilir. Kendilerini kurgu karakterlerle özdeşleştiren çocukların öz-temsil ve benlik algısı filmlerdeki söylem aracılığıyla şekillenebilmektedir. İzleyici sayısı dünya genelinde yüksek olan animasyon filmlerinin Türkçeye çevrilmesi söz konusu söylemlerin uluslararası dolanımına ve uluslararası kültürel planlamaya yardımcı olmaktadır. Bu filmlerin söylemlerinde 2000 yılından sonra modernizmden postmodernizme geçilen bir kırılma noktası yaşanmıştır. Söylemlerin farklılaştığı ve kültürel farklılıklara ve insan haklarına daha çok değer veren yeni söylemlere yer verildiği düşünülmektedir. Ancak uzun vadede halen uluslararası kültürel planlamaya hizmet etmektedirler. Eleştirel söylem çözümlemesi söz konusu filmlerdeki söylemlerin üretim ve tüketim süreçlerini sosyo-kültürel boyutlarıyla incelemek için kullanabilir. Bu makale, postmodernist söylemlere yer veren çocuk animasyon filmlerinin çevirisi aracılığıyla çocukların öz-temsillerin nasıl şekillenebileceğini eleştirel söylem çözümlemesi ile incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• animasyon filmleri
• söylem çözümlemesi
• çeviri
• öz-temsil.

Constructing Self Representation through Translation of Children’s Animations

Öz

Animated films have an indirect role in the education of children as one of the tools in the field of public pedagogical space, which shape social cognition. Through the discourses in these films, children can unwittingly construct ideas about identity, social roles and social norms. Self-representation and self-perception of children who identify themselves with fictional characters can be shaped through discourses in these films. The translation of animated films, which have a high number of viewers worldwide, into Turkish helps the international circulation of these discourses and international cultural planning. There has been a breaking point from modernism to postmodernism after 2000 in the discourses of these films. It is thought that the discourses have differentiated and new discourses which value cultural differences and human rights have been introduced. However, they still serve international cultural planning in the long run. Critical discourse analysis can be used to examine the production and consumption processes of the discourses in these films with their socio-cultural dimensions. This article aims to examine how children's self-representations can be shaped through the translation of children's animated films which include postmodernist discourses through critical discourse analysis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• animations
• discourse analysis
• translation
• self-representation.

Kaynakça

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.). (1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. New York: Springer-Verlag Publishing.
2. Ashcroft, B., G. Griffiths & H. Tiffin. (1989). The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. London:Routledge.
3. Asimaki, A. & G. Koustourakis. “Habitus: An Attempt at a Thorough Analysis of a Controversial Concept in Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice”. Social Sciences. Vol. 3, No. 4, 2014, pp. 121-131. doi:10.11648/j.ss.20140304.13.
4. Booker, M. Keith. (2010). Disney, Pixar, and The Hidden Messages of Children’s Films. California: Abc- Clio.
5. Bostan. A.D. & S. Kırel. (2018) “Postmodern Dönem Disney Prenses Anlatılarında İnşa Edilen Kadın Temsilinin Moana Örneği Üzerinden İncelenmesi”, TRTAKADEMİ, ISSN 2149-9446, Cilt 03, Sayı 05, Ocak 2018, 7-26.
6. Bourdieu, P. (2006). The sense of practice. Athens: Alexandreia.
7. Bourdieu, P. (2000) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Athens: Plethron.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Texts of Sociology. Athens: Delfini.

9. Callero, P. L. “The Sociology of the Self”, Annual Review of Sociology, 2003, Vol. 29 (2003), Annual Reviews Stable. pp. 115-133.
10. Gecas, V., & M. L. Schwalbe. (1983). “Beyond the looking-glass self: Social structure and efficacy-based self-esteem”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/3033844.
11. Fairclough, N. (2001a). “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research”, in R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.),Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications.
12. Fairclough, N. (1993). “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Commodification of Public Discourse”, Discourse and Society, 4, 133-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/095792659300 4002002.
13. Fairclough, N. (1992a) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
14. Fairclough, N. (1992b) Discourse and Text: Linguistics and intertextual analysiswithin discourse analysis. Discourse and Society,3(2): 193-217.
15. Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London, UK: Longman.
16. Freeman, E. (2005). Monsters, Inc.: Notes on the Neoliberal Arts Education. New Literary History, 36, 83-95.
17. Giroux, H. A. (1999). The Mouse That Roared: Disney and the end of innocence. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
18. Janks, H. (2005). “Language and the design of texts”. English Teaching: Practice and Critique. December, 2005, Volume 4, Number 3.http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/ etpc/2005v4n3art6.pdf pp. 97-110.
19. Jimenez, S. (2022). The Representation of Women in Disney Animated Films. Theses/ Capstones/Creative Projects. 181. Bachelor of Arts. Thesis of Sociology. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/university_honors_program/181
20. Lugo, C.R. & M. K. Bloodsworth-Lugo. “Look Out New World, Here We Come”?”, Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, Volume 9 Number 2, April 2009. Sage Publications, pp. 166-178.
21. Rosa, J. “. (2017). “Discourse, Linguistic Production, and Subjectivity: Disney-fying Language”. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.31390/taboo.10.2.14
22. Rosenberg, M. (1979). “Components of Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale”. Conceiving the self. New York Basic Books.
23. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). “Identity theory and social identity theory”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870.
24. Stets, J. E. & P. J. Burke. A Sociological Approach to Self and Identity, Department of Sociology, Washington State University, Chapter for Handbook of Self and Identity, Mark Leary & June Tangney (Eds), New York: Guilford Press.
25. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
26. Yıldız, H. (2012). “Canlandırma Filmleri ile İdeoloji Aktarımı: Shrek Disney’e Karşı”. Akdeniz İletişim Dergisi. pp. 69-85.
27. Yılmaz Kutlay, S. (2015). “Kişisel Tarihin Bir Ürünü Olarak Çevirmen Habitusu”. International Journal of Language Academy, Volume 3/1 Spring, 428/437, ISSN: 2342-0251
28. Yılmaz Kutlay, S. (2021). “A critical discourse analysis of the novel White Teeth and its translation”. Kuramdan Uygulamaya Çeviri Odaklı Çözümlemeler, Uysal, Nazan Müge (ed.), Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, pp.163-184.
29. N.a. https://news.sky.com/story/disney-warns-viewers-about-racist-stereotypes-in-classic-films-on-streaming-service-12105375, accessed on 04.04.2025.
30. N.a. https://movies.disney.com/e https://movies.disney.com/elementallemental, accessed on 18.03.2025.
31. N.a. https://movies.disney.com/zootopia-2, accessed on 30.03.2025.
32. N.a. https://www.disney.com/encanto, accessed on 30.03.2025.
33. N.a. https://news.disney.com/moana-quotes, accessed on 18.03.2025.