KONTROL LİDERİN ELİNDE Mİ? GİRİŞİMCİLİK OKULUNDAN CEVAP

Öz

Strateji oluşturmada liderin rolü ve konumu konusunda işletme disiplininde çok çeşitli görüşler hakim olmuştur. Örgütün iç çevresinde en güçlü kim? Lider mi strateji oluşturur, yoksa örgüt dinamikleri mi? Örgüt mü stratejiyi izler, yoksa strateji mi örgütü? Örgüte kontrol mü hakimdir yoksa kaos mu? Tüm bu sorular henüz yanıt bulamamış ve kontrol-kaos paradoksu olarak literatürdeki yerini almıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Mintzberg’in “Strategy Safari” adlı eserinde belirtmiş olduğu kontrol ve kaos üzerine oluşmuş olan paradoksu, on stratejik düşünce okulundan biri olan “Girişimcilik Okulu” çerçevesinde ele alıp “girişimci kişilik” ile strateji oluşturmada liderin elinde bulundurabileceği inisiyatifi vurgulamaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Liderlik, Paradoks, Girişimcilik Okulu, Kontrol Kuramı, Kaos Kuramı

IS CONTROL IN THE HANDS OF LEADERS? THE ANSWER COMES FROM THE ENTREPRENEURIAL SCHOOL

Öz

In Business Administration discipline there have been various views on leader’s statue and role in strategy formation. Who is the strongest in the internal environment of the organization? Does the leader form the strategies or organizational dynamics do so? Does the organization follow the strategy, or vice versa? Is there control over chaos or chaos over control in the organization? The aim of this study is to examine the control-chaos paradox stated in Mintzberg’s “Strategy Safari” book within the perspective of Entrepreneurial School, which is one of the ten schools of strategic management and to underline the initiative of the leader with his “entrepreneur-oriented character”.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Leadership, Paradox, Entrepreneurial School, Control Theory, Chaos Theory

Kaynakça

1. ALADA, D. (2001). İktisadi düşünce tarihinde girişimcilik kavramı üzerine notlar, İ.Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23-24, 12 s.
2. ASHFORTH, B.E., SAKS, A.M., RAYMOND, T.L. (1998). Socialization and newcomer adjustment: the role of organizational context, Human Relations, 51 (7).
3. ATAMAN, G. (2009). İşletme yönetimi, İstanbul: Türkmen Kitabevi.
4. BAKOĞLU, R. (2000). The road, the roadblocks and diversions on the way to today’s strategy concept. Öneri Dergisi, 14, 101-107. ss.
5. BOLMANN, L.G., DEAL, T.E. (1991). Leadership and management effectiveness: a multiframe, multi-sector analysis, Human Resources Management, 30 (4), 509- 534. ss.
6. BOYETT, I. (1997). The public sector entrepreneur – a definition, Behaviour & Research, 3 (2), 77-92. ss.
7. CARREE, M.A., THURIK, A.R. (2002). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth, chapter prepared for the International handbook of entrepreneurship research, edited by Z. ACS and D. AUDRETSCH. Erişim adresi: , Erişim tarihi: 08.05.2009.
8. CHAKRAVARTY, M. (2005). The 10 schools of strategic planning, Redif News, Erişim adresi: , Erişim tarihi: 11.4.09.

9. CHAKRAVARTY, B., LORANGE, P. (2008), Driving renewal: the entrepreneur-manager, Journal of Business Strategy, 29, (2), 14-21. ss.
10. COLE, A. H. (1969). Definition of entrepreneurship, In J. L. COMIVES, (Ed), Karl A. Bostrom Seminar in the Study of Enterprise, 10-22 ss.
11. DE WIT, B., MEYER, R. (1998). Strategy: process, content, context, London: International Thomson Business Pres.
12. DOOLEN, T.L., HACKER, M.E., VAN AKEN, E.M. (2003). The impact of organizational context on work team effectiveness: a study of production team, IEEETtransactions on Engineering Management, 50 (3), 285. s.
13. EIJNATTEN, F.M., PUTNIK, G.D. (2004). Chaos, complexity, learning, and the learning organization towards a chaordic enterprise, The Learning Organization, 11 (6).
14. ENTRIALGO, M., FERNANDEZ, E., VAZQUEZ, C.J. (2001). The effect of the organizational context on SME’s entrepreneurship: Some Spanish evidence, Small Business Economics, 16, 223–236. ss.
15. GARTNER, W.B. (1989). Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question, ET&P; University of Baltimore Publication, [Erişim adresi]: , [Erişim tarihi: 11.04.2009].
16. GUMMESSON, E. (2006). Qualitative research in management: addressing complexity, context and persona, Management Decision, 44 (2), 167-179. ss.
17. GÜNDÜZ, Ş. (2007). Dönüşümsel ve etkileşimsel liderlik ile iş tatmini arasındaki ilişki, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul: Maltepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme. 4-6. ss.
18. HALPIN, D., JORDAN, G. (2009). Interpreting environments: Interest group response to population ecology pressures, Cambridge University Press, [Erişim adresi]: , [Erişim tarihi: 25.04.2009].
19. HAMILTON, R.T., HARPER, D.A. (1994). The entrepreneur in theory and practice, Journal of Economic Studies, 21 (6), 3-18. ss.
20. KALU, K.N. (2003). Entrepreneurs or conservators?: Contractarian principles of bureaucratic performance, Administration and Society. 35 (5): 539-563. ss.
21. KERTENEZKY, J. (2000). Alfred Marshall on big business, principles of economics, Library of Economics. [Erişim adresi]: http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP.html, [Erişim tarihi: 12.04.2009].
22. KIR, K.C. (1995). Patron ve profesyonel yöneticilerin liderlik tarzları, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Yönetim ve Organizayon Anabilim Dalı.
23. LANGLOIS, R.N. (1987). Schumpeter and obsolescence of the entrepreneur, History of the economics society annual meetings, [Erişim adresi]: , [Erişim tarihi: 11.04.2009].
24. LEAVY, B. (2005). A Leader’s guide to creating an innovation culture, Strategy & Leadership, 33 (4), 38-45. ss.
25. LOUNSBURY, M. (1998). Collective entrepreneurship: the mobilization of college and university recycling coordinators. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11 (1), 50-69. ss.
26. MAKIPAA, M. (2004). The role and types of business ınformation in different “schools of thought”, of strategic management, Frontiers of E-business Research, [Erişim adresi]: , [Erişim tarihi: 03.04.2009].
27. MATLAY, H. (2005). Researching entrepreneurship and education. Education Training, 47 (8/9), 665-677. ss.
28. MINER, J.B. (1997). Psychological typology of successful entrepreneurs. Greenwood Publishing Group, , Incorporated, 19-20. ss.
29. MINTZBERG, H., AHLSTRAND, B., LAMPBELL, J. (1998). Strategy Safari, Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic Management, Pearson Education.
30. MORRISON, A. (2006). A contextualisation of entrepreneurship, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour &Rresearch, 12 (4), 192-209. ss.
31. OGBONNA, E., HARRIS, L.C. (2000). Leadership style, organizational culture and performance: empirical evidence from UK companies, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11 (4). 766–788. ss.
32. ÖZKUL, G. (2007). Kapitalist sistemin sürükleyici aktörleri: ekonomik teoride girişimciler. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3, 343-366. ss.
33. PORTER, L. W.; MCLAUGHLIN, G. B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather?, The Leadership Quarterly, 17.
34. PRICE, A.D.F., NEWSON, E. (2003). Strategic management: Consideration of paradoxes, processes, and associated concepts as applied to construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, 19 (4), 183-92. ss.
35. SARVAN, F., ARICI, E.D., ÖZEN, J., ÖZDEMİR, B., İÇİGEN, E.T. (2003). On stratejik yönetim okulu: biçimleşme Okulu’nun bütünleştirici çerçevesi, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 6, 73-12. ss.
36. SMITH, A.C.T., GRAETZ, F. (2006). Complexity theory and organizing form dualities, Management Decision, 44 (7), 851-870. ss.
37. STUMPF, F.A., TYMON, W.G. (2001). Consultant or entrepreneur? Demystifying the “war for talent'”, Career Development International, 6 (1), 48-55. ss.
38. ŞİMŞEK, Z. (1998). Üç perspektif ışığında örgütsel kuramın bugünü ve geleceği üzerine bir değerlendirme, Anadolu Üniversites İ.İ.B.F., VI. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Eskişehir.
39. THOMPSON, J. L. (1999),. The world of The entrepreneur - a new perspective, Journal of Workplace Learning: Employee Counselling Today, 11 (6), 209-224. ss.
40. Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlüğü, [Erişim adresi]: , [Erişim tarihi: 10.04.2009].
41. VIKIPEDI Ansiklopedisi, [Erişim adresi]: , [Erişim tarihi: 10.04.2009].
42. ZUBER, J.K. (1999). Constructing an educational seawall: a study of leadership, organizational dynamics, policy, and purpose, Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.