BİST SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK 25 ENDEKSİNDE YER ALAN İŞLETMELERİN YEŞİL ENTELEKTÜEL SERMAYE UNSURLARI ÜZERİNE İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2, 249 - 271, 02.07.2024

Şükran Sırkıntıoğlu Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1378008

https://izlik.org/JA87MJ66AB

Öz

Günümüzde, geleneksel rekabet edebilirlikten yeşil rekabet edebilirliğe doğru bir paradigma değişimi yaşanmaktadır. Bu değişim, örgütleri stratejilerinde değişiklik yapmaya zorlamaktadır. Geleneksel anlayıştan çıkan örgütler yeşil stratejiler geliştirmeye başlamaktadır. Yeşil rekabet avantajını elde eden örgütler rakiplerine karşı taklit edilemeyecek çevre stratejileri geliştirerek sürdürülebilir fayda elde etmektedir. Böylelikle, örgütler rekabet avantajını yeşil entelektüel sermaye yoluyla elde etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı; BİST Sürdürülebilirlik 25 Endeksinde yer alan işletmelerin yeşil entelektüel sermaye unsurlarına yönelik bir içerik analizi yapmaktır. Bu endekste yer alan işletmeler, genel sürdürülebilirlik notu yüksek olan ve sosyal, çevresel ve yönetsel performanslarına ilişkin bilgileri şeffaf bir şekilde kamuoyuyla paylaşmaktadırlar. Çalışmanın bir diğer amacı ise yeşil entelektüel sermaye kavramına ilişkin kavramsal bir çerçeve oluşturmak ve literatürde kavram ile ilgili yapılan çalışmaları sistematik olarak analiz etmektir. Çalışmada ulaşılan sonuçlara göre; endekste yer alan işletmelerin yeşil entelektüel sermaye boyutlarından yeşil yapısal sermaye ve yeşil ilişkisel sermayeye ilişkin faaliyetlerini, yeşil beşerî sermayeye göre daha çok açıkladıkları sonucuna ulaşılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yeşil Entelektüel Sermaye , Yeşil Beşerî Sermaye , Yeşil Yapısal Sermaye , Yeşil İlişkisel Sermaye , BİST Sürdürülebilirlik 25 Endeksi

A CONTENT ANALYSIS ON GREEN INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL FACTORS OF ENTERPRISES IN THE BIST SUSTAINABILITY 25 INDEX

https://izlik.org/JA87MJ66AB

Öz

Today, there is a paradigm shift from traditional competitiveness to green competitiveness. This change forces organizations to change their strategies. Organizations that leave the traditional understanding start to develop green strategies. Businesses that establish environmental strategies which their competitors are unable to replicate can gain a sustainable competitive advantage and ultimately profit in the long term. Thus, organizations gain competitive advantage through green intellectual capital. The main purpose of this study is to conduct a content analysis of the green intellectual capital elements of the enterprises in the BIST Sustainability 25 Index. The companies included in this index are those with high overall sustainability scores and transparently disclose information on their social, environmental and managerial performance to the public. Another objective of the study is to create a conceptual framework for the concept of green intellectual capital and to systematically analyze the studies on the concept in the literature. According to the results of the study, it is concluded that the enterprises in the index disclose their activities related to green structural capital and green relational capital, which are green intellectual capital dimensions, more than green human capital.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Green Intellectual Capital , Green Human Capital , Green Structural Capital , Green Relational Capital , BIST Sustainability 25 Index

Kaynakça

• Abrudan, D. B., Rafi, N., Daianu, D. C., & Kalyar, M. N. (2022). Linking green intellectual capital with green innovation: Examining the roles of green dynamic capabilities and motivation to achieve legitimacy. Agricultural Economics, 68(7), 250-258.
• Ahmed, A., Bhatti, S.H., Golgeci, I. & Arslan, A. (2022). Digital platform capability and organizational agility of emerging market manufacturing SMEs: The mediating role of intellectual capital and the moderating role of environmental dynamism. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 1-13.
• Ahmed, N. U., Montagno, R. V, & Firenze, R. J. (1998). Organizational performance and environmental consciousness: An empirical study. Management Decision, 36(2), 57–62.
• Albejaidi, F. (2022). Empirical evidence on influence of green intellectual capital upon environmental performance of educational institutions and health organizations. Gomal University Journal of Research, 38(1), 1-10.
• Ali, M., Puah, C. H., Ali, A., Raza, S. A., & Ayob, N. (2022). Green intellectual capital, green HRM and green social identity toward sustainable environment: a new integrated framework for Islamic banks. International Journal of Manpower, 43(3), 614-638.
• Ali, W., Wen, J., Hussain, H., Khan, N.A., Younas, M.W., & Jamil, I. (2021). Does green intellectual capital matter for green innovation adoption? Evidence from the manufacturing SMEs of Pakistan. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(5), 868-888.
• Allameh, S. M. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital the role of social capital, knowledge sharing. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 858–874.
• Alt, E., Díez-de-Castro, E. P., & Lloréns-Montes, F. J. (2015). Linking employee stakeholders to environmental performance: the role of proactive environmental strategies and shared vision. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 167-181.
• Asiaei, K., Jusoh, R., Barani, O., & Asiaei, A. (2022a). How does green intellectual capital boost performance? The mediating role of environmental performance measurement systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1587-1606.
• Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Alizadeh, R., & Yaghoubi, M. (2022b). Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 76-93.
• Astuti, P., & Datrini, L. (2021). Green competitive advantage: Examining the role of environmental consciousness and green intellectual capital. Management Science Letters, 11(4), 1141-1152.
• Begum, S., Ashfaq, M., Asiaei, K., & Shahzad, K. (2023). Green intellectual capital and green business strategy: The role of green absorptive capacity. Business Strategy and the Environment.1-17.
• Berry, M. A., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive corporate management: Environmental new industrial revolution. Academy of Management, 12(2), 38–50.
• Bombiak, E. (2022). Green intellectual capital as a support for corporate environmental development—Polish company experience. Energies, 15(9), 3004.
• Bontis, N. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5–8), 433–462.
• Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41-60.
• Can Saglam, Y. (2023). Does green intellectual capital matter for reverse logistics competency? The role of regulatory measures. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 1-21.
• Can Saglam, Y., Yildiz Çankaya, S. & Sezen, B. (2021). Proactive risk mitigation strategies and supply chain risk management performance: An empirical analysis for manufacturing firms in Turkey. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(6), 1224-1244.
• Capello, R. & Faggian, A. (2005). Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes, Regional Studies, 39(1), 75–87.
• Capello, R. (2002). Spatial and sectoral characteristics of relational capital in innovation activity. European Planning Studies, 10(2), 177–200.
• Chang, C. H., & Chen, Y. S. (2012). The determinants of green intellectual capital. Management Decision, 50(1), 74–94.
• Chaudhry, N., Bilal, A., Awan, M., & Bashir, A. (2016). The role of environmental consciousness, green intellectual capital management and competitive advantage on financial performance of the firms: An evidence from manufacturing sector of Pakistan. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 12(2), 51–70.
• Chen, Y. S. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of business ethics, 77, 271-286.
• Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Enhance environmental commitments and green intangible assets toward green competitive advantages: An analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM). Quality & Quantity, 47(1), 529–543.
• Chukwuka, L., Okegbe, T.O., Amahalu, N.N., & Obi, J.C. (2022). Firm characteristics and corporate reserve of quoted oil and gas firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Research. 9(1), 299-309.
• Curado, C., & Bontis, N. (2006). The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 3(4), 367-381.
• Dameri, R. P., & Ricciardi, F. (2015). Smart city intellectual capital: An emerging view of territorial systems innovation management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(4), 860–887.
• Dang, V.T., & Wang, J. (2022). Building competitive advantage for hospitality companies: The roles of green innovation strategic orientation and green intellectual capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103161.
• Delgado-Verde, M., Amores-Salvadó, J., Martín-de Castro, G., & Navas-López, J. E. (2014). Green intellectual capital and environmental product innovation: The mediating role of green social capital. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(3), 261-275.
• Dewi, R.R; Murwaningsari, E; Mayangsari, S. (2021). Green intellectual capital on value relevance in Indonesia’s manufacturing companies, Accounting Finance Review, 6(3), 120 – 136.
• Dzinkowski, R. (2000). The value of intellectual capital. The Journal of Business Strategy, 2(4), 3–4.
• Elias, J., & Scarbrough, H. (2004). Evaluating human capital: An exploratory study of management practice. Human resource management journal, 14(4), 21-40.
• Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource combinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1193–1201.
• Gharib, M., Alam, M. S., Hawaldar, I. T., Murshed, M., Khan, U., Alvarado, R., & Rehman, I. U. (2023). Roles of green intellectual capital facets on environmental sustainability in Oman. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3), 1-19.
• Ghosh, A., & Haque, S. (2023). Can the components of green intellectual capital influence employee green behavior? An empirical analysis on Indian energy sector using the partial least squares method. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24(3), 632-652.
• Haldorai, K., Kim, W. G., & Garcia, R. F. (2022). Top management green commitment and green intellectual capital as enablers of hotel environmental performance: the mediating role of green human resource management. Tourism Management, 88, 1-11.
• Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academic Management Review, 20, 986–1014.
• Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479.
• Huang, C. & Kung, F. (2011). Environmental consciousness and intellectual capital management: Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industry. Management Decision, 49(9), 1405-1425.
• Inayat, A., Afridi, S., & Javed, A. (2022). Green intellectual capital and sustainable performance of SMEs: Roles of green absorptive capacity and green dynamic capabilities. City University Research Journal (CURJ), 12(2), 152-170.
• Ionita, C., & Dinu, E. (2021). The effect of intangible assets on sustainable growth and firm value–evidence on intellectual capital investment in companies listed on Bucharest stock exchange. Kybernetes, 50(10), 2823-2849.
• Jirakraisiri, J., Badir, Y.F. & Frank, B. (2021). Translating green strategic intent into green process innovation performance: The role of green intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(7), 43-67.
• Johnson, W. H. A. (1999). An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital: Measuring the stock and flow of intellectual capital components in the firm. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5–8), 562–575.
• Khan, A., Hussain, S., & Sampene, A. K. (2023). Investing in green intellectual capital to enhance green corporate image under the influence of green innovation climate: A case of Chinese entrepreneurial SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 138-177.
• Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Department of Computer Science, Keele University, UK.
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 625-645.
• López‐Gamero, M. D., Zaragoza‐Sáez, P., Claver‐Cortés, E., & Molina‐Azorín, J. F. (2011). Sustainable development and intangibles: Building sustainable intellectual capital. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(1), 18-37.
• Maaz, M.A.M., Ahmad, R. & Abad, A. (2022). Antecedents and consequences of green supply chain management practices: A study of Indian food processing industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(7), 2045-2073.
• Mansoor, A., Jahan, S., & Riaz, M. (2021). Does green intellectual capital spur corporate environmental performance through green workforce? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(5), 823-839.
• Marco-Lajara, B., Zaragoza-Sáez, P. C., Martínez-Falcó, J., & Sánchez-García, E. (2023). Does green intellectual capital affect green innovation performance? Evidence from the Spanish wine industry. British Food Journal, 125(4), 1469-1487.
• Massaro, M., Dumay, J., Garlatti, A., & Dal Mas, F. (2018). Practitioners’ views on intellectual capital and sustainability: From a performance-based to a worth-based perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(2), 367-386.
• McEvily, S. K., & Chakravarthy, B. (2002). The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 285–305.
• Mehmood, K.K., & Hanaysha, J.R. (2022). Impact of corporate social responsibility, green intellectual capital, and green innovation on competitive advantage: Building contingency model. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), 13(1), 1-14.
• Menguc, B., & Ozanne, L. K. (2005). Challenges of the “green imperative”: A natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation-business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 430–438.
• Miller, R. & Wurzburg, G. (1995). Investing in human capital. The OECD Observer 193, 16-19.
• Muafi, M., & Sulistio, J. (2022). A nexus between green intellectual capital, supply chain integration, digital supply chain, supply chain agility, and business performance. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 15(2), 275-295.
• Nikolaou, I. E., Tsalis, T. A., Kostakis, I., Stergiopoulou, F., Athanasiadou, I., Lanaras-Mamounis, G., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2023). Green intellectual capital: a critical factor to explain the relationship between corporate sustainable and financial performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7, 1-22.
• Nisar, Q. A., Haider, S., Ali, F., Jamshed, S., Ryu, K., & Gill, S. S. (2021). Green human resource management practices and environmental performance in Malaysian green hotels: The role of green intellectual capital and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 1-11.
• Omar, M. K., Yusoff, Y. M., & Zaman, M. D. K. (2017). The role of green intellectual capital on business sustainability. World Applied Sciences Journal, 35(12), 2558–2563.
• Özdemir, Z. & Pamukçu, F. (2016). Kurumsal sürdürülebilir raporlama sisteminin Borsa İstanbul sürdürülebilirlik endeksi kapsamındaki işletmelerde analizi. Mali Çözüm, 134(2), 13-35.
• Özmutlu, S. Y. (2023). Çevresel yeteneklerin kurumsal çevre stratejisi ve pazar performansı üzerindeki etkileri: doğal kaynak temelli görüş. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 189-213.
• Perterlaf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179–191.
• Pirogova, O., & Plotnikov, V. (2020). Intellectual capital management within the framework of the VBM concept. In E3S Web of Conferences, 157, 1-9.
• Sarwar, A., & Mustafa, A. (2023). Analysing the impact of green intellectual capital on environmental performance: The mediating role of green training and development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-14.
• Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5), 35–55.
• Shah, S.M.M., Ahmed, U., Ismail, A.I., & Mozammel, S. (2021). Going intellectually green: Exploring the nexus between green intellectual capital, environmental responsibility, and environmental concern towards environmental performance. Sustainability, 13(11), 1-22.
• Shehzad, M. U., Zhang, J., Dost, M., Ahmad, M. S., & Alam, S. (2023). Linking green intellectual capital, ambidextrous green innovation and firms green performance: Evidence from Pakistani manufacturing firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24(4), 974-1001.
• Sheikh, A. M. (2022). Green intellectual capital and social innovation: The nexus. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(6), 1199-1220.
• Si, K., Xu, X.L., & Chen, H.H. (2020). Examining the interactive endogeneity relationship between R&D investment and financially sustainable performance: Comparison from different types of energy enterprises. Energies, 13, 23-32.
• SteWart, T. A. (1994). Intellectual capital: Your company’s most valuable asset. Fortune vom, 3(94), 28-33.
• Sudibyo, Y., & Sutanto, K. (2020). Environmental consciousness and corporate social responsibility as drivers of green intellectual capital. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(4), 716-726.
• Sydler, R., Haefliger, S., & Pruksa, R. (2014). Measuring intellectual capital with financial figures: can we predict firm profitability?. European Management Journal, 32(2), 244-259.
• Thiagarajan, A., & Sekkizhar, J. (2017). The impact of green intellectual capital on integrated sustainability performance in the Indian auto-component industry. Journal of Contemporary Research in Management, 12(4), 21-78.
• Tran, T. D., Huan, D. M., Phan, T. T. H., & Do, H. L. (2023). The impact of green intellectual capital on green innovation in Vietnamese textile and garment enterprises: Mediate role of environmental knowledge and moderating impact of green social behavior and learning outcomes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 1-14.
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
• Ullah, H., Wang, Z., Bashir, S., Khan, A. R., Riaz, M., & Syed, N. (2021). Nexus between IT capability and green intellectual capital on sustainable businesses: Evidence from emerging economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 27825-27843.
• Ullah, S., Mehmood, T., & Ahmad, T. (2023). Green intellectual capital and green HRM enabling organizations go green: Mediating role of green innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 15(2), 245-259.
• Wang, C.H., & Juo, W.J. (2021). An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: green innovation strategy for performance sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3241-3254.
• Wirtenberg, J., Harmon, J., & Fairfield, K. D. (2007). HR’s role in building a sustainable enterprise: Insights from some of the world’s best companies. Human Resource Planning, 30(1), 10–20.
• Wu, W. Y., Chang, M. L., & Chen, C. W. (2008). Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation. R&D Management, 38(3), 265-277.
• Xi, M., Fang, W., & Feng, T. (2023). Green intellectual capital and green supply chain integration: The mediating role of supply chain transformational leadership. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24(4), 877-899.
• Yadiati, W. (2019). The role of green intellectual capital and organisational reputation in influencing environmental performance. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(3), 261-268.
• Yang, D., Jiang, W., & Zhao, W. (2019). Proactive environmental strategy, innovation capability, and stakeholder integration capability: A mediation analysis. Business Strategy Environiment, 28, 1534–1547.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. Yong, J.Y., Yusliza, M.Y., Ramayah, T. & Fawehinmi, O. (2019). Nexus between green intellectual capital and green human resource management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 364-374.
• Yusliza, M. Y., Yong, J. Y., Tanveer, M. I., Ramayah, T., Faezah, J. N., & Muhammad, Z. (2020). A structural model of the impact of green intellectual capital on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 1-11.
• Yusoff, Y.M., Omar, M.K., Zaman, M.D.K. & Samad, S. (2019). Do all elements of green intellectual capital contribute toward business sustainability? Evidence from the Malaysian context using the partial least squares method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 626-637.
• Zhang, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). How to improve the corporate sustainable development? The importance of the intellectual capital and the role of the investor confidence. Sustainability, 14, 37-49.