BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kültür Bürokrasi ve Yolsuzluk: Kültürlerarası Zaman Serimli/Boylamsal Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 131 - 149, 01.07.2018

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı ülkelerin kültürel yapılarının yolsuzluk ya da rüşvet eğilimine olan etkilerinin zaman serimli boylamsal olarak incelenmesidir. Aynı zamanda ülkelerin bürokratik yapılarının, kültür ve rüşvet ilişkisini artırıp artırmadığını incelemektir. Bu çerçevede 68 ülke ve 3 bölgeyi içeren teorik ve ampirik bir çalışma yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak yolsuzluk, bireysel kültürler ile negatif ilişkiliyken; yolsuzluk ile belirsizlikten kaçınan kültürler arasında pozitif ilişki görülmektedir. Belirsizlikten kaçınma eğiliminin yüksek olması aşırı bürokratik yapılanmayı meydana getirmekte ve bu durumun yolsuzluğun artışını desteklediği görülmektedir. 11 yıllık bir süreç içerisinde aşırı bürokrasi ile yolsuzluk arasında yüksek oranda ilişkisinin devam ettiği görülmüştür.

Kaynakça

  • Akçakaya, M. (2016). Weber’in bürokrasi kuramının bugünü ve geleceği. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(3) 275-295.
  • Allik, J., McCrae, R. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 13-28.
  • Barutçu, S., Aydemir, M. ve Barutçu, E. (2005). Uluslararası pazarlarda rüşvet sorunu: Denizli’de faaliyet gösteren işletmelerde bir Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14,157-175.
  • Cameron, K. S. ve Quinn, R. D. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture, Pub. Addison-wesley Publishing Company Inc., Massachusetts.
  • Çukurçayır, M.A., Özer, M.A. ve Turgut, K. (2012). Yerel yönetimlerde yolsuzlukla mücadelede yönetişim ilke ve uygulamaları. Sayıştay Dergisi, 86(3), 1-25.
  • Dalgın, M. (2004). Inequality and growth: A Panel data dynamic approch. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 18 (3-4), 65-77.
  • Deal, T. E. ve Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate culture: The rites and rituals of corporate life, reading (MA), Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  • Denison, D. R. (1997). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Doney, P. M. ve Joseph, D. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601-620
  • Ergeneli, A. (2017). Örgütsel Davranış, Nobel yayınları.
  • Gesteland, R. R. (1999). Cross-cultural business behavior: Marketing, negotiating, and managing across cultures. 2nd ed., Copenhagen Business School Press,
  • Getz, K. Ve Volkema, J. (2001). Culture, perceived corruption, and economics. Business & Society, 40(1), 7-30.
  • Hampden-Turner, C. ve Trompenaars, F. (2000). Building cross-cultural competence: How to create wealth from conflicting values. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences, international differences in work- related values, SAGE pub. London.
  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede G. J. ve Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival, U.S.A., McGraw-Hill.
  • House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., ve Gupta, V. (eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Husted, B. (1999) Wealth, culture, and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 30: 339-360.
  • Husted, B., (2002). Culture and International Anticorruption Agreements in Latin America. Journal of Business Ethics 37(4), 413–422.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J.W. Berry, M.H. Segall, & C. Kağıtçıbaşı (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Volume 3: Social behavior and applications. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Keskin, U (2016). Franz Kafka’nın eserlerinde aşırı bürokrasinin ve otoriter yönetici imgesi. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 17.2: 253-273.
  • Li, S., Triandis, H. C. ve Yao Yu (2006). Cultural orientation and corruption. Ethics & Behavior, 16(3), 199–215.
  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Özdemir, M. (2008). Kamu yönetiminde etik. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(7), 179- 195.
  • Peters, T. J. ve Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence : lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies, New York, Harper and Row.
  • Salacuse, J. W. (1999). Intercultural negotiation in international business. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8(3), 217-236.
  • Schein, H.E. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership, San Francisco, Jossey- Boss Publishers,
  • Seleim, A. ve Bontis, N. (2009). The relationship between culture and corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 165-184.
  • Şahin, K. T. (2007). İşlem maliyeti yaklaşımı’nın kültürel temelleri. Yönetim, 18(58), 12-22.
  • The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank (2006) Doing Business 2007, How to reform Comparing Regulation in 175 Economies
  • The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank (2018) Doing Business 2018, Reforming to Create Jobs, Comparing Business Regulation for Domestic Firms in 190 Economies
  • Tokatlıoğlu, M. Y. (2003). Ekonomik boyutuyla yolsuzluk olgusu ve yolsuzlukla mücadele. Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, Cilt 5, Sayı 2.
  • Transparency International (2007), Global Corruption Report 2007, available at: www.trasparency.org
  • Transparency International (2017), Corruption Perceptions Index 2017, available at: www.trasparency.org
  • Triandis, H.C. (1994). Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism. Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Sage Publication, London.
  • Triandis H.C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism, Westview Press.
  • Weaver, G. R. (2001). Ethics programs in global business: Culture’s role in Managing. Ethics Journal of Business Ethics 30: 3-15.
  • Yeganeh H. (2014). Culture and corruption: A concurrent application of Hofstede's, Schwartz's and Inglehart's frameworks. International Journal of Development Issues 13(1), 2-24.
  • Yılmaz, Abdullah ve Raci Kılavuz ( 2002) Türk kamu bürokrasisinin işlemsel sorunları üzerine notlar. CÜ. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 17-31.

Culture Bureaucracy and Corruption: A Longitudinal Cross-Cultural Study

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 131 - 149, 01.07.2018

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to longitudinally examine the effects of cultural structures of countries on corruption or bribery tendencies. At the same time, it examines whether bureaucratic structures of countries increase the relationship between culture and bribery. In this framework, a theoretical and empirical study including 68 countries and 3 regions was conducted. As a result, corruption is negatively associated with individual cultures; there is a positive correlation between corruption and cultures avoiding ambiguity. The high tendency to avoid ambiguity leads to excessive bureaucratic structure, which seems to support the increase in corruption. Over a period of 11 years, it has been seen that the culture has continued to be related with both excessive bureaucracy and corruption

Kaynakça

  • Akçakaya, M. (2016). Weber’in bürokrasi kuramının bugünü ve geleceği. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(3) 275-295.
  • Allik, J., McCrae, R. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 13-28.
  • Barutçu, S., Aydemir, M. ve Barutçu, E. (2005). Uluslararası pazarlarda rüşvet sorunu: Denizli’de faaliyet gösteren işletmelerde bir Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14,157-175.
  • Cameron, K. S. ve Quinn, R. D. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture, Pub. Addison-wesley Publishing Company Inc., Massachusetts.
  • Çukurçayır, M.A., Özer, M.A. ve Turgut, K. (2012). Yerel yönetimlerde yolsuzlukla mücadelede yönetişim ilke ve uygulamaları. Sayıştay Dergisi, 86(3), 1-25.
  • Dalgın, M. (2004). Inequality and growth: A Panel data dynamic approch. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 18 (3-4), 65-77.
  • Deal, T. E. ve Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate culture: The rites and rituals of corporate life, reading (MA), Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  • Denison, D. R. (1997). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Doney, P. M. ve Joseph, D. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601-620
  • Ergeneli, A. (2017). Örgütsel Davranış, Nobel yayınları.
  • Gesteland, R. R. (1999). Cross-cultural business behavior: Marketing, negotiating, and managing across cultures. 2nd ed., Copenhagen Business School Press,
  • Getz, K. Ve Volkema, J. (2001). Culture, perceived corruption, and economics. Business & Society, 40(1), 7-30.
  • Hampden-Turner, C. ve Trompenaars, F. (2000). Building cross-cultural competence: How to create wealth from conflicting values. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences, international differences in work- related values, SAGE pub. London.
  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede G. J. ve Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival, U.S.A., McGraw-Hill.
  • House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., ve Gupta, V. (eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Husted, B. (1999) Wealth, culture, and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 30: 339-360.
  • Husted, B., (2002). Culture and International Anticorruption Agreements in Latin America. Journal of Business Ethics 37(4), 413–422.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J.W. Berry, M.H. Segall, & C. Kağıtçıbaşı (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Volume 3: Social behavior and applications. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Keskin, U (2016). Franz Kafka’nın eserlerinde aşırı bürokrasinin ve otoriter yönetici imgesi. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 17.2: 253-273.
  • Li, S., Triandis, H. C. ve Yao Yu (2006). Cultural orientation and corruption. Ethics & Behavior, 16(3), 199–215.
  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Özdemir, M. (2008). Kamu yönetiminde etik. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(7), 179- 195.
  • Peters, T. J. ve Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence : lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies, New York, Harper and Row.
  • Salacuse, J. W. (1999). Intercultural negotiation in international business. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8(3), 217-236.
  • Schein, H.E. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership, San Francisco, Jossey- Boss Publishers,
  • Seleim, A. ve Bontis, N. (2009). The relationship between culture and corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 165-184.
  • Şahin, K. T. (2007). İşlem maliyeti yaklaşımı’nın kültürel temelleri. Yönetim, 18(58), 12-22.
  • The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank (2006) Doing Business 2007, How to reform Comparing Regulation in 175 Economies
  • The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank (2018) Doing Business 2018, Reforming to Create Jobs, Comparing Business Regulation for Domestic Firms in 190 Economies
  • Tokatlıoğlu, M. Y. (2003). Ekonomik boyutuyla yolsuzluk olgusu ve yolsuzlukla mücadele. Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, Cilt 5, Sayı 2.
  • Transparency International (2007), Global Corruption Report 2007, available at: www.trasparency.org
  • Transparency International (2017), Corruption Perceptions Index 2017, available at: www.trasparency.org
  • Triandis, H.C. (1994). Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism. Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Sage Publication, London.
  • Triandis H.C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism, Westview Press.
  • Weaver, G. R. (2001). Ethics programs in global business: Culture’s role in Managing. Ethics Journal of Business Ethics 30: 3-15.
  • Yeganeh H. (2014). Culture and corruption: A concurrent application of Hofstede's, Schwartz's and Inglehart's frameworks. International Journal of Development Issues 13(1), 2-24.
  • Yılmaz, Abdullah ve Raci Kılavuz ( 2002) Türk kamu bürokrasisinin işlemsel sorunları üzerine notlar. CÜ. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 17-31.
Toplam 39 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Ercan Ergün Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Temmuz 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Ergün, E. (2018). Kültür Bürokrasi ve Yolsuzluk: Kültürlerarası Zaman Serimli/Boylamsal Bir Çalışma. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 19(2), 131-149.