Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity Nexus in Turkiye’s Manufacturing Industry: A Sectoral Analysis (2009-2022)

Öz

This study examines the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and productivity in Türkiye’s manufacturing industry, focusing on 14 sub-sectors from 2009 to 2022. The analysis aims to evaluate the impact of both current and lagged FDI on productivity dynamics using standard panel data, co-integration analysis, Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS), Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS), and a Panel Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model to estimate short and long-term effects. In the short term, standard panel models show productivity has a positive relationship with current FDI inflows and per capita personnel costs, and a negative relationship with the turnover index. However, no significant relationship was found with lagged FDI. The Panel ARDL model confirms these dynamics, identifying a statistically significant positive FDI impact in seven of the fourteen sectors, highlighting sectoral heterogeneity. Long-term analysis reveals a different dynamic. While no direct relationship exists between current FDI and productivity, lagged FDI inflows positively impact sectoral performance. This finding is robustly confirmed by the Panel ARDL model, which indicates a stable long-run relationship via a significant error correction term. Furthermore, per capita personnel costs and the turnover index show positive long-term effects. These findings emphasize the need for strategic, sector-specific policies. The varied impact of FDI suggests a need to distinguish between high-absorption sectors that readily benefit and those requiring foundational capacity building to maximize FDI’s contribution to sustainable productivity growth.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Foreign direct investment
• Productivity
• Panel data analysis
• Co-integration analysis
• Autoregressive distributed lag analysis

Türkiye İmalat Sanayisinde Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım ve Verimlilik İlişkisi: Sektörel Bir Analiz (2009-2022)

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2009-2022 yılları arasında Türkiye’nin imalat sanayisinde doğrudan yabancı yatırım (DYY) girişleri ile verimlilik arasındaki ilişkiyi, 14 imalat alt sektörüne odaklanarak incelemektedir. Analiz, mevcut ve gecikmeli DYY’nin verimlilik dinamikleri üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Kısa ve uzun dönem etkileri tahmin etmek için panel veri tahmini, eşbütünleşme analizi, FMOLS ve DOLS yöntemleri uygulanmıştır. Kısa dönemde, verimlilik ile DYY girişleri ve kişi başına personel maliyetleri arasında pozitif bir ilişki bulunurken, ciro endeksi ile negatif bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Gecikmeli DYY, ihracat-ithalat karşılama oranı ve ticari mal alımları ile anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır. Uzun dönem analizinde, DYY ile verimlilik arasında doğrudan bir ilişki tespit edilmemiştir; ancak, gecikmeli DYY girişlerinin sektörel performansı olumlu etkilediği görülmüştür. Ayrıca, kişi başına personel maliyetleri, ciro endeksi ve ticari mal alımları pozitif etkiler gösterirken, ihracat-ithalat karşılama oranı farklı sonuçlar sunmaktadır. Bulgular, DYY’nin sürdürülebilir verimlilik artışına katkısını maksimize etmek için stratejik sektörel politikalara ihtiyaç duyulduğunu vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Doğrudan yabancı yatırım
• Verimlilik
• Panel veri analizi
• Eşbütünleşme analizi
• Gecikmesi dağıtılmış otoregresif model analizi.

Kaynakça

1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351.
2. Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3), 605-618.
3. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2004). FDI and economic growth: The role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics, 64(1), 89-112.
4. Arısoy, İ. (2012). The impact of foreign direct investment on total factor productivity and economic growth in Turkey. The Journal of Developing Areas, 17-29.
5. Benli, M. (2016). Productivity spillovers from FDI in Turkey: Evidence from quantile regressions. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 23(3), 177-196.
6. Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3), 247-277.
7. Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J.-W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115-135.
8. Bournakis, I., & Tsionas, M. (2022). Productivity with endogenous FDI spillovers: A novel estimation approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 251, 108546.

9. Caves, R. E. (1974). Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host-country markets. Economica, 41(162), 176-193.
10. Chudnovsky, D., López, A., & Rossi, G. (2008). Foreign direct investment spillovers and the absorptive capabilities of domestic firms in the Argentine manufacturing sector (1992–2001). The Journal of Development Studies, 44(5), 645-677.
11. Dancey, C. P., Reidy J. (2017). Statistics without maths for psychology. 7th Ed. Prentice Hall.
12. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of The American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427-431.
13. Driffield, N., & Taylor, K. (2000). FDI and the labour market: A review of the evidence and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(3), 90-103.
14. Fatima, S. T. (2016). Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: evidence from Turkish micro-level data. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(3), 291-324.
15. Filiz, K. (2014). FDI and total factor productivity relations: An empirical analysis for BRIC and Turkey. Advances in Management, 7(3), 23-27.
16. Fu, X. (2012). Foreign direct investment and managerial knowledge spillovers through the diffusion of management practices. Journal of Management Studies, 49(5), 970-999.
17. Gallagher, K. P., & Zarsky, L. (2007). The enclave economy: Foreign investment and sustainable development in Mexico’s Silicon Valley. MIT Press.
18. Gorg, H., & Greenaway, D. (2004). Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? World Bank Research Observer, 19(2), 171-197.
19. Granger, C. W., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
20. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press.
21. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1251-1271.
22. Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605-627.
23. Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Sánchez-Martín, M. E., & Thirion, G. (2016). A difficult relationship: declining (but productive) FDI inflows in Turkey. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (7918).
24. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1-44.
25. Karahan, O., & Colak, O. (2021). Foreign direct investment and productivity growth in Eastern European countries. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), 14(3), 26-34.
26. Keller, W. (2010). International trade, foreign direct investment, and technology spillovers. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 793-829). North-Holland.
27. Küçük, N. E. (2023). Dijital Dönüşümün Uluslararası Ticaret Üzerine Etkisi,. 5. International Cappadocia Scientific Research Congress Proceedings Book, 544-550.
28. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
29. Li, Y., & Chen, S. Y. (2010). The impact of FDI on the productivity of Chinese economic regions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 17(3), 299-312.
30. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.
31. Markusen, J. R., & Venables, A. J. (1999). Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development. European Economic Review, 43(2), 335-356.
32. Okşak, Y., & Koyuncu, C. (2021). Long-run asymmetric association between FDI and productivity in Turkey. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci: Časopis Za Ekonomsku Teoriju i Praksu, 39(2), 253-277.
33. Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 61(S1), 653-670.
34. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers. Economics, 1240(1), 1-39.
35. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.
36. Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
37. Phelps, N. A. (2008). Cluster or capture? Manufacturing foreign direct investment, external economies and agglomeration. Regional Studies, 42(4), 457-473.
38. Phillips, P. C. B. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75, 2, 335-346.
39. Qasim, M., & Su, W. (2022). Technology transfer and economic growth through foreign direct investment in transition economies. Journal of Policy Options, 5(2), 1-6.
40. Ramasamy, M., Dhanapal, D., & Murugesan, P. (2017). Effects of FDI spillover on regional productivity: Evidence from panel data analysis using stochastic frontier analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 12(3), 427-446.
41. Rodrik, D. (2008). One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton University Press.
42. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), 71–102.
43. Sofuoğlu, E., & Kızılkaya, O. (2018). İş gücü verimliliği ve doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar arasındaki ilişki: Türkiye ekonomisi için ampirik bir analiz. Turkish Studies, 13, 22.
44. Sözüer, A. (2023). Foreign direct ınvestment and labor productivity: Evidence from industrial firms in Türkiye. Istanbul Management Journal, (95), 12-21.
45. The Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye TCMB (2024, 07.10). Retrieved from https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/
46. Turkstat (2024, 05.10). Retrieved from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/
47. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002), Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 2, 4.