Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinde Ekonomik Büyüme ve Çevresel Bozulma İlişkisi: Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Temelli Panel Veri Analizi

Öz

Küresel düzeyde sürdürülebilir kalkınma tartışmalarının önem kazandığı son yıllarda, ekonomik büyümenin çevresel etkileri akademik gündemin odağında yer almaktadır. Bu bağlamda, çalışma 2004–2024 döneminde Avrupa Birliği (AB) ülkeleri için Dünya Bankası verilerinden yararlanarak ekonomik büyüme ile çevresel bozulma arasındaki dinamik etkileşimi incelemekte; analiz, Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi hipotezinin teorik temelleri üzerine inşa edilmektedir. Çalışmada milli gelir büyümesi, milli gelir büyümesinin karesi, enerji tüketimi, ticaret açıklığı, karbondioksit (CO₂) emisyonları ve doğrudan yabancı yatırımlardan oluşan temel makroekonomik değişkenleri içeren bir panel veri yapısı kullanılmıştır. AB ülkeleri arasında gözlenen güçlü ekonomik ve çevresel etkileşimler nedeniyle, analizde yatay kesit bağımlılığı dikkate alan ve daha sağlam standart hatalar sağlayan Driscoll–Kraay tahmincisi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, GDPG katsayısının pozitif, GDPG² katsayısının negatif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmasıyla, CO₂ emisyonları üzerinde ÇKE’nin öngördüğü ters-U biçimli ilişkinin geçerli olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca enerji tüketimi ve dışa açıklık CO₂ emisyonlarını artırıcı ve anlamlı etkilere sahipken, FDI değişkeni istatistiksel olarak anlamsız bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar, AB’de sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine ulaşmak için enerji verimliliğinin yükseltilmesi, yenilenebilir kaynakların teşviki ve ticarette çevresel standartların güçlendirilmesi gerektiğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekonomik büyüme
• Karbon emisyonu
• Panel veri analizi
• Kuznets eğrisi
• Driscoll-Kraay yöntemi

The Relationship Between Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation in European Union Countries: A Panel Data Analysis Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve

Öz

In recent years, as discussions on sustainable development have gained importance at the global level, the environmental impacts of economic growth have been at the center of the academic agenda. In this context, the study examines the dynamic interaction between economic growth and environmental degradation for European Union (EU) countries during the period 2004–2024, using World Bank data; the analysis is built on the theoretical foundations of the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Due to the strong economic and environmental interactions observed among EU countries, the Driscoll–Kraay estimator, which accounts for cross-sectional dependence and provides more robust standard errors, was used in the analysis. The findings indicate that the inverse-U-shaped relationship predicted by the CGE model on CO₂ emissions is valid, with the GDPG coefficient being positive, the GDPG² coefficient being negative, and both statistically significant. Furthermore, while energy consumption and openness to trade have significant and increasing effects on CO₂ emissions, the FDI variable was found to be statistically insignificant. The results indicate that in order to achieve sustainable development goals in the EU, it is necessary to improve energy efficiency, promote renewable sources, and strengthen environmental standards in trade.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Economic growth
• carbon emissions
• panel data analysis
• Driscoll-Kraay method

Kaynakça

1. Allard, A., Takman, J., Uddin, G. S., and Ahmed, A. (2018). The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(6), 5848–5861. doi: 10.1007/S11356-017-0907-0/TABLES/14
2. Altıntaş, H., & Kassouri, Y. (2020). Is the environmental Kuznets Curve in Europe related to the per-capita ecological footprint or CO2 emissions? Ecological Indicators, 113, 106187. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106187
3. Anser, M. K., Alharthi, M., Aziz, B., and Wasim, S. (2020). Impact of urbanization, economic growth, and population size on residential carbon emissions in the SAARC countries. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 22(4), 923–936. doi: /10.1007/s10098-020-01833-y
4. Arı, A., ve Zeren, F. (2011). CO2 Emisyonu ve ekonomik büyüme: Panel veri analizi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 18(2), 37-47.
5. Atgür, M. (2021). Ekonomik büyüme, enerji tüketimi ve karbon emisyonları ilişkisi: Çin örneği. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 172–186. doi: 10.32709/akusosbil.696857
6. Bai, J., and Ng, S. (2004). A PANIC Attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4), 1127–1177. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00528.x
7. Baltagi, B. H., and Hashem Pesaran, M. (2007). Heterogeneity and cross section dependence in panel data models: theory and applications introduction. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 229–232. doi: 10.1002/jae.955
8. Bao, Z., and Lu, W. (2023). Applicability of the environmental Kuznets curve to construction waste management: A panel analysis of 27 European economies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 188, 106667. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106667

9. Başar, Y., ve Şaşmaz, M. Ü. (2016). Karbon vergisi, ekonomik büyüme ve co₂ emisyonu arasındaki nedensellik: Danimarka, Finlandiya, Hollanda, İsveç ve Norveç Örneği. International Journal of Applied Economic and Finance Studies, 1(1), 32–41.
10. Batmaz, T., Bayraç, H. N., ve Güllü, M. (2019). Türkiye’de yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının büyüme ve karbon emisyonu ilişkisi. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 645–658.
11. Benli, M. (2024). Türkiye’de Ar-Ge, büyüme ve dış ticaret üçgeni: yönlendirilmiş döngüsüz graflar analizi. Sakarya Üniversitesi İktisat Dergisi, 13(3), 349–358.
12. Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., and Lee, J.-W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115–135. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00033-0
13. Breitung, J., and Pesaran, M. H. (2007). Unit roots and cointegration in panels. In The Econometrics of Panel Data (ss. 279–322). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75892-1_9
14. Caravaggio, N. (2020). A global empirical re-assessment of the Environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation. Forest Policy and Economics, 119, 102282. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102282
15. Choi, I. (2006). Combination unit root tests for cross-sectionally correlated panels. In B. H. Baltagi (Ed.), Panel data econometrics : Theoretical contributions and empirical applications içinde (ss. 311–333). Elsevier.
16. Cole, M. A., Rayner, A. J., and Bates, J. M. (1997). The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 401–416. doi: 10.1017/S1355770X97000211
17. Colther, C., and Doussoulin, J. P. (2024). Recent pplications and developments of the Cobb–Douglas Function: From productivity to sustainability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 1646–1666. doi: 10.1007/s13132-024-02061-1
18. Destek, M. A., Shahbaz, M., Okumus, I., Hammoudeh, S., and Sinha, A. (2020). The relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions in G-7 countries: evidence from time-varying parameters with a long history. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(23), 29100–29117. doi: /10.1007/s11356-020-09189-y
19. Driscoll, J. C., and Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560. doi: 10.1162/003465398557825
20. Fakher, H. A., Ahmed, Z., Acheampong, A. O., and Nathaniel, S. P. (2023). Renewable energy, nonrenewable energy, and environmental quality nexus: An investigation of the N-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve based on six environmental indicators. Energy, 263, 125660. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125660
21. Frodyma, K., Papież, M., & Śmiech, S. (2022). Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve in the European Union countries. Energy, 241, 122899. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122899
22. Grossman, G. M., and Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. doi: 10.2307/2118443
23. Gülmez, A. (2015). OECD Ülkelerinde ekonomik büyüme ve hava kirliliği ilişkisi: Panel veri analizi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(3), 18–30.
24. Guo, X., and Shahbaz, M. (2024). The existence of environmental Kuznets curve: Critical look and future implications for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119648. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119648
25. Haldar, A., and Sethi, N. (2022). Environmental effects of ınformation and communication technology - Exploring the roles of renewable energy, innovation, trade and financial development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111754. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111754
26. Haseeb, A., Xia, E., Saud, S., Usman, M., and Quddoos, M. U. (2023). Unveiling the liaison between human capital, trade openness, and environmental sustainability for BRICS economies: Robust panel‐data estimation. Natural Resources Forum, 47(2), 229–256. doi: 10.1111/1477-8947.12277
27. Hayford, I. S., Ofori, E. K., Gyamfi, B. A., and Gyimah, J. (2023). Clean cooking technologies, information, and communication technology and the environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(48), 105646–105664. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29577-4
28. Hodu Ngangnchi, F., Ajong Aquilas, N., and Emmanuel Mbella, M. (2024). Natural resource use, industrialization and climate change in Africa: Blueprints for sustainable regional development. Research in Globalization, 9, 100245. doi: 10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100245
29. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
30. Jamel, L., and Maktouf, S. (2017). The nexus between economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in European countries. Cogent Economics and Finance, 5(1), 1341456. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2017.1341456
31. Jiang, R., Li, R., and Wu, Q. (2019). Investigation for the decomposition of carbon emissions in the USA with C-D function and LMDI methods. Sustainability, 11(2), 334. doi: 10.3390/su11020334
32. Kazanasmaz, E., Demirel, B. L., Karatepe, S., ve Hızarcı, A. E. (2023). Ekonomik büyüme, elektrik tüketimi ve karbon emisyonu ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Muhasebe ve Finans İncelemeleri Dergisi, 6(2), 248–265. doi: 10.32951/mufider.1356297
33. Khanna, T. M., Baiocchi, G., Callaghan, M., Creutzig, F., Guias, H., Haddaway, N. R., Hirth, L., Javaid, A., Koch, N., Laukemper, S., Löschel, A., Zamora Dominguez, M. del M., and Minx, J. C. (2021). A multi-country meta-analysis on the role of behavioral change in reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions in residential buildings. Nature Energy, 6(9), 925–932. doi: /10.1038/s41560-021-00866-x
34. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(No:1), 1–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581
35. Le, T.-H., Le, H.-C., and Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2020). Does financial inclusion impact CO2 emissions? Evidence from Asia. Finance Research Letters, 34, 101451. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101451
36. Leal, P. H., and Marques, A. C. (2022). The evolution of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis assessment: A literature review under a critical analysis perspective. In Heliyon (Vol. 8, Issue 11). Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11521
37. Li, B., Du, Y., and Chen, G. (2023). The effects of carbon trading on resident income: a theoretical and empirical study on the pilot carbon market in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(59), 123843–123861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30903-z
38. Long, X., Naminse, E. Y., Du, J., and Zhuang, J. (2015). Nonrenewable energy, renewable energy, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth in China from 1952 to 2012. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.176
39. Lu, W., Wu, H., and Wan, L. (2022a). Driving effect of CO2 emissions on economic growth—application of empirical likelihood for generalized method of moments. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 51(12), 7500–7512. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2020.1839095
40. Lu, W., Wu, H., and Wan, L. (2022b). Driving effect of CO2 emissions on economic growth—application of empirical likelihood for generalized method of moments. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 51(12), 7500–7512. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2020.1839095
41. Maku, O. A., and Ikpuri, P. O. (2020). A multivariate analysis between renewable energy, carbon emission and economic growth: New evidences from selected Middle East and North Africa countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(6), 440–450. doi: 10.32479/ijeep.10074
42. Menegaki, A. N. (2014). On energy consumption and GDP studies; A meta-analysis of the last two decades. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.081
43. Mirza, F. M., and Kanwal, A. (2017). Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Pakistan: Dynamic causality analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1233–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.081
44. Mohammed, S., Gill, A. R., Ghosal, K., Al-Dalahmeh, M., Alsafadi, K., Szabó, S., Oláh, J., Alkerdi, A., Ocwa, A., & Harsanyi, E. (2024). Assessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve within EU-27: Steps toward environmental sustainability (1990–2019). Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 18, 100312. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2023.100312
45. Moon, H. R., and Perron, B. (2004). Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics, 122(1), 81–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.020
46. Narayan, P. K., Saboori, B., and Soleymani, A. (2016). Economic growth and carbon emissions. Economic Modelling, 53, 388–397. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.027
47. Newey, W. K., and West, K. D. (1987). a simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703. doi: 10.2307/1913610
48. Özdemir, B. K., ve Koç, K. (2020). Türkiye’de Karbon Emisyonları, Yenilenebilir Enerji Ve Ekonomik Büyüme. Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(1), 66–86. doi: /10.18354/esam.665191
49. Pablo-Romero, M. del P., and De Jesús, J. (2016). Economic growth and energy consumption: The Energy-Environmental Kuznets Curve for Latin America and the Caribbean. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 1343–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.029
50. Pala, A. (2018). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde enerji tüketimi, karbon emisyonu ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisinin ARDL yaklaşımı ile incelenmesi. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14, 1-29.
51. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.572504
52. Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967–1012. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
53. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. doi: /10.1002/jae.951
54. Phillips, P. C. B., and Sul, D. (2003). Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. The Econometrics Journal, 6(1), 217–259. doi: 10.1111/1368-423X.00108
55. Şahin, C., ve Ünal, S. (2023). Karbon salınımının, ekonomik büyüme ve finansal gelişme ile ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 15(29), 367–376.
56. Sarkodie, S. A., and Strezov, V. (2019). A review on Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 649, 128–145. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.276
57. Şimşek, T., ve Yiğit, E. (2017). BRICT ülkelerinde yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi, petrol fiyatları, CO2 emisyonu, kentleşme ve ekonomik büyüme üzerine nedensellik analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 12(3), 117–136. doi: /10.17153/oguiibf.335630
58. Siqin, Z., Niu, D., Li, M., Zhen, H., and Yang, X. (2021). Carbon dioxide emissions, urbanization level and industrial structure: empirical evidence from North China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 34528–34545. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-342919/v1
59. Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511817434
60. Türe, H., ve Akdi, Y. (2006). Mevsimsel eşbütünleşme: Tüketim ve GSYİH. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 21(242), 101–113.
61. Voumik, L. C., Rahman, M., & Akter, S. (2022). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy, nuclear energy, and R&D for EU: fresh panel evidence. Heliyon, 8(12), e12447. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12447
62. Wang, Q., Zhang, F., and Li, R. (2023). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in 208 counties: The roles of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy and natural resource rent. Environmental Research, 216, 114637. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114637
63. Wang, T., and Henderson, D. J. (2022). Estimation of a varying coefficient, fixed-effects Cobb–Douglas production function in levels. Economics Letters, 213, 110354. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110354
64. Wu, Z., Xu, X., and He, M. (2025). The impact of green finance on urban carbon emission efficiency: Threshold effects based on the stages of the digital economy in China. Sustainability, 17(3), 854. doi: 10.3390/su17030854
65. Xie, J., Ahmed, Z., Zhang, P., Khan, S., and Alvarado, R. (2024). Financial expansion and CO2 mitigation in top twenty emitters: Investigating the direct and moderating effects of the digital economy. Gondwana Research, 125, 1–14. doi: /10.1016/j.gr.2023.07.013
66. Xie, L., Mu, X., Hu, G., Tian, Z., and Li, M. (2023). How do information and communication technology and urbanization affect carbon emissions? Evidence from 42 selected “Belt and road initiative” countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(14), 40427–40444. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-25003-3
67. Yao, S., Zhang, S., and Zhang, X. (2019). Renewable energy, carbon emission and economic growth: A revised environmental Kuznets Curve perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1338–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.069
68. Zaman, K., Shahbaz, M., Loganathan, N., and Raza, S. A. (2016). Tourism development, energy consumption and environmental Kuznets Curve: Trivariate analysis in the panel of developed and developing countries. Tourism Management, 54, 275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.12.001