GATT/WTO ÇERÇEVESİNDE ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE ÇEVRE İLİŞKİSİ

Öz

The intersections between trade and environment have recently emerged as important concern in the world community. Both environmental protection and trade are crucial to the welfare of nations; and yet policies in both areas have developed, for the most part, in isolation from each other. This article describes what appears to be an enlarging potential for conflict between the two, as reflected in disputes about the trade and impacts of environmental regulations and about the environmental impacts arising from efforts to liberelize trade

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

GATT/WTO ÇERÇEVESİNDE ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE ÇEVRE İLİŞKİSİ

Öz

Çevre ve dış ticaret arasındaki etkileşim son yıllarda dünya toplumlarının önemli ilgi alanlarından birini oluşturmaktadır. Zira, gerek çevrenin korunması ve gerekse dış ticaret ülkelerin refahı için kritik bir önem taşır.Ancak, söz konusu alanlara ilişkin politikalar, büyük ölçüde birbirinden bağımsız olarak geliştirilmiştir. Dolayısıyla bu makalede, çevre ve dış ticaret arasındaki çatışmanın mevcut ve potansiyel boyutları incelenmiştir. Bu çerçevede, çevresel düzenlemelerin dış ticaret üzerinde yaratacağı etkiler ile ticaretteki liberalleşmenin çevre üzerinde yaratacağı etkiler ele alınmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uluslararası ticaret, çevresel düzenlemeler ve rekabet gücü

Kaynakça

1. BÖRKEY,(1998) Peter, François Leveque, Voluntary Approaches for
2. Environmental Protection in the European Union, Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, ENV/EPOC/GEEI(98)29/FINAL, 11 December. CALDWELL, Douglas J., (1996),Environmental Labelling in the Trade and Environment Context, Washington D.C, International Trade and Development Centre, October.
3. COMMON, Mick (1996), “Environmental Policy and International
4. Competitiveness”, Environmental Economics Seminar Series, , (Çevrimiçi) http://www.environment.gov.au, 16 Mayıs 2000.
5. COSBEY, Aaron, (1996), Trade and Sustainable Development:The
6. Global Picture, Winnipeg, Canada, International Institute for Sustainable Development,. EKEMAN, Ebru, (1998) Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye’nin Çevre
7. Politikalarının Karşılaştırmalı İncelemesi, İstanbul, İktisadi Kalkınma Vakfı Yayınları No:153. ESTY, Daniel C., (1994) Greening the GATT: Trade, Environment and Future, Washington D.C, Institute for International Economics,.
8. GATT Secretariat, (1992) “Trade and Environmet”, International Trade 1990-1991, Geneva, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, , (Çevrimiçi) http://www.wto.org/trade_environment/html, 2 Mart 2000.

9. GOODMAN, Sally L., (1998), Is ISO 14001 an Important Element in
10. Business Survival?, U.K, The ISO 14000 Information Centre.
11. GROSSMAN, Gene H., Alan B.Krueger, (1992) Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, U.S.A, NBER Working Paper Series, No:3914.
12. HOUSMAN, Robert ve diğerleri, (1995) The Use of Trade Measures in
13. Select Multilateral Environmental Agreements, Geneva, UNEP, Environment and Trade Series No:10. IISD, (1996) Global Green Standarts, Winnipeg, Canada, International
14. Institute for Sustainable Development. JICKLING, Mark, (1992) Offshore Manufacturing:Why U.S. Firms Go
15. Abroad, Washington D.C, Congressional Research Service, Report No:92- 438 E,. KERR, Robert ve diğerleri, (1999) Beyond Regulation: Exporters and Voluntary Environmental Measures, Winnipeg, Canada, International
16. Institute for Sustainable Development, 1999.
17. KRISSOFF, Barry ve diğerleri, (1996) Exploring Linkages Among
18. Agriculture, Trade and the Environment, U.S.A, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No:7 MOLTKE, Konrad Von, (1999) “The Dilemma of the Precautionary
19. Principle in International Trade”, Bridges, Volume:3, No:6, July-August . OECD, (1997) Processes and Production Methods(PPMs): Conceptual
20. Framework and Considerations on Use of PPM-Based Trade Measures, Paris, OECD, OCDE/GD(97)137 . -------, (1993) Environmental Policies and Industrial Competitiveness,
21. Paris, OECD, OCDE/GD(93)83, January 1993.
22. REPETTO, Robert, (1994) Trade and Sustainable Development,
23. Washington D.C, U.S.A, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). SAMPSON, Gary P., (1999) Trade, the Environment and the WTO: A
24. Policy Agenda, Washington D.C, Overseas Development Council, ODC Policy Paper. THOMAS, Christopher ,Greg A. Tereposky,(1993) “The Evolving
25. Relationship Between Trade and Environmental Regulation”, Journal of World Trade, Volume:27, August 1993.
26. WARD, Halina, (1999) Science and Precaution in the Trading System,
27. Winnipeg, Canada, International Institution for Sustainable Development. WILSON, Arlene, (1994) GATT, Trade Liberalization, and the Environment: An Economic Analysis, U.S.A, Congressional Research
28. Service, Report No: 94-291 E, April 5, 1994.
29. WTO, TBT Agreement’s Annex 1, (1995),(Çevrimiçi) http://www.wto.org, 11 Mayıs 2000.