MALİYET HASTALIĞI HİPOTEZİ: TÜRKİYE'DE KAMU VE ÖZEL SEKTÖR ÜCRETLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

Öz

If there exist meaningful link between wages for public sector employees (officers and public workers) and private sector where the former tend to demonstrate lower productivity increase than the latter, the “cost disease” hypothesis brought to literature by Baumol-Bowen (1966) study might be at least partially acceptable for Turkish public sector. The objective of this study is by using econometric techniques to investigate the existence of such links between private and public sector wages using Turkish yearly data for 1963-2006 period. According to the results of statistical methods used in this study, there exist statistically significant effects of private sector wages over public sector wages

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cost Disease, Scandinavian Model, Public Sector Wages, Granger Causality

MALİYET HASTALIĞI HİPOTEZİ: TÜRKİYE'DE KAMU VE ÖZEL SEKTÖR ÜCRETLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

Öz

Türkiye’de eğer kamu sektöründe çalışanların (memur ve işçilerin) reel ücretleri ile özel sektör çalışanların (işçilerin) reel ücretleri arasında bir ilişki mevcut ise, Baumol ve Bowen (1966) çalışmasında ortaya koyduğu “maliyet hastalığı” hipotezinin kısmen de olsa Türk kamu sektörü için önemli olabileceği sonucuna varılabilir. Bu çalışmada kamu sektörü hizmet üretiminde önemli bir maliyet unsuru olan ücretlerin özel sektör ücretleri ile ilişkisi Türkiye bağlamında 1963-2006 dönemi için araştırılmış ve böyle bir ilişkinin var olduğu ekonometrik yöntemler kullanılarak gösterilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Maliyet Hastalığı, İskandinav Modeli, Kamu Ücretleri, Nedensellik

Kaynakça

1. Azariadis, C. (1975). “Implicit Contracts and Underemployment Equilibria”, 83 .Journal of Political Economy, 1183-1202.
2. Baumol, W.J. ve Bowen W. G. (1966). Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma, New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
3. Baumol, W. J. (1967). “The Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis.” American Economic Review, 57(3) :415- 26.
4. Becker, S. G. (1964). Human Capital : A Theroretical and Emprical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, New York, National Bureau of Economic Research
5. Becker, S. G. (1965). “A Theory of Allocation of Time”, Economic Journal, 75, September: 493-517.
6. Blanchard, O. and L. Summers (1986), “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem”, NBER Macroeconomic Annual, 1, 15-78.
7. Celasun, M, ve Rodrik, D. (1989). “Debt, Adjustment and Growth: Turkey”, Developing Countries’ Debt, ed.: J. Sachs, Chicago: University of Chicago Press and NBER.
8. Davidson, R. ve Mackinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. Oxford University Press. DPT (2007). Ekonomik ve Sosyal Göstergeler (1950-2006). http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/ekonomi/gosterge/tr/esg.asp

9. Eview, (2007). Eviews Help Book, 6.1 Version.
10. Ferris, J. S. ve West, E. G. (1999), “Cost Disease verses Leviathan Explanations of Investigation.” Public Choice, 98(3-4) : 307-16. Government Costs: An Empirical
11. Frieberg, K. (2007), “Intersectoral wage linkages: the case of Sweden,” Empirical Economics, 32:161–184.
12. Garett, A.T., ve Rhine, R. (2006). “On the Size and Growth of Government”, Federal Res. Bank of St. Louis Review:13-30.
13. Grene, W.H. (1997). Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Third Edition, New Jersey.
14. Hershlag, Z. Y. (1988). The Contemporary Turkish Economy, London and New York: Routledge.
15. Henrekson, M. ve Lybeck, J. A. (1988). “Editors’ Introduction and Summary” içinde Explaining the growth of Government, ed.s Johan A. Lybeck and Magnus Henrekson.Elsevier Science. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
16. Holmlund B ve Ohlsson H. (1992) Wage linkages between private and public sectors in Sweden. Labour, 6:3–17.
17. Hyclak, T., Johnes, G., ve Thornton, R.J. (2005). Fundementals of Labor Economics, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.,
18. Jacobson T. ve Ohlsson H. (1994) “Long-run relations between private and public sector wages in Sweden.” Empirical Economics 19:343–360
19. Johansen, K. ve Strom, B. (2001). “Wages and Politics: Evidence from the Norwegian Public Sector,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 3: 311-331.
20. Lindquist M.J. ve Vilhelmsson R. (2004) “Is the Swedish central government a wage leader?” Working Paper Series, Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University
21. Neck, R. ve Getzner. M. (2007). “Austrian Government Expenditure: ‘Wagner’s Law’ or ‘Baumol’s Cost Disease’?” International Business and Economics Research Journal, 11: 49-65.
22. Shapiro C., ve Stiglitz, J. E. (1984). “Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device”, American Economic Review: 433-444.
23. TOBB (2002). Cumhuriyet Döneminin Ekonomik Büyüklükleri (1923-2002).
24. Turan, G. (2001). “Sendikaların Ücretler ve İstihdam Üzerine Etkileri”, CMİS Dergisi, Sayi 1 Cilt 15.
25. TUIK (2007). İstatistiki Göstergeler, 1923-2006. ISSN: 1300-0535. Yayın No: 3114.