8.RISING SIGNIFICANCE OF NON-STATE ENTITIES IN THE GLOBAL SYSTEM: NEW ACTORS AND NEW CHALLENGES

Öz

Understanding the role of state and non-state actors in the global system is contingent upon a comprehensive analysis of the system through historical perspective. To do so, one, first, needs to conceive the emergence and development of the state-centric system. The phenomenon of state emerged in the seventeenth century with the collapse of imperial powers. Nation-states have played a dominant role in the world politics for about three hundred years. However, with the increased impacts of globalization processes, the power of the nation-state have begun to decline and, eventually, it has been forced to share its power with emerging entities. These new actors of the global system include a variety of units ranging from nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to inter-governmental organizations (IGOs). This paper discusses underlying factors of declining role of nation-state in the international system in the context of new emerging powers of non-state actors

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

8.RISING SIGNIFICANCE OF NON-STATE ENTITIES IN THE GLOBAL SYSTEM: NEW ACTORS AND NEW CHALLENGES

Öz

Global sistemde devlet dışı aktörlerin rolünün iyi bir şekilde anlaşılması tarihsel perspektifte ele alınacak geniş kapsamlı bir analizle mümkündür. Bunun için ilk olarak ulus devlet sisteminin ortaya çıkışı ve gelişiminin kavranmasına ihtiyaç vardır. Devlet olgusu, on yedinci yüzyılda imparatorlukların yıkılması ile ortaya çıkmaya başlamış ve ulus devletler üç yüz yıl süre ile dünya politikasında baskın bir rol oynamıştır. Ancak küreselleşme sürecinin etkisinin artması ile birlikte ulus devletin gücü azalmaya başlamış ve sonunda ulus devlet gücünü yeni ortaya çıkan devlet dışı aktörler ile paylaşmak zorunda kalmıştır. Global sistemin bu yeni aktörleri sivil toplum kuruluşlarından (NGO) hükümetler arası küresel organizasyonlara (IGO) kadar farklı alanlarda birçok farklı unsuru içinde barındırmaktadır. Bu makalede uluslararası sistemde ulus devletin rolünün azalmasının altında yatan faktörler, yeni ortaya çıkan devlet dışı aktörlerin siyasal ve ekonomik gücü çerçevesinde tartışılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Devlet Dışı Aktörler, Ulus Devlet, Küreselleşme, Egemen Güç

Kaynakça

1. Archick, K., & Mix, D. E. (2011). The European Union: Questions And Answers. Current Politics & Economics of Europe, 22.
2. Ataman, M. (2003). The impact of non-State actors on world politics: a challenge to Nation-States. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 2(1), 42–66.
3. Bennett, A. L. (1988). International organisations. Retrieved from http://afrilib.odinafrica.org/handle/0/3078
4. Cantwell, J., & Iammarino, S. (2000). Multinational corporations and the location of technological innovation in the UK regions. Regional Studies, 34(4), 317–332.
5. Cantwell, J., & Iammarino, S. (2005). Multinational corporations and European regional systems of innovation. Routledge.
6. Carr, E. H., & Cox, M. (1946). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Macmillan London.
7. Carson, A., & Thompson, A. (2014). The Power in Opacity: Rethinking Information in International Organizations. Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/politics/about/file-repository/public/Power-in-Opacity-Princeton-%5BCarson- Thompson%5D.pdf
8. Clark, J. D. (2008). The globalization of civil society. Critical Mass: The Emergence of Global Civil Society, 3–23.

9. Clarke, G. (1998). Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Politics in the Developing World. Political Studies, 46(1), 36– 52.
10. Copeland, D. C. (1996). Economic interdependence and war: a theory of trade expectations. International Security, 20(4), 5–41.
11. Ehrenberg, J. (1999). Civil society. NYU Press.
12. Geeraerts, G., & Mellentin, A. (1995). Analyzing Non-State Actors in World Politics. Pole Paper Series, 1(4). Retrieved from http://asrudiancenter.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/analyzing-non-state-actors-in-world-politics/
13. Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton University Press.
14. Gilpin, R. G. (1996). No one loves a political realist. Security Studies, 5(3), 3–26.
15. Göksel, N. K. (2004). Gl obalisation and the State. Studies, 25(3), 345–354.
16. Guzzetti, L. (1995). A brief history of European Union research policy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg. Retrieved from http://www.netaffair.org/documents/1995-a-brief-history-of-european- research.pdf
17. Held, D., & McGrew, A. (1998). The end of the old order? Globalization and the prospects for world order. Review of International Studies, 24(5), 219–245.
18. Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1995). Globalization and the future of the nation state. Economy and Society, 24(3), 408–442.
19. Hobbes, T. (1969). Leviathan, 1651. Scolar Press.
20. Keohane, R. O. (1989). International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory. Retrieved from http://www.citeulike.org/group/3040/article/2772922
21. Krasner, S. D. (2001). Sovereignty. Foreign Policy, 122(24), 11.
22. Langhorne, R. (2001). The coming of globalization: Its evolution and contemporary consequences. Macmillan.
23. Langhorne, R. (2006). The essentials of global politics. Hodder Arnold.
24. Mathews, J. T. (1998). Power Shift: The Age of Non-State Actors. Foreign Affairs (January/February, 1997), 93–105.
25. Milner, H. (1998). International political economy: beyond hegemonic stability. Foreign Policy-Washington-, 112–123.
26. Miyoshi, M. (2003). A Borderless World? Globalization: Critical Concepts in Sociology, 2(726), 368.
27. Morgenthau, H. J. (1978). Politics Among Nations, revised. New York: Knoph.
28. Morgenthau, H. J. (2006). Six principles of political realism. Classic Readings and Contemporary Debates in International Relations, 57–62.
29. O’Rourke, K. (2002). Europe and the Causes of Globalization, 1790 to 2000. Department of Economics, Trinity College. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/24134616_Europe_and_the_causes_of_globalization_1790_to_2000/file/9fcfd 50fe598cda9ef.pdf
30. Oatley, T. H., & Education, P. (2012). International political economy. Longman Boston. Retrieved from ftp://174.46.176.136/Pearson/9780205060634.pdf
31. Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
32. Slaughter, A.-M. (1997). The real new world order. Foreign Affairs, 183–197.
33. Smith, G.S. (2011). G7 to G8 to G20: Evolution in Global Governance. CIGI G20 papers. No :6. Retrieved from http://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/g20no6.pdfSpar, D. L. (2001). National policies and domestic politics. The Oxford Handbook of International Business, 206–231.
34. Taylor, P. (2005). International organization in the age of globalization. Continuum.
35. Thou, Y. (2011). The Changing Role of Nation-state. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2).
36. UN. (2014). UN Structure and Organization. Retrieved June 13, 2014, from http://www.un.org/en/aboutun/structure/org_chart.shtml
37. Vaughan, M. (2011). After Westphalia, Whither The Nation State, Its People and Its Governmental institutions? In Isa Asia Pacific Regional Conference (p. Page–1). The University of Queensland. Retrieved from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:266787
38. Waltz, K. N. (1964). The stability of a bipolar world. Daedalus, 881–909.
39. Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5–41.
40. Watson, A. (2009). The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis Reissue with a new introduction by Barry Buzan and Richard Little. Routledge.