BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

GEOFFREY CHAUCER'IN TROLIUS VE CRISEYDE ESERİNDE KÜLTÜRÖTESİLİK

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 1, 704 - 719, 01.01.2017

Öz

İnsanın bulunduğu her yerde etkileşimin ve kültürel bir alışverişin olduğu bilinmektedir. Belirli bir coğrafyaya yerleşerek tek bayrak altında tek millet olarak yaşayan topluluklardan çok daha önce de ticaret, göç ya da savaş gibi çeşitli nedenlerle insanlar arasındaki etkileşim kaçınılmaz hale gelmiştir. Bu bağlamda millet bilincinin ortaya çıkıp, kendi ülkelerinin kalkınması amacıyla güçlü devletlerin başlattığı sömürgecilik hareketinden önce de kültürel etkileşim görülmektedir. Sömürgecilik ve Sömürgecilik- Sonrası çalışmalar 20. yüzyılda araştırmacılarını kültürötesilik alanına yönlendirmiştir. Kültürötesi çalışmaları, kültürün geçmiş ve bugünle var olduğunu ortaya koyarak bir şekilde etkileşim halinde olan kültürlerin mevcut kültürel yapıya katkıda bulunduklarını vurgular. İnsanın olduğu her dönemde etkileşim olduğu göz önüne alındığında kültürötesilik çalışmaları Ortaçağ gibi geçmiş bir dönem için de söz konusudur ve birçok Ortaçağ eserinde kültürel etkileşimin izleri metinlerarasılık aracılığıyla görülebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada Geoffrey Chaucer'ın M.S. 14. yüzyılda kaleme aldığı ve M.Ö. 12. yüzyılda gerçekleştiği düşünülen Truva Savaşı'nın gölgesinde yaşanan bir aşk hikâyesinin anlatıldığı Troilus and Criseyde eseri kültürötesilik bağlamında incelenecektir.

Kaynakça

  • Altschul, Nadia, R. “Postcolonialism and the Study of the Middle Ages.” History Compass 6.2 (2008): 588–606. Web. 20 Mayıs 2015.
  • Arnold, Matthew. Culture and Anarchy. New York: Oxford UP, 2006.
  • Benson, Larry D. The Riverside Chaucer. Ed. F. N. Robinson. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.
  • Brooks, Roy L. “Cultural Diversity: It’s All about the Mainstream.” The Monist 95. 1 (2012): 17-32. Web. 26 Şubat 2016.
  • Byrne, Maire. The Names of God in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: A Basis for Interfaith Dialogue. New Delhi: Continuum International Publishing, 2011.
  • Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. F. N. Robinson. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1974.
  • Classen, Albrecht, ed. East Meets West in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times: Transcultural Experiences in the Premodern World. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
  • Cuccioletta, Donald. “Multiculturalism or Transculturalism: Towards a Cosmopolitan Citizenship.” London Journal of Canadian Studies 17 (2001/2002): 1-11. Web. 12 Mayıs 2015.
  • “Dulcarnon.” Oxford English Dictionary. OED, 2017. Web. 31 Ocak 2017.
  • Euclid. The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements. Çev. ve Ed. Sir Thomas L. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1926.
  • Gaunt, Simon. “Can the Middle Ages Be Postcolonial?” Comparative Literature 61.2 (2009): 160-176. Web. 29 Mayıs 2015.
  • Grosu, Lucia-Mihaela. “Multiculturalism or Transculturalism? Views on Cultural Diversity.” Synergy 8. 2 (2012): 102-111. Web. 24 Şubat 2016.
  • Holt, Andrew. “Crusading against Barbarians: Muslims as Barbarians in Crusades Era Sources.” East Meets West in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times: Transcultural Experiences in the Premodern World. Ed. A. Classen ve M. Sandidge. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. 441-456.
  • Kornetzki, Anastasiya. Contrastive Analysis of New Text Types in Russian, British and American Business Online and Print Media. Berlin: Frank & Timme, 2011.
  • Kristeva, Julia. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Leon S. Roudiez. Çev. T. Gora, A. Jardine ve L. S. Roudiez. New York: Colombia UP, 1980.
  • Lewis, C. S. “What Chaucer Really Did to Il Filostrato.” Chaucer Criticism: Troilus and Criseyde & the Minor Poems Vol. II. Ed. Richard J. Schoeck ve Jerome Taylor. Wisconsin: U Notre Dame P, 1971. 16-33.
  • Lewis, Jeff. “From Culturalism to Transculturalism.” Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies 1 (Bahar 2002): 14-32. Web. 12 Mayıs 2015.
  • “Lord.” Oxford English Dictionary. OED, 2016. Web.17 Mayıs 2016.
  • Mikula, Maja. Key Concepts in Cultural Studies. Pekin: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
  • Munro, Dana Carleton, “The Western Attitude toward Islam during the Period of the Crusades.” Speculum 6.3 (Temmuz 1931): 329-343. Web. 27 Nisan 2017.
  • Nash-Marshall, Sarah. “Boethius’s Influence on Theology and Metaphysics to c1500.” A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages. Ed. N. H. Kaylor ve P. E. Phillips. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
  • Nida, Eugene A., Taber Charles R. Helps for Translations Prepared under the Auspices of the United Bible Societies. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1982.
  • Niles, John D. Old English Literature: A Guide to Criticism with Selected Readings. Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2016.
  • Nygren, Anders. Agape and Eros. Çev. Philip S. Watson. London: The Westminster Press, 1953.
  • Ortiz, Fernando. Cuban Counterpoint: Tobacco and Sugar. Çev. Harriet de Onis. Durham: Duke UP, 1995.
  • Said, Edward. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.
  • Wetherbee, Winthrop. Chaucer and the Poets: An Essay on “Troilus and Criseyde”. London: Cornell UP, 1984.
  • Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford UP, 1983.

TRANSCULTURALISM IN GEOFFREY CHAUCER'S TROILUS AND CRISEYDE

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 1, 704 - 719, 01.01.2017

Öz

Cultural interaction is possible wherever people live. Due to various reasons such as trade, migration and war, interaction among people became inevitable long before communities had begun to live as a nation under one ag in a certain land. Thus, cultural transactions could be seen even before colonialism initiated by the powerful nations in purpose of the development of their own states. In the 20th-century, colonial and post-colonial studies have steered researchers towards the notion of transculturalism. Transcultural studies elucidate that culture is established with the past and present, and that cultures, which interact with each other one way or another, contribute to the construction of the present culture. In view of the existence of interaction among communities in every period, transcultural studies is applicable to medieval studies, and the traces of cross-cultural transactions can be detected in many medieval literary works by means of intertextuality. In this article, Geoffrey Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde, a fourteenth-century text about a love story that is assumed to take place in the twelfth century B.C. during the Trojan War, will be analysed within the framework of transculturalism.

Kaynakça

  • Altschul, Nadia, R. “Postcolonialism and the Study of the Middle Ages.” History Compass 6.2 (2008): 588–606. Web. 20 Mayıs 2015.
  • Arnold, Matthew. Culture and Anarchy. New York: Oxford UP, 2006.
  • Benson, Larry D. The Riverside Chaucer. Ed. F. N. Robinson. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.
  • Brooks, Roy L. “Cultural Diversity: It’s All about the Mainstream.” The Monist 95. 1 (2012): 17-32. Web. 26 Şubat 2016.
  • Byrne, Maire. The Names of God in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: A Basis for Interfaith Dialogue. New Delhi: Continuum International Publishing, 2011.
  • Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. F. N. Robinson. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1974.
  • Classen, Albrecht, ed. East Meets West in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times: Transcultural Experiences in the Premodern World. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
  • Cuccioletta, Donald. “Multiculturalism or Transculturalism: Towards a Cosmopolitan Citizenship.” London Journal of Canadian Studies 17 (2001/2002): 1-11. Web. 12 Mayıs 2015.
  • “Dulcarnon.” Oxford English Dictionary. OED, 2017. Web. 31 Ocak 2017.
  • Euclid. The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements. Çev. ve Ed. Sir Thomas L. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1926.
  • Gaunt, Simon. “Can the Middle Ages Be Postcolonial?” Comparative Literature 61.2 (2009): 160-176. Web. 29 Mayıs 2015.
  • Grosu, Lucia-Mihaela. “Multiculturalism or Transculturalism? Views on Cultural Diversity.” Synergy 8. 2 (2012): 102-111. Web. 24 Şubat 2016.
  • Holt, Andrew. “Crusading against Barbarians: Muslims as Barbarians in Crusades Era Sources.” East Meets West in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times: Transcultural Experiences in the Premodern World. Ed. A. Classen ve M. Sandidge. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. 441-456.
  • Kornetzki, Anastasiya. Contrastive Analysis of New Text Types in Russian, British and American Business Online and Print Media. Berlin: Frank & Timme, 2011.
  • Kristeva, Julia. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Leon S. Roudiez. Çev. T. Gora, A. Jardine ve L. S. Roudiez. New York: Colombia UP, 1980.
  • Lewis, C. S. “What Chaucer Really Did to Il Filostrato.” Chaucer Criticism: Troilus and Criseyde & the Minor Poems Vol. II. Ed. Richard J. Schoeck ve Jerome Taylor. Wisconsin: U Notre Dame P, 1971. 16-33.
  • Lewis, Jeff. “From Culturalism to Transculturalism.” Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies 1 (Bahar 2002): 14-32. Web. 12 Mayıs 2015.
  • “Lord.” Oxford English Dictionary. OED, 2016. Web.17 Mayıs 2016.
  • Mikula, Maja. Key Concepts in Cultural Studies. Pekin: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
  • Munro, Dana Carleton, “The Western Attitude toward Islam during the Period of the Crusades.” Speculum 6.3 (Temmuz 1931): 329-343. Web. 27 Nisan 2017.
  • Nash-Marshall, Sarah. “Boethius’s Influence on Theology and Metaphysics to c1500.” A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages. Ed. N. H. Kaylor ve P. E. Phillips. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
  • Nida, Eugene A., Taber Charles R. Helps for Translations Prepared under the Auspices of the United Bible Societies. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1982.
  • Niles, John D. Old English Literature: A Guide to Criticism with Selected Readings. Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2016.
  • Nygren, Anders. Agape and Eros. Çev. Philip S. Watson. London: The Westminster Press, 1953.
  • Ortiz, Fernando. Cuban Counterpoint: Tobacco and Sugar. Çev. Harriet de Onis. Durham: Duke UP, 1995.
  • Said, Edward. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.
  • Wetherbee, Winthrop. Chaucer and the Poets: An Essay on “Troilus and Criseyde”. London: Cornell UP, 1984.
  • Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford UP, 1983.
Toplam 28 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Funda Hay Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 57 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Hay, F. (2017). GEOFFREY CHAUCER’IN TROLIUS VE CRISEYDE ESERİNDE KÜLTÜRÖTESİLİK. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 57(1), 704-719.

Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi - dtcfdergisi@ankara.edu.tr

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.   22455