POSTMODERN LAMPOON: METATHEATRICAL SATIRE ON NEOLIBERALISM IN TIMBERLAKE WERTENBAKER’S OUR COUNTRY’S GOOD

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 64 Sayı: 2, 1021 - 1043

Esra Ünlü Çimen

https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2024.64.2.3

Öz

Metatheatre, which generally indicates a number of strategies revealing the fictionality of plays, has been prevalent throughout the history of theatre. The metatheatrical vehicles like the play-within-the-play have been sustainedly employed by playwrights in Ancient Greek theatre, Roman theatre and English theatre since the Renaissance up to day. In English theatre, a remarkable number of studies on this concept have focused on the Renaissance as it was popularised in this period. The studies on metatheatre have often described it as a technical novelty breaking the illusion created by traditional/realist plays. However, a careful analysis of its use in plays from varying periods and cultures show that metatheatre has also been employed as a tool of satirizing politics by the playwrights. In both the Renaissance and the eighteenth-century English drama, metatheatrical tools were used to satirize domestic politics and familiar politicians. However, with postmodernism, in the twentieth century, the context of satire changed since it was directed at universal problems, ideologies and accustomed ways of thinking rather than the contemporary problems of a certain country. In line with such a change, metatheatrical satires in the twentieth century aimed to target grand narratives produced by modernity. One such play is Our Country’s Good (1988) by Timberlake Wertenbaker where neoliberalism as a master narrative is satirized through the device of the rehearsal-within-the-play. Within this context, this study aims to explore Our Country’s Good as a postmodern satire in order to show that satire still has validity in the postmodern age, and draw attention to the symbiotic and persistent relation between satire and metatheatre.

Anahtar Kelimeler

metatheatre, satire, postmodernism, Timberlake Wertenbaker, Our Country’s Good

POSTMODERN YERGİ: TIMBERLAKE WERTENBAKER’IN OUR COUNTRY’S GOOD OYUNUNDA NEOLİBERALİZMİN METATEYATRAL HİCVİ

Öz

Tiyatro metinlerinin kurgusallığını vurgulayan metatiyatro kavramı tiyatro tarihi boyunca karşımıza çıkar. Antik Yunan’da, Roma’da ve Rönesans’tan itibaren günümüze kadar İngiliz tiyatrosunda oyun yazarları eserlerinde oyun-içinde-oyun gibi çeşitli metateyatral araçlara başvurmuşlardır. İngiliz tiyatrosu özelinde, metatiyatronun Rönesans döneminde popülerleşmiş olmasının neticesinde, bu kavram üzerine yapılan çalışmaların daha ziyade Rönesans dönemi oyunlarını kapsadığı görülebilir. Kavram üzerine yapılan çalışmaların çoğu metatiyatroyu geleneksel/gerçekçi oyunların yarattığı illüzyonu bozan teknik bir yenilik olarak ele almışlardır. Fakat, metatiyatronun farklı dönem ve kültürlerdeki kullanımına bakmak onun aynı zamanda siyasi hiciv amaçlı kullanılan bir tiyatro tekniği olduğunu ortaya koyar. Örneğin, Rönesans ve on sekizinci yüzyıl İngiliz tiyatrosunda oyun yazarlarının ülke sorunlarını ve politikacıları hicvetmek için metatiyatroya başvurdukları görülür. 20. yüzyılda ise postmodernizmin etkisiyle hiciv kavramının bağlamı değişmiş, önceki yüzyıllarda belirli bir ülkenin belirli bir dönemindeki ekonomik kriz, sosyal adaletsizlik, siyasi baskı gibi sorunlarını hedef alan hiciv, daha evrensel meseleleri ve ideolojileri tartışmaya açmaya başlamıştır. Bu değişim meticesinde, metateyatral hicivler modernitenin ürünü olan büyük anlatıları sorgulamaya başlamışlardır. Böyle bir durum, Timberlake Wertenbaker’ın oyun-içinde-prova tekniği yoluyla kendi döneminin neoliberal uygulamalarından yola çıkarak neoliberalizmi genel bir ideoloji olarak hicvettiği Our Country’s Good (1988) adlı oyununda görülebilir. Bu çerçevede, bu çalışmanın amacı, Wertenbaker’ın Our Country’s Good oyununu postmodern hiciv olarak analiz ederek hicvin postmodern çağda da geçerliliği olan bir tür olduğunu göstermeye ve hicivle metatiyatro arasında süregelen simbiyotik ilişkiyi ortaya koymaya çalışmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

metatiyatro, hiciv, postmodernizm, Timberlake Wertenbaker, Our Country’s Good

Kaynakça

• Abel, L., (2003). Tragedy and Metatheatre: Essays on Dramatic Form. New York: Holmes & Meier.
• Abel, L. (1963). Metatheatre: A New View of Dramatic Form. New York: Hill & Wang.
• Aristotle. (2004). Poetics. Classical Literary Criticism. P. Murray and T. S. Dorsch (Trans.). London: Penguin.
• Baker-White, R. (1999). The Text in Play: Representations of Rehearsal in Modern Drama. London: Associated UP.
• Baldick, C. (2008a). Satire. Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms (3rd ed., p. 299). New York: Oxford UP.
• Baldick, C. (2008b). Metaheatre. Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms (3rd ed., p. 203). New York: Oxford UP.
• Baldick, C. (2008c). Utopia. Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. (3rd ed., p. 348). New York: Oxford UP.
• Billington, M. (27 Aug 2015). Our Country’s Good Review – Dramatic Redemption from Australian Hell. The Guardian. 15.07.2024, https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2015/aug/27/our-countrys-good-review-timberlake-wertenbaker-australia-convicts-national-theatre
• Brenton, H. (1986). The Churchill Play. Plays: One (Christie in Love, Magnificence, The Churchill Play, Weapons of Happiness, Epsom Downs, Sore Throats). London: Methuen.
• Bush, S. (2013). Introduction: Timberlake Wertenbaker’s Floating Identities. The Theatre of Timberlake Wertenbaker. London: Bloomsbury.
• Carlson, S. (2000). Language and Identity in Timberlake Wertenbaker’s Plays. In E. Aston and J. Reinelt (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Modern British Women Playwrights (pp. 134-149). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
• Carlson, S. (1993). Issues of Identity, Nationality, and Performance: the Reception of Two Plays by Timberlake Wertenbaker. New Theatre Quarterly, 9(35), 267-289. DOI:10.1017/S0266464X00007995. http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0266464X00007995
• Dymkowski, C. (1988). ‘The Play’s the Thing’: The Metatheatre of Timberlake Wertenbaker. In N. Boireau (Ed.), Drama on Drama: Dimensions of Theatricality on the Contemporary British Stage (pp. 121-135). New York: Palgrave.
• Elliott, R. C. (1960). The Power of Satire: Magic, Ritual, Art. Princeton: Princeton UP.
• Fielding, H. (1902). The Historical Register for the Year 1736. The Complete Works of Henry Fielding, Esq. Plays and Poems in Five Volumes. Vol. 4. New York: Croscup & Sterling Company.
• Foucault, M. (1986). Of Other Spaces. Diacritics, J. Miskowiec (Trans.). 16(1), 22-27. Jstor. http://www.jstor.org/stable/464648
• Gardner, L. (18 Mar 2018). Our Country's Good Review – New Voice for the Silenced in Wertenbaker's Penal Colony Drama. The Guardian. 15.07.2024, https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2018/mar/18/our-countrys-good-review-new-voice-for-the-silenced-in-wertenbakers-penal-colony-drama
• Griffin, D. (1994). Satire: A Critical Reintroduction. Lexington: Kentucky UP.
• Hewison, R. (1995). The Enterprise Culture: Britain in the 1980s. Culture & Consensus: England, Art and Politics Since 1940. London: Methuen.
• Hooley, D. M. (2007). Roman Satire. Malden: Blackwell.
• Hornby, R. (1986). Drama, Metadrama and Perception. London: Associated UP.
• Keane, C. (2006). Introduction. Figuring Genre in Roman Satire. New York: Oxford UP.
• Kyd, T. (2002). The Spanish Tragedy. In D. Bevington et al. (Eds.). English Renaissance Drama: A Norton Anthology (pp. 8-73). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Lyotard, J. F. (1984). Introduction. The Postmodern Condition (pp. xxiii-xxv). G. Bennington and B. Massumi (Trans.). Minneapolis: Minnesota UP.
• Pavis, P. (1998). Metatheatre. Dictionary of the Theatre: Terms, Concepts, and Analysis. (C. Shantz, Trans.). Toronto: Toronto UP. Pellegrini, D. (2010). Metatheatre. The Oxford Companion to Theatre & Performance. D. Kennedy, (Ed.), (p. 318). New York: Oxford UP.
• Quintero, R. (2007). Introduction: Understanding Satire. In R. Quintero (Ed.), A Companion to Satire (pp. 1-11). Malden: Blackwell.
• Real, H. J. (1992). An introduction to Satire. In H. J. Real (Ed.), Teaching Satire: Dryden to Pope (pp. 7-19). Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
• Rich, F. (Apr 30 1991). Review/Theater; Broadway Season’s Last Drama Offers A Defense of Theater. The New York Times. 15.07.2024, https://www.nytimes.com/1991/04/30/theater/review-theater-broadway-season-s-last-drama-offers-a-defense-of-theater.html
• Rosenmeyer, T. G. (2002). ‘Metatheater’: An Essay on Overload. Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics, 10(2), 87-119. Jstor. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20163888
• Roth, M. E. (2001). Opening Civic, Feminist and Theatrical Spaces: The Plays of Timberlake Wertenbaker. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Berkeley: California University. ProQuest.
• Sen, S. (2012). Metatheatricality on the Renaissance Stage, The Audience and the Material Space. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Philadelphia: Temple University. https://scholarshare.temple.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.12613/2343/Sen_temple_0225E_11182.pdf?sequence=1
• Stephenson, H. and Natasha, L. (1997). Timberlake Wertenbaker. In Stephenson, H. and Natasha, L. (Eds.), Rage and Reason: Women Playwrights on Playwriting (pp. 136-145). London: Methuen.
• Sullivan, E. B. (1993). Hailing Ideology, Acting in the Horizon, and Reading between Plays by Timberlake Wertenbaker. Theatre Journal, 45(2), 139-54. Jstor. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3208919
• Ugolini, Paola. (2016). Satire. In M. Sgarbi (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy (pp. 1-10). Switzerland: Springer International. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_878-
• Ünlü Çimen, E. (2023). Hiciv Tiyatro. In S. Şenlen Güvenç (Ed.). Ana Hatlarıyla İngiliz Edebiyatı: Anglo-Sakson Döneminden Çağdaş İngiliz Edebiyatına (pp. 153-160). Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi.
• Weeks, S. (2000). The Question of Liz: Staging the Prisoner in Our Country’s Good. Modern Drama, 43(2), 147-156. Project Muse. DOI: 10.1353/mdr.2000.0065
• Wertenbaker, T. (1991). Our Country’s Good. London: Methuen.
• Wilson, A. (1991). Our Country’s Good: Theatre, Colony and Nation in Wertenbaker’s Adaptation of The Playmaker. Modern Drama, 34(1), 23-34. Project Muse. DOI:10.1353/mdr.1991.0061