Yıl 2020, Cilt 8 , Sayı 1, Sayfalar 478 - 484 2020-01-31

Reproductive Abortion Problem in Legumes
Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu

Seyithan SEYDOŞOĞLU [1] , Uğur SEVİLMİŞ [2]


Generative organ (flower and pods) abortion is an important problem in legumes. Although many flowers are produced by the plant, most of these flowers are shed and do not produce pods. In fact, modest flower abortion is an agriculturally desirable feature since an excessive number of pods is inversely proportional to quality. But generally, legumes shed excessive number of generative organs as a result of high temperature, insufficient light, drought, nutrient deficiency and high plant density. In this article, generative abortion was investigated in the light of two current hypothesis -nutritional deficiency and hormonal control hypothesis. In addition, some deficiencies in the literatures on this subject and the opportunities they create are mentioned.

Baklagillerde generatif organ (çiçek ve bakla) dökümü önemli bir problemdir. Bitki tarafından çok sayıda çiçek üretilse de bu çiçeklerin çoğu dökülmekte ve baklaya dönmemektedir. Aslında, aşırı sayıda bakla sayısı, kaliteyle ters orantılı olduğundan, orta derecede çiçek dökümü tarımsal açıdan istenen bir özelliktir. Fakat genellikle baklagiller normalden fazla sayıda generatif organı yüksek sıcaklık, yetersiz ışık, kuraklık, besin elementi yetersizliği, yüksek bitki yoğunluğu sonucunda dökmektedir. Bu çalışmada, öne çıkan iki hipotez olan besin eksikliği ve hormonal kontrol hipotezleri ışığında, baklagillerde generatif döküm sorunu incelenmiştir. Ayrıca, bu konuda yürütülmüş çalışmalardaki bazı eksikliklere ve bunların ortaya çıkardığı fırsatlara değinilmiştir.

  • [1] Aloni. B, Karni. L, Zaidman. Z ve Schaffer. A.A, “Changes of carbohydrates in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) flowers in relation to their abscission under different shading regimes” Annals of Botany, c.78, s. 2, ss.163-168, 1996.
  • [2] Gent. M.P, "Carbohydrate level and growth of tomato plants II. The effect of irradiance and temperature" Plant Physiology, c. 81, s.4, ss.1079-1986, 1986.
  • [3] Van Schaik. P.H ve Probst. A.H “Effects of some environmental factors on flower production and reproductive efficiency in soybeans” 1. Agronomy Journal, c. 50, s. 4, ss. 192-197, 1958.
  • [4] Musser. R.L, P.J. Kramer ve J.F. Thomas “Periods of shoot chilling sensitivity in soybean flower development and compensation in yield after chilling”, Annals of Botany, c. 57, s.3, ss. 317-329, 1986.
  • [5] Dominguez. C ve Hume. D.J, “Flowering, abortion, and yield of early-maturing soybeans at three densities” 1. Agronomy Journal, c. 70, s. 5, ss. 801-805, 1978.
  • [6] Brevedan. R.E, Egli. D.B ve Leggett. J.E, “Influence of nutrition on flower and pod abortion and yield of soybeans” 1. Agronomy journal, c. 70, s. 1, ss. 81-84, 1978.
  • [7] Mann. J.D ve Jaworski. E.G “Comparison of stresses which may limit soybean yields” 1. Crop Science, c. 10, s. 6, ss. 620-624, 1970.
  • [8] Parry. M, Parry. M.L, Canziani. O, Palutikof. J, Van der Linden. P ve Hanson. C, “Climate change 2007-impacts, adaptation and vulnerability” Working group II contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • [9] Alward. R.D, Detling. J.K ve Milchunas. D.G, “Grassland vegetation changes and nocturnal global warming”, Science, c. 283, s. 5399, ss. 229-231, 1999.
  • [10] Gibson. L.R ve Mullen. R.E, “Influence of day and night temperature on soybean seed yield”, Crop Science, c. 36, s. 1, ss. 98-104, 1996.
  • [11] Mohammed. A.R ve Tarpley. L, “High nighttime temperatures affect rice productivity through altered pollen germination and spikelet fertility” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, c. 149, s.6-7, ss. 999-1008, 2009.
  • [12] Cantarero. M.G, Cirilo. A.G ve Andrade. F.H, “Night temperature at silking affects set in maize” Crop Science, c. 39 s. 3, ss. 703-710, 1999.
  • [13] Izquierdo. N, Aguirrezábal. L, Andrade. F ve Pereyra. V, “Night temperature affects fatty acid composition in sunflower oil depending on the hybrid and the phenological stage” Field Crops Research, c. 77, s. 2-3, ss. 115-126, 2002.
  • [14] Prasad. P.V.V, Pisipati. S.R, Ristic. Z, Bukovnik. U ve Fritz. A.K, “Impact of night time temperature on physiology and growth of spring wheat”, Crop Science, c. 48, s. 6, ss. 2372-2380, 2008
  • [15] Gipson. J.R ve Ray. L.L, “Fiber elongation rates in five varieties of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as influenced by night temperature” 1. Crop Science, c. 9, s. 3, ss. 339-341, 1969.
  • [16] Gomez-Jimenez. M.C, Paredes. M.A, Gallardo. M ve Sanchez-Calle. I.M, “Mature fruit abscission is associated with up-regulation of polyamine metabolism in the olive abscission zone” Journal of Plant Physiology, c. 167, s. 17, ss.1432-1441, 2010.
  • [17] Meir. S, Philosoph-Hadas. S, Sundaresan. S, Selvaraj. K.V, Burd. S, Ophir. R ve Lers. A, “Microarray analysis of the abscission-related transcriptome in the tomato flower abscission zone in response to auxin depletion”, Plant Physiology, c. 154 s. 4, ss. 1929-1956, 2010.
  • [18] Wilmowicz. E, Kućko. A, Ostrowski. M ve Panek. K, “Inflorescence defıcıent ın abscıssıon-like is an abscission-associated and phytohormone-regulated gene in flower separation of Lupinus luteus”, Plant Growth Regulation, c. 85, s. 1, ss. 91-100, 2018.
  • [19] Westgate. M.E ve Peterson. C.M, “Flower and pod development in water-deficient soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.)”, Journal of Experimental Botany, c. 44, s. 1, ss. 109-117, 1993.
  • [20] Kokubun. M, “Physiological mechanisms regulating flower abortion in soybean. In Soybean-Biochemistry”, Chemistry and Physiology. IntechOpen, 2011.
  • [21] Snyder. R.L, Carlson. R.E ve Shaw. R.H, “Yield of Indeterminate Soybeans in response to multiple periods of soil-water stress during reproduction” 1. Agronomy Journal, c. 74, s. 5, ss. 855-859, 1982.
  • [22] Barnabás. B, Jäger. K ve Fehér. A, “The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals”, Plant, Cell & Environment, c. 31 s. 1, s. 11-38, 2008.
  • [23] Wiebold. W.J, Ashley. D.A ve Boerma. H.R, “Reproductive abscission levels and patterns for eleven determinate soybean cultivars” 1. Agronomy Journal, c. 73 s. 1, ss. 43-46, 1981.
  • [24] Huff. A ve Dybing. C.D, “Factors affecting shedding of flowers in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill),” Journal of Experimental Botany, c. 31 s. 3, ss. 751-762, 1980.
  • [25] Antos. M ve Wiebold. W.J, “Abscission, total soluble sugars, and starch profiles within a soybean canopy,” 1. Agronomy Journal, c. 76, s. 5, ss. 715-719, 1984.
  • [26] Ruan. Y.L, Patrick. J.W, Bouzayen. M, Osorio. S ve Fernie. A.R, “Molecular regulation of seed and fruit set,” Trends In Plant Science, c. 17, s. 11, ss. 656-665, 2012.
  • [27] Heindl. J.C ve Brun. W.A, “Light and shade effects on abscission and 14C-photoassimilate partitioning among reproductive structures in soybean”, Plant Physiology, c. 73 s. 2, ss. 434-439, 1983.
  • [28] Schou. J.B, Jeffers. D.L ve Streeter. J.G, “Effects of reflectors, black boards, or shades applied at different stages of plant development on yield of soybeans”, 1. Crop Science, c. 18, s. 1, ss. 29-34, 1978.
  • [29] Wahua. T.A.T ve Miller. D.A, “Effects of shading on the N2-Fixation, yield, and plant composition of field-grown soybeans”, 1. Agronomy Journal, c. 70, s. 3, ss. 387-392, 1978.
  • [30] Fehr. W.R, Caviness. C.E ve Vorst. J.J, “Response of indeterminate and determinate soybean cultivars to defoliation and half-plant cut-off,” 1. Crop Science, c. 17 s. 6, ss. 913-917, 1977.
  • [31] Hardman. L.L ve Brun. W.A, “Effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment at different developmental stages on growth and yield components of soybeans” 1. Crop Science, c. 11, s. 6, ss. 886-888, 1971.
  • [32] Riesmeier. J.W, Willmitzer. L ve Frommer. W.B, “Evidence for an essential role of the sucrose transporter in phloem loading and assimilate partitioning”, The EMBO Journal, c. 13, s. 1, ss. 1-7, 1994.
  • [33] Egli. D.B, “ The soybean: Botany, production and uses”, CAB International, London ss. 113-141, 2010.
  • [34] Aloni. B, Pashkar. T ve Karni. L “Partitioning of [14C] sucrose and acid invertase activity in reproductive organs of pepper plants in relation to their abscission under heat stress” Annals of Botany, c. 67, s. 5, ss. 371-377, 1991.
  • [35] Turner. A.D ve Wien. H.C, “Dry matter assimilation and partitioning in pepper cultivars differing in susceptibility to stress-induced bud and flower abscission”, Annals of Botany, c. 73, s. 6, ss. 617-622, 1994.
  • [36] De Bruin. J.Lve Pedersen. P, “Growth, yield, and yield component changes among old and new soybean cultivars”, Agronomy journal, c. 101 s. 1, ss. 124-130, 2009.
  • [37] Pamplin. R.A, “The anatomical development of the ovule and seed in the soybean”, PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, ss. 110, 1963.
  • [38] Brun. W.A ve Betts. K.J, “Source/sink relations of abscising and nonabscising soybean flowers”, Plant Physiology, c. 75, s. 1, ss. 187-191, 1984.
  • [39] Pongsroypech. C, “A study of reproductive grwoth in soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). PhD t dissertation, University of Missouri Columbia, 1974.
  • [40] Hansen. W.R ve Shibles. R, “Seasonal log of the flowering and podding activity of field-grown soybeans,” 1. Agronomy Journal, c. 70, s. 1, ss. 47-50, 1978.
  • [41] Abernethy. R.H, Palmer. R.G, Shibles. R ve Anderson. I.C, “Histological observations on abscising and retained soybean flowers”, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, c. 57, s. 3, ss. 713-716, 1977.
  • [42] Heitholt. J.J, Egli. D.B, Leggett. J.E, . "Characteristics of reproductive abortion in soybean", Crop Science, c. 26, s. 3, ss. 589-595, 1986.
  • [43] Dokoozlian. N.K ve Peacock. W.L, “Gibberellic acid applied at bloom reduces fruit set and improves size of Crimson Seedless table grapes”, Hort Science, c. 36 s 4, ss. 706-709, 2001.
  • [44] Estornell. L.H, Agustí. J, Merelo. P, Talón. M ve Tadeo. F.R, “Elucidating mechanisms underlying organ abscission”, Plant Science, s. 199 ss. 48-60, 2013.
  • [45] Kim. J, “Four shades of detachment: regulation of floral organ abscission”, Plant Signaling & Behavior, c. 9, s. 11, 2014, doi: 10.4161/15592324.2014.976154.
  • [46] Kim. J, Yang. J, Yang. R, Sicher. R.C, Chang. C ve Tucker. M.L, “Transcriptome analysis of soybean leaf abscission identifies transcriptional regulators of organ polarity and cell fate, Frontiers In Plant Science, c. 7:125, 2016, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00125.
  • [47] Sundaresan. S, Philosoph-Hadas. S, Riov. J, Mugasimangalam. R, Kuravadi. N.A, Kochanek. B ve Meir. S, “De novo transcriptome sequencing and development of abscission zone-specific microarray as a new molecular tool for analysis of tomato organ abscission”. Frontiers In Plant Science, c. 6, ss. 1258, 2016.
  • [48] Oh. Y, Baldwin. I.T ve Galis. I, “A jasmonate ZIM-domain protein NaJAZd regulates floral jasmonic acid levels and counteracts flower abscission in Nicotiana attenuata plants”, PLoS ONE 8:e57868. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0057868, 2013.
  • [49] González-Carranza. Z.H, Whitelaw. C.A, Swarup. R ve Roberts. J.A, “Temporal and spatial expression of a polygalacturonase during leaf and flower abscission in oilseed rape and Arabidopsis”, Plant physiology, c. 128 s. 2, ss. 534-543, 2002.
  • [50] Singh. A.P, Tripathi. S.K, Nath. P ve Sane. A.P, “Petal abscission in rose is associated with the differential expression of two ethylene-responsive xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase genes, RbXTH1 and RbXTH2”. Journal of Experimental Botany, c. 62, s. 14, ss. 5091-5103, 2011.
  • [51] Del Campillo. E ve Bennett. A.B, “Pedicel breakstrength and cellulase gene expression during tomato flower abscission”, Plant Physiology, c. 111, s. 3, ss. 813-820, 1996.
  • [52] Belfield. E.J, Ruperti. B, Roberts. J.A ve McQueen-Mason. S, “Changes in expansin activity and gene expression during ethylene-promoted leaflet abscission in Sambucus nigra. Journal of Experimental Botany, c. 56, s. 413, ss. 817-823, 2005.
  • [53] Prusinski. J, “Degree of success of legume cultivars registered by the center for cultivar testing over the period of market economy”, Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura c. 6, s. 3, ss. 16, 2007.
  • [54] Pigeaire. A, Delane. R, Seymour. M ve Atkins. C, “The sequence of flower and pod abscission on the main stem inflorescence of lupinus angustifolius”, 1989.
  • [55] Lakshmi Kanthamma. C.V, “Effect of environmental stress on flower abscission and yield of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp)” Doctoral dissertation, andhra pradesh agrıcultural unıversıty rajendranagar, hyderabad), 1991.
  • [56] Van Steveninck. R.F.M, “Factors affecting the abscission of reproductive organs in yellow lupins (Lupinus luteus L.) I. The effect of different patterns of flower removal”, Journal of Experimental Botany, c. 8, s. 3, ss. 373-381, 1957.
Birincil Dil tr
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0002-3711-3733
Yazar: Seyithan SEYDOŞOĞLU (Sorumlu Yazar)
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0003-3820-8387
Yazar: Uğur SEVİLMİŞ

Tarihler

Yayımlanma Tarihi : 31 Ocak 2020

Bibtex @derleme { dubited605907, journal = {Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi}, issn = {}, eissn = {2148-2446}, address = {}, publisher = {Düzce Üniversitesi}, year = {2020}, volume = {8}, pages = {478 - 484}, doi = {10.29130/dubited.605907}, title = {Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu}, key = {cite}, author = {Seydoşoğlu, Seyithan and Sevi̇lmi̇ş, Uğur} }
APA Seydoşoğlu, S , Sevi̇lmi̇ş, U . (2020). Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu . Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi , 8 (1) , 478-484 . DOI: 10.29130/dubited.605907
MLA Seydoşoğlu, S , Sevi̇lmi̇ş, U . "Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu" . Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 8 (2020 ): 478-484 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/dubited/issue/49725/605907>
Chicago Seydoşoğlu, S , Sevi̇lmi̇ş, U . "Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu". Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 8 (2020 ): 478-484
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu AU - Seyithan Seydoşoğlu , Uğur Sevi̇lmi̇ş Y1 - 2020 PY - 2020 N1 - doi: 10.29130/dubited.605907 DO - 10.29130/dubited.605907 T2 - Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 478 EP - 484 VL - 8 IS - 1 SN - -2148-2446 M3 - doi: 10.29130/dubited.605907 UR - https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.605907 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu %A Seyithan Seydoşoğlu , Uğur Sevi̇lmi̇ş %T Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu %D 2020 %J Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi %P -2148-2446 %V 8 %N 1 %R doi: 10.29130/dubited.605907 %U 10.29130/dubited.605907
ISNAD Seydoşoğlu, Seyithan , Sevi̇lmi̇ş, Uğur . "Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu". Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 8 / 1 (Ocak 2020): 478-484 . https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.605907
AMA Seydoşoğlu S , Sevi̇lmi̇ş U . Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu. DÜBİTED. 2020; 8(1): 478-484.
Vancouver Seydoşoğlu S , Sevi̇lmi̇ş U . Baklagillerde Generatif Döküm Sorunu. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi. 2020; 8(1): 478-484.