Altıgen Boşluklu Delikli Kirişlerde Göçme Modlarının Sayısal Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Delikli ve petek çelik kirişler, yüksek yapısal verimlilikleri nedeniyle yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır; ancak gövde boşluklarının varlığı, dolu gövdeli kesitlerde görülmeyen Vierendeel eğilmesi ve gövde dikmesi burkulması gibi karmaşık göçme modlarını ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, altıgen boşluklu delikli kirişlerin yük taşıma kapasitesi ve göçme modları üzerindeki geometrik parametrelerin etkisi araştırılmıştır. Farklı boşluk açılarına (40° ile 63° arasında değişen) ve boşluk sayılarına sahip on adet delikli kiriş ve referans olarak bir adet dolu gövdeli kiriş olmak üzere, toplam on bir model üzerinde doğrusal olmayan sonlu elemanlar analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçların güvenilirliğini sağlamak amacıyla, sayısal modelleme yaklaşımı literatürdeki deneysel bir çalışma ile doğrulanmıştır. Tüm modeller, boşluk geometrisinin etkilerini geleneksel üretim yöntemlerindeki kesit derinliği artışından kaynaklanan etkilerden izole etmek amacıyla, sabit bir toplam derinliğe sahip olacak şekilde tasarlanmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, kiriş geometrisi ile göçme modu arasında doğrudan bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Sünek ve yüksek kapasiteli eğilme göçmesinden; gevrek ve daha düşük kapasiteli kesme göçmesine (Vierendeel eğilmesi veya gövde dikmesi burkulması) geçişi kontrol eden temel parametre, net kesit derinliği (dt) ile toplam kiriş derinliği (dg) arasındaki boyutsuz oran olan 2dt/dg oranıdır. Daha yüksek 2dt/dg oranlarına (0.50 ve 0.42) sahip modeller, sünek bir eğilme mekanizması geliştirerek dolu gövdeli kiriş kapasitesinin %86-92’sine ulaşmıştır. Buna karşın, daha düşük 2dt/dg oranına (0.33) sahip modeller, boşluk açısından bağımsız olarak, referans kiriş kapasitesinin %72-79’u seviyesinde Vierendeel mekanizmasıyla erken ve gevrek bir göçme sergilemiştir. Ayrıca, boşluk açısının (θ) ise ikincil bir parametre olduğu belirlenmiştir. Delikli çelik kirişlerde sünek göçmenin elde edilmesi ve erken Vierendeel göçmesinin önlenmesi için 2dt/dg oranının optimize edilmesinin gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Delikli kiriş
• petek kiriş
• sonlu elemanlar analizi
• Vierendeel eğilmesi
• gövde dikmesi burkulması

Numerical Evaluation of Failure Modes in Perforated Beams with Hexagonal Openings

Öz

Perforated and castellated steel beams are widely used due to their high structural efficiency; however, the presence of web openings introduces complex failure modes, such as Vierendeel bending and web-post buckling, which are not observed in solid-web sections. In this study, the influence of geometric parameters on the load-bearing behavior and failure mechanisms of perforated beams with hexagonal openings was systematically investigated. Nonlinear finite element analyses were performed on eleven models, including ten perforated beams with varying opening angles (ranging from 40° to 63°) and numbers of openings, as well as a solid-web reference beam. The numerical modeling approach was validated against experimental data from the literature to ensure the reliability of the results. All models were designed with a constant overall depth, allowing the effects of opening geometry to be isolated from those associated with increased section depth in conventional fabrication methods. The analysis results indicate a direct correlation between beam geometry and failure mode. The primary parameter controlling the transition from ductile, high-capacity flexural failure to brittle, low-capacity shear failure (Vierendeel bending or web-post buckling) is the dimensionless ratio 2dt/dg, where dt is the net section depth and dg is the total beam depth. Models with higher 2dt/dg ratios (such as 0.50 and 0.42) reached 86–92% of the capacity of the solid-web beam by developing a ductile flexural mechanism. In contrast, models with a lower 2dt/dg ratio (0.33) exhibited early brittle failure through the Vierendeel mechanism at 72–79% of the reference capacity, independent of opening angle. The opening angle (θ) was determined to be a secondary parameter. It is concluded that optimizing the 2dt/dg ratio is essential for achieving ductile failure in perforated steel beams and avoiding premature Vierendeel failure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Perforated beam
• castellated beam
• finite element analysis
• Vierendeel bending
• web-post buckling

Kaynakça

1. [1] Design Guide 31: Castellated and Cellular Beam Design, AISC, Chicago, IL, USA, 2017.
2. [2] D. Kerdal, and D. A. Nethercot, “Failure modes for castellated beams,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 295-315, 1984, DOI: 10.1016/0143-974X(84)90004-X
3. [3] R. Deepha, and S. Jayalekshmi, “Finite element analysis on shear strength of a castellated beam with hexagonal web opening”, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1006, no. 1, 2020, Art. no. 012009, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1006/1/012009
4. [4] W. Zaarour, and R. Redwood, “Web buckling in thin webbed castellated beams,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 122, no. 8, pp. 860-866, 1996, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:8(860)
5. [5] R. Redwood, and S. Demirdjian, “Castellated beam web buckling in shear,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 124, no. 10, pp. 1202-1207, 1998, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:10(1202)
6. [6] K. D. Tsavdaridis, and C. D’Mello, “Vierendeel bending study of perforated steel beams with various novel web opening shapes through nonlinear finite-element analyses,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 138, no. 10, pp. 1214-1230, 2012, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000562
7. [7] L. Budi, and W. Partono, “Optimization analysis of size and distance of hexagonal hole in castellated steel beams,” Procedia Eng., vol. 171, pp. 1092-1099, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.465
8. [8] P. Ponsorn, and K. Phuvoravan, “Efficiency of castellated and cellular beam utilization based on design guidelines,” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., vol. 25, no. 3, 2020, Art. no. 04020016, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.000049

9. [9] L. Barkiah, and A. R. Darmawan, “Comparative analysis of the flexural capacity of conventional steel beams with castellated beams,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 780, no. 1, 2021, Art. no. 012013, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/780/1/012013
10. [10] F. P. V. Ferreira, R. Shamass, L. F. P. Santos, V. Limbachiya, and K. D. Tsavdaridis, “EC3 design of web-post buckling resistance for perforated steel beams with elliptically-based web openings,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 175, 2022, Art. no. 109196, DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109196
11. [11] S. G. Morkhade, and L. M. Gupta, “Critical study of steel beams with web openings,” Aust. J. Struct. Eng., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 24-35, 2023, DOI: 10.1080/13287982.2022.2117319
12. [12] S. G. Morkhade, L. M. Gupta, and C. H. Martins, “Effect of Web Post Width on Strength Capacity of Steel Beams with Web Openings: Experimental and Analytical Investigation,” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., vol. 27, no. 2, 2022, Art. no. 04022010, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000688
13. [13] A. Khan, C. H. Martins, A. Rossi, and S. G. Morkhade, “Evaluation of web post-buckling and vierendeel mechanism in steel alveolar beams with five shapes of web openings: a numerical study,” J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil., vol. 11, Art. no. 118, 2026, DOI: 10.1007/s41024-026-00800-2
14. [14] S. S. Patil, and P. D. Kumbhar, “Comparative study on the behaviour of castellated beams provided with hexagonal, circular, and diamond-shaped web openings,” Asian J. Civ. Eng., vol. 25, pp. 359-369, 2024, DOI: 10.1007/s42107-023-00780-5
15. [15] F. De'nan, C. S. Wai, and N. S. Hashim, “Impact of web perforation size and shapes on structural behavior: a finite element analysis,” World J. Eng., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 911-923, 2024, DOI: 10.1108/WJE-03-2023-0076
16. [16] N. S. Hashim, and F. De'nan, “The numerical assessment of stress distribution of I-beam with web opening,” World J. Eng., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 986-1001, 2024, DOI: 10.1108/WJE-03-2023-0078
17. [17] G. Promsatit, T. Sethaput, W. Atjanakul, and A. Boonyaprapasorn, “Enhancing web-post buckling resistance in perforated steel beams: An in-depth investigation of elliptical openings, geometric parameters, and ai-driven predictions,” Structures, vol. 71, 2025, Art. no. 107907, DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107907
18. [18] W. Sae-Long, S. Arun, S. Limkatanyu, P. Chaimahawan, N. Damrongwiriyanupap, W. Fakkaew, and S. Wongchairattana, “Behavior and design implications of web-post shear failure in cellular beams,” Results Eng., vol. 27, 2025, Art. no. 106709, DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106709
19. [19] W. Sae-Long, S. Arun, A. Witthayapraphakorn, S. Limkatanyu, N. Damrongwiriyanupap, W. Fakkaew, P. Chaimahawan, and C. Thongchom, “Local failure behavior of cellular beams: A parametric finite element study of web-post bending moment,” Results Eng., vol. 29, 2026, Art. no. 109372, DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109372
20. [20] J. Betken, A.-L. Bours, R. Winkler, and M. Knobloch, “Numerical analysis of the stability behaviour of castellated beams and comparison to regular hot-rolled profiles,” Steel Constr., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 50-59, 2026, DOI: 10.1002/stco.70007
21. [21] P. K. Bhat, S. Ashwitha, and D. K. Bhat, “Span-dependent comparative analysis of lateral torsional buckling and nonlinear load behaviour in castellated and solid I-beams using analytical and finite element approaches,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 12, 2025, Art. no. 125701, DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ae284c
22. [22] Ansys® Academic Research Mechanical, Release 2024 R2, ANSYS, Inc.
23. [23] K. D. Tsavdaridis, and C. D'Mello, “Web buckling study of the behaviour and strength of perforated steel beams with different novel web opening shapes,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 1605-1620, 2011, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.04.004
24. [24] Ansys® Academic Research Mechanical, Release 2024 R2, Help System, Element Reference, ANSYS, Inc.
25. [25] American Institute of Steel Construction, “Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-22)”, AISC, Chicago, IL, 2022
26. [26] A. A. Aglan and R. G. Redwood, “Web buckling in castellated beams,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 307-320, 1974, DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1974.4059