Dicle Barajı Su Alma Yapısında Periyodik Su Kalitesi Değişimleri ve Sentinel-2 Tabanlı NDWI ile NDTI İndekslerinin Sınırlılıkları

Öz

Bu çalışmada, 2022–2025 yılları arasında Ocak, Mart, Haziran ve Eylül aylarında Dicle Barajı su alma yapısından alınan 16 su örneğine ait fizikokimyasal ve mikrobiyolojik su kalitesi verileri, Sentinel-2A uydu görüntülerinden türetilen Normalize Edilmiş Fark Su İndeksi (NDWI) ve Normalize Edilmiş Fark Bulanıklık İndeksi (NDTI) ile birlikte değerlendirilmiştir. Elektriksel iletkenlik, pH, sülfat, bulanıklık, renk, su sıcaklığı, toplam koliform ve fekal koliform parametrelerindeki periyodik farklılıklar, yıllar blok değişkeni olarak ele alınarak kesin (exact) Friedman testi ile incelenmiş; çoklu karşılaştırmalardan kaynaklanan Tip I hata olasılığını kontrol etmek amacıyla Holm düzeltmesi uygulanmıştır. Elektriksel iletkenlik, pH, sülfat, bulanıklık, renk parametreleri ile optik indeksler arasındaki ilişkiler Pearson ve Spearman korelasyon analizleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Uzun yıllara ait meteorolojik normaller ise yalnızca çalışma alanının iklimsel özelliklerini tanımlamak amacıyla kullanılmıştır. Holm düzeltmesi sonrasında, örnekleme dönemleri arasında yalnızca su sıcaklığı ve toplam koliform parametrelerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık belirlenmiştir. Toplam koliform için elde edilen Kendall'ın W katsayısının 1,000 olması, örnekleme dönemlerinin sıralamasının dört yıl boyunca tamamen aynı olduğunu göstermektedir. NDWI ile incelenen su kalitesi parametrelerinin hiçbiri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmamıştır. NDTI açısından ise yalnızca elektriksel iletkenlik ile olan ilişkinin hem Pearson (r = 0,7649; düzeltilmiş p = 0,0056) hem de Spearman (ρ = 0,7432; düzeltilmiş p = 0,0097) analizlerinde anlamlılığını koruduğu belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, elektriksel iletkenliğin doğrudan optik olarak aktif bir parametre olmaması ve söz konusu ilişkinin yalnızca 16 gözleme dayanması nedeniyle, bu bulgu öngörücü bir model olarak yorumlanmamıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, NDWI ve NDTI indekslerinin laboratuvar analizlerinin yerine geçemeyeceğini; ancak daha kapsamlı arazi gözlemleri ve bağımsız doğrulama verileri ile desteklenmeleri durumunda su kalitesinin izlenmesinde tamamlayıcı araçlar olarak kullanılabileceklerini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dicle Barajı
• su kalitesi
• Sentinel-2A
• Normalize Edilmiş Fark Su İndeksi (NDWI)
• Normalize Edilmiş Fark Bulanıklık İndeksi(NDTI)

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, insan katılımcılar, deney hayvanları veya etik kurul onayı gerektiren herhangi bir deneysel uygulama içermemektedir. Su örnekleri, Dicle Barajı su alma yapısından rutin çevresel izleme çalışmaları kapsamında toplanmış olup, insanlar, hayvanlar veya koruma altındaki ekosistemler üzerinde herhangi bir müdahalede bulunulmamıştır. Yazar, çalışmanın araştırma dürüstlüğü ve bilimsel yayın etiği ilkelerine uygun olarak yürütüldüğünü beyan etmektedir.

Periodic Water-Quality Variation at the Dicle Dam Intake and the Limitations of Sentinel-2-Derived NDWI and NDTI

Öz

This study jointly evaluated physicochemical and microbiological water-quality data from 16 samples collected at the Dicle Dam intake structure in January, March, June, and September between 2022 and 2025, together with the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) and Normalized Difference Turbidity Index (NDTI) derived from Sentinel-2A imagery. Periodic differences in electrical conductivity, pH, sulfate, turbidity, color, water temperature, total coliform, and fecal coliform were examined using an exact Friedman test, with years treated as blocks, and Holm correction was applied for multiple testing. Relationships between electrical conductivity, pH, sulfate, turbidity, color, and the optical indices were evaluated using Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses. Long-term meteorological normals were used only to describe the climatic characteristics of the study area. After Holm correction, only water temperature and total coliform differed significantly among the sampling periods. A Kendall's W value of 1.000 for total coliform indicated that the ordering of the sampling periods was identical across all four years. NDWI was not significantly associated with any of the examined water-quality parameters. For NDTI, only its relationship with electrical conductivity remained significant in both Pearson (r=0.7649, adjusted p=0.0056) and Spearman (ρ=0.7432, adjusted p=0.0097) analyses. However, because electrical conductivity is not a directly optically active parameter and the relationship was based on only 16 observations, this finding was not interpreted as a predictive model. The results indicate that NDWI and NDTI cannot replace laboratory analyses but may serve as complementary monitoring tools when supported by more extensive field observations and independent validation data.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dicle Dam
• water qualıty
• Sentinel-2A
• NDWI
• NDTI
• temporal variation

Etik Beyan

This study did not involve human participants, animals, or any experimental procedures requiring ethical committee approval. Water samples were collected from the Dicle Dam intake structure as part of routine environmental monitoring, and no interventions affecting humans, animals, or protected ecosystems were performed. The authors declare that the study was conducted in accordance with the principles of research integrity and publication ethics.

Kaynakça

1. [1] A. N. Tyler, P. D. Hunter, E. Spyrakos, S. Groom, A. M. Constantinescu, and J. Kitchen, “Developments in Earth observation for the assessment and monitoring of inland, transitional, coastal and shelf-sea waters,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 572, pp. 1307–1321, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.020.
2. [2] S. A. Jaywant and K. M. Arif, “Remote sensing techniques for water quality monitoring: A review,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 24, Art. no. 8041, 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24248041.
3. [3] C. Giardino et al., “Imaging spectrometry of inland and coastal waters: State of the art, achievements and perspectives,” Surveys in Geophysics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 401–429, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10712-018-9476-0.
4. [4] S. G. P. Virdis, W. Xue, E. Winijkul, V. Nitivattananon, and P. Punpukdee, “Remote sensing of tropical riverine water quality using Sentinel-2 MSI and field observations,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 144, Art. no. 109472, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109472.
5. [5] Y. O. Ouma, K. Noor, and K. Herbert, “Modelling reservoir chlorophyll-a, TSS, and turbidity using Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat-8 OLI satellite sensors with empirical multivariate regression,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2020, Art. no. 8858408, 2020, doi: 10.1155/2020/8858408.
6. [6] G. Sent et al., “Deriving water quality parameters using Sentinel-2 imagery: A case study in the Sado Estuary, Portugal,” Remote Sensing, vol. 13, no. 5, Art. no. 1043, 2021, doi: 10.3390/rs13051043.
7. [7] S. K. McFeeters, “The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1425–1432, 1996, doi: 10.1080/01431169608948714.
8. [8] J. P. Lacaux, Y. M. Tourre, C. Vignolles, J. A. Ndione, and M. Lafaye, “Classification of ponds from high-spatial resolution remote sensing: Application to Rift Valley Fever epidemics in Senegal,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 66–74, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.012.

9. [9] K. Toming, T. Kutser, A. Laas, M. Sepp, B. Paavel, and T. Nõges, “First experiences in mapping lake water quality parameters with Sentinel-2 MSI imagery,” Remote Sensing, vol. 8, no. 8, Art. no. 640, 2016, doi: 10.3390/rs8080640.
10. [10] M. A. Warren et al., “Assessment of atmospheric correction algorithms for the Sentinel-2A MultiSpectral Imager over coastal and inland waters,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 225, pp. 267–289, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.018.
11. [11] N. Pahlevan et al., “ACIX-Aqua: A global assessment of atmospheric correction methods for Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 over lakes, rivers, and coastal waters,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 258, Art. no. 112366, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112366.
12. [12] L. De Keukelaere et al., “Atmospheric correction of Landsat-8/OLI and Sentinel-2/MSI data using iCOR algorithm: Validation for coastal and inland waters,” European Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 525–542, 2018, doi: 10.1080/22797254.2018.1457937.
13. [13] A. Bielski and C. Toś, “Remote sensing of the water quality parameters for a shallow dam reservoir,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 13, Art. no. 6734, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12136734.
14. [14] M. Sedighkia and A. Abdoli, “Linking remote sensing analysis and reservoir operation optimization for improving water quality management of reservoirs,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 613, Part B, Art. no. 128445, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128445.
15. [15] M. Mamun, M. Hasan, and K.-G. An, “Advancing reservoirs water quality parameters estimation using Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellite data with machine learning approaches,” Ecological Informatics, vol. 81, Art. no. 102608, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102608.
16. [16] J. Lioumbas et al., “Satellite remote sensing to improve source water quality monitoring: A water utility’s perspective,” Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, vol. 32, Art. no. 101042, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101042.
17. [17] N. Ndou, “Geostatistical inference of Sentinel-2 spectral reflectance patterns to water quality indicators in the Setumo Dam, South Africa,” Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, vol. 30, Art. no. 100945, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.100945.
18. [18] Y. Lai, J. Zhang, W. Li, and Y. Song, “Water quality monitoring of large reservoirs in China based on water color change from 1999 to 2021,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 633, Art. no. 130988, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130988.
19. [19] S. Tumur, “A physical, chemical and microbiological evaluation of Karacadağ natural spring waters,” Advances in Biology & Earth Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 63–87, 2025, doi: 10.62476/abes.10163.
20. [20] S. Tumur, A. Cihan, and M. Z. Duz, “Toxic elements (As3+, Pb2+, Hg2+, Cd2+) in wastewater: A case study on environmental threats and health risks,” Advances in Biology & Earth Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 289–302, 2025, doi: 10.62476/abes.102289.
21. [21] DİSKİ General Directorate Water Quality Control Laboratory, “Water-quality test reports for Dicle Dam Downstream Intake Structure—DKG3 Eğil,” unpublished institutional laboratory reports, Diyarbakır, Türkiye, 2022–2025.
22. [22] Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Meteorology, “Long-term monthly climate statistics for Diyarbakır Province,” Ankara, Türkiye, 1929–2025 observation period.
23. [23] M. Drusch, U. Del Bello, S. Carlier, O. Colin, V. Fernandez, F. Gascon, B. Hoersch, C. Isola, P. Laberinti, P. Martimort, A. Meygret, F. Spoto, O. Sy, F. Marchese, and P. Bargellini, “Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 120, pp. 25–36, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026.
24. [24] M. Friedman, “The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance,” Journal of the American Statistical Association,vol. 32, no. 200, pp. 675–701, 1937, doi: 10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522.
25. [25] S. Holm, “A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 65–70, 1979, doi: 10.2307/4615733.
26. [26] C. Reitter, H. Petzoldt, A. Korth, F. Schwab, C. Stange, B. Hambsch, A. Tiehm, I. Lagkouvardos, J. Gescher, and M. Hügler, “Seasonal dynamics in the number and composition of coliform bacteria in drinking water reservoirs,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 787, Art. no. 147539, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147539.
27. [27] C. E. Veras, J. Tobiason, A. C. Marques, Y. Lee, and E. Kumpel, “Seasonal total coliform dynamics in a drinking water reservoir,” Water Research, vol. 284, Art. no. 123850, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2025.123850.