How to approach the innovative economies at the conjecture of religion, faith, and ethics?

Öz

The rapidly evolving integration between the research centers, technoparks, and accelerators, which are becoming a focus of technology development for local, regional, national, and global markets, is witnessing global innovation networks. Though each production process became dependent on a particular technology and paradigms on energy usage and resource efficiency, there is a growing concern for sustainability and environmental protection. The most influential living being, which disrupts the balance and efficiency of ecosystems, is undoubtedly the human being since there is a direct relationship between the pollution and destruction of nature and the alienation of individuals from their natural environment due to continuous innovation and material advancement. The study argues that religion and culture also affect individual decisions and behaviors on the values and goals regarding their attitude towards innovation and related paradigms. One of the solutions is for sustainability to reconcile with and recognize natural creations as a Divine art and exhibition and learn to live in harmony and peace with the phenomenons of religion, faith, ethics, and culture that affect perceptions and attitudes towards innovative economies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innovation
• Ethics
• Sustainability
• Religion
• Technology.

Din, inanç ve ahlak bağlamında yenilikçi ekonomilere nasıl yaklaşılır?

Öz

Yerel, bölgesel, ulusal ve küresel pazarlar için teknoloji geliştirmenin odak noktası haline gelen araştırma merkezleri, teknoparklar ve hızlandırıcılar arasındaki hızla gelişen entegrasyon, küresel inovasyon ağlarına tanık oluyor. Her üretim süreci belirli bir teknolojiye ve enerji kullanımı ve kaynak verimliliğine ilişkin paradigmalara bağımlı hale gelse de, döngüsel ekonomi ve endüstiyel simbiyoz gibi yenilikçi paradigmaların etkisiyle sürdürülebilirlik ve çevrenin korunmasına yönelik artan bir endişe söz konusudur. Ekosistemlerin dengesini ve verimliliğini bozan en etkili canlı kuşkusuz insandır, çünkü doğanın kirlenmesi ve tahribatı ile bireylerin sürekli yenilik ve maddi ilerleme nedeniyle doğal çevrelerine yabancılaşması arasında doğrudan bir ilişki vardır. İş, din ve kültürün, bireylerin yeniliğe ve ilgili paradigmalara karşı tutumlarına ilişkin değerler ve hedefler üzerindeki bireysel karar ve davranışlarını da etkilediğini ileri sürmektedir. Sürdürülebilirlik için önerilen çözümlerden biri, doğal varlıkları ilahi bir sanat ve sergi olarak anlamak, tanımak ve yenilikçi ekonomilere yönelik algıları ve tutumları etkileyen din, inanç, ahlak ve kültür olgularıyla uyum ve barış içinde yaşamayı öğrenmektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İnovasyon
• Etik
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Din
• Teknoloji.

Kaynakça

1. [1] Roost F, Jeckel E. “Post-Fordist Production and Urban Industrial Land Use Patterns”. Urban Planning, 6(3), 321–333, 2021.
2. [2] Landers RN, Marin S. “Theory and Technology in Organizational Psychology: A Review of Technology Integration Paradigms and Their Effects on the Validity of Theory”. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 235-258, 2021.
3. [3] Cantwell J, Santangelo G. “Capitalism, profits, and innovation in the new techno-economic paradigm”. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, 131–157, 2000.
4. [4] Robinson WI. “Debate on the New Global Capitalism: Transnational Capitalist Class, Transnational State Apparatuses, and Global Crisis”. International Critical Thought, 7(2), 171-189, 2017.
5. [5] Utterback JM. “The Process of Technological Innovation Within the Firm”. Academy of Management Journal, 14(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.5465/254712.
6. [6] Charles A. Time “The New Economy”. Time Dergisi, 1983, https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,926013,00.html (15.06.2021).
7. [7] Shepherd BS. Businessweek “The New Economy: What it Really Means”. http://www.businessweek.com/1997/46/b3553084. htm (15.06.2021).
8. [8] Jalava J, Pohjola M. “Economic Growth in the New Economy: Evidence from Advanced Economies”. Information Economics and Policy, 14(2), 189‒210, 2002.

9. [9] Koski H, Rouvinen P, Ylä-Anttila P. “ICT Clusters in Europe: The Great Central Banana and the Small Nordic Potato”. Information Economics and Policy, 14(2), 145‒165, 2002.
10. [10] Kallio J, Mallat N. Ministry of Transport and Communications. “Trust in the New Economy – The Case of Finnish Banks”. http://www.lvm.fi/fileserver/ 1704.pdf (01.07.2013).
11. [11] Tapscott D. The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril In The Age of Networked Intelligence, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1997.
12. [12] Shao BB, Shu WS. “Productivity Breakdown of the Information and Computing Technology Industries Across Countries”. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(1), 23‒33, 2004.
13. [13] Myro RL, Vega J, Álvarez E. “Information Technologies and Economic Growth: Do the Physical Measures Tell Us Something?” Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1719067 (15.06.2021).
14. [14] Daveri F, Mascotto A. “The IT Revolution across the United States”. Review of Income and Wealth, 52(4), 569‒602, 2006.
15. [15] Kiracı A. “Yeni Ekonomide Yenilikçi Ürünler, Mahkumlar İkilemi ve Firmalar için Artan Bir Maliyet Bileşeni”. İktisadi Yenilik Dergisi, 1(1), 27-38, 2016.
16. [16] Gokhberg L, Kuznetsova T. “S&T and Innovation in Russia: Key Challenges of the Post-Crisis Period”. Journal of East-West Business, 17(2-3), 73-89, 2011.
17. [17] Hausman A, Johnston WJ. “The role of innovation in driving the economy: Lessons from the global financial crisis”. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2720-2726, 2014.
18. [18] Lee Y, Fong E, Barney JB, Hawk A. “Why Do Experts Solve Complex Problems Using Open Innovation? Evidence from the US Pharmaceutical Industry”. California Management Review, 62(1), 144–166, 2019.
19. [19] Dahlke J, Bogner K, Becker M, Schlaile MP, Pyka A, Ebersberger B. “Crisis-driven innovation and fundamental human needs: A typological framework of rapid-response COVID-19 innovations”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120799, 2021.
20. [20] Breier M, Kallmuenzer A, Clauss T, Gast J, Kraus S, Tiberius V. “The role of business model innovation in the hospitality industry during the COVID-19 crisis”. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102723, 2021.
21. [21] Ardito L, Coccia M, Messeni Petruzzelli A. “Technological exaptation and crisis management: Evidence from COVID-19 outbreaks”. R&D Management, 51(4), 381-392, 2021.
22. [22] Oh DS, Phillips F, Park S, Lee E. “Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination”. Technovation, 54, 1-6, 2016.
23. [23] Jarvi K. Ecosystem Archıtecture Desıgn: Endogenous And Exogenous Structural Propertıes. PhD Dissertation, Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis 511, 2013.
24. [24] Bingham RD. “Innovation, Bureaucracy, and Public Policy: a Study of Innovation Adoption By Local Government”. Western Political Quarterly, 31(2), 178–205, 1978.
25. [25] Ercan T, Kutay M. Training professional smart city workforces through a partnership with technology firms, Editor(s): John R.Vacca, Smart Cities Policies and Financing, 181-196, Elsevier, 2022.
26. [26] Koh WTH. “Singapore's transition to innovation-based economic growth: infrastructure, institutions and government's role”. R&D Management, 36(2), 143-160, 2006.
27. [27] De Clercq D, Menzies TV, Diochon M, Gasse Y. “Explaining Nascent Entrepreneurs' Goal Commitment: An Exploratory Study”. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 22(2), 123-139, 2009.
28. [28] Boutroux E. Çağdaş Felsefede İlim ve Din. Çeviri: Katipoğlu H. İstanbul, Türkiye, M.E.Yayınları, 1997.
29. [29] Erişirgil ME. Muasır Filozoflara Göre İlim ve Din. İstanbul, Türkiye, D.F.İ.F.Y., sy. I, 1925.
30. [30] Taylan N. İlim-Din sahaları İlişkileri Sınırları. İstanbul, Türkiye, Çağrı Yayınları, 1979.
31. [31] Adıvar A. Tarih Boyuca İlim ve Din. 2. baskı. İstanbul, Türkiye, Remzi Kitabevi, 96-101, 1969.
32. [32] Nursi BS. The Words, İstanbul, Türkiye, Sözler Neşriyat, 1960.
33. [33] Hacıoğlu V. “Innovative Entrepreneurship and Development of Service Industry: A Macroeconomic Perspective”. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 69-75, 2021.
34. [34] Çakır C. “Küresel Kriz ve Said Nursi'nin İktisat Görüşü – II”. Köprü Dergisi, 207, http://www.koprudergisi.com.tr/?dergi=107&yazi=cevre-ve-iktisat (01.03.2022).
35. [35] Yıldız A. “Orta Gelir Tuzağı ve Orta Gelir Tuzağından Çıkış Stratejileri”. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(2), 155-170, 2015.
36. [36] Akçomak S. “Türkiye’nin bilim, teknoloji ve yenilik politikası neleri başaramadı?” https://sarkac.org/2018/07/bilim-teknoloji-ve-yenilik/ (27.02.2022).
37. [37] Akın Ü, Emir M. “İslami Girişimcilik”. Türk ve İslam Dünyası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(6), 277-289, 2016.
38. [38] Cheema WA. “Hadith: He whose two days are equal, is a loser” By Waqar Akbar Cheema In Hadith Research July 1, 2017.
39. [39] Jami` at-Tirmidhi, The Book of Destiny, Chapter 8: Belief In The Divine Decree And Submission To It, Sahih Muslim 2664, Book 46, Hadith 52, www.sunnah.com (27.06.2022).
40. [40] Jami` at-Tirmidhi, Chapters on Righteousness And Maintaining Good Relations With Relatives, Chapter 19: What Has Been Related About Covering(The Faults) Of The Muslims, www.sunnah.com (27.06.2022).