İMALAT SANAYİ İHRACATINDA UZMANLAŞMA: TÜRKİYE -AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ ANALİZİ (1991–2003)

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’nin AB–15 ve AB–10 ile Bulgaristan ve Romanya gibi aday ülke grupları içinde imalat sanayi ihracatında uzmanlaştığı/karşılaştırmalı üstünlüğe sahip olduğu endüstrileri belirlemektir. İlk olarak, Balassa endeksi kullanılarak Türkiye’nin ihracatta uzmanlaşma değerleri 1991–2003 dönemini kapsayan SITC Rev.3, 3 basamaklı imalat sanayi ihracat verileriyle hesaplanmıştır. Daha sonra SITC teknoloji sınıflandırmasına göre Türkiye’nin ihracatta uzmanlaştığı/karşılaştırmalı üstünlüğe sahip olduğu endüstriler belirlenerek değerlendirilmeye çalışılmıştır

Öz

Purpose of this study is to identify the Turkish Industries that have comparative advantage in manufacturing export within EU-15 and EU-10 as well as candidate countries such as Bulgaria and Romania. First, export specialization value of Turkey has been calculated with respect to SITC Rev.3 3 digit product group manufacturing export data that were adapted to Balassa index for the period of 1991–2003. Then, technological structures of the Turkish industries that exhibit export specialization/comparative advantage, in accordance with SITC technology classification, have been defined

Kaynakça

1. AIGINGER, Karl (2000) “Specialization of European Manufacturing”, Austrian Economic Quarterly,2,pp.81-92.
2. www.wifo.ac.at/Karl.Ainger/ publications/2000 /specialization.pdf
3. BALLASA, B (1965) Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage”, The The Manchester School of Economics and Social Science, No.33.
4. BRAKMAN, Steven, GARRETSEN Harry and MARREWIJK van Charles (2003) An Introduction to Geographical Economics: Trade, Location and Growth, Cambridge University Press.
5. EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK (ECB) (2004) “Sectoral Specialization in the EU: A Macroeconomic Perspective”, Occasional Paper Series,No.19,July. www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/scpops/ ecbocp19.pdf
6. DIŞ TİCARET MÜSTEŞARLIĞI (DTM) İstatistikleri, 2006, www.dtm.gov.tr HELPMAN, Elhanan (1999) “The Structure of Foreign Trade”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.13, No.2 Spring, 121-144.
7. KRUGMAN, Paul (1990), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, Cambrige, Mas.:MIT Pres.
8. LAURSEN, K. (1998) “Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives as Measures of International Specialisation”, DRUID Working Paper No. 98-30, December.

9. MARREWIJK Charles Van (2001) International Trade and the World Economy, Oxford University Pres.
10. MARTIN, Ron and SUNLEY, Peter (1996) “Paul Krugman’s Geographical and Its Implications for Regional Development Theory: A Critical Assessment”, Economic Geography, Vol,72, No.3, 259-292.
11. PALUZIE, Elisenda, PONS, Jordi and TIRADO, A. Daniel (2001) “Regional Integration and Specialization Patterns in Spain”, Regional Studies, Vol.35.4, pp.285-296.
12. RIVERA-BATIZ, Luis A. ve OLIVA Maria A. (2003) International Trade, Theory, Strategies and Evidence, Oxford University Press.
13. SEYIDOĞLU, Halil,(1999) Uluslararası İktisat Teori Politika ve Uygulama, Geliştirilmiş 13. Baskı, İstanbul.
14. SMYTH-ADDISON, Diarmaid (2005) “Ireland’s Revealed Comparative Advantage”, Quarterly Bulletin 1, 101-115.
15. TÜRKİYE İSTATİSTİK KURUMU (TÜİK) (2006) İstatistikleri, www.tüik.gov.tr.
16. VOGIATZOGLOU, Klimis (2004) “Patterns of Industrial Export Specialization in Greece in the course of European Economic Integration: Empirics and Determinants”, http://gnu.univ.gda.pl/ ~eefs/pap/vogiatzoglou/doc
17. YILMAZ, Bahri (2003) “Turkey’s Competitiveness in The European Union: A Comparison With Five Candidate Countries- Bulgaria, The Czech republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania- And The EU15”, Ezoneplus Working Paper No.12, February.
18. UNCTAD (2005), International Trade Statistics, http://www.stats.unctad.org/handbook