Bölgesel Kalkınmada Kamu Yatırımlarının Rolü: Kuramsal Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, kamu yatırımları ve iktisadi kalkınma ilişkisinin kuramsal çerçevesini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla, kamu sermayesi ve iktisadi kalkınmaya ilişkin kuramsal ve ampirik literatür incelenerek, konunun 1950 lerden günümüze değin uzanan yol haritası oluşturulmaya çalışılmıştır. Bölgesel ekonomilerin gelişme deneyimlerinde devletin rolü tartışmaları, 1950’lerden günümüze değin çeşitli okulların katkısıyla evrilerek, kamu yatırımlarının hangi ölçüt ve kriterlere göre yapılması gerektiği sorusu etrafında odaklanmıştır. “Yeni bölgesel kalkınma” anlayışına göre, sosyal altyapıyı ve teknolojik ilerlemeyi geliştirecek yatırımlar, en az fiziki altyapı yatırımları kadar önemlidir. Diğer yandan, çeşitli önemli ayrıntılarda birbiriyle uyuşsun veya uyuşmasın, kamu yatırımlarının ekonomideki rolü tartışmalarının odağı bağımsız tek tek şirketlerin ya da yatırımların kendi içinde karlılığı değil ileri ve geri bağlantılarıyla şirketler, sektörler ve hatta ekonomi dışı kurumlar arasındaki dışsallıklar ve karşılıklı etkileşimleridir. Bu anlamda, kamu yatırımları ve kalkınma ilişkisinin farklı kavramlar ve yaklaşımlarla da olsa hep yinelenen paradigmatik çerçevesi ve ekonomik kalkınma eksenli tartışmalara çok önemli katkısı bu etkileşimler, yeni yatırımları uyarma potansiyelleri ve bunların yol açtığı birikimli nedenselliklerin temel tartışma zeminini oluşturmasıdır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kamu yatırımları, kamu sermayesi, kamu yatırım kriterleri, birikimli nedensellikler, bölgesel kalkınma

The Role of Public Investments in Regional Development: A Theoretical Review

Öz

The aim of this study is to inquire into the theoretical background between public investments and economic development. To this purpose, we have conducted a detailed review of the literature on public capital and economic growth and tried to work out a road map of its progress from the birth of ‘development economics’ in the 1950’s to the present focus on ‘regional development’. According to the new regional development paradigm, investments for developing social infrastructure and human capital are at least as important as those for physical infrastructure. On the other hand, regardless of their agreement or disagreements, rather than focusing on the profitability of autonomous single firms in isolation, it is the significance of forward and backward linkages and cumulative effect of the interactions between firms, sectors of the economy as well as the dependency of economic growth on institutions that constitutes the common ground. Therefore one recurrent theme, albeit formulated and appearing in different concepts in the various approaches on the relationship between public investments and development, is the emphasis on the inducement potentials, externalities and interactions as a whole determining the fundamental ground and the paradigmatic frame of the debates on economic development

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public Investments, public capital, public investment criterias, cummulative causations, regional development

Kaynakça

1. Armstrong, H., J. T. (2000) Regional Economics and Policy, 3rd. Ed., Oxford and Massachusetts. Blackwell.
2. Arthur, W. B. (1989) “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and ‘lock-in’ by historical Events” Economic Jour- nal, 99:116-131.
3. Arthur, W. B. (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor. Michigan University Press.
4. Aschauer, D. (1989a) “Does Public Capital Crowd out Pri- vate Capital?” Journal of Monetary Economics, 24:171-188.
5. Aschauer, D. (1989b) “Is Public Expenditure Productive?” Journal of Monetary Economics, 23: 177-200.
6. Boschma, R.A., ve Lambooy, J.G. (1999) “Evolutionary Eco- nomics and Economic Geography” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9: 411-429.
7. Cooke, P. ve Morgan, K. (1998) The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
8. Cooke, P. (2003) Knowledge Economies: Clusters,Learning and Cooperative Advantage, London, Routledge.

9. Deliktaş, E., Önder, Ö. ve Karadağ, M. (2009) “The Spillover Effects of Public Capital on the Turkish Private Manufac- turing Industries in the Geographical Regions” Annals of Regional Science, 43: 365-378.
10. De la Fuente, A. and Vives, X. (1995) “Infrastructure and Education as Instruments of Regional Policy—Evidence from Spain” Economic Policy, 20: 11–51.
11. Duffy-Deno, K., ve Eberts, R. (1991) “Public Infrastructure and Regional Economic Development: A Simultaneous Equations Approach” Journal of Urban Economics, 30: 329–343.
12. Dulupçu, M.A., Sungur, O. ve Keskin, H. (2010) “Bölge- sel Kalkınmada Yeni Yaklaşımlar ve Türkiye’de Kalkınma Planlarına Yansımaları: Kalkınma Planlarının Yeni Teoriler Açısından Değerlendirilmesi” Ankara Üniversitesi TÜCA- UM VI. Ulusal Coğrafya Sempozyumu, Ankara.
13. Fernald, J. (1999) “Roads to Prosperity? Assessing the Link Between Public Capital And Productivity” American Eco- nomic Review, 89(3): 619–638.
14. Freeman, C. (1994) “Critical Survey: the Economics of Tech- nical Change” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18: 463- 512.
15. Garcia-Milà, T. Ve McGuire, T. J. (1992) “The Contribution of Publicly Provided Inputs to States’ Economies” Regional Science and Urban Economics ,22: 229– 241.
16. Garcia-Milà, T., McGuire, T.J. ve Porter, R.H. (1996) “The Effects of Public Capital in State-level Productions Func- tions Reconsidered” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78: 177-180.
17. Gramlich, E. (1994) “Infrastructure Investment: A Review Essay” Journal of Economic Literature, XXXII: 1176-1196.
18. Hansen, N.M. (1965a) “Unbalanced Growth and Regional Development” Economic Inquiry, 4(1): 3-14.
19. Hansen, N.M. (1965b) “The Structure and Determinants of Local Public Investment Expenditures” The Review of Eco- nomics and Statistics, 47(2):150-162.
20. Hirschman, A. O. (1958) The Strategy of Economic Develop- ment, Yale University Press, New Haven.
21. Holtz-Eakin, D. (1994) “Public sector Capital and Productiv- ity Puzzle” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76: 12- 21.
22. Holtz-Eakin, D. ve Schwartz, A. E. (1995) “Spatial Produc- tivity Spillovers from Public Infrastructure: Evidence from State High Ways” International Tax and Public Finance, 2: 459-468.
23. Hulten C. ve Schwab, R. (1991) “Public Capital Formation and The Growth of Regional Manufacturing Industries” National Tax Journal, XLIV: 121 - 134.
24. Karadağ, M., Ö. Önder ve E. Deliktaş, (2004) “The Effects of Public Capital on Private Sector Performance in the Turk- ish Regional Manufacturing Industries” European Planning Studies 12(8):1145-1156.
25. Krugman, P. (1991a) Geography and Trade, Cambridge, MIT Press.
26. Krugman, P. (1991b) “Increasing Returns and Economic Ge- ography” Journal of Political Economy, 99: 483–499.
27. Kumral, N. (2007) “Türkiyede Bölgesel Politikalartda para- digma Değişimi ve İzmir Örneği”, AB Bölgesel Kalkınma Politikası Semineri, İzmir Ticaret Odası.
28. Ligthart, J.E. (2002) “Public Capital and Output Growth in Portugal: An Empirical Analysis”. European Review of Eco- nomics and Finance, 1(2): 3-30.
29. Lucas, R. E. (1988) “On the Mechanics of Economic Devel- opment” Journal of Monetary Economics, 22:3-42.
30. Lundvall, B. A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: To- wards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Lon- don, Pinter.
31. Lundvall, B.A. ve Johnson, B. (1994) “The Learning Econo- my” Journal of Industrial Studies, 1(2): 23–42.
32. Mankiw, G., Romer, P. M. ve Weil, D. (1992) “A Contri- bution to the Empirics of Economic Growth” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 407-437.
33. Martin, P. (1998) “Can Regional Policies Affect Growth and Geography in Europe?” World Economy, 21: 757–774.
34. Martin, P. (1999) “Public Policies, Regional Inequalities and Growth” Journal of Public Economics, 73: 85-105.
35. Martin, P. (2000) “The Role of Public Policy in the Process of Regional Convergence” EIB Papers, 5(2): 69-80.
36. Martin, R. ve Sunley, P. (1998) “Slow Convergence? The New Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional Development” Economic Geography, 74(3): 201-227.
37. Martin, R.ve Sunley, P. (2006) “Path Dependence and Re- gional Economic Development” Journal of Economic Geog- raphy, 5: 395-437.
38. Meier, G. M. (1976) Leading Issues In Economic Develop- ment, 3rd ed., New York. Oxford University Press.
39. Moody, C. E. (1974) “The Measurement of Capital Services by Electrical Energy” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Sta- tistics, 36(1): 45-52.
40. Moreno, R., López-Bazo, E. ve Artís, M. (2003) “On the Ef- fectiveness of Private and Public Capital” Applied Econo- mics, 35: 727–740.
41. Morgan, K. (1997) “The Learning Region: Institutions, In- novations and Regional Renewal” Regional Studies, 31: 491-503.
42. Munnell, A. ve Cook, L. (1990) “How Does Public Infra- structure Affect Regional Economic Performance? New England Economic Review, 11-33.
43. Munnell, A. (1992) “Infrastructure Investment and Econom- ic Growth” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6: 189-198.
44. Munnell, A. (1993) “An Assesment of Trends in and Eco- nomic Impacts of Infrastructure Investment”, OECD In- frastructure Policies for the 1990’s, 21-53.
45. Myrdal, G. (1957) Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Re- gions, London, Duckworth.
46. Myrdal, G. (1970) An Approach to the Asian Drama, Method- oland Theoretical, New York, Vintage Books.
47. Nurkse, R. (1952) “Some International Aspects of the Prob- lem of Economic Development” American Economic Re- view, 572- 583.
48. Önder, Ö., Deliktaş, E. ve Karadağ, M. (2010) “The Impact of Public Capital Stock on Regional Convergence in Tur- key” European Planning Studies, 18(7):1041-1055.
49. Pereira, A.M. ve Flores, R. (1999) “Public Capital Accumu- lation and Private Sector Performance” Journal of Urban Economics, 46: 300-322.
50. Pereira, A.M. ve Roca-Sagalés, O. (2003) “Spillover Effects of Public Capital Formation: Evidence from the Spanish Regions” Journal of Urban Economics, 53: 238-256.
51. Pereira, A.M. ve Andraz, J.M. (2006) “Public Investment in Transportation Infrastructures and Regional Assymetries in Portugal” Annals of Regional Science, 40(4): 803-817
52. Perroux, F. (1950) “Economic Space: Theory and Applica- tions” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64:89-104.
53. Pezzini, M. (2003) “Cultivating Regional Development: Main Trends and Policy Challenges in OECD Regions” www. oecd.org/dataoecd/44/20/2489826.pdf, (23.11.2010)
54. Picci, L. (1995) “Productivity and Infrastructure in the Italian Regions” University of Bologna, Working Papers, 230.
55. Porter, M. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Lon- don, Macmillan.
56. Pose, A.R. ve Fratesi, U. (2004) “Policy Debates Between De- velopment and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions” Regional Studi- es, 38(1): 97–113.
57. Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
58. Romp, W. ve De Haan J. (2005) “Public Capital and Eco- nomic Growth: A Critical Survey” EİB Papers, 10 (1): 41- 70.
59. Romer, P.M. (1986) “Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth” The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002- 1037.
60. Romer, P.M. (1990) “Endogenous Technological Change” Journal of Political Economy, 98: 71-102.
61. Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1943) “Problems of Industrializa- tion of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe” Economic Jour- nal, 53(210): 202-211.
62. Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1961) “Notes on the Theory of the “Big Push” Ellis, H.S. ve Wallich,H.C.(eds.) Economic De- velopment for Latin America, New York, St. Martin’s.
63. Rosik, P. (2006) “Public Capital and Regional Economic Growth” rosik.pdf, (01.10.2010).
64. Schmutzler A. (1999) “The New Economic Geography”, Journal of Economic Surveys,13(4): 356-379.
65. Seitz, H. (1995) “The Productivity and Supply of Urban Inf- rastructures” Annals of Regional Science, 29: 121–141.
66. Stephan, A. (2001) “Essays on the Contribution of Pub- lic Infrastrucutre to Private Production and its Political Economy” www.dissertation.de/FDP/3898253708.pdf (01.02.2011).
67. Storper, M. (1995) “The Resurgence of Regional Economics, Ten Years Later: the Region as a Nexus of Untraded In- terdependencies” European Urban and Regional Studies, 2: 191-221.
68. Sturm, J.E., Jacobs, J. ve Groote, P. (1999) “Output Effects of Infrastructure Investment in the Netherlands, 1853-1913” Journal of Macroeconomics, 21(2): 355-380.
69. Tatom, J. (1991) “Public Capital and Private Sector Perfor- mance” Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 3-15.
70. Tatom, J. (1993) “The Spurious Effect of Public Capital For- mation on Private Sector Productivity” Policy Studies Jour- nal, 21(2): 391-395.
71. TUSİAD (2005) “Türkiye’de Bölgesel Gelişme Politikaları” Ya- yın No. 4, TUSIAD-T/2005- 09/408, İstanbul:TUSİAD.
72. Uzbay Pirili, M. (2008) “Global Capitalism and Discourses on Capital” Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2): 71-98.
73. Veblen, T. B (1898) “Why is Economics not an Evolutio- nary Science?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(4): 373-97.
74. Venables, A.J. (1996) “Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries” International Economic Review, 37(2,): 341-359
75. Yıldırım, J. (2005) Regional Policy and Economic Conver- gence in Turkey: A Spatial Data Analysis, 18th European Advanced Studies, Institute in Regional Science (Krakow and Lodz, Poland: ERSA).