Sosyal Sermayenin Radikal Yenilik Girişimleri Üzerindeki Etkisi: Havacılık Sektöründe Bir Vaka Çalışması

Öz

Sosyal sermaye, sosyal ilişkilerden doğmaktadır ve yaratıcılık, yenilik ve takımların verimliliği gibi önemli yararlar sağlamaktadır. Fakat sosyal bağların yapısı ve içeriği sosyal sermayenin sonuçlarını değiştirmektedir. Bu çalışma, yenilik çabalarında sosyal sermayenin ne derece kullanıldığını ve kullanılan sosyal sermayenin özelliklerini ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bir işletmede yenilik çabalarında kullanılan bağların gücü, güvenin türü ve bilginin türü analiz edilmiştir. Literatürde sosyal sermaye hakkında derinlemesine bir bilginin yer almaması, bu araştırmada bireylerin sosyal ilişkilere ilişkin deneyimlerinin tanımlanması isteği, keşfedici ve betimleyici bir çalışma olarak vaka çalışması yapılmasına neden olmuştur. Bulgular, araştırma kapsamındaki işletmede işletme içi sosyal sermayenin kullanıldığı, aynı departmanda çalışan bireyler arasında güçlü bağlar geliştiği ve kullanıldığı, çalışılan departman, görev ve sorumluluklar farklılaştıkça bağın gücünün azaldığı ve uzmanlık temelli güvenin sosyal ağlarda mevcut olduğu şeklindedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yenilik, sosyal sermaye, güçlü bağ, güven

Impact of Social Capital on Radical Innovation Efforts of the Organizations: A Case in the Aviation Industry

Öz

Social capital stems from the social relationships and yields highly critical benefits such as creativity, innovation and team productivity. However, the context and the structure of the social ties can potentially change the outcomes of social capital. This study aims to reveal the extent and the characteristics of social capital used in the radical innovation efforts. The strength of ties, type of trust and type of knowledge utilized in a selected radical innovation project were analyzed in this research. As an exploratory and descriptive study, case study method was adopted to investigate social capital as a relatively unexplored phenomenon, and to reflect the experiences of relevant individuals in regards to the social relationships embedded in the innovation efforts. The findings indicate that the organization has benefited from the existence and effective use of internal social capital, strong ties were developed and used among the members of the same department, strength of the ties got weaker as the team members, job descriptions and responsibilities started to vary and, finally, the case revealed that competence-based trust and tacit knowledge were found to be the essential parts of creative and innovative thinking

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innovation, social capital, strong ties, trust

Kaynakça

1. Abrahams, L.C., Cross, R., Lesser, E. & Levin, D.Z. (2003) “Nurturing Interpersonal Trust in Knowledge Sharing Networks” Academy of Management Executive, (4):64-79.
2. Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S.W. (2002) “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept” Academy of Management Review, 27(1):17-40.
3. Ateş, R. (2007) İnovasyon Hayat Kurtarır, 1.Baskı, İstanbul, Doğan Kitapçılık.
4. Baker, M. (2000) Achieving Success Through Social Capital, USA, Jossy Bass.
5. Baum, J. & Ingram, P. (2000) “Interorganizational Learning and Network Organization: Toward a Beha- vioral Theory of the Firm”,http://bic.mgmt.utoronto. ca/2000-04.pdf.
6. Borgatti, P.S. & Cross, R. (2003) “A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks” Management Science, 49(4):432-445.
7. Brass, D.J. & Labianca, G. (1999) “Social Capital, Social Liabilities and Social Resource Management”, Ro- ger Th. A.J. Leenders, Shaul M.Gabbay (eds.), Corpora- te Social Capital and Liability, USA, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Buğra, A. (2000) Devlet-Piyasa Karşıtlığının Ötesin- de: İhtiyaçlar ve Tüketim Üzerine Yazılar, Çev. Bahadır Sina Şener, İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları.

9. Burt, R. S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Struc- ture of Competition, Harvard, Harvard University Press.
10. Burt, R. S. (1997) “The Contingent Effect of Soci- al Capital” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2):339- 366.
11. Burt, R.S. (1997) “A Note on Social Capital and Network Content” Social Networks, 19:355-373.
12. Cainelli, G., Mancinelli, S. & Mazzanti, M. (2007) “Social Capital and Innovation Dynamics in District- Based Local Systems” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(6):932-948.
13. Castiaux, A. (2007) “Radical Innovation in Establis- hed Organizations: Being a Knowledge Predator” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1):36-52.
14. Cengiz, A.A. (2006) Literature Review: The Paradox of Social Network Ties in Creating Knowledge, Procee- dings of Global Conference on Emergent Business Phenome- na in the Digital Economy, Tampere University of Tech- nology, Finland, 28 Nov-2 Dec.
15. Choo, C.W. (1998) The Knowing Organization, Ox- ford University Press.
16. Chua, A. (2002) “The Influence of Social Interaction on Knowledge Creation” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(4):375-392.
17. Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory, England, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
18. Cooper, R. G. (1999) “From Experience: The Invi- sible Success Factors in Product Innovation” Journal of Product Innovation, 16(2):115-133.
19. Cross, R. & Sproull, L. (2004) “More Than An Ans- wer: Information Relationships for Actionable Knowled- ge” Organization Science, 15(4):446-462.
20. Davenport T. & Prusak H. L. (2000) Working Know- ledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know?, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
21. De Carolis, D.M. & Saparito, P. (2006) “Social Ca- pital, Cognition, and Entrepreneurial Opportunities: A Theorotical Framework” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1):41-56.
22. Desouza, K.C. (2003) “Knowledge Management Barriers: Why the Technology Imperative Seldom Work?” Business Horizons, 46(1):25-29.
23. Esmer,Y (1997) Devrim, Evrim, Statüko: Türkiye’de Sosyal, Siyasal, Ekonomik Değerler, İstanbul, TESEV Ya- yınları.
24. Ernst, Dieter & Kim, Linsu (2002) “Global Produc- tion Networks, Knowledge Diffusion, and Local Capabi- lity Formation” Research Policy, 31(9):1417-1429.
25. Floyd, S.W. & Woolbridge, B. (1999) “Knowledge Creation and Social Networks in Corporate Entreprene- urship: The Renewal of Organizational Capability” Ent- repreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3):121-143.
26. Granovetter, M. (1973) “The Strength of Weak Ties” American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-1380.
27. Hansen, M.T. (1999) “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organizational Subunits”, Administrative Science Quar- terly, 44(1):82-112.
28. Hansen, M., Marie L. & Lovas, B. (2005). Know- ledge Sharing in Organizations: Multiple Networks, Multiple Phases. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (5):776-799.
29. Hodson, R. (1996) “Dignity in the Workplace Un- der Participative Management: Alienation and Freedom Revisited” American Sociological Review, 61(5):719-738.
30. Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s Consequences: Interna- tional Differences in Work-Related Values, Newbury Park, C A. Sage.
31. Howell, J. M. & Higgins, C.A. (1990) “Champions of Technological Innovation” Administrative Science Qu- arterly, 35(2):317-341.
32. Hulbert, J.S., Haines, V.A. & Beggs, J.J. (2000) “Core Networks and the Activation of Ties” American Sociological Review, 65(4):598-618.
33. Huysman, M. & Wulf, V. (2006) “IT to Support Knowledge Sharing in Communities, Towards A Soci- al Capital Analysis” Journal of Information Technology, 21:40-51.
34. Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. (2002) “Why all This Fuss about Codified and Tacit Knowled- ge?” Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2):245-262.
35. Göksel, A., Aydıntan, B. & Bingöl, D. (2010) “Örgütlerde Bilgi Paylaşım Davranışı: Sosyal Sermaye Boyutuyla Bir Bakış” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65(4):87-109.
36. Gynawali, D.R. (1999) “Interorganizational Lear- ning Dynamics: Roles of Networks on Knowledge Cre- ation”
37. http://notes.lancs.ac.uk/pub/ol3.nsf/0/2900de63 51042d958025676100505844/$FILE/Gnyawali.pdf, (25.06.2006).
38. Kabasakal, H. & Bodur, M.(2008) “Leadership and Culture in Turkey: A Multi-faceted Phenomenon” Jag- deep, S. Chhokar, Felix C. Broadbeck and J.R.House (eds.) Culture and Leadership Across the World, USA, Taylor&Francis.
39. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1982) The Changing Value of Child- ren in Turkey, Papers of East-West Population Institute, No:60.
40. Kessler, E. H. & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1996) “Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes” Academy of Management, 21(4):1143-1191.
41. Kiray, M. (1997) Abondonment of Land and Trans- formation to Urban Life, Human Development Report, Ankara, Turkey, UNDP.
42. Kraatz, M.S. (1998) “Learning by Association: In- terorganizational Networks and Adaptation to Envi- ronmental Change” Academy of Management Journal, 41(6):621-643.
43. Landry, R., Amara, N. & Lamari, M. (2000) Does Social Capital Determine Innovation ? To What Extent?. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, Brazil.
44. Le Storti, A. J. (2006) “Leadership for Innovation: What Leaders Must Do for Innovation to Happen” Howe School for Technology Management, 2(10):1-5.
45. Lettl, C. (2007) “User Involvement Competence for Radical Innovation” Journal of Engineering and Techno- logy Management, 24(1):53-75.
46. Levin, D.Z. & Cross, R. (2004) “The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer” Management Science, 50 (11):1477-1490.
47. Lin, N. (2001) Social Capital : A Theory of Social Structure and Action, USA, Cambridge University Press.
48. Mair, J & Marti, I. (2006) “Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and De- light” Journal of World Business, 41(1):36-44
49. March, J.G. (1991) “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning” Organization Science, 2(1):71- 88.
50. Marsden, P.W. (1987) “Core Discussion Networks of Americans” American Sociological Review, 52(1):122-131.
51. Mehra, A. Kilduff, M. & Brass, J. D. (2001) “The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Imp- lications for Workplace Performance” Administrative Sci- ence Quarterly, 46: 121-146.
52. Morris, L. (2006) Permanent Innovation, USA, In- novation Academy.
53. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998) “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage” Academy of Management Review, 23(2):242-286.
54. Newell, S., Tansley, C. & Huang, J. (2004) “Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in on ERP Project Team: The Importance of Bridging and Bonding” British Journal of Management, 14:43-57.
55. Nonaka, I. (1991) “The Knowledge Creating Com- pany” Harvard Business Review, 69:96-104.
56. Nonaka & Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Crea- ting Company: How Japanese Companies Create The Dyna- mics of Innovation. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
57. OECD (1997) Oslo Manual, European Commision, Eurostat.
58. Özen, Ş. & Aslan, Z. (2006) “İçsel ve Dışsal Sos- yal Sermaye Yaklaşımları Açısından Türk Toplumunun Sosyal Sermaye Potansiyeli: Ortadoğu Sanayi ve Ticaret Merkezi (OSTİM) Örneği” Akdeniz Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 6(12):130-160.
59. Özdemir, A. A. (2007) “Sosyal Ağ Özellikleri Bakış Açısıyla Sosyal Sermaye ve Bilgi Yaratma İlişkisi: Aka- demisyenler Üzerinde Yapılan Alan Araştırması” Yayım- lanmamış Doktora Tezi, Eskişehir, Anadolu Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
60. Özkan-Canbolat, E. (2010) “Örgütlerin İçinde Bu- lunduğu Ağ Şebekelerindeki Konumlarının Örgütsel al Capital and the Cost of Financial Capital: An Em- Alandaki Eşbiçimliliğe Etkisi” Organizasyon ve Yönetim beddedness Approach” Roger Th. A.J. Leenders, Shaul Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1):1-10.
61. Paşa, F. S., Kabasakal, H. & Bodur, M. (2001) “So- ciety, Organizations and Leadership in Turkey” Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4):559-589.
62. Perretti, F. & Negro, G. (2007) “Mixing Genres and Matching People: A Study in Innovation and Team Composition in Hollywood” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28:563-586.
63. Polanyi, M., (1958) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
64. Reagans R. & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001) “Network, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Cor- porate R&D Teams” Organizational Science, 12(4):502- 517.
65. Rubin H.J. & Rubin I.S. (1995) Qualitative Intervi- ewing: The Art of Hearing Data, United Kingdom, Sage Publications.
66. Sargut, A. (2001) Kültürler Arası Farklılaşma ve Yö- netim, Ankara, İmge Kitabevi.
67. Schuller, T. (2001) “The Complementary Roles of Human and Social Capital” ISUMA, 42(1):17-24.
68. Semerciöz, F. (2002) “Endüstriyel Bölgeler ve Bu Bölgelerdeki İşletmelerarası İlişkiler: Merter Teksitl Böl- gesi Örneği” 9.Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildirisi, İstanbul.
69. Şengün, A.E. & Wasti, S.N. (2006) “Alıcı-Satıcı İliş- kilerinde Güvenin Performansa Etkileri: Eczane-Ecza Deposu İlişkisi Örneği” ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 33:223- 254.
70. Tsai, W. (2001) “Knowledge Transfer in Intraor- ganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovati- on and Performance” Academy of Management Journal, 44(3):996-1004.
71. Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998) “Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks” Aca- demy of Management Journal, 41(4):464-478.
72. Un, C. A. & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004) “Strategies for Knowledge Creation in Firms” British Journal of Ma- nagement, 15:27-41.
73. Uzzi, B. & Gillespie, J. J. (1999) “Corporate Soci- M.Gabbay (eds.) Corporate Social Capital and Liability, USA, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
74. Uzzi, B. and Lancaster, Ryon. (2003) “Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients” Management Science, 49(4):383-399.
75. Wasti, A.S. (1995) “Kültürel Farklılaşmanın Örgütsel Yapı ve Davranışa Etkileri: Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme” ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 22(4):503-529.
76. Woolcock, M. (1998) “Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework” Theory and Society, 27(3):151-160.
77. Rosegger, G. (1996) “Firms’ Information Sources and the Technology Life Cycle” International Journal of Technology Management, 12:704–716.
78. Yin, R.K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Method, Oaks, Sage Publications.
79. Simonin, B.L. (1999) “Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances” Strategic Ma- nagement Journal, 27(3):595-623.
80. Zack, M. (1999) “Managing Codified Knowledge. Sloan Management Review” 40(4):45-58.