Real Convergence in Selected OECD Countries

Öz

The purpose of this study is to re-examine the convergence hypothesis both linear and nonlinear time series techniques for 21 OECD countries during the period of 1950-2008. The linear augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test results support the existence of a unit root which means that there is nonconvergence in both de-meaned output and the output gap series constructed as the difference between actual GDP series of each OECD country from that of the USA. We used a nonlinear test as an alternative procedure if there are nonlinearities in the series. The nonlinear testing procedures reject the null hypothesis that there is a unit root in the series providing some supportive evidence of a nonlinear output convergence among the selected OECD economies

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Convergence hypothesis, nonlinear unit root, KSS test, LNV-sollis test

Seçilmiş OECD Ülkelerinde Gerçek Yakınsama

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 1950-2008 periyodunda 21 OECD ülkesi için yakınsama hipotezini sınamaktır. Doğrusal Dickey Fuller (ADF) test sonuçları, hem ortalamadan çıkarılmış çıktı serilerinde ve hem de her bir OECD ülkesinin fiili GDP serilerinin ABD’nin GDP serilerinden farkını ifade eden serilerde yakınsamanın olmadığı anlamına gelen birim kökün varlığını desteklemektedir. Çalışmada kullanılan serilerin doğrusal olmaması halinde, doğrusal olmayan birim kök testleri ADF birim kök testine bir alternatif olarak kullanılmaktadır. Doğrusal olmayan test sonuçları, seçilmiş OECD ekonomileri arasında doğrusal olmayan çıktı yakınsaması kanıtlarını destekleyerek, serilerde birim kökün varlığını ifade eden boşluk hipotezini red etmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yakınsama hipotezi, doğrusal olmayan birim kök, KSS testi, LNV-sollis testi

Kaynakça

1. Carlino, G.A. ve Mills, I.O. (1993) “Are US Regional Incomes Converging? A Time Series Analysis” Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(2):335-346.
2. Dawson, J. W. ve Strazicich, M.C. (2009) “Time- Series Tests of income Convergence with Two Structural Breaks: Evidence From 29 Countries” Applied Economics Letters, 17(9):909-912.
3. Dawson, J. W. ve Sen, A. (2007) “New Evidence on the Convergence of International income From A Group of 29 Countries” Empirical Economics, 33(2):199-230.
4. Dickey, D.A. ve W.A. Fuller (1979) “Distribution of The Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with A Unit Root” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74:427-431.
5. Enders, W. ve Granger, C.W.J. (1998) “Unit-Root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with An Example Using the Term Structure of Interest Rates” Journal of Business Economic Statistics, 16:304-311.
6. Kapetanios, G., Yongcheal, S. ve Andy, S. (2003) “Testing For Unit Root in The Nonlinear STAR Framework” Journal of Econometrics, 112:359-379.
7. Kasman, A., Kasman-Kirbas, S. ve Turgutlu, E. (2005) “Nominal and Real Convergence Between the CEE Countries and The EU: A Fractional Cointegration Analysis” Applied Economics, 37(21):2487-2500.
8. Leybourne, S., Newbold, P. ve Vougas, D. (1998) “Unit Roots and Smooth Transitions” Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19:83-97.

9. Liew, V. K. ve Ahmad, Y. (2009) “Income Convergence: Fresh Evidence From Nordic Countries” Applied Economics Letters, 16(12):1245-1248.
10. Loewy, M.B. ve Papell, D.H.(1996) “Are U.S Regional Incomes Converging? Some Further Evidence” Journal of Monetary Economics, 38(3):587-598.
11. Lucas, R.E. (1988) “On the Mechanics of Economic Development” Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1):3- 42.
12. Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P. ve Terasvirta, T. (1988) “Testing Linearity Against Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models” Biometrika, 75:491-499.
13. Romer, P.M.(1986) “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth” The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5):1002-1037.
14. Sala-i Martin, X. (1996) “The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis” Economic Journal, 106:1019-36.
15. Sollis, R.(2004)“Asymmetric Adjustment and Smooth Transitions: A Combination of Some Unit Root Tests” Journal of Time Series Analysis, 25:409-417.
16. Solow, R.M. (1956) “A Contribution to The Theory of Growth” Quartely Journal of Economics, 70(1):65-94.