The Research on the Voice and Silence Behaviours of Iranian and Turkish Employees According to Their Demographic Characteristics
Öz
The aim of this study was to present how employees’ voice and silence behaviour differ according to demographic characteristics. Two different sample was used as Iranian and Turkish. 160 surveys were distributed for both samples. 123 survey were usable for Iranian sample and 149 surveys were usable for Turkish sample in various sectors. The data were collected using by a questionnaire form and analysed with the statistical program SPSS. The scale for employee voice and silence was adapted from Dyne et al. (2003), including 30 items and six factors. Explanatory factor analysis was used to determine the scale factor structure. Then alpha coefficients were determined for scale reliability. In order to determine the significant difference of employee voice and silence behaviour according to demographic characteristics, a t-test and Anova test were employed. Significant differences were found for employee voice and silence across demographic characteristics on both Iranian and Turkish sample. The similarities and differences between the employees were compared in terms of these two countries.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Adams, J. S. (1965). “Inequity in social exchange”. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, New York: Academic Press. (2), 267-299.
- Afkhami A. M., & Mehrabanfar, E. (2015). “Organizational Silence, from Roots to Solutions: A Case Study in Iran Petroleum Industry” Iranian Journal of Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 4(2), 68-83.
- Anderson, J.C., Gerbing D.W. (1988) “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two - Step Approach” Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
- Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). “Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations” In Greenberg, J., & Edwards, M. S. (Eds.). (2009). Voice and silence in organizations. Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 175-202.
- Bagheri, G., Zarei, R., & Aeen, M. N. (2012). “Organizational silence (basic concepts and its development factors)” Ideal Type of Management, 1(1), 47-58.
- Bjerring, J.C., Hansen, J.U., & Pedersen, N.J.L.L. (2014). “On the rationality of pluralistic ignorance” Synthese, 191 (11), 2445-2470.
- Bogosian, R. (2011). “Engaging Organizational Voice: A Phenomenological Study of Employees' Lived Experiences of Silence in Work Group Settings” (Doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University).
- Brinsfield, C., Edwards, M., & Greenberg, J. (2009). “Voice and Silence in Organizations: Historical Review and Current Conceptualizations” In J. Greenberg, M. S. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and Silence in Organizations ( 3-33). UK: Emerald Group Publishing LTD.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
İşletme
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Mehmet Sağlam
*
0000-0002-1909-4284
Türkiye
Sahar Mohammadi Bazargani
Bu kişi benim
0000-0003-0179-5899
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Nisan 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
11 Ocak 2019
Kabul Tarihi
11 Ocak 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2
Cited By
Yakın İlişkilerde Bağlanma Eğilimlerimiz Çalışma Hayatındaki Ses Davranışımızı Etkiler Mi? Bağlanma Stillerinin Çalışan Ses Davranışıyla İlişkilendirilmesi
İş'te Davranış Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.25203/idd.1109535Örgütsel Demokrasinin Örgütsel Bağlılığa Etkisi: Eğitim Çalışanları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma
ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD)
https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1087084Silence in the workplace: what do we know from research?
European Journal of Training and Development
https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2024-0077