BibTex RIS Cite

İŞLETMELERİN KURUMSAL SOSYAL SORUMLULUK DÜZEYLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR LİTERATÜR TARAMASI

Year 2010, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 303 - 318, 01.02.2010

Derya Kelgökmen İlic

Abstract

Günümüzde işletmeler sürdürülebilir işletme başarısının sadece kısa dönemli karları maksimize ederek sağlanamayacağının farkına varmışlardır. Sosyal sorumluluğun toplum refahına olan etkisi, artık toplumun tüm kesimleri tarafından kabul görmüştür. Bu bağlamda sosyal sorumluluk yaklaşımında işletmeler, toplum, çevre ve tüketici çıkarlarının birlikte gözetilmesi ilkesi ile hareket ederler.Bu çalışmada işletmelerin sorumluluklarının belirlenmesi ve kurumsal sosyal
sorumluluğun işletmelerde hangi düzeylerde olduğunu ortaya koymak amacıyla
literatür taraması yapılmıştır. Bununla birlikte çalışmada Türkiye‟deki işletmelerin
kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk faaliyetleri derlenmiştir.

Keywords

Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk sosyal sorumluluk düzeyi sosyal sorumluluk piramidi

References

  • Alexander, G.J. ve Buchholz, R. A. (1978), Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance,: The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Sep).pp. 479-486
  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B. Ve Hatfield J., D. (1985), An Empirical Examination Of The Relationshıp Between Corporate Social Responsibility And Profiıtability, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28. No- 2, ss. 446-463.
  • Ay, C. ve Aytekin, P. (2005), “Reklamda Etik”, Öneri, C.6,S.24, ss.45-60.
  • Berkman, Ümit. (2002), "Sosyal Sorumluluk, İş Ahlakı Gelişimi ve Yakın Geleceği", /bilder5.doc,/ Erişim tarihi: 12.11.2009
  • Business in the Community (BITC), http://www.bitc.org.uk/ Erişimtarihi: 12.11.2009
  • Büyük,http://www.bendevarim.org/makale_03.html Erişim tarihi:28.12.2009 S.(2006),” T
  • Capital Dergisi, Türkiye‟nin Sosyal Sorumluluk Liderleri Araştırması Sonuçları, http://www.capital.com.tr/haber.aspx?HBR_KOD=5271/ Erişim tarihi:12.12.2009
  • Carroll, A., B. (1991), The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibiiity: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, July-August, pp. 39-48.
  • Chryssides, G.,D.ve Kaler, J., H.,(1999), “An Introduction To Business Ethics”, International Thomson Publishing Inc, London.
  • Cochran, P.L. ve Wood R. A. (1984), Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Mar), pp. 42-56.
  • Davis, K. Ve Blomstrom, R.L., (1971), Business Society and Environment, Social Power and Response, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  • European Commission,(2002), Corporate social responsibility:A business contribution to sustainable development, Industrial relations and industrial change, Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs, Unit D.1, Manuscript.
  • Johnson, H.H., (2003), Does It Pay To Be Good? Social Responsibility and Financial Performance, Business Horizons, November-December.
  • Kärnä, J., Hansen E., Juslin H., (2003), Social Responsibility In Environmental Marketing Planning , European Journal of Marketing, Vol.: 37 No. 5/6; Research paper
  • Kok, P., Van der Wiele, T., McKenna, R., Brown, A., (2001), A Corporate Social Responsibility Audit within a Quality Management Framework, Journal of Business Ethics, 31: ss.285–297.
  • KurumsalSosyal.com, Türkiye‟nin Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Platformu, http://www.kurumsalsosyal.com/tr-TR/projeler/6.aspx / tarihi: 21.12.2009
  • Luthans, F., Hodgetts, R.M., ve Thompson K.R, (1987), Social Issues In Business Strategic and Public Policy Perspectives, Macmillan Publishing Company, NewYork.
  • McGuire, J.,B., Sundgren, A. Ve Schneeweis T., (1988), Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Dec)., pp. 854-872.
  • McWilliams A. ve Siegel D., (2000), Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 5 (May), pp. 603-609.
  • McWilliams A. ve Siegel D., (2001),Corporate Social Responsibility:A Theory Of The Firm Perspect,ve, Academy ol Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, ss.117-127
  • Peltekoğlu, B.F., (2001), Hakla İlişkiler Nedir?, Beta Yayınları, 2. Baskı, İstanbul. Robbins, S.P. (1994), Management, 4th Ed., Prentice hall International Inc., New Jersey.
  • Sönmez., F. (2004). “İşletmelerin Sosyal Sorumluluğu ve Çevre Sorunlarında Ekonomik Yaklaşımlar”, Yaklaşım Dergisi, Sayı:133, Yıl:12, ss.476-490, Ocak, 2004.
  • Stahl, M. J. ve Grigsby, D. W. (1997), Strategic Management; Total Quality and Global Competition, (Blackwell, Oxford).
  • Social Venture Network, http://www.svn.org/ Erişimtarihi: 12.11.2009
  • Yaylıoğlu, http://www.kurumsalsosyal.com//tr-TR/ates-yaylioglu/1363_kss-projelerinin olcumlenmesi.aspx/ Erişim tarihi: 21.12.2009
  • Tuncay, E., (2006), Sosyal Sorumluluk Şirketlerin Marka Değerini Yükseltiyor, ReferansTR/MedyaIliskileri/BasindaMeslekLisesi/ Erişim tarihi: 12.11.2009http://www.mesleklisesimemleketmeselesi.com/tr

A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DETERMINING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS OF FIRMS

Year 2010, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 303 - 318, 01.02.2010

Derya Kelgökmen İlic

Abstract

Today there is a growing perception among enterprises that sustainable business success cannot be achieved solely through maximizing short-term profits. The contribution effect of social responsibility to social welfare is widely accepted by the whole community. In this context in corporate social responsibility approach firms consider all society, environment and consumer interests together. In this study, a literature review is conducted for determining responsibilities of firms and their corporate social responsibility levels. Furthermore, corporate social responsibility activities of firms in Turkey are studied

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility social responsibility level social responsibility pyramid

References

  • Alexander, G.J. ve Buchholz, R. A. (1978), Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance,: The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Sep).pp. 479-486
  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B. Ve Hatfield J., D. (1985), An Empirical Examination Of The Relationshıp Between Corporate Social Responsibility And Profiıtability, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28. No- 2, ss. 446-463.
  • Ay, C. ve Aytekin, P. (2005), “Reklamda Etik”, Öneri, C.6,S.24, ss.45-60.
  • Berkman, Ümit. (2002), "Sosyal Sorumluluk, İş Ahlakı Gelişimi ve Yakın Geleceği", /bilder5.doc,/ Erişim tarihi: 12.11.2009
  • Business in the Community (BITC), http://www.bitc.org.uk/ Erişimtarihi: 12.11.2009
  • Büyük,http://www.bendevarim.org/makale_03.html Erişim tarihi:28.12.2009 S.(2006),” T
  • Capital Dergisi, Türkiye‟nin Sosyal Sorumluluk Liderleri Araştırması Sonuçları, http://www.capital.com.tr/haber.aspx?HBR_KOD=5271/ Erişim tarihi:12.12.2009
  • Carroll, A., B. (1991), The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibiiity: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, July-August, pp. 39-48.
  • Chryssides, G.,D.ve Kaler, J., H.,(1999), “An Introduction To Business Ethics”, International Thomson Publishing Inc, London.
  • Cochran, P.L. ve Wood R. A. (1984), Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Mar), pp. 42-56.
  • Davis, K. Ve Blomstrom, R.L., (1971), Business Society and Environment, Social Power and Response, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  • European Commission,(2002), Corporate social responsibility:A business contribution to sustainable development, Industrial relations and industrial change, Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs, Unit D.1, Manuscript.
  • Johnson, H.H., (2003), Does It Pay To Be Good? Social Responsibility and Financial Performance, Business Horizons, November-December.
  • Kärnä, J., Hansen E., Juslin H., (2003), Social Responsibility In Environmental Marketing Planning , European Journal of Marketing, Vol.: 37 No. 5/6; Research paper
  • Kok, P., Van der Wiele, T., McKenna, R., Brown, A., (2001), A Corporate Social Responsibility Audit within a Quality Management Framework, Journal of Business Ethics, 31: ss.285–297.
  • KurumsalSosyal.com, Türkiye‟nin Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Platformu, http://www.kurumsalsosyal.com/tr-TR/projeler/6.aspx / tarihi: 21.12.2009
  • Luthans, F., Hodgetts, R.M., ve Thompson K.R, (1987), Social Issues In Business Strategic and Public Policy Perspectives, Macmillan Publishing Company, NewYork.
  • McGuire, J.,B., Sundgren, A. Ve Schneeweis T., (1988), Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Dec)., pp. 854-872.
  • McWilliams A. ve Siegel D., (2000), Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 5 (May), pp. 603-609.
  • McWilliams A. ve Siegel D., (2001),Corporate Social Responsibility:A Theory Of The Firm Perspect,ve, Academy ol Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, ss.117-127
  • Peltekoğlu, B.F., (2001), Hakla İlişkiler Nedir?, Beta Yayınları, 2. Baskı, İstanbul. Robbins, S.P. (1994), Management, 4th Ed., Prentice hall International Inc., New Jersey.
  • Sönmez., F. (2004). “İşletmelerin Sosyal Sorumluluğu ve Çevre Sorunlarında Ekonomik Yaklaşımlar”, Yaklaşım Dergisi, Sayı:133, Yıl:12, ss.476-490, Ocak, 2004.
  • Stahl, M. J. ve Grigsby, D. W. (1997), Strategic Management; Total Quality and Global Competition, (Blackwell, Oxford).
  • Social Venture Network, http://www.svn.org/ Erişimtarihi: 12.11.2009
  • Yaylıoğlu, http://www.kurumsalsosyal.com//tr-TR/ates-yaylioglu/1363_kss-projelerinin olcumlenmesi.aspx/ Erişim tarihi: 21.12.2009
  • Tuncay, E., (2006), Sosyal Sorumluluk Şirketlerin Marka Değerini Yükseltiyor, ReferansTR/MedyaIliskileri/BasindaMeslekLisesi/ Erişim tarihi: 12.11.2009http://www.mesleklisesimemleketmeselesi.com/tr
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA89VF84NK
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Derya Kelgökmen İlic This is me

Publication Date February 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Cite

APA İlic, D. K. (2010). A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DETERMINING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS OF FIRMS. Ege Academic Review, 10(1), 303-318.
AMA İlic DK. A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DETERMINING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS OF FIRMS. ear. February 2010;10(1):303-318.
Chicago İlic, Derya Kelgökmen. “A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DETERMINING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS OF FIRMS”. Ege Academic Review 10, no. 1 (February 2010): 303-18.
EndNote İlic DK (February 1, 2010) A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DETERMINING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS OF FIRMS. Ege Academic Review 10 1 303–318.
IEEE D. K. İlic, “A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DETERMINING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS OF FIRMS”, ear, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 303–318, 2010.
ISNAD İlic, Derya Kelgökmen. “A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DETERMINING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS OF FIRMS”. Ege Academic Review 10/1 (February 2010), 303-318.
JAMA İlic DK. A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DETERMINING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS OF FIRMS. ear. 2010;10:303–318.
MLA İlic, Derya Kelgökmen. “A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DETERMINING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS OF FIRMS”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 10, no. 1, 2010, pp. 303-18.
Vancouver İlic DK. A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DETERMINING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVELS OF FIRMS. ear. 2010;10(1):303-18.