Teorik Makale

The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2021
PDF İndir
EN

The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«

Öz

In modern society and economy the principle of efficiency is omnipresent. Even in the discourse of sustainability – which, in many aspects, represents a challenge to modern visions of progress and Western »way of life« – resource and energy efficiency are seen as crucial factors. However, »instrumental reason«, which is underlying efficiency, has not only been criticized by the Frankfurt school (see Horkheimer 2013 [1947]). There is a long tradition, which ranges from Rousseau (2019 [1755]) to Batailles (1985), which questions the models of progress coupled so closely with efficiency. Today, »commercialization« (see e.g. Hochschild 2003) and »economization« (see e.g. Murphy 2016) are prominent lines of discourse which do express similar objections to the efficiency principle. What is more, recent phenomenons of (pandemic) crisis demonstrate that following the path of efficiency may lead to paradoxical effects, in that the ability of the health system to cope with stress was especially poor in the most efficient ones (like in Italy): efficiency thus proofed to be very inefficient in pandemic times (see e.g. Popic 2020). Likewise, in the past, the effectiveness of the critique of efficiency has been very limited. One of the reasons for this disproportion could be that the voices of critique (of efficiency) were unable to manifest in technology which is a major driving force of modern society and economy. Accordingly, the logics of anti-efficiency – i.e. logics of relationship, emotion, innovation, etc. – must not only be formulated theoretically but »translated« into technology in order to become effective.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

BMBF, European Social Fund for Germnay

Proje Numarası

02L18A090

Kaynakça

  1. Anton, Corey (2009): Clocks, Synchronization, and the Fate of Leisure. In: Kleinman (2009), pp. 71–87.
  2. Badura, Bernhard/Steinke, Mika (2012): Die erschöpfte Arbeitswelt – Durch eine Kultur der Achtsamkeit zu mehr Energie, Kreativität, Wohlbefinden und Erfolg. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  3. Bataille, Georges (1985): Visions of Excess – Selected Writings, 1927–1939. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  4. Bauch, Jost (1996): Gesundheit als sozialer Code – Von der Vergesellschaftung des Gesundheitswesens zur Medikalisierung der Gesellschaft. Weinheim/München: Juventa.
  5. Becker, Gary S. (1964): Human Capital – A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis With Special Reference to Education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  6. Beckert, Jens (1997): Grenzen des Marktes – Die sozialen Grundlagen wirtschaftlicher Effizienz. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
  7. Böhme, Hartmut (2006): Fetischismus und Kultur – Eine andere Theorie der Moderne. Reinbek: Rowohlt. BR24 (2020): Söder will mehr Geld für Gesundheitssystem ausgeben. In: BR24. Beitrag vom 14.5.2020. URL: https://www.br.de/nachrichten/bayern/soeder-will-mehr-geld-fuer-gesundheitssystem-ausgeben,RyyRaKt.
  8. Deleuze, Gilles (1992 [1990]): Postscript on the Societies of Control. In: October. Vol. 59 (1992), pp. 3–7. Duda, Helga (1987): Macht oder Effizienz? – Eine ökonomische Theorie der Arbeits¬be¬ziehungen im modernen Unternehmen. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ekonomi

Bölüm

Teorik Makale

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Kasım 2021

Kabul Tarihi

23 Aralık 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Jain, A. K. (2021). The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«. Economics Business and Organization Research, 3(2), 168-193. https://izlik.org/JA24XK94AS
AMA
1.Jain AK. The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«. Economics Business and Organization Research. 2021;3(2):168-193. https://izlik.org/JA24XK94AS
Chicago
Jain, Anil K. 2021. “The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«”. Economics Business and Organization Research 3 (2): 168-93. https://izlik.org/JA24XK94AS.
EndNote
Jain AK (01 Aralık 2021) The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«. Economics Business and Organization Research 3 2 168–193.
IEEE
[1]A. K. Jain, “The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«”, Economics Business and Organization Research, c. 3, sy 2, ss. 168–193, Ara. 2021, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA24XK94AS
ISNAD
Jain, Anil K. “The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«”. Economics Business and Organization Research 3/2 (01 Aralık 2021): 168-193. https://izlik.org/JA24XK94AS.
JAMA
1.Jain AK. The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«. Economics Business and Organization Research. 2021;3:168–193.
MLA
Jain, Anil K. “The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«”. Economics Business and Organization Research, c. 3, sy 2, Aralık 2021, ss. 168-93, https://izlik.org/JA24XK94AS.
Vancouver
1.Anil K. Jain. The Logics of Anti-Efficiency – On the Need of Technological »Translations«. Economics Business and Organization Research [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2021;3(2):168-93. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA24XK94AS