Öğretmen Adaylarının Yenilikçlik Algılarını Etkileyen Etkenler Üzerine Nicel bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının yenilikçilik algılarını araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya fen bilimleri, matematik ve sosyal bilimler öğretmenliği alanlarından 189 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Veri toplama araçları Biriysel Yenlikçilik Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonu ve ailesel etkenler envanteridir. Regresyon analizi veri analizi yöntemi olarak kullanılmıştır. Analizin ikinci döngüsü sonucunda yenilikçilik algısının en güçlü yordayıcısı olarak tecrübeye açıklık değişkeni ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ANAHTAR KELIMELER: Yenilikçilik algısı,Kişilik değişkenleri,Öğretmen eğitimi

A Quantitative Investigation of the Factors Affecting Innovation Perceptions of Teacher Candidates

Öz

The aim of this paper is to investigate the innovation perceptions of teacher candidates. The sample comprises of 189 second year students in the science, mathematics and social sciences teaching departments.  The data collection tools are the Turkish version of the Individual Innovativeness Scale (IIS), and the Domestic Factors Inventory. Regression analysis is the main data analysis techniques. Results yielded a regression model in which the most powerful determinant for innovation perception emerged as openness to experience.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innovativeness perception,Personality variables,Teacher education

Kaynakça

1. Aydin, E & Corlu, M.A. (2016). An investigation of the factors affecting innovation perceptions of mathematics, science and social sciences teacher candidates. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences. 4, 255-259
2. Azzam, A.M. (2009). Why Creativity Now? A Conversation with Sir Ken Robinson, Teaching for the 21st Century, 67(1), 22-26. Brandstätter, H. (2011). Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Personality and individual differences, 51(3), 222-230.
3. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G. and Aiken, L.S. (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.
4. Corlu, M.A. & Aydin, E. (2016). Evaluation of learning gains through integrated STEM projects. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 20-29. DOI:10.18404/ijemst.35021
5. Çuhadar, C., Bülbül, T., & Ilgaz, G. (2013). Exploring of the relationship between individual innovativeness and techno-pedagogical education competencies of pre-service teachers. Ilkogretim Online, 12(3).
6. Durbin, J.; Watson, G. S. (1951). "Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression, II". Biometrika 38 (1–2): 159–179.DOI:10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.159
7. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill International Edition.
8. Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1994). Role of parental motivational practices in children’s academic intrinsic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 104-113.

9. Grolnick, W. S., Friendly, R. W., & Bellas, V. M. (2009). Parenting and children’s motivation at school. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school, 279-300. New York & London: Routledge.
10. Hofman, R. H., Jansen, E., & Spijkerboer, A. (2011). Innovations: Perceptions of teachers and school leaders on bottlenecks and outcomes. Education as Change, 15(1), 149-160.
11. Huck, S.W. (2011). Reading Statistics and Research, 6th Edition. American Psychological Association
12. Hunter, S. (2013). Out Think: How Innovative Leaders Drive Exceptional Outcomes. Wiley.
13. Johnston, R. & Heineke, J. (1998). Exploring the Relationship between Perception and Performance: Priorities for Action, The Service Industries Journal, 18(1).
14. Kasule, W.G., Wesselink, R., Noroozi, O., & Mulder, M. (2015). The current status of teaching staff innovation competence in Ugandan universities: perceptions of managers, teachers, and students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 330-343.
15. Kılıçer, K. & Odabaşı, H.F. (2010). Bireysel yenilikçilik ölçeği (BYÖ): Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması, (Individual Innovativeness Scale: Reliability and validity study). Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 150-164.
16. Mathisen, G.E. & Bronnick, K.S. (2009). Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research 48, 21–29
17. Morsümbül, Ü. (2014). Hızlı Büyük Beşli Kişilik Testi Türkçe Versiyonu Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. (Fast Big Five Personality Test Turkish version reliability and validity study) Düşünen Adam, The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 27:316-322. DOI: 10.5350/DAJPN2014270405
18. Mumford, M.D., Scott, G.M., Gaddis, B.H. and Strange, J.M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. ‘Leadership Quarterly.’ 13, pp.705-750
19. Patterson, F., Kerrin, M. & Gatto-Roissard, G. (2009). Characteristics and Behaviours of Innovative People in Organisations Literature review. A paper prepared for NESTA Policy and Research Unit (NPRU). Retrieved at: https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/characteristics_behaviours_of_innovative_people.pdf
20. Quazi, A. & Talukder, M. (2011). Demographic determinants of employees’ perception and adoption of technological innovation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(3), 38-46.
21. Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 353–385.
22. Scott, S.G., Bruce, R.A., 1994. Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal 37 (3), 580–607.
23. Shermer, M. (2016, March 1). Is Social Science Politically Biased? Scientific American. Retrieved from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-social-science-politically-biased
24. Simonton, D.K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology. 12 (1), 28-46.
25. Stajkovic, A.D. & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 124 (2), 240–261.
26. Steel, G. D., Rinne, T., & Fairweather, J. (2012). Personality, nations, and innovation: Relationships between personality traits and national innovation scores. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(1), 3-30.
27. Sung, S.Y & Choi, J.N. (2009). Do Big Five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(7), 941-956.
28. Talukder, M. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of technological innovation by individual employees: An Australian study, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 52-57.
29. Thompson, B. (2008). Foundations of Behavioral Statistics. New Age International Publishers
30. Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2011). A New ICT Curriculum for Primary Education in Flanders: Defining and Predicting Teachers' Perceptions of Innovation Attributes. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 124-135.
31. Wang, R. & Lin,C., (2012). Understanding innovation performance and its antecedents: A socio-cognitive model. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 29, 210–225
32. Yıldırım, C. (1988). Matematiksel Düşünme.(Mathematical Thinking). Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul.
33. Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 259–271.