İngilizce Öğretmen Adayları Arasındaki Kültürlerarası İletişim Yeterliliğinin Açıklayıcı Gücü

Öz

Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimlerinde kültürlerarası iletişim yeterliliği büyük ilgi görürken çalışmalar öğretmen adaylarının katkılarını hafife almıştır. Dillerin ve insanların aktarımındaki gelişmeler sayesinde kültür ve dil arasındaki geleneksel bağ eskisi kadar katı değildir ve bu da uluslararası ortamlarda dili düzgün kullanmak için önemli bir ihtiyaç yaratmıştır. Bu yüzden, yabancı bir dil öğrenirken farklı milletlerin kültürel değerlerini kabul etmek ana hedef hâline gelmiştir. Özellikle, öğretmen adaylarının talep edilen kültürlerarası becerilerden yararlanabilmeleri onların sosyal, akademik ve profesyonel hayatlarını zenginleştirme potansiyeline sahiptir. Mevcut çalışma, cinsiyet, öğrenim yılı, iki/çok dillilik, başka bir şehirde yaşama ve yurtdışında eğitim deneyimi gibi demografik değişkenlerin kültürlerarası iletişim yeterliliği üzerinde yordayıcı bir güce sahip olup olmadığını açıklamayı amaçlamaktadır. 199 öğretmen adayının önceki kültürlerarası deneyimlerini analiz etmek için birkaç çoklu regresyon kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, dil sayısının kültürlerarası iletişim yeterliklerindeki varyansı açıkladığını ve iki dilli bireylerle karşılaştırıldığında, çok dillilerin kültürlerarası iletişim yeterliklerinin daha yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir. Yurtdışında eğitim deneyimi ve başka bir şehirde yaşama varyansları da yordanmıştır ancak cinsiyet farkı anlamlı sonuçlar vermemiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kültürlerarası yeterlilik
• Çok dillilik
• Yurtdışında okuma
• Öğretmen eğitimi

The Explanatory Power of Intercultural Communicative Competence among EFL Teacher Candidates

Öz

While intercultural communicative competence has gained considerable attention in teachers’ professional development, contributions from teacher candidates have usually been underestimated. The traditional bound between language and culture has become less solid thanks to the advancements in transfer of languages and people, which has created a significant need to use language properly in international encounters. Therefore, acknowledging cultural values of different nations has become a primary aim while learning a foreign language. Teacher candidates could benefit from demanded intercultural skills and these skills have the potential to enrich their identity in social, academic, and professional lives. The current study intends to explain whether demographic variables of gender, study year, bi/multilingualism, living in another city, and study abroad experience have a predictive power on intercultural communicative competence. Several multiple regressions were used to analyse 199 teacher candidates’ previous intercultural experiences and findings suggest that number of languages explained the variance in intercultural communicative competence, and compared to bilingual individuals, multilinguals had higher intercultural communicative competence. Study abroad experience and living in another city also predicted the variance. However, gender difference did not yield significant results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Intercultural competence
• Multilingualism
• Study abroad
• Teacher education

Kaynakça

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21-71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
3. Berardo, K., & Deardorff, D. K. (2012). Building cultural competence: Innovative activities and models. Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
4. Byram, M. (1997). “Cultural awareness” as vocabulary learning. Language Learning Journal, 16(1), 51-57. doi: 10.1080/09571739785200291
5. Byram, M. (2012). Language awareness and (critical) cultural awareness - relationships, comparisons and contrasts. Language Awareness, 21(1-2), 5-13. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2011.639887
6. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Cushner, K., & Chang, S. C. (2015). Developing intercultural competence through overseas student teaching: Checking our assumptions. Intercultural Education, 26(3), 165–178. doi: 10.1080/14675986.2015.1040326
8. Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266. doi: 10.1177/1028315306287002

9. Dewaele, J. M., & Botes, E. (2020). Does multilingualism shape personality?: An exploratory investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(4), 811-823. doi: 10.1177/1367006919888581
10. Dooly, M. A. (2011). Crossing the intercultural borders into 3rd space culture(s): Implications for teacher education in the twenty-first century. Language And Intercultural Communication, 11(4), 319-337. doi: 10.1080/14708477.2011.599390
11. Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100 (Supplement 2016), 19-47.
12. Eren, Ö. (2021). Raising critical cultural awareness through telecollaboration: Insights for pre-service teacher education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-24. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1916538
13. Eren, Ö. (2022). Negotiating pre-service EFL teachers’ identity orientations through telecollaboration. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-16. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2022.2085280
14. Fantini, A., & Tirmizi, A. (2006). Exploring and assessing intercultural competence. federation EIL, Brattleboro, VT. Retrieved from 1-62. http://Digitalcollections.Sit.Edu/Worldlearning_Publications/1%5Cnhttp://Digitalcollections.Sit.Edu/Worldlearning_Publications
15. Godwin-Jones, R. (2013). Integrating intercultural competence into language learning through technology. Language Learning and Technology, 17(2), 1-11.
16. Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Telecollaboration as an Approach to Developing Intercultural Communication Competence. Language Learning and Technology, 23(3), 8-28.
17. Gudykunst, W. (Ed.). (2005). Theorizing about intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Hekman, S. (1997). Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 22(2), 341-365.
19. Kim, Y. Y. (2007). Ideology, identity, and intercultural communication: An analysis of differing academic conceptions of cultural identity. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 237-253. doi: 10.1080/17475750701737181
20. Lee, J., & Song, J. (2019). Developing intercultural competence through study abroad, telecollaboration, and on-campus language study. Language Learning and Technology, 23(3), 178-198.
21. Lenkaitis, C. A., Calo, S., & Venegas Escobar, S. (2019). Exploring the intersection of language and culture via telecollaboration: Utilizing videoconferencing for intercultural competence development. International Multilingual Research Journal, 13(2), 102-115. doi: 10.1080/19313152.2019.1570772
22. Mertler, C. A., & Reinhart, R. V. (2016). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. New York: Routledge.
23. Noels, K., Yashima, T., & Zhang, R. (2012). Language, identity and intercultural communication. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 52-66.). London: Routledge.
24. Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
25. Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2018). Discourse moves and intercultural communicative competence in telecollaborative chats. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 218-239.
26. Sobkowiak, P. (2019). The impact of studying abroad on students’ intercultural competence: An interview study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 681-710. doi: 10.14746/Ssllt.2019.9.4.6
27. Solhaug, T., & Kristensen, N. N. (2020). Gender and intercultural competence: Analysis of intercultural competence among upper secondary school students in Denmark and Norway. Educational Psychology, 40(1), 120-140. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1646410
28. Stockard, J. (2006). Gender socialization. In J. S Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 215-227). Boston, MA: Springer.
29. Taguchi, N., Xiao, F., & Li, S. (2016). Effects of intercultural competence and social contact on speech act production in a Chinese study abroad context. Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 775-796. doi: 10.1111/Modl.12349
30. Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries. W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 211-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Toomey, A., Dorjee, T., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2013). Bicultural identity negotiation, conflicts, and intergroup communication strategies. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42(2), 112-134. doi: 10.1080/17475759.2013.785973
32. Trede, F., Bowles, W., & Bridges, D. (2013). Developing intercultural competence and global citizenship through international experiences: Academics’ perceptions. Intercultural Education, 24(5), 442-455. doi: 10.1080/14675986.2013.825578
33. Tsang, A. (2020). Examining the relationship between language and cross-cultural encounters: Avenues for promoting intercultural interaction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 0(0), 1-13. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1725526
34. Üzüm, B., Akayoglu, S., & Yazan, B. (2020). Using telecollaboration to promote intercultural competence in teacher training classrooms in Turkey and the USA. Recall, 32(2), 162-177. doi: 10.1017/S0958344019000235
35. Viáfara González, J. J. (2019). Prospective English teachers re-examining language ideologies in telecollaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1-23. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1590419
36. Wolff, F., & Borzikowsky, C. (2018). Intercultural competence by international experiences?: An investigation of the Impact of educational stays abroad on intercultural competence and its facets. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(3), 488-514. doi: 10.1177/0022022118754721