Türk Yönetim Kültürü Araştırmalarına Organizasyonel Bakış

Yıl 2024, , 87 - 118, 13.06.2024

İbrahim Durmuş

https://doi.org/10.32449/egetdid.1362787

Öz

Türk kültürü araştırmaları, birçok açıdan değerlendirilebilir. Organizasyondaki iş faaliyetleri, Türk kültüründen etkilenebilir. Araştırmanın amacı, yönetimde Türk kültürüne ilişkin araştırmalarına odaklanmaktır. Organizasyonda çalışanlar iş faaliyetlerini yerine getirirken, hem yönetim mekanizmasından hem de kültürel değerlerden etkilenir. Araştırmada Web of Science’de, yönetimde Türk kültürü makalelerine odaklanılmıştır. Araştırma analizinde R programı ve bibliyometrik analizlerden faydalanılmıştır. Analizde vurgulanan anahtar kelimelere ve ilişkilere yer verilmiştir. Yönetimde Türk kültürü araştırmalarının, 1993-2023 yıllarında incelendiğini ve toplam 1369 yazarın araştırma yürüttüğü görülmüştür. Araştırmaların yıllık büyüme oranının %2.34 olduğu, en fazla atıfın 2011 ve araştırmanın 2020 yılında gerçekleştirildiği gözlemlenmiştir. Analizde yazarların en fazla vurgu yaptığı kelimeler; Türkiye, kültür, organizasyon kültürü, yönetim, liderlik, iş tatmini, kolektivizm, yenilik, bilgi yönetimi ve kültürlerarası kelimelerin olduğu görülmüştür. Analiz sonucunda Türkiye ve kültür kavramlarının güçlü ilişkilere sahip olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Araştırmada bu ilişkiye ek olarak yönetim, liderlik, değişim, yükseköğretim, organizasyon kültürü, Türk kültürü ve rekabet eden değerler kelimelerinin de birbirleri ile güçlü ilişkilere sahip olduğu anlaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bibliyometrik Analiz, Çalışanlar, Organizasyonlar, Türk Kültürü, Yönetim

Etik Beyan

Araştırma etik kurul onayı gerektirmemektedir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Destekleyen kurum yoktur.

Proje Numarası

projeden türetilmemiştir

Teşekkür

-

Organizational Perspective on Turkish Management Culture Research

Öz

Turkish culture research can be evaluated from different perspectives. While employees in the organization carry out their work activities, they are affected by both the management mechanism and cultural values. In this respect, the organizational perspective on Turkish management culture can make a new contribution to the literature. The research aims to examine the effects of Turkish culture on the performance of business activities in the organization from a management perspective. For this purpose, this study focuses on Turkish management culture research in the literature. In the research, Turkish management culture articles in Web of Science journals were examined. The analysis method of the research consisted of the R program and bibliometric analysis. Keywords highlighted in the analysis and their relationships with each other are included. Turkish management culture research was analyzed on 17.04.2023. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that there were a total of 490 articles in the literature. It was observed that the articles on the subject covered the years 1993-2023 and a total of 1369 authors conducted research. It was observed that the annual growth rate of research was 2.34%, and most citations were made in 2011 and article was published in 2020. As a result, the words that the authors emphasize most in their research are listed as; Türkiye, culture, organizational culture, management, leadership, job satisfaction, collectivism, innovation, knowledge management, and intercultural. As a result of the analysis, it was understood that the concepts of Türkiye and culture have strong relationships. In addition to this relationship, the research found that the words management, leadership, change, higher education, organizational culture, Turkish culture, and competing values also have strong relationships with each other.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bibliometric Analysis, Employees, Organizations, Turkish Culture, Management

Proje Numarası

projeden türetilmemiştir

Kaynakça

• Abbasi, M. S., Tarhini, A., Elyas, T. ve Shah, F. (2015). Impact of individualism and collectivism over the individual’s technology acceptance behaviour: A multi-group analysis between Pakistan and Turkey. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(6), 747-768.
• Acar, H. (2019). Türk kültür ve devlet geleneğinde kadın. İnsan & İnsan, 6(21), 395-411.
• Albayrak, G. ve Albayrak, U. (2014). Organizational culture approach and effects on Turkish construction sector. APCBEE Procedia, 9, 252-257.
• Aria, M. ve Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 959-975.
• Ates, H. (2004). Management as an agent of cultural change in the Turkish public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 14(1), 33-58.
• Aycan, Z. (2001). Human Resource Management in Turkey current issues and future challenges. International Journal of Manpower, 22(3), 252-260.
• Beşirli, H. (2011). Türk kültüründe güç, iktidar, itaat ve sadakatin yemek sembolizmi esasında değerlendirilmesi. Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Veli Araştırma Dergisi, 58, 139-152.
• Burak, D. M. (2015). The role of the Turkish Culture on the Turkish Rulers from past to present. T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu, 755-770.
• Carvalho, R. V. C., Seidl-de-Moura, M. L., Martins, G. D. F. ve Vieira, M. L. (2014). Culture and developmental trajectories: A discussion on contemporary theoretical models. Early Child Development and Care, 184(11), 1599-1614.
• Chang, W-J., Hu, D-C. ve Keliw, P. (2021). Organizational culture, organizational citizenship behavior, knowledge sharing and innovation: A study of indigenous people production organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(9), 2274-2292.
• Cobo, M.J., Martinez, M.A., Gutierrez-Salcedo, M., Fujita, H. ve Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). 25 years at Knowledge-Based Systems: A bibliometric analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 80, 3–13.
• Coşkun, Ö. (2016). Türk yönetim sistemi üzerine kısa bir değerlendirme. The Journal of International Lingual, Social and Educational Sciences, 2(2), 126-135.
• Çakar, N. D. ve Ertürk, A. (2010). Comparing innovation capability of small and medium‐sized enterprises: Examining the effects of organizational culture and empowerment. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(3), 325-359.
• Derviş, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156-160.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D. Pandey, N. ve Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
• Drucker, P. (2007). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. 1st Edition, London. ISBN: 9780080942384
• Eker, M. ve Eker, S. (2009). An empirical analysis of the association between the organizational culture and performance measurement systems in the Turkish manufacturing sector. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 11(2), 43-76.
• Erciyes, E. (2019). A cross-cultural analysis of management approaches in comparison to Turkish and swiss companies. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 8, 1-11.
• Eroğlu, O. ve Pıçak, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship, national culture and Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(16), 146-151.
• Ersoy, A. ve Ehtiyar, R. (2015). Kültürel farklılıkların yönetiminde kültürel zekânın rolü: Türk ve yabancı yöneticiler üzerine bir araştırma. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 26(1), 42-60.
• Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J.L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M. ve ark. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-Nation study. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 332(6033), 1100-1104.
• Gülsoy, T. ve Ustabaş, A. (2019). Corporate sustainability initiatives in gender equality: Organizational practices fostering inclusiveness at work in an emerging-market context. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(4), 1-34.
• Halub, H., Sauber, A. ve Stück, J. (2012). The Turk and the Yankee: A cross-cultural comparison between Turkish and American managers. Journal of the Indiana Academy of the Social Sciences, 15(1), 21-36.
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation leadership and organization: Do American Theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 42-63.
• Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Perspectives, 7(1), 1-20.
• Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 861–862.
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. ve Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations Software of the Mind, 3rd edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill. ISBN: 978-0-07-177015-6
• Kayalar, M. ve Aytar, O. (2012). Küresel iş dünyasında kültürel farklılıkların yönetimi: Türk girişimciliği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 4(7), 47-64.
• Klassen, R. M., Usher, E. L. ve Bong, M. (2010). Teachers' collective efficacy, job satisfaction, and job stress in cross-cultural context. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 464-486.
• Kozan, M. K. ve Ergin, C. (1999a). The influence of intra-cultural value differences on conflict management practices. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(3), 249-267.
• Kozan, M. K. ve Ergin, C. (1999b). Third party role in conflict management in Turkish organizations. Human Organization, 58(4), 405-415.
• Kozan, M. K. ve Ilter, S. S. (1994). Third party roles played by Turkish managers in subordinates' conflicts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 453-466.
• Liu, X., Sun, R., Wang, S. ve Wu, Y. J. (2020). The research landscape of big data: A bibliometric analysis. Library Hi Tech, 38(2), 367-384.
• Mamatoğlu, N. ve Tasa, H. (2019). Conflict and negotiation in Turkish culture. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 48(1), 305-335.
• Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A. ve Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An upto-date review. El profesional de la información, 29(1), 1-20.
• Mulyana, Y., Chaeroni, N., Erlangga, H. ve ark. (2021). The influence of motivation, ability, organizational culture, work environment on teachers performance. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 99-108.
• Naik, A. R., Baker, S. ve Mohiyeddini, C. (2023). What is culture? Neuroscience and Psychology, 11, 1-8.
• Özçelik, G. ve Ferman, M. (2006). Competency approach to Human Resources Management: Outcomes and contributions in a Turkish Cultural context. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), 72-91.
• Özkalp, E., Sungur, Z. ve Özdemir, A. (2009). Conflict management styles of Turkish managers. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(5), 419-438.
• Pauliene, R. (2012). Transforming leadership styles and knowledge sharing in a multicultural context. Business, Management and Education, 10(1), 91-109.
• Pellegrini, E. K. ve Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader–Member Exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish Business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 264–279.
• Sabetzadeh, F. ve Chen, Y. (2023). An investigation of the impact of interpersonal and institutional trust on knowledge sharing in companies: Invisible hands for knowledge sharing. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 1-24.
• Simga-Mugan, C., Daly, B. A., Onkal, D. ve Kavut, L. (2005). The influence of nationality and gender on ethical sensitivity: An application of the issue-contingent model. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 139-159.
• Şentürk, F. K. ve Altunok, D. (2023). Turkish adaptation of the prosocial organizational behaviors scale: A validity and reliability study. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 22(85), 118-134.
• Tanyıldızı, N. İ. (2011). Türk kültürünün gençlere tanıtımında medyanın rolü: Hacı Bektaş Velî, Mevlana ve Yunus Emre üzerine bir araştırma. Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Veli Araştırma Dergisi, 59, 101-118.
• Uğurlu, N. S., Türkoğlu, B., Kuzlak, A. ve Gupta, A. (2021). Stereotypes of single and married women and men in Turkish culture. Current Psychology, 40, 213–225.
• Uysal, G. (2019). Human Resource Management in Turkey: Concept and cases. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 16(1), 1-6.
• Uzkurt, C., Kumar, R., Kimzan, H. S. ve Eminoğlu, G. (2013). Role of innovation in the relationship between organizational culture and firm performance: A study of the banking sector in Turkey. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(1), 92-117.
• Wasti, S. A. (1998). Cultural barriers in the transferability of Japanese and American Human Resources Practices to developing countries: The Turkish case. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4), 608-631.
• Wasti, S. A. (2003). The influence of cultural values on antecedents of organisational commitment: An individual-level analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52(4), 533-554.
• Wasti, S. A., Tan, H. H., Brower, H. H. ve Önder, Ç. (2007). Cross-cultural measurement of supervisor trustworthiness: An assessment of measurement invariance across three cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 477–489.
• White, L. A. (1959). The concept of culture. American Anthropologist, 61(2), 227-251.
• Zakaria, N., Amelinckx, A. ve Wilemon, D. (2004). Working together apart? Building a knowledge-sharing culture for global virtual teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 15-29.