Araştırma Makalesi

İkâme Bir Ürün Olarak Osmanlı Devleti'nde Sakarin

Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2 21 Aralık 2016
PDF İndir
EN TR

Saccharin as Substitute Goods in Ottoman State

Öz

Constantin Fahlberg invented saccharin during the end of 1870’s. Saccharin was a product that it has strong sweetening power. Potential to sugar substitute and support of German government were provided to enlarge its market rapidly. But due to its chemical origin, some medical concerns were shown towards this product. Some doctors thought that usage of saccharin caused health problems. Due to these medical concerns, many European governments banned or restricted the entrance of this product to their countries. Fahlberg thought that his product did not deserve these critiques. According to him, critiques were originated from shaken interests of sugar industry. Near to 1900’s, saccharin also entered Ottoman market. Similarly, it was also criticized by Ottoman doctors. In front of this situation, approach of Ottoman State towards saccharin happened within three stages. In the first stage, Ottoman officials did not foresee a risky situation for the usage of saccharin as a substitute for sugar. Because saccharin is a chemical drug for diabetes disease and sugar prices were very convenient. As to second stage, critiques to saccharin were taken into account. High sugar prices of this period were caused some probable risks of food fraud according to officials. Additionally, medical studies of the period provided more information about probable risks of saccharin. As a result of this situation, Ottoman State applied quantitative restrictions in saccharin import. In addition, the product could be only brought by pharmacists. Third period of saccharin in Ottoman State happened within compelling conditions of World War I. After extreme increases in sugar prices; there was an excessive demand for illegal usage of saccharin, because sugar almost disappeared from market. In front of this situation, official permission was given to saccharin usage with some restrictions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Babıali Evrak Odası (BEO) 2146/160902, 3879/ 290865, 4419/331394, 4522/339131.
  2. Dahiliye Nezareti İdare-i Umumiye (DH.İ.UM) 77-2/130.
  3. Dahiliye Nezareti Mektubî Kalemi (DH.MKT) 764/31, 2367/92, 2790/39.
  4. Hariciye Nezareti İdarî Kısım (HR.İD) 1274/57, 1274/59, 1274/60, 1274/61.
  5. Dosya Usulü İradeler (İ.DUİT) 78/7.
  6. Meclis-i Vükela (MV) 202/64, 204/35.
  7. Şura-yı Devlet (ŞD) 445/6, 2722/2

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Fatih Damlıbağ
GÜMÜŞHANE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GÜMÜŞHANE İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

21 Aralık 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

31 Aralık 2016

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2016 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Damlıbağ, F. (2016). İkâme Bir Ürün Olarak Osmanlı Devleti’nde Sakarin. Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi, 31(2), 383-404. https://izlik.org/JA63AH35NS
AMA
1.Damlıbağ F. İkâme Bir Ürün Olarak Osmanlı Devleti’nde Sakarin. TID. 2016;31(2):383-404. https://izlik.org/JA63AH35NS
Chicago
Damlıbağ, Fatih. 2016. “İkâme Bir Ürün Olarak Osmanlı Devleti’nde Sakarin”. Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi 31 (2): 383-404. https://izlik.org/JA63AH35NS.
EndNote
Damlıbağ F (01 Aralık 2016) İkâme Bir Ürün Olarak Osmanlı Devleti’nde Sakarin. Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi 31 2 383–404.
IEEE
[1]F. Damlıbağ, “İkâme Bir Ürün Olarak Osmanlı Devleti’nde Sakarin”, TID, c. 31, sy 2, ss. 383–404, Ara. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA63AH35NS
ISNAD
Damlıbağ, Fatih. “İkâme Bir Ürün Olarak Osmanlı Devleti’nde Sakarin”. Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi 31/2 (01 Aralık 2016): 383-404. https://izlik.org/JA63AH35NS.
JAMA
1.Damlıbağ F. İkâme Bir Ürün Olarak Osmanlı Devleti’nde Sakarin. TID. 2016;31:383–404.
MLA
Damlıbağ, Fatih. “İkâme Bir Ürün Olarak Osmanlı Devleti’nde Sakarin”. Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi, c. 31, sy 2, Aralık 2016, ss. 383-04, https://izlik.org/JA63AH35NS.
Vancouver
1.Fatih Damlıbağ. İkâme Bir Ürün Olarak Osmanlı Devleti’nde Sakarin. TID [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2016;31(2):383-404. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA63AH35NS