Bibliometric Analysis of Instructional Leadership Studies in Turkey and the World

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 37, 97 - 116, 30.04.2024

Onur Erdoğan , Ferudun Sezgin , Ayhan Ural

Öz

In this study, the articles published in the field of instructional leadership were examined by the bibliometric analysis method at the international and national levels. The articles scanned in the field of educational sciences in the Web of Science database were included in the study. These articles were analyzed by citation analysis technique according to the article, institution, and country at the international scale and according to the article at the Turkish scale. The results indicated that the first articles in the field of instructional leadership were published in the 1980s, the number of published articles increased in the 2000s, and this increasing trend continued in the following years. The results of the research show that the most influential article at the international level is the study titled "Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership" by Marks and Printy (2003), while in Turkey, the study titled "The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration" by Liu, Bellibaş and Gümüş (2021). The results also showed that the most influential country in terms of articles published in the field of instructional leadership is the United States of America, and Turkey is the third most influential country. In terms of institutions, the results indicated that the most influential institution in terms of articles in this field was the University of Johannesburg, and Adıyaman and Karabük University were among the most influential institutions in Turkey. The research results are discussed with education policy at the global and national levels.
Keywords: Instructional leadership, learning-centered leadership, bibliometric analysis, science mapping.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Instructional leadership, learning-centered leadership, bibliometric analysis, science mapping

Türkiye’de ve Dünyada Yapılan Öğretimsel Liderlik Çalışmalarının Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Bu araştırmada öğretimsel liderlik alanına ilişkin yayımlanan makaleler uluslararası ve ulusal düzeyde bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Araştırmaya Web of Science veri tabanında eğitim bilimleri alanında taranan makaleler dâhil edilmiştir. Bu makaleler atıf analizi tekniğiyle dünya ölçeğinde makaleye, kuruma ve ülkeye göre, Türkiye ölçeğinde makaleye ve kuruma göre incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar öğretimsel liderlik alanında ilk makalelerin 1980’li yıllarda yayımlandığına, yayımlanan makale sayısında 2000’li yıllarla birlikte artış yaşandığına ve bu artış trendinin ilerleyen yıllarla birlikte devam ettiğine işaret etmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları uluslararası düzeyde en etkili makalenin Marks ve Printy (2003) tarafından gerçekleştirilen “Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership” başlıklı araştırma olduğu, Türkiye özelinde ise Liu ve diğerleri (2021) tarafından yayımlanan “The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration” başlıklı makale olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca sonuçlar öğretimsel liderlik alanında yayımlanan makaleler açısından en etkili ülkenin A.B.D. olduğunu ve Türkiye’nin de en etkili üçüncü ülke olduğunu göstermiştir. Kurumlar açısından ise araştırma sonuçları bu alandaki makaleler özelinde en etkili kurumun Johannesburg Üniversitesi olduğuna ve Türkiye’den de Adıyaman Üniversitesi ve Karabük Üniversitesi’nin en etkili kurumlar arasında bulunduğuna işaret etmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları küresel ulusal düzeyde eğitim politikasıyla tartışılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Öğretimsel liderlik, öğrenme merkezli liderlik, bibliyometrik analiz, bilim haritalama.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öğretimsel liderlik, öğrenme merkezli liderlik, bibliyometrik analiz, bilim haritalama

Kaynakça

• Bellibas, M. S., Bulut, O., Hallinger, P., & Wang, W. C. (2016). Developing a validated instructional leadership profile of Turkish primary school principals. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 115-133.*
• Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2017). Multilevel analysis of the relationship between principals’ perceived practices of instructional leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(1), 49-69.*
• Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2018). The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(2), 226-244.*
• Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387-412.*
• Bendikson, L., Robinson, V., & Hattie, J. (2012). Principal instructional leadership and secondary school performance. SET: Research Information for Teachers, (1), 2-8.
• Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2018). Examining the relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviors, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(4), 550-567.*
• Cansoy, R., Parlar, H., & Polatcan, M. (2022). Collective teacher efficacy as a mediator in the relationship between instructional leadership and teacher commitment. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(6), 900-918.*
• Calik, T., Sezgin, F., Kavgaci, H., & Cagatay Kilinc, A. (2012). Examination of relationships between ınstructional leadership of school principals and self-efficacy of teachers and collective teacher efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 2498-2504.*
• Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258.*
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
• DuFour, R. (2002). The learning-centered principal. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 12-15.
• Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Sook Kim, E., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501-530.*
• Gumus, E., & Bellibas, M. S. (2016). The effects of professional development activities on principals’ perceived instructional leadership practices: Multi-country data analysis using TALIS 2013. Educational Studies, 42(3), 287-301.*
• Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221-239.*
• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-247.
• Hallinger, P., Gümüş, S., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2020). 'Are principals instructional leaders yet?'A science map of the knowledge base on instructional leadership, 1940–2018. Scientometrics, 122(3), 1629-1650.*
• Heck, R. H., Larsen, T. J., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 94-125.*
• Honig, M. I. (2012). District central office leadership as teaching: How central office administrators support principals’ development as instructional leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 733-774.*
• Kilinc, A. C., Bellibas, M. S., & Polatcan, M. (2022). Learning-centred leadership and change in teacher practice in Turkey: Exploring the mediating effects of collaboration. Educational Studies, 48(6), 790-808.
• Kwan, P. (2020). Is transformational leadership theory passé? Revisiting the integrative effect of instructional leadership and transformational leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(2), 321-349.
• Leithwood, K. A. (2001). School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 217–235.
• Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: Does trust matter?. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(6), 609-622.
• Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430-453.*
• Ma, X., & Marion, R. (2021). Exploring how instructional leadership affects teacher efficacy: A multilevel analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 188-207.
• Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.*
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı-MEB (2018). Türkiye 2023 eğitim vizyonu. http://2023vizyonu.Meb.Gov. Tr/Doc/2023_Egitim_Vizyonu.Pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group*, T. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
• National Commission on Excellence in Education-NCEE (1983). A Nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. An open letter to the american people. A report to the nation and the secretary of education. Washington, DC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED226006.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Neumerski, C. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310-347.*
• Özdoğru, M., & Güçlü, N. (2020). Okul yöneticilerinin öğretimsel liderlik davranışları ile kurumsal itibar algısı arasındaki ilişki. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(3), 1869-1914.
• Robinson, V. M. (2010). From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical findings and methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(1), 1-26.*
• Shatzer, R. H., Caldarella, P., Hallam, P. R., & Brown, B. L. (2014). Comparing the effects of instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement: Implications for practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 445-459.*
• Spillane, J. P., Hallett, T., & Diamond, J. B. (2003). Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 1-17.*
• U.S. Deparment of Education (2004). A Guide to education and no child left behind. Washington, DC: Education Publications Center.
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer manual. Chrome extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.vosviewer.c m/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.8.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Yaman, E., & Ezer, Ö. (2015). Öğretmen algılarına göre ortaokul müdürlerinin öğretimsel liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişki. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 39-54.