Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of Defensive Medicine Behaviours in Various Medical Specialties and Titles: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
EN

Evaluation of Defensive Medicine Behaviours in Various Medical Specialties and Titles: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Abstract

Objective: Defensive medicine is increasingly prevalent among physicians worldwide, including in Turkey. This study aims to explore physicians’ views and tendencies regarding defensive medicine, define the concept and practices in light of the literature, and examine the reasons and consequences of such practices. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 390 physicians working in Edirne province and its districts, using the Defensive Medicine Practices Attitude Scale. Results: The most common positive defensive medicine practices reported were placing greater emphasis on informed consent forms, keeping more detailed patient records, and providing patients with more thorough explanations of medical procedures. The most common negative defensive practice was avoiding patients perceived as having a high likelihood of initiating legal action. Overall, 85% of the participants stated they were familiar with the concept of defensive medicine. Physicians with lower professional seniority, particularly those working in state or university hospitals, demonstrated a stronger tendency toward defensive practices. Conclusion: This study, in line with previous research, shows that defensive medicine practices are widely adopted among physicians. To reduce these tendencies, it is essential to establish a healthcare system and legal framework that enable physicians to practice in accordance with ethical principles. Addressing the underlying factors driving defensive behaviors and implementing necessary improvements by healthcare authorities are crucial.

Keywords

Destekleyen Kurum

During this study, no financial or material support was received from any pharmaceutical company directly related to the research topic, nor from any company providing or producing medical instruments or materials that could potentially influence the evaluation process of this study.

Etik Beyan

This study was approved by the Non-Interventional Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Trakya University Faculty of Medicine (Approval Date: November 28, 2022, Protocol No: 2022/384). Informed consent was obtained from all participating physicians, and the study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The identities of participants were kept confidential, and the data were used solely for research purposes.

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Baungaard, N., Skovvang, P. L., Assing Hvidt, E., Gerbild, H., Andersen, M. K., & Lykkegaard, J. (2022). How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: A systematic review.
  2. 2. Summerton, N. (1995). Positive and negative factors in defensive medicine: A questionnaire study of general practitioners. BMJ, 310(6971), 27–29.
  3. 3. Clarke, S., & Oakley, J. (Eds.). (2007). Informed consent and clinician accountability: The ethics of report cards on surgeon performance. Cambridge University Press.
  4. 4. Catino, M. (2011). Why do doctors practice defensive medicine? The side-effects of medical litigation. Safety Science Monitor, 15(1), 1–12.
  5. 5. Toraman, A., & Çarıkçı, I. H. (2019). Evaluation of the reasons for defensive medicine from the perspective of physicians. Süleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal, 10(23), 40–51.
  6. 6. Banaz, M., & Yalçın Balcık, P. (2022). Examination of physicians' defensive medicine attitudes. Hacettepe Health Administration Journal, 25(3), 501–516.
  7. 7. Başer, A., Kolcu, G., Çığırgil, Y., Kadınkız, B., & Öngel, K. (2014). Evaluation of the opinions of family physicians working in Izmir Karşıyaka district regarding defensive medicine practices. Smyrna Medical Journal, 16, 24.
  8. 8. Zheng, J., Lu, Y., Li, W., Zhu, B., Yang, F., & Shen, J. (2023). Prevalence and determinants of defensive medicine among physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 35(4).

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Birinci Basamak Sağlık Hizmetleri , Hasta Güvenliği , Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi , Sağlık Sistemleri , Sağlık Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

26 Ağustos 2025

Kabul Tarihi

24 Kasım 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Öz Nalbant, G. (2025). Evaluation of Defensive Medicine Behaviours in Various Medical Specialties and Titles: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Eurasian Journal of Health Technology Assessment, 9(2), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.52148/ehta.1772439

Açık erişimli ve çift-kör hakemli bir dergidir.

Dergi içeriği tüm kullanıcılara ücretsiz olarak sunulmaktadır.
Dergideki yazıların bilimsel sorumluluğu yazarlarına aittir.
Dergimizde yayınlanmış makaleler kaynak gösterilmeden kullanılamaz
© T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Araştırma, Geliştirme ve Sağlık Teknolojisi Değerlendirme Daire Başkanlığı
Tüm Hakları Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğüne aittir.