Yükseköğretimde Pedagojik Formasyon İhtiyacı: Türkiye'de Akademik Kadroların Öğretim Yeterliliği Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'de yükseköğretim kurumlarında görev yapan öğretim elemanlarının pedagojik yeterlilik düzeylerini değerlendirmeyi ve bu alandaki yapısal eksiklikleri ortaya koyarak çözüm önerileri sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada nitel yöntem kullanılmış, literatür taraması ve karşılaştırmalı doküman analizi yoluyla Türkiye’deki durum Finlandiya, İsveç, Hollanda, Birleşik Krallık, Kanada ve Avustralya gibi ülkelerdeki pedagojik formasyon modelleriyle karşılaştırılmıştır. Türkiye’de öğretim elemanlarının önemli bir kısmı pedagojik formasyon eğitimi almadan ders vermeye başlamaktadır. Bu durum sınıf yönetimi, ölçme-değerlendirme, öğrenciyle etkileşim ve öğretim tasarımı gibi temel alanlarda çeşitli yetersizliklere yol açabilmektedir. Eğitim fakültesi kökenli akademisyenlerin pedagojik açıdan görece daha donanımlı olduğu, ancak bu farkın sistem geneline yansımadığı görülmektedir. Uluslararası örneklerde ise öğretim üyelerinin pedagojik gelişimini desteklemek amacıyla yapılandırılmış eğitim programları, mentorluk sistemleri ve sertifikasyon süreçlerinin yaygın biçimde uygulanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, Türkiye'de yükseköğretim alanında pedagojik yeterliklerin kurumsal bir yapıya kavuşturulması, öğretim becerilerini destekleyici programların yaygınlaştırılması ve bu sürecin akademik yükselme kriterlerine entegre edilmesi gerektiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pedagojik Yeterlik
• Yükseköğretim
• Öğretim Kalitesi

The Need for Pedagogical Formation in Higher Education: An Evaluation on the Teaching Competence of Academic Staff in Türkiye

Öz

Introduction Higher education institutions are multidimensional learning environments that enable individuals to acquire academic knowledge, as well as critical thinking, problem-solving, and creative skills. In this context, instructors' pedagogical competencies, as well as their subject knowledge, are critical for the quality of the learning process. In Turkey, however, most academics working in higher education institutions begin teaching without receiving any training in pedagogy. This may result in a decline in teaching quality, student dissatisfaction, and suboptimal learning outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the pedagogical competencies of academic staff in Turkey, compare them with international practices, and highlight the need for pedagogical training. Literature Review It is widely acknowledged within the field of international literature that pedagogical formation is a pivotal factor in enhancing the quality of education in higher education settings. In countries such as the Nordic countries, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia, there is a widespread implementation of structured training programs and certification processes that support the pedagogical development of faculty members. For instance, in the Netherlands, the "University Teaching Qualification" certificate is mandatory for all academic staff, while in Norway, faculty members are obliged to complete a specified number of hours of pedagogical training. In the UK, the Higher Education Academy (HEA) is responsible for the standardisation and promotion of teaching quality through its accreditations. In Canada and the USA, Teaching and Learning Centres established within universities support pedagogical development. In Turkey, however, pedagogical formation is not compulsory and institutional support is limited, resulting in inequalities and inadequacies in teaching quality. Discussion and Conclusion The absence of pedagogical training within higher education institutions in Turkey has been identified as a significant impediment to the advancement of pedagogical knowledge and competencies among instructors, resulting in the adoption of student-centred teaching methodologies that are limited in scope. Despite the apparent pedagogical superiority of academics from faculties of education, this does not guarantee the sustainability of quality throughout the system. A survey of international examples demonstrates that the establishment of mandatory and systematic pedagogical training programmes is an effective strategy for enhancing teaching quality. In Turkey, structures such as the National Education Academy for teachers within the Ministry of National Education can be considered a significant model for the institutionalisation of pedagogical development in higher education. Furthermore, the integration of pedagogical formation into the criteria for academic promotion would serve to encourage academic staff to develop in this field. The enhancement of pedagogical formation in higher education has been demonstrated to engender improvements in the quality of teaching, as well as exerting a favourable influence on student success, satisfaction and learning outcomes. In order to ensure the ongoing quality of higher education in Turkey, it is essential that institutional and systematic steps are taken in this field. International practices indicate the necessity of mandatory and structured pedagogical training. In this context, structural reforms are required, including the compulsory nature of pedagogical formation, the establishment of mentoring systems, and the opening of centres to support teaching skills. The notion of universities of the future entails a paradigm shift in the role of academics, who will no longer be confined to the mere transmission of knowledge. Instead, they will assume a multifaceted role that encompasses the facilitation of learning and interaction with students. It is therefore imperative that the dissemination and institutionalisation of pedagogical formation is a priority for Turkey's academic future.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pedagogical Competence
• Higher Education
• Teaching Quality

Kaynakça

1. Aalto University. (2025). Aalto University pedagogical training for faculty. https://www.aalto.fi/en/services/ aalto-university-pedagogical-training-for-faculty
2. Advance HE. (2025). Fellowship. Retrieved April 19, 2025, from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/fellowship
3. Alimbekov, A., Yeşil, R., Yılmaz, K., Yılmaz, H., Boobekova, K., Borkoyev, B., & Mamirova, C. (2021). Üniversite öğretim elemanlarının pedagojik yeterlikleri sergileme konusunda yaşadıkları sorunlar/ zorluklar ve eğitim ihtiyaçlarının değerlendirilmesi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33206/jmss.2021.10.1.1
4. Arslantaş, H. İ. (2011). Öğretim elemanlarının öğretim strateji yöntem ve teknikleri, iletişim ve ölçme de ğerlendirme yeterliklerine yönelik öğrenci görüşleri. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 487 506.
5. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
6. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
7. Devlin, M., & Samarawickrema, G. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher edu cation context. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 111–124. https://doi. org/10.1080/07294360903244398
8. Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Edu cation, 5(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404040463

9. Kember, D., & McNaught, C. (2007). Enhancing university teaching: Lessons from research into award-win ning teachers. Routledge.
10. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2023). Aday Öğretmen Yetiştirme Süreci Rehberi. Ankara: Öğretmen Yetiş tirme ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü.
11. Ödalen, J., Brommesson, D., Erlingsson, G. Ó., Schaffer, J. K., & Fogelgren, M. (2018). Teaching university teachers to become better teachers: the effects of pedagogical training courses at six Swedish univer sities. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 339-353.
12. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The Impact of Pedagogical Training on Teaching in Higher Education. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3), 315-329.
13. Toronto Metropolitan University. (2025). Graduate Teaching Development Program Level 1. Retrieved April 21, 2025, from https://www.torontomu.ca/learning-teaching/ta-ga/professional-development-prog ram/level-1
14. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing Approaches to Teaching: A Relational Perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21(2), 1-14.
15. University of California, Berkeley. (2025). Certificate Program. Retrieved April 21, 2025 from https://gsi. berkeley.edu/programs-services/certificate-program/
16. University of Oslo. (2025). Program for Basic Competence in University Pedagogy. Retrieved April 19, 2025, from https://www.uio.no/link/english/academic-development/ from
17. University of Stavanger. (2021). Guidelines for appointment and promotion to teaching and research posts. Retrieved https://www.uis.no/sites/default/files/2020-12/Guidelines%20for%20appoint ment%20and%20promotion%202021.pdf
18. University of Twente. (2025). University Teaching Qualification (UTQ). Retrieved from https://www.utwen te.nl/en/learning-teaching/professional-learning-development/utq/
19. Utrecht University. (2025). Teaching qualifications for university educators. Retrieved from https://www. umcutrecht.nl/en/teaching-qualifications-for-teachers
20. Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2019). Yükseköğretim Eğitim ve Öğretim Planlama Rehberi. Ankara: YÖK Yayınları. 71
21. Özer, B., Duran, V., & Tekke, M. (2020). Training of trainers: An action-based research for improving the pedagogical skills of academicians. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(3), 704–715. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20327
22. van Keulen, H., van Alst, J., de Jong, R., & Halma, A. (2006, June). Towards a national system of teaching qualifications in higher education in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the 6th International Con ference of the International Consortium for Educational Development, Sheffield, United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27701109_Towards_a_national_system_ of_teaching_qualifications_in_Higher_Education_in_The_Netherlands
23. Resmî Gazete (2024, 3 Şubat). Millî Eğitim Akademisi Başkanlığı Yönetmeliği. https://www.resmigazete. gov.tr