Öğretmenler için Etkili Mesleki Gelişim Yaklaşımları ile Bir Model Önerisi ve Uygulama Yönergesi

Öz

Öğretmenlerin diğer tüm profesyoneller gibi, sürekli mesleki gelişim faaliyetlerine katılırlar. Bu çalışmada öğretmenlerin katıldığı mesleki gelişim faaliyetlerinin hangi koşullar altında, öğretmen gelişimi ve nihai amaç olan öğrenci öğrenmesiyle ilişkili olduğuna dair alanyazında yer alan ampirik çalışmalar incelenmiştir. Alanyazındaki ampirik araştırmalardan hareketle, öğretmenler için yürütülen mesleki gelişim faaliyetlerini oldukça etkili kılan işiçinde öğrenme faaliyetleri olan mentörluk, akran koçluğu, araştırma dersi yaklaşımları açıklanmış, bunlara dayalı olarak hizmetöncesi eğitime giriş basamağından emekliğe kadar geçen mesleki kariyer aşamalarını kapsayan, mesleki gelişim modeli önerisi ve modelin kullanımına ilişkin yönerge geliştirilmiştir. Model kapsamında hizmetöncesi eğitim sürecinde; eğitim fakültesi kontenjanlarının tedrici olarak düşürülmesi ve pedagojik formasyon sertifika programlarının kapatılması; aday öğretmenlik sürecinde, aday öğretmenlik süresinin iki yıl olarak belirlenmesi, aday öğretmenlerin tecrübeli ve başarılı bir mentör rehberliğinde adaylık sürecini geçirmesi, ortaöğretim öğretmen adaylarının tezsiz yüksek lisans yapması; mesleki kariyerinin ortalarında olup makul düzeyde performans sergileyen öğretmenlerin, işiçinde ve meslektaşlarla işbirlikli mesleki gelişim faaliyetleri olan, akran koçluğu, araştırma dersi, zümre işbirliği ve araştırma takımlarına katılımları ve eylem araştırması yapmaları; mesleki anlamda tecrübeli, oldukça başarılı ve liderlik becerileri gelişmiş öğretmenlerin ise, mesleki gelişim faaliyetlerini öz-yönetimli şekilde yürütmeleri önerilmiştir. Model kapsamında öğretmenlerin, eylül ayı seminer çalışmalarında eğitim-öğretim yılı boyunca bireysel mesleki gelişim planı hazırlamaları ve bu kapsamda planlı veya plan dışı katılım sağladıkları veya yürüttükleri formal ve informal mesleki gelişim faaliyetlerine ilişkin kanıtları (görsel, işitsel veya doküman) sürekli mesleki gelişim faaliyetleri dosyasında belgelendirmeleri ve yıl boyunca yapmış olduğu mesleki gelişim faaliyetleri ile buna ilişkin kazanımlarını haziran ayı seminer çalışmalarında meslektaşları ile paylaşır ve onlardan geri bildirim almaları önerilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğretmen,mesleki gelişim,akran koçluğu,mentorluk

Kaynakça

1. Allensworth, E., Ponisciak S., & Mazzeo, C. (2009). The schools’ teachers leave: Teacher mobility in Chicago public schools, consortium on Chicago school research, University of Chicago, Chicago.
2. Archibald, S., Coggshall, J. G., Croft, A., & Goe, L. (2011). High-quality professional development for all teachers: Effectively allocating resources. Research & Policy Brief. National Comprehensive Center for the Teacher Quality.
3. Barrera-Pedemonte, F. (2016). High-quality teacher professional development and classroom teaching practices: Evidence from TALIS 2013. OECD Education Working Papers 141, OECD Publishing, Paris.
4. Barber, M. and Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best performing school systems come out on top. New York: McKinsey & Company.
5. Behrstock-Sherratt, E., Bassett, K., Olson, D., & Jacques, C. (2014). From good to great: Exemplary teachers share perspectives on increasing teacher effectiveness across the career continuum. American Institutes for Research.
6. Bruns, B., Costa, L., & Cunha, N. (2018). Through the looking glass: Can classroom observation and coaching improve teacher performance in Brazil? Economics and Review, 64, 214-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.003
7. Bryk, A., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 751-781.
8. Cilliers, J. Fleisch, B., Prinsloo, C., & Taylor, S. (2019). How to improve teaching practice? An experimental comparison of centralized training and in-classroom coaching. Journal of Human Resources https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.55.3.0618-9538r1.

9. Craft, A. (2002). Continuing professional development: A practical guide for teachers and schools. NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
10. Croft, A., Coggshall, J., Dolan, M., & Powers, E. (with Killion, J.). (2010). Job-embedded professional development: What it is, who is responsible, and how to get it done well (Issue Brief). Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Erişim Adresi: https://learningforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/job-embedded-professional-development.pdf
11. Cropanzano, R. (2009) Writing non-empirical article for journal of management: general thoughts and suggestions. Journal of Management 35(6).1304-1311 DOI: 10.1177/0149206309344118
12. Çelik, Z., Bozgeyikli, H., Yurdakul, S. (2020). Eğitime bakış 2019: İzleme ve değerlendirme raporu. Ankara: Eğitim-Bir-Sen Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi.
13. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604.
14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44.
15. DeMonte, J. (2013). High quality professional swvelopment for teachers: Supporting teacher training and to improve student learning. Centers for American Progress. Erişim Adresi: https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/07/DeMonteLearning4Teachers-1.pdf Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States, Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252-263.
16. Evertson, C. M., & Smithey, M. W. (2000). Mentoring effects on protégées’ classroom practice: An experimental field study. Journal of Educational Research, 93(5), 294-304.
17. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research journal, 38(4), 915-945.
18. Harwell, M., D’Amico, L., Stein, M. K., & Gatti, G. (2000, February 15). Professional development and the achievement gap in Community School District #2. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
19. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Helms-Lorenz, M., Slof, B., & Grift, W. V. (2013), First year effects of induction arrangements on beginning teachers’ psychological processes, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1265-1287, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0165-y.
21. Hirsh, S. (2009). A new definition. Journal of Staff Development, 30(4), 10–16.
22. Yazar, (2014).
23. Yazar, (2017).
24. Jensen, B. (2012). Catching up: Learning from the best school systems in East Asia. Summary Report. Victoria, Australia: Grattan Institute. Erişim Adresi: https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/129_report_learning_from_the_best_main.pdf
25. Kaplan, P. (2019). 2020 YKS: Hangi bölümlerde baraj var? Erişim Tarihi ve Adresi: 11.04.2020; http://www.pervinkaplan.com/detay/2020-yks-hangi-bolumlerde-baraj-var/8832
26. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teaching coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the casual evidence. Review of Educational Reaearch, 88(4), 547-588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
27. Lisans öğrencilerinin yüzde. (2018). Lisans öğrencilerinin yüzde 9’u eğitim fakültelerinde. Erişim Tarihi ve Adresi: 11.04.2020; https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/egitim/lisans-ogrencilerinin-yuzde-9u-egitim-fakultesinde-41019363
28. Morgan, C., & Peter, N. (2005). Continuing professional development for teachers: From induction to senior management. NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
29. Musset, P. (2010). Initial teacher education and continuing training policies in a comparative perspective: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review on potential effects. OECD Education Working Papers 48. OECD Publishing, Paris.
30. OECD. (2005). Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers, Education and training policy, Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264018044-en.
31. OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
32. Opfer, V., & D. Pedder. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning, Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609.
33. Pang, M. (2006). The use of learning study to enhance teacher professional learning in Hong Kong. Teaching Education, 17(1), 27-42.
34. Rockoff, J. (2008). Does mentoring reduce turnover and improve skills of new employees? Evidence from teachers in New York City, NBER Working Paper 13868, National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2008, www.nber.org/papers/w13868.
35. Russo, A. (2004). School-based coaching: A revolution in professional development – Or just the latest fad? Harvard Education Letter.20(4) Erişim Adresi: https://www.academia.edu/22570318/SchoolBased_Coaching_A_revolution_in_professional_development_or_just_the_latest_fad
36. Saxe, G., Gearhart, M., & Nasir, N. S. (2001). Enhancing students' understanding of mathematics: A study of three contrasting approaches to professional support. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 55–79.
37. Sawchuk, S. (2011). Teacher-coaching boosts secondary scores, study finds, Teacher Beat blog, Erişim tarihi ve adresi:22 Mart 2020;http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/2011/08/teacher-coaching_boosts_scores.html
38. Stephens, D., & Boldt, G. (2004). School university partnerships: rhetoric, reality, and intimacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 9(85), 703–707.
39. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. [BES]. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Erişim Adresi: http://educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/goto/BES
40. Trust, T., Krutka, D., & Carpenter, J. (2016). Together we are better: Professional learning networks for teachers, Computers & Education, 102, 15-34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007.
41. Van Hook, K., Lee, D., & Ferguson, S. (2010). Voices from the field: Teachers describe their experience with a bold system of reform. Santa Monica, CA: National Institute for Excellence in Teaching.
42. Zepeda, S. J. (2015). Job embedded professional development: Support, collaboration, and learning in schools. NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
43. Zepeda, S. J. (2017). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
44. Zepeda, S. J. (2019). Professonal development: What works. NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
45. Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional Learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and Abroad. Technical Report. USA: National Staff Development Council. Erişim Adresi: https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/professional-learning-learning-profession-status-report-teacher-development-us-and-abroad.pdf
46. Wiburg, K.M., & Brown, S. (2006). Lesson study communities: Increasing achievement with diverse students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.