ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS' SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS

Melehat Gezer

ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS' SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS

Öz

This study aims to determine prospective social studies teachers’ social justice beliefs. The study was conducted 59 senior undergraduate students registered in social studies teaching department. The data were collected through ethical dilemma scenarios and analyzed through descriptive analysis technique. The participants were found to justify their acts reflecting their social justice beliefs mostly with fact/phenomenon. It was also found that all the acts explained associating with moral laws, moral competence and conscience were compatible with the conception of social justice. A portion of the acts justified with feelings, a concrete fact/phenomenon and with probable consequences were, on the other hand, found to be in contradiction with social justice beliefs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Arnold, H.J., & Feldman, D.C. (1981). Social desirability response bias in self–report choice situations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 377–385. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/255848
Athanases, S., & de Oliviera, L. C. (2007). Conviction, confrontation, and risk in new teachers’ advocating for equity. Teaching Education, 18(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210701325150
Barter, C., & Renold, E. (1999). The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Social Research Update, 25, 1–7. Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU25.html
Cook, S.W. (1990). Toward a psychology of improving justice: Research on extending the equality principle to victims of social injustice. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–4560.1990.tb00278.x
Creswell, J.W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri, beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. (M. Bütün & S.B. Demir, Trans). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Araştırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları (S.B. Demir, Trans). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
Demirkaya, H., & Ünal, O. (2016). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının sosyal adalet algıları. Paper presented at I. International Academic Research Congress (INESS), Antalya, Turkey.
Erkuş, A. (2011). Davranış bilimleri için bilimsel araştırma süreci (3. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Furman, G.C., & Shields, C.M. (2003). How can educational leaders promote and support social justice and democratic community in schools? Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, USA.
Gezer, M. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler eğitiminde sosyal adalet eğitimine kuramsal bir bakış. In Dinçer, S. (Eds.), Değişen dünyada eğitim (pp. 309–322). doi: 10.14527/9786052412480.22
Gezer, M. (2020). Analysing secondary school students’ social justice beliefs through ethical dilemma scenarios. Education and Science, 45(201), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8471
Ginns, P., Loughland, A., Tierney, R., Fryer, L., Amazan, R., & McCormick, A. (2015). Evaluation of the learning to teach for social justice beliefs scale in an Australian context. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(2), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.956701
Harrison, D.W. (2006). Human ecology and social justice. Social Justice in Context, 2, 3–10. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.88.3194&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Kelly–Jackson, C. (2015). Teaching for social justice and equity: The journey of a teacher educator. The New Educator, 11(3), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2014.966400
Lewis, J.B. (2001). Social justice, social studies, social foundations. The Social Studies, 92(5), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377990109604001
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. California: SAGE.
Merriam, S.B. (1998). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
Merriam, S.B. (2013). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber [Qualitative research A guide to design and implementation] (S. Turan, Trans.). Ankara: Nobel Akademik.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Miller, A.L. (2012). Investigating social desirability bias in student self–report surveys. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(1), 30–47. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061958.pdf
Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Pieper, A. (2012). Etiğe Giriş (V. Atayman & G. Sezer, Trans.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
Prilleltensky, I., & Nelson, G. (1997). Community psychology: Reclaiming social justice. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 166–184). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.
Prilleltensky, I. (2001). Value–based praxis in community psychology: Moving towards social justice and social action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(5), 747–778. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010417201918
Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
Silverman, J.C. (2007). Epistemological beliefs and attitudes toward inclusion in pre–service teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F088840640703000105
Torres–Harding, S.R., Siers, B., & Olson, B.D. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the social justice scale (SJS). Am J Community Psychol, 50(1–2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9478-2
WEF (2020). “Mind the 100 year gap”. 24.06.2020. https://www.weforum.org/reports/gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality
Wilks, T. (2004). The use of vignettes in qualitative research into social work values. Qualitative Social Work, 3(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1473325004041133
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Melehat Gezer ^*
0000-0001-7701-3203
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

8 Aralık 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Ağustos 2020

Kabul Tarihi

26 Kasım 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 18

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA43FG42LR

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Gezer, M. (2020). ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(18), 171-187. https://izlik.org/JA43FG42LR

AMA

1.Gezer M. ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS. EJEDUS. 2020;9(18):171-187. https://izlik.org/JA43FG42LR

Chicago

Gezer, Melehat. 2020. “ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS”. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 9 (18): 171-87. https://izlik.org/JA43FG42LR.

EndNote

Gezer M (01 Aralık 2020) ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 9 18 171–187.

IEEE

[1]M. Gezer, “ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS”, EJEDUS, c. 9, sy 18, ss. 171–187, Ara. 2020, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA43FG42LR

ISNAD

Gezer, Melehat. “ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS”. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 9/18 (01 Aralık 2020): 171-187. https://izlik.org/JA43FG42LR.

JAMA

1.Gezer M. ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS. EJEDUS. 2020;9:171–187.

MLA

Gezer, Melehat. “ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS”. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 9, sy 18, Aralık 2020, ss. 171-87, https://izlik.org/JA43FG42LR.

Vancouver

1.Melehat Gezer. ANALYSING of PROSPECTIVE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ SOCIAL JUSTICE BELIEFS THROUGH ETHICAL DILEMMAS. EJEDUS [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2020;9(18):171-87. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA43FG42LR