The Effects of Integrated Problem-Based Learning, Predict, Observe, Explain on Problem-Solving Skills and Self-Efficacy

Öz

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the potential effects of problem-based learning (PBL), predict observe explain (POE), and PBLPOE on students’ problem-solving skills and self-efficacy in Biology. This research is based on various facts that problem-solving skills and self-efficacy of Indonesian students in biology subjects are still low. Research Methods: This quasi-experiment employed a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. One hundred and thirty-two (132) tenth graders (aged 15 to 17) from Bengkulu, Indonesia, participated in this study. The participants were homogenous concerning academic abilities. Data were collected using an essay test and observation sheets. The essay test was developed to examine the students’ problem-solving skills, and observation sheets were used to evaluate the students’ self-efficacy. The data were analyzed using ANCOVA and Least Significant Different (LSD) test. Findings of the study suggest that PBLPOE has a more significant effect on students’ problem-solving skills and self-efficacy compared to PBL, POE, and conventional learning. The highest scores of problem-solving skills and self-efficacy were obtained by students from the PBLPOE class, followed by the PBL, POE, and conventional groups. Implications for Research and Practice: Based on the results of this study, it is evident that PBLPOE is effective in fostering students’ problem-solving skills and self-efficacy; thus, the use of PBLPOE in Biology classrooms is highly recommended.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Problem-based learning
• predict observe explain
• PBLPOE
• problem-solving skills
• self-efficacy

Kaynakça

1. Akamca, Ö., G., & Hamurcu, H. (2009). Science and Technology Education Based on Analogies, Concept Cartoons and Predict- Observe-Explain Techniques. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 4 (4), 1186-1206. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/185878
2. Altunsoy, S., Cimen, O., Ekici, G., Atik, A.D., Gokmen, A. (2010). An Assessment of the Factors that Influence Biology Teacher Candidates’ Levels of Academic Self-Efficacy. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2010) 2377–2382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.340
3. Ancel, G. (2016). Problem-Solving Training: Effects on the Problem-Solving Skills and Self-Efficacy of Nursing Students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Issue 64, 2016, 231-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.64.13
4. Ancel, G., Erkal, S., & Gencturk. Z.B. (2015). An Analysis of the Relationship between Self- Efficacy Beliefs and Perceived Problem Solving Ability among Nursing and Midwifery Students.The Journal of Clinical Nursing Science Turkey , 7(1), 20-28. doi:10.5336/nurses.2013-38266
5. Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. Sixth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Aurah, C.T., Cassady, J.C., McConnell, T.J. (2014). Predicting Problem Solving Ability from Metacognition and Self-Efficacy Beliefs on a Cross Validated Sample.
7. British Journal of Education, 2(1), 49-72. Retrieved from http://www.ea-journals.org/
8. Balim, A. G., Çeliker, H. D., Türkoğuz, S., Evrekli, E., & Ekici, D. İ. (2015). Kavram Karikatürleri Destekli Probleme Dayalı Öğrenme Yönteminin Öğrencilerin Kavramsal Anlama Düzeyleri ile Problem Çözme Becerisi Algıları Üzerine Etkisi [The Effect of Concept Cartoons-Assisted Problem-Based Learning Method on Conceptual Understanding Levels and Problem-Solving Skill Perceptions of Students]. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 12(4), 53-76. doi: 10.12973/tused.10151a

9. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide to the construction of self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, (Vol. 5., pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: IAP - Information Age Publishing.
10. Bars, M., Oral, B. (2017). The Relationship among Metacognitive Awareness, Self-Efficacy toward theTeaching Profession and the Problem-Solving Skills of Teacher Candidates. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 72(2017), 107-128. doi: 10.14689/ejer.2017.72.6
11. Bilen, Özel & Köse, (2016). Using Action Research Based on the Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy for Teaching Enzymes. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(2), 72-81. doi:10.19128/turje.70576
12. Bowen, M., dan Haysom, J. (2014). Predict, Observe, Explain Activities Enhancing Scientific Understanding. USA: NSTA Press.
13. Burns, H.K., O'Donnell, J., & Artman, J. (2010). High-Fidelity Simulation in Teaching Problem Solving to 1st-Year Nursing Students.A Novel Use of the Nursing Process. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6(3), 87-95. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2009.07.005
14. Cohen, L., Manion L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education 7th edition. New York: Routledge.
15. Creswell, J., W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
16. Fitriani, A., Zubaidah, S., Susilo, H., Al Muhdhar, M.H.I. (2018). Students’ Self-Efficacy on Biology Lesson of Senior High Schools in Bengkulu City, Indonesia. Proceedings of the 1st Annual International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICoMSE 2017). Advances in Social Science, Education and
17. Humanities Research, 218, 225-230. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icomse-17.2018.40
18. Geitz, G., Brinke, J.D., & Kirschner, P. (2015). Changing Learning Behaviour: Self-Efficacy and Goal Orientation in PBL Groups in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Research 75 (2016), 146-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ijer.2015.11.001
19. Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21 st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. USA: Corwin.
20. Gurlen, E. (2011). The Effect of Problem Based Learning on Learning Outcomes, Problem Solving Skills and Self-Efficacy Belief. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40 (2011), 221-232. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/87363
21. Hamidi, F., Shirdel, Z. (2015). Effectiveness of Problem Solving Skills on Academic Help-Seeking and Self-Efficacy of Female High School Student. International Journal of Psychology 9(2), 1-24. Retrieved from http://www.ijpb.ir/article_55588_f4cc199313bfd7ed5937fa72239097f3.pdf
22. Hoi, P.T., Bao, D.Q., Nghe, P.K., Nga, N.T. (2018). Developing Problem-Solving Competency for Students in Teaching Biology at High School in Vietnam. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018, 6(5), 539-545. doi: 10.12691/education-6-5-27
23. Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, M. C., Ho, H. Y., & Chen, Y. L. (2014). Using a “Prediction-Observation-Explanation” Inquiry Model to Enhance Student Interest and Intention to Continue Science Learning Predicted by Their Internet Cognitive Failure. Computers & Education, 72, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.004
24. Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The Influence of Academic Self-Efficacy on Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. Educational Research Review, 17 (2016), 63–84. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
25. Hsieh, P., Cho, Y., Liu, M., Schallert, D.L. (2008). Middle School Focus: Examining the Interplay between Middle School Students Achievement Goals and Self-Efficacy in a Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment. American Secondary Education, 3(36), 33-50. Retrieved from http://list.shaanan.ac.il/fl/files/282.pdf
26. James, D. (2010). Practical eTeaching Strategies for Predict – Observe – Explain Problem-Based Learning and Role Plays. Australia: LAMS International Australia.
27. Kadir, A., Abdullah, N.H., Anthony, E., Salleh, B.M., Kamarulzaman, R. (2016). Does Problem-Based Learning Improve Problem Solving Skills? A Study among Business Undergraduates at Malaysian Premier Technical University. International Education Studies, 9(5), 166-172. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p166
28. Kala, N., Yaman, F., & Ayas, A. (2013). The Effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain Technique in Probing Students’ Understanding about Acid-Base Chemistry: A Case for The Concepts of pH, pOH, and Strength. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 555-574. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10763-012-9354-z
29. Karamustafaoglu, S., Naaman, R.M. (2015). Understanding Electrochemistry Concepts Using the Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 923-936. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1364a
30. Kearney, M. (2004). Classroom Use of Multimedia-Supported Predict–Observe–Explain Tasks in a Social Constructivist Learning Environment. Research in Science Education, 34(4), 427–453. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-004-8795-y
31. Kurtuldu, M. K., & Bulut, D. (2017). Development of a Self-Efficacy Scale toward Piano Lessons. Education Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(3), 835–857. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.3.0209
32. Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Bahri, A., Dinnurriya, M.S. (2016). Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through Remap NHT in Biology Classroom. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(11), 1-19. Retrieved from https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v17_issue2_files/zubaidah.pdf
33. Mourtos, N.J., Okamoto, N.D., Rhee, J. (2004). Defining, Teaching, and Assessing Problem Solving Skill. UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Mumbai, India 9-13 February 2004. Retrieved from http://www.sjsu.edu/people/nikos.mourtos/docs/UICEE%2004%20Mumbai.pdf
34. Nijhuis, J. F. H., Segers, M. S. R., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2005). Influence of Redesigning a Learning Environment on Student Perceptions and Learning Strategies. Learning Environments Research, 8, 67–93. doi:10.1007/s10984-005-7950-3
35. Özgen, K., & Pesen, C. (2010). Probleme Dayali Öğrenme (PDÖ) Yaklaşimi İle İşlenen Matematik Dersinde Öğrencilerin Problem Çözme Becerilerinin Analizi[Analysis of Students' Problem Solving Skills in Mathematics Course With Problem Based Learning (PBL) Approach]. National Education Journal, 40(186), 27-37. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/442753
36. Özreçberoglu, U., Çaganaga, C. K. (2018). Making It Count: Strategies for Improving Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics for Students and Teachers’ Classroom Management. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4):1253-1261. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/82536
37. Qarareh, O. A. (2016). The Effect of Using the Constructivist Learning Model in Teaching Science on the Achievement and Scientific Thinking of 8th Grade Students International Education Studies, 9(7) 178-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n7p178
38. Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Leis, M., Leendertse, M., Punie, Y., Gijsbers, G., Kirschner, P., Stoyanov, S. and Hoogveld, B. (2011). The Future of Learning: Preparing for Change. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC66836.pdf
39. Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological Correlates of University Students' Academic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353-387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
40. Şahbaz, Ö., & Hamurcu, H. (2012).The Effects of Problem Based Learning and Cooperative Learning Methods on Scientific Period Skills of Students and Learning Outcomes. Education Sciences (NWSA), 2(7), 734-754.
41. Scott, L. (2015). Future Learning 3: What Kind of Learning for the 21st Century? Education and Research: UNESCO.
42. Suryadi, B., Santoso, T.I. (2017). Self-Efficacy, Adversity Quotient, and Students’ Achievement in Mathematics. International Education Studies, 10(10), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n10p12
43. Syed, H. S., & Feyzollah, M. (2012). Effect of Problem–Solving Styles on academic Achievement of Agricultural Students in The University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. Scholars Research Library Annals of Biological Research, 3(8): 4154-4158. Retrieved from http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archieve.html
44. Udeani, U. & Adeyemo, S.A. (2011). The Relationship among Teachers Problem Solving Abilities, Students’ Learning Styles and Students’ Achievement in Biology. University of Lagos, Lagos. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 2(1), 82-87. Retrieved from www.soeagra.com/ijert.html
45. Usher, E. L. (2009). Sources of Middle School Students' Self-Efficacy in Math: A Qualitative Investigation of Student, Teacher, and Parent Perspectives. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 275-314. doi:10.1037/a0024048
46. Vadapally, P. (2014). Exploring Students’ Perceptions and Performance on Predict-Observe-Explain Tasks in High School Chemistry Laboratory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Northern Colorado.
47. Wang, Y. & Chiew, V. (2010). On The Cognitive Process of Human Problem Solving. Cognitive Systems Research 11(2010), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.08.003
48. Yaman, S., & Yalçin, N. (2005). Fen Eğitiminde Probleme Dayali Öğrenme Yaklaşiminin Problem Çözme Ve Öz-Yeterlik Inanç Düzeylerinin Gelişimine Etkisi[The Effect of Problem Based Learning Approach on the Development of Problem Solving and Self-Efficacy Belief Levels in Science Education]. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal , 29(29), 229-236. Retrieved from http://dergipark.org.tr/hunefd/issue/7809/102467
49. Yuksel, I., Ates, S. (2017). The Effect of Two Approaches to Developing Reasoning Skills of Preservice Science Teachers. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 8(3), 19-35. Retrieved from